Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,116 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 370,065
Pageviews Today: 489,511Threads Today: 110Posts Today: 2,316
04:39 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20

 
tweeny
User ID: 1044395
United States
07/24/2010 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Good Timeline someone put together on another forum, using permit numbers and emails that can be verified online. If they ever started well B, there would be a different API number filed for the well, as opposed to just giving a 001 designation as they do for a second attempt or bypass on the same well. This also shows that the permit to abandon the well was given on April 16, a few days before it blew. The permit from March 10 was to abandon the well BORE and modify it with a bypass. This theory only holds water if ALL of this documentation was faked.


3-10-2009 BP Initial Exploration Plan Mississippil Canyon Block, OCS-G 32306 They oriiginally planned to drill two exploratory wells, Well A and B. Well A to be completed by July 09. Well B to be completed by April 10. Original rig was Marianas. After reviewing the below documents, it appears they only ever drilled one well, called Well 01. I checked all MMS permits, and nothing ever shows but for Well 01 and the longitude and latitude coordinates never change. After the blow up, they drilled Relief Wells 02 and 03.

5-13-2009 - Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Longitude 88.365934), water depth 4992

9-28-09 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

10-15-09 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

10-21-2009 Application For Permit to Modify - API Well# 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Status "Borehole Sidetracked." Permit Type: "Information", Subtype "Surface Location Plat", Date commencing work 10-22-09, Permit Type Information, Status Borehole Sidetracked;

10-29-09 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

12-28-09 - Application for Permit to Modify - API 6900, Well 01, Rig Marianas, Date Commencing work 12-28-09, Status Borehole Sidetracked, Permit type: "Other operation" Permit Subtype "Describe Operations";

11-1-09 - Transocean report - unlatched BOP from well head, preparing to pull riser - Shear Rams on Yellow Pod Failure (problems began 28 Oct 09 through 31 Oct 09);

11-1-09 BP email - confirms BOP being pulled and cementing 18" casing. Shear rams cannot be functioned from Yellow Pod. Additionally, lower annular will not close and upper annular was stripped through during a "well control event."

1-12-10 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

1-25-10 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

3-10-10 - Application for Permit to Modify - API 6900, Well 01, Rig DWH, Status: "Borehole Sidetracked", Permit Type: "Abandonment of Well Bore", Permit Subtype: "Plugback to Sidterack/Bypass"; Date Commencing 3-10-10;

3-10-10 11:11 am - BP email "We are in the midst of a well control situation . . . and have stuck pipe. We are bring out equipment to begin operations to sever the drillpipe, plugback the well and bypass. . . . The BOP test is due tomorrow. We would like to set the plus after we kill the well and then test the BOPs . .let me know if this is successful"

3-10-10 12:12 pm - BP email - Are there any hydrocarbons being zones below 12,900 feet?

3-10-10 1:57 pm - BP email - We have a partial log over the area below 12,900 that has a 4' stringer that shows some resistivity which has bridged over. We are packed off and unable to circulate through the bit or under reamer, indicating we are packed off above the under reamer. There is no way for us to perforate to put cement across that stringer. With the give and take of the well and hole behavior we would feel much more comfortable getting at least one of the two plus set in order to fully secure the well prior to testing BOPs.

3-10-10 - 3:23 pm BP email - Sorry, we cannot grant a departure on the BOP test further than wen you get the well under control. It is OK to not place a cement plug across the 4 foot stringer since you can't.

3-10-10 - 3:41 pm BP email, I would like to have a conversation with you in the morning to discuss the BOP test. We have major concerns about coming out without getting at least one cement plug set to secure the well. I realize the guidance on BOP test extensions comes from the regional office, but we wanted to discuss with you first . . .

3-10-10 Email BP confirming MMS approval of BOP test extension. After further consideration, an extension is approved to delay the BOP test until the lower cement plus is set. Before testing BOPs, please wait for the cement plug to set up and verify its successful placement by tagging with 15000# pipe weight. Please note the dept of the cement top and BOP test extension in the IADC report

3-12-10 - BP email "verbal approval granted last night to revise the setting depth of the cement plug to 12,150' due to the SCMT/Temp logging tool left in the hole"

3-15-10 - Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

3-25-10 - Revised Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

4-14-10 - Revised Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

4-14-10 - BP email discussing changes to design parameters of well. States "We have flipped design parameters around to the point that I got nervous" but says "all looks fine." Discusses running casing as a long string versus a liner. Apparently, running as a long string was not the original configuration.

4-15-10 - Revised Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

4-15-10 - BP document - long string is best economically and well integrity case for future completion operations. If liner required, will add $7-$10 million. Goes on to state there have been two lost circulations during this hole section - the second was a "major loss".

4-16-10 Application for Permit to Modify - API 6901, Well 01, Rig - DWH, Status (blank), Permit Type "abandonment of Well Bore", Permit Subtype "Temporary Abandonment"; Date commencing 4-18-10;

4-16-10 - BP email - honor models to go with long string;

4-16-10 - BP email. Still waiting for approval of the departure to set surface plus

4-26-10 Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

4-26-10 Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 002, Rig - TO Development II, Location (Lon: 88.362608), Water Depth 5132;

5-3-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

5-12-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

5-23-10 - Application for Permit to Modify, API 6900, Well 02, Rig T0 II, Type "Relief Well"l, Status (blank); Permit Type - " Abandonment of Well Bore", Permit Subtype "Temporary Abandonment";

**I'm the first to admit I don't understand all this, but this makes me wonder if Relief Well 02 encountered problems and was plugged**

5-24-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

5-30-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

6-2-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 002, Rig - TO Development II, Location (Lon: 88.362608), Water Depth 5132;

6-17-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;


Much of the above came from MMS website or here:

Energy Committee documents

[link to energycommerce.house.gov]
[link to energycommerce.house.gov]
Oiled in Florida (OP)

User ID: 1039480
United States
07/24/2010 09:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Wake The Sheeple

Last Edited by Oiled In Florida on 07/24/2010 09:54 PM
Oiled in Florida (OP)

User ID: 1039480
United States
07/24/2010 09:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Released emails about this Incident:

From: Douglas, Scherie D
Sent: Wednesday, March <10th>
To: Patton, Frank
Cc: Powell, Heather (JC Connor Consulting)
Subject: MC 252 #001 - Plug back approval requested
Importance: High

Frank,
We are in the midst of a well control situation on Me 252 #001 and have stuck pipe. We are bringing out equipment to
begin operations to sever the drillpipe, plugback the well and bypass.

The APM for the plugback is submitted in Ewell.

The BOP test is due tomorrow. We would like to set the plugs (2) after we kill the well and then test BOPs per the
procedure in the APM. Please advise if this is acceptable.·

Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Thanks.

Scherie Douglas
Sr. Regulatory & AdvocarJ!} Advisor
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
&#65532;
Definitions:

Plug-back places a cement plug at one or more locations in a well to shut off flow from below the plug. Plug-back is also used before abandoning a well or before sidetracking is done.

Sidetracking is the workover term for drilling a directional hole to bypass an obstruction in the well that cannot be removed or damage to the well, such as collapsed casing that cannot be repaired. Sidetracking is also done to deepen a well or to relocate the bottom of the well in a more productive zone, which is horizontally removed from the original well.

To sidetrack, a hole (called a window) is made in the casing above the obstruction. The well is then plugged with cement below the window. Special drill tools, such as a whipstock, bent housing, or bent sub are used to drill off at an angle from the main well. This new hole is completed in the same manner as any well after a liner is set.
 Quoting: tweeny 1044395


And what are the IP verified dates of these e-mails and from what sources?

Last Edited by Oiled In Florida on 07/24/2010 09:59 PM
tweeny
User ID: 1044395
United States
07/24/2010 10:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
These are from the government websites

[link to energycommerce.house.gov]


[link to energycommerce.house.gov]

so if these are faked the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the MMS would all have to be in on it I suppose.

Google it, these documents are all over the web. They were released June 14th.

All I am saying is that you are not going to be able to prove this theory from available documents. You can believe what you want , but if you go with the A B theory, then you would have an unbelievable level of collusion between everyone from the House members to NASA.
Bumpus
User ID: 1004282
United States
07/25/2010 08:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Bumpa wahka bumpa wahka BUMP
Nancy Lazaryan
User ID: 1009846
Canada
07/28/2010 01:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
What have we been saying here at GLP over and over and over?
That there are TWO wells that BLEW.

The first well blew on February 13th.
And the well that blew on April 20th IS NOT THE WELL THAT HAS BEEN "CAPPED". The well that blew up on April 20th is NOT the well that we are being shown in the ROV live feeds.

link here:
[link to www.floridaoilspilllaw.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1018917
United States
07/31/2010 02:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Are we not covering the oil disaster anymore? What, they can't find the oil on the surface, so there's no longer any problem?
CFarer43
User ID: 1044760
United States
08/02/2010 01:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Well B eruption verified with correct coordinates.
East and North Coordinates on Scandi Neptune CAM of the You Tube Eruption match the Coordinates for Well B. Watch the black gushing oil from the gaping hole about 300 feet from the capped well. The East and North coordinates are blurred but readable. They are a near match to the coordinates for Well B as given by BP's own lease, OCS-G-32306. E: 1202491.82 N: 10432204.42 [link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 931556
United States
08/03/2010 11:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Well B eruption verified with correct coordinates.
East and North Coordinates on Scandi Neptune CAM of the You Tube Eruption match the Coordinates for Well B. Watch the black gushing oil from the gaping hole about 300 feet from the capped well. The East and North coordinates are blurred but readable. They are a near match to the coordinates for Well B as given by BP's own lease, OCS-G-32306. E: 1202491.82 N: 10432204.42 [link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: CFarer43 1044760

Good catch. But did BP drill well site A or B first? We may never know.........
Oiled in Florida (OP)

User ID: 929032
United States
08/10/2010 06:09 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
The Gulf of Mexico BLUE PLAGUE is Evolving

[link to worldvisionportal.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1059401
United States
08/11/2010 11:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Thread: Two different well leaks more proof
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1006234
United States
08/11/2010 11:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
bump wowey bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1059401
United States
08/11/2010 12:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
is this another riser
third location
E: 366902.53
N:3179424.99

[link to www.jtnog.org] cam 11 now

picture of a different riser

[link to i262.photobucket.com]
Oiled in Florida (OP)

User ID: 929032
United States
08/11/2010 07:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
is this another riser
third location
E: 366902.53
N:3179424.99

[link to www.jtnog.org] cam 11 now

picture of a different riser

[link to i262.photobucket.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1059401


In case you haven't figured it out yet, the ROV "live" (a/k/a not really live) feeds have been altered. They show different coordinates, times, and dates.

It's a media WAG THE DOG cover-up like America and world has never seen before.

Stop eating the bait and get the hook out of your mouth. You're being lied to.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1102906
United States
09/18/2010 09:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Well B eruption verified with correct coordinates.
East and North Coordinates on Scandi Neptune CAM of the You Tube Eruption match the Coordinates for Well B. Watch the black gushing oil from the gaping hole about 300 feet from the capped well. The East and North coordinates are blurred but readable. They are a near match to the coordinates for Well B as given by BP's own lease, OCS-G-32306. E: 1202491.82 N: 10432204.42 [link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: CFarer43 1044760


The East cord is very close to BP's Exploration Plan of Well "B", ~25 feet

But the North seems to be ~2000 feet away from BP's Exploration Plan.

If we are reading it wrong it is really has a North of 10434204 it would be ~10 from BP's Exploration Plan of Well "B"

The question is "Is the video blurry enough to confuse a 4 with a 2?"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1102906
United States
09/18/2010 11:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
I did some more looking and of the Live feeds we still have Development Driller 2 and HOS Achiever and compared them to the AIS map

Development Driller 2 seems to be right on top of Well "A" and says on the screen "BP MC 252 #1".

HOS Achiever seems to be right on top of Well "B". It does not say on screen that is is MC 252 #2.

What I found odd is that DD2 is there to watch the cap and make sure is there is no leaks, but only one ROV. HOS Achiever has two ROV's. What is the HOS Achiever looking for at the proposed site of Well "B"?

One more odd tidbit, We no longer have the Development Driller 3 live feeds but when I tracked the vessel it was moving around a lot a few miles SW of the sites of Well "A" and "B". Is deep water drilling still allowed after the DWH sank, if not what is the DD3 doing and what are they looking for?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1102906
United States
09/18/2010 11:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
I did some more looking and of the Live feeds we still have Development Driller 2 and HOS Achiever and compared them to the AIS map

Development Driller 2 seems to be right on top of Well "A" and says on the screen "BP MC 252 #1".

HOS Achiever seems to be right on top of Well "B". It does not say on screen that is is MC 252 #2.

What I found odd is that DD2 is there to watch the cap and make sure is there is no leaks, but only one ROV. HOS Achiever has two ROV's. What is the HOS Achiever looking for at the proposed site of Well "B"?

One more odd tidbit, We no longer have the Development Driller 3 live feeds but when I tracked the vessel it was moving around a lot a few miles SW of the sites of Well "A" and "B". Is deep water drilling still allowed after the DWH sank, if not what is the DD3 doing and what are they looking for?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1102906


I saw this
"The MC252 well has been shut-in since July 15; there is no oil flowing into the Gulf.

The DDII currently is on standby and awaiting conclusion of DDIII cementing operations.

The DDIII began MC252 well cement pumping operations at 1:30 p.m. CDT Friday and finished at 8:30 p.m. CDT.

The cement will be allowed to set and later tested in accordance with the approved operating plan.

Updated Sept 18 at 10:00 a.m. CDT"

So the DD3 pumped cement a day ago? If so why is it's location a few miles SW of site A and B and has moved a lot in two areas very close to each other, almost like it is pumping cement where it is at.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1071852
United States
09/22/2010 10:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
THIS IS LIKE SO YESTERDAY

antibs crisco
female.faust

User ID: 1064960
United States
09/25/2010 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
disagree with last poster --

because of

Thread: CONFIDENTIAL BP WELL INFO PLEASE COPY AND FLOOD INTERNET. (Page 5)

they were dealing with oil on apr. 3.


also, a cogent explanation of the timeline so far, from [link to wilynetwork.wordpress.com]


<blockquote><green>If you put this all together, this is a scenario that unfolds:

BP submitted a proposal to drill Well “A” on Feb. 23, 2009 . Well “A” encountered some sort of formation collapse where the drill pipe and bit became stuck and had to be cut. At this point there is conflicting information. Scenario 1: BP and Transocean drilled well “A”, had a formation blowout, plugged the formation failure with cement and redrilled the well. They never did drill Well “B”. Well “A” has been the only well at that location. This is the location that we see today, after tropical storm Bonnie. Scenario 2: BP abandoned well “A” due to the underground formation failure and the subsequent jambing of the drill pipe and cutting tip. BP and Transocean commenced drilling well “B” and this is the well that blewup on April 20 and it is Well “B” that is the source of the ongoing disaster.What is troubling is that the ROV footage of the wellhead gushing and being cut with first the wire saw and then with the “giant shears” was clearly the well “B” location (check the GPS coordinates on Skandi ROV)… as the screen shots from the cutting operation show. Well “B” location has been the one we have been viewing up until storm Bonnie according to GPS coordinates.. As soon as the storm Bonnie passed and the seas subsided the ROV’s clearly showed the new Cap on well “A” (GPS Coordinates for Well “A”). Some have assumed that BP switched the cap to present a picture of a non leaking well while they continued to struggle with Well “B” which many think is still out of control. If this is true it would partially explain why hydrogen sulfide levels have spiked since the well was supposedly capped. It might also explain why there are reports of night time spraying of disperant Corexit. Ever since tropical storm Bonnie BP has had their undersea cameras trained on non event scenes. For all we know, they could be struggling with a blowout of Well “B”, or seafloor leaks and eruptions. Of course, if this is happening we would be the last to know. I think the increased hydrogen sulfide levels are the most troubling indicators of something amiss. It’s highly poisonous and FEMA has evacuation plans drawn up if HS levels get out of hand. If the Well is capped, and there are no serious seafloor blowouts or eruptions… as BP has led us to believe, then there should be no readings indicating hydrogen sulfide during air quality tests. These videos and links will point you in the direction you need to take to better understand what is going on here. I admit, drawing conclusions from all of this is difficult.

R. Clegg

8/31/2010</blockquote></green>
Be seeing you.
ynPQQVqxcNGRfIaQmB
User ID: 1399385
France
05/25/2011 12:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Hey, youÂ’re the goto expert. Tahnks for hanging out here.

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob