Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,048 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,536,520
Pageviews Today: 3,539,107Threads Today: 862Posts Today: 15,800
10:44 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject PROOF -- BP Deepwater Horizon Drilled TWO Wells That Blew Out on FEB 13 and APR 20
Poster Handle tweeny
Post Content
Good Timeline someone put together on another forum, using permit numbers and emails that can be verified online. If they ever started well B, there would be a different API number filed for the well, as opposed to just giving a 001 designation as they do for a second attempt or bypass on the same well. This also shows that the permit to abandon the well was given on April 16, a few days before it blew. The permit from March 10 was to abandon the well BORE and modify it with a bypass. This theory only holds water if ALL of this documentation was faked.


3-10-2009 BP Initial Exploration Plan Mississippil Canyon Block, OCS-G 32306 They oriiginally planned to drill two exploratory wells, Well A and B. Well A to be completed by July 09. Well B to be completed by April 10. Original rig was Marianas. After reviewing the below documents, it appears they only ever drilled one well, called Well 01. I checked all MMS permits, and nothing ever shows but for Well 01 and the longitude and latitude coordinates never change. After the blow up, they drilled Relief Wells 02 and 03.

5-13-2009 - Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Longitude 88.365934), water depth 4992

9-28-09 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

10-15-09 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

10-21-2009 Application For Permit to Modify - API Well# 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Status "Borehole Sidetracked." Permit Type: "Information", Subtype "Surface Location Plat", Date commencing work 10-22-09, Permit Type Information, Status Borehole Sidetracked;

10-29-09 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig Marianas, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

12-28-09 - Application for Permit to Modify - API 6900, Well 01, Rig Marianas, Date Commencing work 12-28-09, Status Borehole Sidetracked, Permit type: "Other operation" Permit Subtype "Describe Operations";

11-1-09 - Transocean report - unlatched BOP from well head, preparing to pull riser - Shear Rams on Yellow Pod Failure (problems began 28 Oct 09 through 31 Oct 09);

11-1-09 BP email - confirms BOP being pulled and cementing 18" casing. Shear rams cannot be functioned from Yellow Pod. Additionally, lower annular will not close and upper annular was stripped through during a "well control event."

1-12-10 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

1-25-10 - Revised Application for Permit to Drill New Well - API Well # 6900, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992;

3-10-10 - Application for Permit to Modify - API 6900, Well 01, Rig DWH, Status: "Borehole Sidetracked", Permit Type: "Abandonment of Well Bore", Permit Subtype: "Plugback to Sidterack/Bypass"; Date Commencing 3-10-10;

3-10-10 11:11 am - BP email "We are in the midst of a well control situation . . . and have stuck pipe. We are bring out equipment to begin operations to sever the drillpipe, plugback the well and bypass. . . . The BOP test is due tomorrow. We would like to set the plus after we kill the well and then test the BOPs . .let me know if this is successful"

3-10-10 12:12 pm - BP email - Are there any hydrocarbons being zones below 12,900 feet?

3-10-10 1:57 pm - BP email - We have a partial log over the area below 12,900 that has a 4' stringer that shows some resistivity which has bridged over. We are packed off and unable to circulate through the bit or under reamer, indicating we are packed off above the under reamer. There is no way for us to perforate to put cement across that stringer. With the give and take of the well and hole behavior we would feel much more comfortable getting at least one of the two plus set in order to fully secure the well prior to testing BOPs.

3-10-10 - 3:23 pm BP email - Sorry, we cannot grant a departure on the BOP test further than wen you get the well under control. It is OK to not place a cement plug across the 4 foot stringer since you can't.

3-10-10 - 3:41 pm BP email, I would like to have a conversation with you in the morning to discuss the BOP test. We have major concerns about coming out without getting at least one cement plug set to secure the well. I realize the guidance on BOP test extensions comes from the regional office, but we wanted to discuss with you first . . .

3-10-10 Email BP confirming MMS approval of BOP test extension. After further consideration, an extension is approved to delay the BOP test until the lower cement plus is set. Before testing BOPs, please wait for the cement plug to set up and verify its successful placement by tagging with 15000# pipe weight. Please note the dept of the cement top and BOP test extension in the IADC report

3-12-10 - BP email "verbal approval granted last night to revise the setting depth of the cement plug to 12,150' due to the SCMT/Temp logging tool left in the hole"

3-15-10 - Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

3-25-10 - Revised Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

4-14-10 - Revised Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

4-14-10 - BP email discussing changes to design parameters of well. States "We have flipped design parameters around to the point that I got nervous" but says "all looks fine." Discusses running casing as a long string versus a liner. Apparently, running as a long string was not the original configuration.

4-15-10 - Revised Application for Bypass - API Well # 6901, Well Name 001, Rig - DWH, Location (Lon: 88.365934), Water Depth 4992; Kickoff point 11585;

4-15-10 - BP document - long string is best economically and well integrity case for future completion operations. If liner required, will add $7-$10 million. Goes on to state there have been two lost circulations during this hole section - the second was a "major loss".

4-16-10 Application for Permit to Modify - API 6901, Well 01, Rig - DWH, Status (blank), Permit Type "abandonment of Well Bore", Permit Subtype "Temporary Abandonment"; Date commencing 4-18-10;

4-16-10 - BP email - honor models to go with long string;

4-16-10 - BP email. Still waiting for approval of the departure to set surface plus

4-26-10 Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

4-26-10 Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 002, Rig - TO Development II, Location (Lon: 88.362608), Water Depth 5132;

5-3-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

5-12-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

5-23-10 - Application for Permit to Modify, API 6900, Well 02, Rig T0 II, Type "Relief Well"l, Status (blank); Permit Type - " Abandonment of Well Bore", Permit Subtype "Temporary Abandonment";

**I'm the first to admit I don't understand all this, but this makes me wonder if Relief Well 02 encountered problems and was plugged**

5-24-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

5-30-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;

6-2-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 002, Rig - TO Development II, Location (Lon: 88.362608), Water Depth 5132;

6-17-10 Revised Application for Permit to Drill a New Well, Well Name 003, Rig - TO Development III, Location (Lon: 88.362664), Water Depth 5159;


Much of the above came from MMS website or here:

Energy Committee documents

[link to energycommerce.house.gov]
[link to energycommerce.house.gov]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News