Terrifying Scientific discovery

It’s already been proven that the sun’s mass warps time, bends light waves and accounts for mutation of species on Earth. Now this new force may be directly interacting with matter in a way that could not only change Mankind’s understanding of physics, but change Mankind itself…and not necessarily in a beneficial way.

[link to www.projectworldawareness.com]

Laboratories around the globe have confirmed that the rate of radioactive decay—once thought to be a constant and a bedrock of science—is no longer a constant. Something being emitted from the sun is interacting with matter in strange and unknown ways with the startling potential to dramatically change the nature of the very Earth itself.

Worst of all, if the decay rates of matter are being mutated then all matter on Earth is being affected including the matter that makes up life.

The mutation may go so far as to change the underlying reality of the quantum universe—and by extrapolation-the nature of life, the principles of physics, perhaps even the uniform flow of time.

In fact, some evidence of time dilation has been gleaned from close observation of the decay rate. If particles interacting with the matter are not the cause—and matter is being affected by a new force of nature-then time itself may be speeding up and there’s no way to stop it.

-snip quote article 1-


* Stanford Report, August 23, 2010
The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements
[link to news.stanford.edu]

"Checking data collected at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island and the Federal Physical and Technical Institute in Germany, they came across something even more surprising: long-term observation of the decay rate of silicon-32 and radium-226 seemed to show a small seasonal variation. The decay rate was ever so slightly faster in winter than in summer.

Was this fluctuation real, or was it merely a glitch in the equipment used to measure the decay, induced by the change of seasons, with the accompanying changes in temperature and humidity?

"Everyone thought it must be due to experimental mistakes, because we're all brought up to believe that decay rates are constant," Sturrock said.

The sun speaks
On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare.

If this apparent relationship between flares and decay rates proves true, it could lead to a method of predicting solar flares prior to their occurrence, which could help prevent damage to satellites and electric grids, as well as save the lives of astronauts in space.

...

Their findings strengthened the argument that the strange swings in decay rates were caused by neutrinos from the sun. The swings seemed to be in synch with the Earth's elliptical orbit, with the decay rates oscillating as the Earth came closer to the sun (where it would be exposed to more neutrinos) and then moving away.

...

Going back to take another look at the decay data from the Brookhaven lab, the researchers found a recurring pattern of 33 days. It was a bit of a surprise, given that most solar observations show a pattern of about 28 days – the rotation rate of the surface of the sun.

The explanation? The core of the sun – where nuclear reactions produce neutrinos – apparently spins more slowly than the surface we see.

All of the evidence points toward a conclusion that the sun is "communicating" with radioactive isotopes on Earth, said Fischbach.


...

If the mystery particle is not a neutrino, "It would have to be something we don't know about, an unknown particle that is also emitted by the sun and has this effect, and that would be even more remarkable," Sturrock said."




>>> Now what could this mean for the radioactive particles released into the Earth now ? And their decay, while the sun is turning up its volume and array ????





-snipped a longggg part-




* ??? FUKUSHIMA & neutrino's ??? and the sun ???


IceCube In Ice Antarctic Telescope » Journals
[link to www.polartrec.net]

"This morning, Jim Madsen, physics professor and IceCube researcher from the University of Wisconsin-River Falls, arrived to the PolarTREC training. I and the other KSTF Fellows spoke with Jim at length about the project, including expectations and our roles as PolarTREC teachers. Jim enlightened us about the nature of neutrinos and how the IceCube detector works to detect them. We had a lot of questions for Jim about neutrinos and how we can study them!

...

•Neutrinos can be created due to radioactive decay of elements like potassium. Nuclear reactors and bombs can create neutrinos; the sun and other stars create neutrinos. But these are "low" energy neutrinos, not what IceCube is trying to detect. IceCube is looking for high energy neutrinos created in "cataclysmic" galactic events, such as collisions of black holes and perhaps mysterious events called gamma-ray bursts."



>>> Could there be a reason for the troubles at the nuclear plants that we -simple people- do not understand,
and that is related to the changes in the sun ??

>>> What does more radioactive particles do to the sun FTE (Flux Transfer Event) ????
(maybe we could look towards changes in the sun before and after Chernobyl ... to understand a possible connection between Fukushims and the sun ...)

>>> And again : does all the saltmining fit into this ? Potassium mining ?

>>> ICECUBE ???? POLAR-TREC ???? .... This is NO coincedence !!!
Just a few posts back AC and BHD spoke about how and if ICE could store/contain frequencies !!! ICE-CUBE !!!!


"• On the extremely rare instance when a neutrino hits the nucleus of an atom, it ends up creating a new charged particle which flies through the ice at very high speeds. As this new particle moves though the ice, it causes a dim trail of light called "Cherenkov radiation."
• this light is detected by hundreds of sensors buried deep in the ice. The scientists use data from the sensors to determine the energy of the original neutrino, and the direction from which it came."



Cherenkov radiation :
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"As a charged particle travels, it disrupts the local electromagnetic field (EM) in its medium. Electrons in the atoms of the medium will be displaced, and the atoms become polarized by the passing EM field of a charged particle. Photons are emitted as an insulator's electrons restore themselves to equilibrium after the disruption has passed. (In a conductor, the EM disruption can be restored without emitting a photon.) In normal circumstances, these photons destructively interfere with each other and no radiation is detected. However, when a disruption which travels faster than light is propagating through the medium, the photons constructively interfere and intensify the observed radiation."

>>> For a quick moment I had to think about OP's "splashzones" ....
This explains why the dont have to occur only in WATER, but also (assumably) happened in Greenland on the ICE, and on/in soil in OZ ... and potentially everywhere.


-snip text-


Cherenkov radiation can also be used to determine properties of high-energy astronomical objects that emit gamma rays, such as supernova remnants and blazars. This is done by projects such as STACEE, a gamma ray detector in New Mexico.

...

The most advanced type of a detector is the RICH, or ring imaging Cherenkov detector, developed in the 1980s. In a RICH detector, a cone of Cherenkov light is produced when a high speed charged particle traverses a suitable gaseous or liquid medium, often called radiator. This light cone is detected on a position sensitive planar photon detector, which allows reconstructing a ring or disc, the radius of which is a measure for the Cherenkov emission angle. Both focusing and proximity-focusing detectors are in use. In a focusing RICH detector, the photons are collected by a spherical mirror and focused onto the photon detector placed at the focal plane. The result is a circle with a radius independent of the emission point along the particle track. This scheme is suitable for low refractive index radiators—i.e. gases—due to the larger radiator length needed to create enough photons. In the more compact proximity-focusing design, a thin radiator volume emits a cone of Cherenkov light which traverses a small distance—the proximity gap—and is detected on the photon detector plane. The image is a ring of light, the radius of which is defined by the Cherenkov emission angle and the proximity gap. The ring thickness is determined by the thickness of the radiator. An example of a proximity gap RICH detector is the High Momentum Particle Identification Detector (HMPID),[5] a detector currently under construction for ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment), one of the six experiments at the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) at CERN."




*INTERSTING:

PROJECT X :

SLAC to Leverage Accelerator Expertise for Project X
February 24, 2011
[link to today.slac.stanford.edu]

This month, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory officially received a funding package of $400,000 from Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for research and development on a radio-frequency power system for the proposed proton accelerator, Project X, at Fermilab.
...
The Project X facility would fuel two experiments: a high-intensity neutrino beam traveling more than 800 miles to a detector at the proposed Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory, and a proton beam that will support rare-decay experiments. Fermilab has officially formed the Project X Collaboration and has plans to apply for the first major step for any Department of Energy project, Critical Decision 0, to establish the scientific case to move the project forward.

((Located 45 miles west of Chicago, Fermilab's particle accelerator complex provides beam to particle physics experiments, test facilities and a cancer treatment center. The proposed Project X would replace the 40-year-old linear accelerator and booster ring.))





The possible potassium earth core:

* Taking a Picture of the Earth's Interior with Geoneutrinos
[link to webcache.googleusercontent.com]

"Neutrinos are subatomic particles created in certain types of nuclear decays. These ghostly particles have no electric charge, a tiny but nonzero mass, and are very weakly interacting. A typical neutrino passes through matter unseen, unfelt, and unperturbed. Indeed, each second of the day and night, many billions of neutrinos pass through you harmlessly; these neutrinos originate mostly from the Sun, but also from the Earth's atmosphere, and from the interior of the Earth. These last "geoneutrinos" have received a great deal of attention lately, and open up new views onto the Earth.

Geoneutrinos are produced in the decays of unstable, radioactive elements--mostly uranium, thorium, and potassium (40K)--inside the Earth. These same decays also generate heat, which makes up some portion (thought to be about 60%) of the geothermal heat flow. The amount of geoneutrinos (and radioactive geothermal heat) depends on the amount of radioactive material through the Earth. We do know very well the amount and distribution of radioactive material in the Earth's thin crust. However, we have only "scratched the surface" of the Earth with direct measurements: the deepest probes that have been recovered from drill holes in the earth's crust come from a depth of only about 10 km, and volcanos bring up mantle material from a depth of a few hundred kilometers. So most of the earth's interior is hidden! Consequently, it remains unclear how much radioactive material is in the inside the bulk of the earth and where it is located. In particular, it is unclear how abundant radioactive elements are in the very core of the Earth. The standard geophysical prediction is that the core is void of all radioactivity. Recently, however, there have been some suggestions that there may be a significant amount of potassium in the Earth's core. These uncertainties about the Earth's radioactive content translate into uncertainties about the amount of geothermal heat and geoneutrinos that are generated by radioactive decays. Thus, measurements of geoneutrinos can address these questions and ultimately determine the nature of the radioactive earth.

Recently the Kamland experiment, which was primarily designed to measure anti-neutrinos from nuclear reactors, reported 9 events due to geoneutrinos. This marks the first detection of neutrinos from the Earth's interior, and already demonstrates that radioactivity is an important heat source for the Earth. This promising discovery gave rise to several papers about the possibilities a measurement of geoneutrinos could provide. "


>>> 9 EVENTS ??? again ...





With the information above, I now recap my questions :

>>> Now what could this mean for the radioactive particles released into the Earth now ? And their decay, while the sun is turning up its volume and array ????

>>> And what/how could those radioactivity eating mushrooms be related to this ?

>>> And how play all those CERN-labs into this, who are working with neutrino's and oscillations ? And the recent problems and fires in those labs ????



(Potassium cations are important in neuron (brain and nerve) function, and in influencing osmotic balance between cells and the interstitial fluid, (snip) creating an electrochemical gradient over the cell membrane.")

>>> What if that principal ^^^ would also occur in the Earth ???
Interresting !
We posted and talked about potassium just recently here on the thread .....
So, think BIG and connect body and Earth ...

(seems like it does in a way.... lol...)

>>> Could there be a reason for the troubles at the nuclear plants that we -simple people- do not understand,
and that is related to the changes in the sun ??

>>> What does more radioactive particles do to the sun FTE (Flux Transfer Event) ????
(maybe we could look towards changes in the sun before and after Chernobyl ... to understand a possible connection between Fukushims and the sun ...)

>>> And again : does all the saltmining fit into this ? Potassium mining ?


>>> For a quick moment I had to think about OP's "splashzones" ....
This explains why the dont have to occur only in WATER, but also (assumably) happened in Greenland on the ICE, and on/in soil in OZ ... and potentially everywhere.


I SAY



xxx MzK