CONFIDENTIAL BP WELL INFO PLEASE COPY AND FLOOD INTERNET.

Little more for the fire


[link to energycommerce.house.gov]

That's some of the most damning evidence I've seen so far...

Cool. Migt be interesting to compare with any saved feeds from the early days of the explosion. Might tell us if we were looking at a different blow out I.e well b. Whch had the more oil? A or b?

WOW more shit.. Look at the dates,

[link to globalwarming.house.gov]

Lol your on a roll OP - go for it!!

Truth







get info while you can, one never knows when nets collapse...

Yes it's coming and there are only a few of us that knew awhile ago...it is amazing riding ahead of the wave, isn't it?

wtf happened to page 15

For dummies a summary plz.

Gogole is your friend

did a search for "BP MS 5030"

Got the following, download and save


June 6 2010


[link to www.bp.com]


Near Shore Water and Sediment Sampling and Analysis Plan

This Work Plan was prepared by Center for Toxicology and Environmental Health, L.L.C. (CTEH), on behalf of Sector Mobile Incident Command (IC), and describes the sampling and analysis activities proposed to determine if migration of oil or petroleum constituents from crude oil releases in the Gulf of Mexico have migrated to near shore areas of the coast between Bay Saint Louis, MS and Panama City, FL.



April 27

[link to www.gomr.mms.gov]




From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:
Douglas, Scherie D [[email protected]] Monday, April 26, 2010 9:17 AM Plans Wetzel, Nick
SEP - MC 252 Relief Wells - Amendments S-7416
Plan Contents.pdf; General Contents.pdf; Geological Information.pdf; AQR Revised.pdf; Oil Spills Information.pdf
Nick, Attached are the following changes to the SEP for the relief wells:
␣ Revised AQR using actual fuel usage ␣ Revised Plan Contents page (added a statement in 1.1) ␣ Revised General Information page (added a statement under 2.7 "Blowout Scenario) ␣ Revised Worst Case Discharge
Let me know if you have any questions.


scenario from BP’s approved regional OSRP with the worst-case scenario from the proposed activities in this Exploration Plan is provided in the table below. The proposed activities are within ten miles seaward of the coastline therefore the “near-shore” worst- case scenario is provided as well as the “exploration” worst-case scenario.
The WCD scenario is a surface oil flow up the riser with drill pipe out of the hole. Calculations are from a Prosper inflow/outflow model.
Category
Type of Activity
Facility Location
Facility Designation
Distance to Nearest Shoreline
Volume Uncontrolled Blowout (per day)
Type of Oil(s)
API Gravity
Regional OSRP (Exploration)
Exploration Drilling
MC 462
MODU
33
250,000
Crude Oil
EP
Exploration Drilling
MC 252
MODU
49 miles
240,000
Crude Oil
35° (estimated)



I guess they must have know they were low balling it at 1000 bpd when the original blow out happened



Here

[link to www.biologicaldiversity.org]


April 7 2010


page 7

4. Worst-case Scenario Determination
Since BP has the capability to respond to the worst-case spill scenario included in its regional Oil Spill Response Plan approved on July 21, 2009, and since the worst-case scenario determined for their EP does not replace the worst-case scenario in their regional OSRP, BP Exploration & Production Inc. hereby certifies that they have the capability to respond, to the maximum extent practicable, to a worst-case discharge, or a substantial threat of such a discharge, resulting from the activities proposed in their EP.
Category
Regional OSRP
EP
Type of Activity
Exploratory
Exploratory
Facility Location (area/block)
MC 462
GC 738 & 782
Facility Designation
Distance to Nearest Shoreline (miles)
33 miles
124 miles
Volume
250,000 barrels 250,000 barrels
184,000 barrels 184,000 barrels
Storage tanks (total)
Flowlines (on facility)
Lease term pipelines
Uncontrolled blowout (volume per day)
Total Volume
Type of oil(s) - (crude oil, condensate, diesel)
crude oil
crude oil
y(s)

It was from a .gov site that would not load so I went to google cache and linked it.

Look at the date of this HOLY SHIT WTF is going on???????
[link to www.bp.com]


Somebody was cutting and pasting and forgot to change the date, the cover page of the sinking oil document says April 3, 2010, but if you download it, the doc properties show it was created on May 25, 2010, that is, after the blowout.

Am I officially a spy if I click the link??

SHIT that one says confidential too....is it prison for me now?

Search for

OCS-G32306 Block

Washington post



[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

[link to markimoore.com]


General Well Information
API Well Number 608174116901
Date of Request 4/15/2010 Water Depth(ft.) 4992 RKB Elevation(ft.) 75
SURFACE
LEASE(OCS) G32306
Entered NAD 27 Data
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Kickoff Point 11585
Approval Date Drive Size(in.) Drive Depth(ft.)
4/15/2010
Req Spud Date Mineral Code Subsea BOP
3/16/2010 H Y

Don't know if this here is important or not:

[link to globalwarming.house.gov]

[link to globalwarming.house.gov]

The first link is about the amount of dispersant (Corexit) used to contain the spill (up to 70.000 gallons a day), the second about a probable oil spill (!) from the relief wells.

This is a PDF of the BP drilling permit letter








MMS Approval Permit Letter

[link to media.mcclatchydc.com]

HALIBURTON LOG FOR LAST 2 HOURS APRIL 20 2010



Thread: **HOLY SHIt WHAT IS THIS*** HALIBURTON LAST 2 HOURS OF BP GOM LOG DATED APRIL 20 2010 !!!!****

there is another link on that page to a PDF version, and the encoded pages can be seen clearly, they are graphs and charts etc.

found this too

[link to energycommerce.house.gov]

GOM Exploration wells, MC 252, Well information

12 pages are missing


HOWEVER IT GIVES THE CASIGN DEPTHS

Awww, now, don't piss on their doomtard parade, sang.

They twist the truth to fit the theory rather than the theory in support of the truth.....with absolutely no experience in the industry and deaf ears to those with the experience.

And all this talk about Matt Simmons being 'the industry in-the-know go-to guy'...LMAO...he's a CFR investment BANKER, FFS...and a peak oiler to boot. Amazing.

Look at this email


[link to energycommerce.house.gov]





FYI - Approved permit for casing. Still working on getting permission to set deeper surface plug.
----- Original Message ----- From: Powell, Heather (JC Connor Consulting) To: Hafle, Mark E Sent: Thu Apr 15 15:11:56 2010 Subject: FW: Modification of Permit to Bypass at Location Surface Lease: G32306 Surface Area: MC Surface Block: 252 Bottom Lease: G32306 Bottom A rea: MC Bottom Block: 252 W ell Name: 001 A ssigned API Number: 608174116901 has been approved.
Please tell me 3rd time's the charm! :)
Thanks! Heather

CONFIDENTIAL

-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:40 PM To: Powell, Heather (JC Connor Consulting) Subject: Modification of Permit to Bypass at Location Surface Lease: G32306 Surface Area: MC Surface Block: 252 Bottom Lease: G32306 Bottom Area: MC Bottom Block: 252 Well Name: 001 Assigned API Number: 608174116901 has been approved.
Modification of Permit to Bypass at Location Surface Lease: G32306 Surface Area: MC Surface Block: 252 Bottom Lease: G32306 Bottom Area: MC Bottom Block: 252 l'17ell Name: 001 Assigned API Number: 608174116901 has been approved. as of 2010-04-15 14:39:39.0


[link to energycommerce.house.gov]

THE PART ABOUT "NEW AND UNUSUAL TECHNOLOGY, HAS BEEN REMOVED "UNUSUAL TECHNOLOGY??????????????????????????

TRANSOCEAN INTERIM REPORT



[link to energycommerce.house.gov]

Deepwater Horizon Incident – Internal Investigation

Investigation Overview Focus Areas
␣ Primary Well Control ␣ Well integrity
␣ Procedures ␣ Secondary Well Control
␣ Blowout preventer ␣ Ignition Source
␣ Evacuation & Response

Loss of Primary Well Control Cement – Areas of Investigation
•
Design
␣ Was it appropriate to utilize nitrogen foamed cement at this depth? ␣ May be uncommon at this depth ␣ Typically used for shallow conductor casing string
␣ Did the operator give the cement enough time to cure? (from Halliburton lab test reports) ␣ Test on 3/29 of 9-7/8” liner slurry (previous casing): 15 hours needed to reach 2100 psi
compressive strength
␣ Test on 4/12 of 7” casing slurry : 0 psi compressive strength after 24 hours; needed 48 hours to reach compressive strength of 1590 psi
– Negative test started ~18 hours after pumped – Do not have any sample test results from rig samples; requested
␣ Was the volume for 7” production casing cement job appropriate? ␣ 60 bbls pumped (requested third party caliper logs to determine if adequate)
␣ 16.7 ppg cement in shoe track over 14 ppg mud in open hole beneath the 7” shoe – could fall out into the open hole
␣ Estimate of 2 bbls nitrogen cement in shoe track – normally would pump all into annulus


Loss of Primary Well Control Cement – Areas of Investigation
•
•
Was there contamination of the cement?
␣ Wiper plug was run through two casing internal diameters ␣ Potential for mud bypassing plug into cement
␣ Circulated bottoms up only to the wellhead rather than to the surface
␣ Potential cuttings in well bore
␣ Potential non-homogeneous mud or gas content – Could lead to cement channeling and flow path for formation fluids
Was there a problem with the float equipment?
␣ There were 9 attempts to activate (IADC and BP daily report 4/19)
␣ Double flapper type
␣ Requires back pressure from annulus side to close
␣ Less than 40 psi back pressure from annulus by calculation – Potential to open while cement is setting
␣ 1st positive test on casing against wiper plug at 10 hours set time – potential to slightly open flappers during cure time
Were the appropriate tests run following the cement job?
␣ No cement bond log was run prior to proceeding with pressure tests ␣ Need to test samples of cement recovered by BP from the Damon Bankston deck

[link to cricketdiane.wordpress.com]

Evaluation of Casing Design Basis for MC-252


[link to energycommerce.house.gov]

pages missing

Excel Spread sheet for Flow data at MC-252 up to july 10 2010

[link to www.energy.gov]

im done, time to sleep