Chemtrails Irrefutable Proof: Pilot filming plane spraying into the air!

The insider: chemtrails KC-10 sprayer

A pilot shots a chemical plane from his cockpit: the video shows an aircraft that spread chemtrails over Canada from the nozzles. The footage is the irrefutable proof of a chemical and clandestine operation that a bold pilot offers to the public in order to demonstrate that chemtrails are real. The "smoke" we can see is neither a fuel dumping nor a contrail. The chemtrails, in fact, is iridescent too. Don't listen to hoaxers who repeat that this document is false or similar lies. The author of this important video writes to Tanker Enemy:

"Nice job tanker enemy... I like the enhancements. Btw, I took the video while we were flying over Canada. Thanks for translating the video so more people will understand what's going on. I'll post more as I see them".

[link to www.youtube.com]

Well you show your IGNORANCE in the first place by saying 2 turbofans when a DC-10 in fact has 3.

I didn't say anything about contrails coming from the engines in the first place which in fact they are not.

I doubt if this particular aircraft is at engine forming contrail height.

Like I said before, this is fuselage induced contrails, most probably very short lived.

Of course you don't see that because the video is an extreme closeup and you can't see any appreciable distance behind the aircraft.


Oh, you're just making shit up now. There is no such thing as a "fuselage induced contrail". Engines create contrails, which look nothing like the spraying being done in this video.

Google agrees. [link to www.google.com]

This is very fake

Contrails don't usually form below 20,000 feet.

Well you show your IGNORANCE in the first place by saying 2 turbofans when a DC-10 in fact has 3.

I didn't say anything about contrails coming from the engines in the first place which in fact they are not.

I doubt if this particular aircraft is at engine forming contrail height.

Like I said before, this is fuselage induced contrails, most probably very short lived.

Of course you don't see that because the video is an extreme closeup and you can't see any appreciable distance behind the aircraft.


Oh, you're just making shit up now. There is no such thing as a "fuselage induced contrail". Engines create contrails, which look nothing like the spraying being done in this video.

Google agrees. [link to www.google.com]


Nope,

From Wikkipedia:

Condensation from decreases in pressure
Main article: Wingtip vortices

As a wing generates lift, it causes a vortex to form at each wingtip, and sometimes also at the tip of each wing flap. These wingtip vortices persist in the atmosphere long after the aircraft has passed. The reduction in pressure and temperature across each vortex can cause water to condense and make the cores of the wingtip vortices visible. This effect is more common on humid days. Wingtip vortices can sometimes be seen behind the wing flaps of airliners during takeoff and landing, and during landing of the Space shuttle.

The visible cores of wingtip vortices contrast with the other major type of contrails which are caused by the combustion of fuel. Contrails produced from jet engine exhaust are seen at high altitude, directly behind each engine. By contrast, the visible cores of wingtip vortices are usually seen only at low altitude where the aircraft is travelling slowly after takeoff or before landing, and where the ambient humidity is higher. They trail behind the wingtips and wing flaps rather than behind the engines.

During high-thrust settings the fan blades at the intake of a turbo-fan engine reach transonic speeds, causing a sudden drop in air pressure. This creates the condensation fog (inside the intake) which is often observed by air travelers during takeoff. For more information see the Prandtl–Glauert singularity effect.

Thanks for posting the video, Pakal.

Do you know of an English translation of the text?


Anyone with a brain in their head knows they have been spraying us for many years now.

For the past two months, most of the chem-spray planes have been sent to the Gulf, although they take time out from their Gulf assignment every week or so to come back and slather our skies.

May God rebuke the evil-doers who are poisoning our planet. Amen.

Pray for humanity! And our planet!



. .

Thanks for posting the video, Pakal.

Do you know of an English translation of the text?


Anyone with a brain in their head knows they have been spraying us for many years now.

For the past two months, most of the chem-spray planes have been sent to the Gulf, although they take time out from their Gulf assignment every week or so to come back and slather our skies.

May God rebuke the evil-doers who are poisoning our planet. Amen.

Pray for humanity! And our planet!



. .

Well you show your IGNORANCE in the first place by saying 2 turbofans when a DC-10 in fact has 3.

I didn't say anything about contrails coming from the engines in the first place which in fact they are not.

I doubt if this particular aircraft is at engine forming contrail height.

Like I said before, this is fuselage induced contrails, most probably very short lived.

Of course you don't see that because the video is an extreme closeup and you can't see any appreciable distance behind the aircraft.


Oh, you're just making shit up now. There is no such thing as a "fuselage induced contrail". Engines create contrails, which look nothing like the spraying being done in this video.

Google agrees. [link to www.google.com]


Nope,

From Wikkipedia:

Condensation from decreases in pressure
Main article: Wingtip vortices

As a wing generates lift, it causes a vortex to form at each wingtip, and sometimes also at the tip of each wing flap. These wingtip vortices persist in the atmosphere long after the aircraft has passed. The reduction in pressure and temperature across each vortex can cause water to condense and make the cores of the wingtip vortices visible. This effect is more common on humid days. Wingtip vortices can sometimes be seen behind the wing flaps of airliners during takeoff and landing, and during landing of the Space shuttle.

The visible cores of wingtip vortices contrast with the other major type of contrails which are caused by the combustion of fuel. Contrails produced from jet engine exhaust are seen at high altitude, directly behind each engine. By contrast, the visible cores of wingtip vortices are usually seen only at low altitude where the aircraft is travelling slowly after takeoff or before landing, and where the ambient humidity is higher. They trail behind the wingtips and wing flaps rather than behind the engines.

During high-thrust settings the fan blades at the intake of a turbo-fan engine reach transonic speeds, causing a sudden drop in air pressure. This creates the condensation fog (inside the intake) which is often observed by air travelers during takeoff. For more information see the Prandtl–Glauert singularity effect.

thanks great post i just love the truth but what in the hell are they spraying

Contrails don't usually form below 20,000 feet.






you just exposed yourself and ignorance



many people and thousands the world over can bear witness to very low chemtrails below 20k ft at very low altitudes

with that said its amazing the lack of contrails around airports from low to high altitudes

Well you show your IGNORANCE in the first place by saying 2 turbofans when a DC-10 in fact has 3.

I didn't say anything about contrails coming from the engines in the first place which in fact they are not.

I doubt if this particular aircraft is at engine forming contrail height.

Like I said before, this is fuselage induced contrails, most probably very short lived.

Of course you don't see that because the video is an extreme closeup and you can't see any appreciable distance behind the aircraft.


Oh, you're just making shit up now. There is no such thing as a "fuselage induced contrail". Engines create contrails, which look nothing like the spraying being done in this video.

Google agrees. [link to www.google.com]


Nope,

From Wikkipedia:

Condensation from decreases in pressure
Main article: Wingtip vortices

As a wing generates lift, it causes a vortex to form at each wingtip, and sometimes also at the tip of each wing flap. These wingtip vortices persist in the atmosphere long after the aircraft has passed. The reduction in pressure and temperature across each vortex can cause water to condense and make the cores of the wingtip vortices visible. This effect is more common on humid days. Wingtip vortices can sometimes be seen behind the wing flaps of airliners during takeoff and landing, and during landing of the Space shuttle.

The visible cores of wingtip vortices contrast with the other major type of contrails which are caused by the combustion of fuel. Contrails produced from jet engine exhaust are seen at high altitude, directly behind each engine. By contrast, the visible cores of wingtip vortices are usually seen only at low altitude where the aircraft is travelling slowly after takeoff or before landing, and where the ambient humidity is higher. They trail behind the wingtips and wing flaps rather than behind the engines.

During high-thrust settings the fan blades at the intake of a turbo-fan engine reach transonic speeds, causing a sudden drop in air pressure. This creates the condensation fog (inside the intake) which is often observed by air travelers during takeoff. For more information see the Prandtl–Glauert singularity effect.



Those were not "wing-tip vortices", and contrails are not formed from the fuselage.

Well you show your IGNORANCE in the first place by saying 2 turbofans when a DC-10 in fact has 3.

I didn't say anything about contrails coming from the engines in the first place which in fact they are not.

I doubt if this particular aircraft is at engine forming contrail height.

Like I said before, this is fuselage induced contrails, most probably very short lived.

Of course you don't see that because the video is an extreme closeup and you can't see any appreciable distance behind the aircraft.


Oh, you're just making shit up now. There is no such thing as a "fuselage induced contrail". Engines create contrails, which look nothing like the spraying being done in this video.

Google agrees. [link to www.google.com]


Nope,

From Wikkipedia:

Condensation from decreases in pressure
Main article: Wingtip vortices

As a wing generates lift, it causes a vortex to form at each wingtip, and sometimes also at the tip of each wing flap. These wingtip vortices persist in the atmosphere long after the aircraft has passed. The reduction in pressure and temperature across each vortex can cause water to condense and make the cores of the wingtip vortices visible. This effect is more common on humid days. Wingtip vortices can sometimes be seen behind the wing flaps of airliners during takeoff and landing, and during landing of the Space shuttle.

The visible cores of wingtip vortices contrast with the other major type of contrails which are caused by the combustion of fuel. Contrails produced from jet engine exhaust are seen at high altitude, directly behind each engine. By contrast, the visible cores of wingtip vortices are usually seen only at low altitude where the aircraft is travelling slowly after takeoff or before landing, and where the ambient humidity is higher. They trail behind the wingtips and wing flaps rather than behind the engines.

During high-thrust settings the fan blades at the intake of a turbo-fan engine reach transonic speeds, causing a sudden drop in air pressure. This creates the condensation fog (inside the intake) which is often observed by air travelers during takeoff. For more information see the Prandtl–Glauert singularity effect.


Not just fail, Epic Fail. Your own reference article clearly supports our position, not yours.

--Contrails produced from jet engine exhaust are seen at high altitude, directly behind each engine. (Which these are not)

--By contrast, the visible cores of wingtip vortices are usually seen only at low altitude where the aircraft is travelling slowly after takeoff or before landing (Which this aircraft is not in the process of doing).

Thank you for this excellent article which supports the existence of aerosol spraying by debunking close ups of many aircraft provided by Tanker Enemy.

Here is a VERY graphic example of fuselage induced contrails,

also know as aerodynamic contrails.

[link to www.google.com]

Did I see a thread titled something about 'Canadians spray clouds to reduce size of hailstones' a day or two back ?

1 of 27 Chemtrail film: Don't Talk About the Weather


theres so much damning evidence in this series I dont even know where to begin :

Another graphic example of a fuselage induced contrail.

[link to www.airliners.net]

Unless, LOL, you mental defectives think Ethiopian Airlines is a participant in the mythical "chemtrail" spraying campaign.

A WARNING TO CHEMPILOTS
[link to www.youtube.com]

REfute THAT chemtrail "debunker" motha fuckers.

Thanks, OP. Added to my files.

.

thanks great post i just love the truth but what in the hell are they spraying

REfute THAT chemtrail "debunker" motha fuckers.

Thanks, OP. Added to my files.

.

OK I will...Uhmmm...attention all dipshits...attention please. Click on this link and look under the wings of this DC-10 airliner. see those things there under the wings? those are the enclosures for the flap supports...DIPSHITS. What you saw on the video was a perfect display of contrails forming. They are caused by the pressure and heat differentials that exist above and below the wings along with exhaust condensation. The "iridescence you see is the formation of ice crystals in the water vapor that was created during the condensation...fucking crackhead doomers...go smoke some more dope dipshits

Contrails don't usually form below 20,000 feet.

And why is it so fucking hard for you friggen idiots that aircraft that DO fly at contrail forming altitudes don't all fly in the same direction?