Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,743 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 639,718
Pageviews Today: 838,373Threads Today: 236Posts Today: 3,346
07:21 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"

 
CONNECTOR
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1039159
Canada
07/17/2010 09:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Dear Friends:

Just read this story on National Geographic about the discovery of a planet that is flying so close to its host that it strips its atmosphere. Researchers on Planet X claim it is a fly-by and also that it is comet-like, similarly to this planet.

If Planet X is real (which I cannot confirm) this would be something to consider i.e. atmospheric stripping of our planet .

Here is the story link: [link to news.nationalgeographic.com]

THE CONNECTOR
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1039163
China
07/17/2010 09:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
And top strip
][nfeRnaL

User ID: 825769
Puerto Rico
07/17/2010 10:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
National Geographic bump
Theories: Misconceptions awaiting confirmation of incorrectness.
Everything is subject to continually changing variables, leaving nothing to remain as a constant.]D)one!!!!
:nfrnl1111:
CONNECTOR  (OP)

User ID: 1039159
Canada
07/17/2010 10:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
bump
Shelly

User ID: 1001295
United States
07/20/2010 07:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
I've heard that this has happened in the past. Stripping Mars and the moon of most of their atmospheres. Maybe Earth too? I don't know if it was the Kolbrin or possibly Immanuel Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision" where it was said that men would "lose their breath" when it passed close by.

They also theorize that our atmosphere used to be denser and that's why large dinosaurs, pterosaurs, etc. lived in our past. They don't believe these giant creatures could survive our current atmosphere, let alone get off the ground in the case of the large pterosaurs.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 566542
United States
07/20/2010 07:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
I've heard that this has happened in the past. Stripping Mars and the moon of most of their atmospheres. Maybe Earth too? I don't know if it was the Kolbrin or possibly Immanuel Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision" where it was said that men would "lose their breath" when it passed close by.

They also theorize that our atmosphere used to be denser and that's why large dinosaurs, pterosaurs, etc. lived in our past. They don't believe these giant creatures could survive our current atmosphere, let alone get off the ground in the case of the large pterosaurs.
 Quoting: Shelly


Interesting information, Shelly.
Fhirinne

User ID: 623339
United Kingdom
07/20/2010 08:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
If a planet came into the inner sol system every 3600 years do you really think you would be here debating if it did or not... short answer nope life on earth would never have gotten off its ass to this point in time.
You are the CEO of your own wellness. You need to take back your health from the disease-care system
Ed_au

User ID: 878385
Australia
07/20/2010 08:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Who care anyway, enjoy before the fly by, not like anyone can do anything about if it even exists.
ookie

User ID: 865973
United States
07/20/2010 08:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Well, the sun is part of a binary system with a star named Gilese. But the closest it gets to Sol is 1 light year. Next visit in two million years. The entire orbit takes 28 million years.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 218281
United States
07/20/2010 10:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
I've heard that this has happened in the past. Stripping Mars and the moon of most of their atmospheres. Maybe Earth too? I don't know if it was the Kolbrin or possibly Immanuel Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision" where it was said that men would "lose their breath" when it passed close by.

They also theorize that our atmosphere used to be denser and that's why large dinosaurs, pterosaurs, etc. lived in our past. They don't believe these giant creatures could survive our current atmosphere, let alone get off the ground in the case of the large pterosaurs.
 Quoting: Shelly


The moon is too small to have enough gravity to have ever held onto an atmosphere. Mars doesn't have a magnetic field because it doesn't have a liquid core. Therefore, it's atmosphere has been stripped over eons by the solar wind. On earth, our magnetic field shields the atmosphere from being stripped away by the charged particles from the sun.

There simply is no evidence whatsoever that px exists, much less has ever made a trip through the inner solar system. The orbits of the inner planets have way too little eccentricity to have ever been majorly disturbed.

Velikovsky has been proven wrong many times over.

[link to abob.libs.uga.edu]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 218281
United States
07/20/2010 10:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Well, the sun is part of a binary system with a star named Gilese. But the closest it gets to Sol is 1 light year. Next visit in two million years. The entire orbit takes 28 million years.
 Quoting: ookie



Complete bullshit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1038381
United States
07/20/2010 10:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"


They also theorize that our atmosphere used to be denser and that's why large dinosaurs, pterosaurs, etc. lived in our past. They don't believe these giant creatures could survive our current atmosphere, let alone get off the ground in the case of the large pterosaurs.
 Quoting: Shelly

Have you ever read the theory that the earth did not receive rain before the Great Flood...could explain why Noah had such a tough time convincing the locals of the impending flood due to RAINS. It also fits in with the "Rainbow Covenant" God made "after" the flood....was that the FIRST rainbow?

Each "stipping" makes major changes...this time it's TRIAL BY FIRE....I guess we're down to the final layers!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 961432
United States
07/20/2010 10:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
I've heard that this has happened in the past. Stripping Mars and the moon of most of their atmospheres. Maybe Earth too? I don't know if it was the Kolbrin or possibly Immanuel Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision" where it was said that men would "lose their breath" when it passed close by.

They also theorize that our atmosphere used to be denser and that's why large dinosaurs, pterosaurs, etc. lived in our past. They don't believe these giant creatures could survive our current atmosphere, let alone get off the ground in the case of the large pterosaurs.
 Quoting: Shelly


Yes, Worlds in Collision talks about this event. Velikovsky claims that Mars had it's atmosphere ripped away by Venus on a very close encounter. Venus was a comet, Velikovsky claimed that Venus was "born" out of Jupiter, I think to fit into Babylonian (or Sumerian?) mythology. But James McCanney believes that Venus was a comet, temporarily captured by Jupiter's gravitational field, which escaped Jupiter's gravity and then headed in towards the sun. It had a couple of orbits with the sun, as noticed in the Mayan calendar that describes the 52-57 year event. Each orbit had close encounters with earth and mars as the orbit was very elliptical in shape. When Venus was finally "captured" by the sun it settled into a more circular orbit. The Venus event was described by nearly all ancient calendars and myths, and it has large significance in the esoteric societies.

Velikovsky was ridiculed by mainstream science primarily because he supported catastrophism which lies in direct opposition to the doctrine of uniformity which itself supports Darwin's theory of evolution. It is difficult to argue Velikovsky's theories in this forum and others since he made the mistake of making all kinds of conjectures about astronomy which were later determined to be way off base. However his work on history and the ancient calendar systems is very good. Unfortunately, Karl Sagan was used by the PTB and mainstream science to ridicule Velikovsky into the dustbin of scientific history.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 868423
Canada
07/20/2010 10:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
mammoths, flash frozen, is evidence of localized atmospheric stripping in earths past. the mammoths were exposed to space for a few seconds.
ookie

User ID: 865973
United States
07/20/2010 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
mammoths, flash frozen, is evidence of localized atmospheric stripping in earths past. the mammoths were exposed to space for a few seconds.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 868423


It takes quite a bit more than a few seconds to flash freeze a woolly mammoth. It would take hours. They had thick fur, skin and fat. They were built to survive cold temps. I doubt they would notice temps of -250 for a few seconds.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 218281
United States
07/20/2010 01:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Velikovsky was ridiculed by mainstream science primarily because he supported catastrophism which lies in direct opposition to the doctrine of uniformity which itself supports Darwin's theory of evolution. It is difficult to argue Velikovsky's theories in this forum and others since he made the mistake of making all kinds of conjectures about astronomy which were later determined to be way off base. However his work on history and the ancient calendar systems is very good. Unfortunately, Karl Sagan was used by the PTB and mainstream science to ridicule Velikovsky into the dustbin of scientific history.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 961432


Virtually all of what he claimed was found to be "way off base".

Read and learn...

[link to abob.libs.uga.edu]
ShadowDancer

User ID: 287857
United States
07/20/2010 05:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Information bump





hiding
************************************
fortitudo et spes
************************************

When Japan happened I responded: "The Excrement Has Impacted the Rotary Oscillator." and clearly it has.
Thread: The Excrement Is Striking the Rotary Oscillator
+++++++++++++++
"Ego et Dominus sumus amici"
+++++++++++++++
Ego et mea umbra
+++++++++++++++

'Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.’
- U.S. government mind manipulator, Dr. Jose Delgado, Congressional Record, No. 262E, Vol. 118, 1974
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Realeyesrealizereal​lies. C.

Thread: GIRD uP as GRID Collapses

Thread: Eugenics 101 (Page 27)

Thread: Frankenfoods for YOU (Page 2)

Thread: I Do Not Consent

Thread: FOOD

Thread: Cern Power___Colder than Space

Thread: Hempilation Compilation Contemplation
Thread: Harmonics and Healing (Page 35)
Thread: Sarah's Nightmare (Page 10)
Thread: Destination Maccabees
Thread: Let's Play a GAME

Thread: Throat Singing
zacksavage

User ID: 941943
United States
07/20/2010 05:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Hey Shadow!!!




Namaste
Z
Free your mind,...your ass will follow.

--- parliament funkadelic
Shelly

User ID: 1001295
United States
07/20/2010 05:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Yes, Worlds in Collision talks about this event. Velikovsky claims that Mars had it's atmosphere ripped away by Venus on a very close encounter. Venus was a comet, Velikovsky claimed that Venus was "born" out of Jupiter, I think to fit into Babylonian (or Sumerian?) mythology. But James McCanney believes that Venus was a comet, temporarily captured by Jupiter's gravitational field, which escaped Jupiter's gravity and then headed in towards the sun. It had a couple of orbits with the sun, as noticed in the Mayan calendar that describes the 52-57 year event. Each orbit had close encounters with earth and mars as the orbit was very elliptical in shape. When Venus was finally "captured" by the sun it settled into a more circular orbit. The Venus event was described by nearly all ancient calendars and myths, and it has large significance in the esoteric societies.

Velikovsky was ridiculed by mainstream science primarily because he supported catastrophism which lies in direct opposition to the doctrine of uniformity which itself supports Darwin's theory of evolution. It is difficult to argue Velikovsky's theories in this forum and others since he made the mistake of making all kinds of conjectures about astronomy which were later determined to be way off base. However his work on history and the ancient calendar systems is very good. Unfortunately, Karl Sagan was used by the PTB and mainstream science to ridicule Velikovsky into the dustbin of scientific history.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 961432


I'm reading Worlds in Collision right now. I wonder if what they thought was Mars or Venus was really Nibiru and during one of its passes, Venus was captured by the sun. Maybe it was formerly one of Nibiru's satellites. I don't think because his conclusions were wrong that that makes all the information he collected unusable. There's so much mystery to our past.

I don't believe in the internet hype that it is due in 2012 or that it comes every 3600 years. I don't see how we can have any clear idea of when it is coming until we spot it. I think scientists need to find it first, before we can get a clear idea.

Here are some links I saved that are pretty interesting.

[link to www.space.com]

[link to xxx.lanl.gov]

[link to www.darkstar1.co.uk]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 991880
United States
07/20/2010 07:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
I'm reading Worlds in Collision right now.
 Quoting: Shelly



Why Velikovsky was wrong...

[link to abob.libs.uga.edu]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 991880
United States
07/20/2010 07:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Here are some links I saved that are pretty interesting.

[link to www.space.com]

[link to xxx.lanl.gov]

[link to www.darkstar1.co.uk]
 Quoting: Shelly


Shot down just today...

[link to www.space.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 868423
Canada
07/20/2010 07:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
mammoths, flash frozen, is evidence of localized atmospheric stripping in earths past. the mammoths were exposed to space for a few seconds.


It takes quite a bit more than a few seconds to flash freeze a woolly mammoth. It would take hours. They had thick fur, skin and fat. They were built to survive cold temps. I doubt they would notice temps of -250 for a few seconds.
 Quoting: ookie

well they were flash frozen. at 1 degree above absolute 0 i have no idea how long it would take to freeze a mammoth. but do remember that their terrain became polar very shortly afterword. this is why the meat is still edible.

its a badge of honor in the north to eat mammoth. i am told its pretty disgusting.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14235
United States
07/20/2010 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
mammoths, flash frozen, is evidence of localized atmospheric stripping in earths past. the mammoths were exposed to space for a few seconds.


It takes quite a bit more than a few seconds to flash freeze a woolly mammoth. It would take hours. They had thick fur, skin and fat. They were built to survive cold temps. I doubt they would notice temps of -250 for a few seconds.

well they were flash frozen. at 1 degree above absolute 0 i have no idea how long it would take to freeze a mammoth. but do remember that their terrain became polar very shortly afterword. this is why the meat is still edible.

its a badge of honor in the north to eat mammoth. i am told its pretty disgusting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 868423


WHAT? Mammoth Burgers?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1042815
United States
07/20/2010 07:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
This is true, I saw it in the movies in 1951.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 991880
United States
07/20/2010 08:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
mammoths, flash frozen, is evidence of localized atmospheric stripping in earths past. the mammoths were exposed to space for a few seconds.


It takes quite a bit more than a few seconds to flash freeze a woolly mammoth. It would take hours. They had thick fur, skin and fat. They were built to survive cold temps. I doubt they would notice temps of -250 for a few seconds.

well they were flash frozen. at 1 degree above absolute 0 i have no idea how long it would take to freeze a mammoth. but do remember that their terrain became polar very shortly afterword. this is why the meat is still edible.

its a badge of honor in the north to eat mammoth. i am told its pretty disgusting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 868423



The "flash frozen mammoths" story is just that...a story.

[link to www.don-lindsay-archive.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1041227
United States
07/20/2010 08:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
mammoths, flash frozen, is evidence of localized atmospheric stripping in earths past. the mammoths were exposed to space for a few seconds.


It takes quite a bit more than a few seconds to flash freeze a woolly mammoth. It would take hours. They had thick fur, skin and fat. They were built to survive cold temps. I doubt they would notice temps of -250 for a few seconds.

well they were flash frozen. at 1 degree above absolute 0 i have no idea how long it would take to freeze a mammoth. but do remember that their terrain became polar very shortly afterword. this is why the meat is still edible.

its a badge of honor in the north to eat mammoth. i am told its pretty disgusting.





The "flash frozen mammoths" story is just that...a story.

[link to www.don-lindsay-archive.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 991880



Is your aptitude monitored?

Do you get less pay when the assigned thread ignores you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 991880
United States
07/20/2010 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Do you enjoy quoting bullshit?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1041227
United States
07/20/2010 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Do you enjoy quoting bullshit?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 991880



Don't care one way or the other.

The bigger question is, why do you enjoy camping out in someone else's thread and telling them how incorrect they are?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1041464
Ireland
07/21/2010 05:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PLANET X fly-by would cause "atmospheric stripping"
Do you enjoy quoting bullshit?



Don't care one way or the other.

The bigger question is, why do you enjoy camping out in someone else's thread and telling them how incorrect they are?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1041227

Perhaps it is because they are so laughably incorrect.





GLP