I find it very strange that there no "REAL PHOTO" of airplane hit the WTC towers

Is English your native language ?

shut up paid shill, trying to turn this into a differant subject

People don't listen to this guys, JUST THINK

ASK ANYONE IN NEW YORK, why they didn't take photo of the airplane strike?!

so whats your point?

[link to www.septemberclues.info]


Visual Control of 9/11
[link to www.septemberclues.info]

Running for their lives comes to mind.

another shills

I know there are many shills that overlook any sept 11 forum automated on their's computer, and they caused a confusion to sway away people the truth, they are in any country and they get paid per find each forums that mention the truth

Anyway, you know how very strange NONE of the people take photo of the REAL strike that hit the tower



Also by the way, I don't believe the tower got hit by the airplane but a missile that look like a small airplane

The reason why i believe this is because I know the power of the jets airplane engine, when it flied at 500 speed and strike the tower, it should LEAVE a mark of what?

a swirl cloud

What that? I will show you:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Now look at any videos that strike the tower...did the cloud was disturb by the force? no, there no vortex or swirling

Prove it a missile.

No. not from the far distance

Well, you may be on to something OP. Reminds me of the strange moving buildings and bridges from "September Clues". I think though, that this point is quite clear that it was an attack to gain power, and the means aren't going to tell us much except that maybe they used advanced technology to fool people into thinking they saw what they saw, but I don't know. It is all quite strange, crawling bridges and all that..

Of course you are right 34, the overwhelming majority know it. The 100th monkey brother...google it.

Man, You got led off track didn't you? No Planes? Please man. Take your medication and find the real truth. Oh, and just because someone doesn't agree, doesn't mean they are a shill....skitso...

This is a point I've made many times on this forum. Usually I get mocked for it.

Manhattan is surrounded on both sides by waterways. On the west side is New Jersey. There had to be thousands of people on the shoreline watching the spectacle of the first tower smoking. The second plane arrived from the west and would have flown right over their heads.

Surely people would have heard it passing overhead and got a few photos of it approaching and hitting the building. Photos like this are not found anywhere.

Yet there are HUNDREDS of amateur photos online showing what New York City looked like AFTER THE TOWERS FELL.


A large plane allegedly hit the tower, leaving a gaping hole. They showed us pics and videos of the hole, including a barely-believable one of a woman standing on the edge of the smoldering wreckage and waving.


Don't you think the plane would be visible inside the hole???? The tail??? Part of the body?? A wing???

All you see is a hole... WITH NOTHING INSIDE THE BUILDING!!!



How easily peoples senses can be deceived in this modern world of media illusion.