Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,320 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,298,435
Pageviews Today: 1,827,202Threads Today: 469Posts Today: 9,996
04:08 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!

 
Cyndexia
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 704712
United States
07/29/2010 11:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) announced Wednesday night that he is considering introducing a constitutional amendment that would change existing law to no longer grant citizenship to the children of immigrants born in the United States.

Currently, the 14th Amendment grants citizenship to any child born in the United States.

But with 12 million illegal immigrants living in the U.S., Graham said it may be time to restrict the ability of immigrants to have children who become citizens just because they are born in the country.

Read more: [link to www.politico.com]


14th Amendment, which states that, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” The amendment was ratified in 1868 as one of several reforms aimed at giving Constitutional rights to former slaves.

"Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself"


:2013:
Email:
Cyndexia@Live.com :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 957500
United States
07/29/2010 11:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
I 100% agree with amending that fucked up "right".

bravo.

applause
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 930337
United States
07/29/2010 11:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cyndexia (OP)

User ID: 704712
United States
07/29/2010 11:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
I am sure the amendment was designed for the time.
"Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself"


:2013:
Email:
Cyndexia@Live.com :)
Cyndexia (OP)

User ID: 704712
United States
07/29/2010 11:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
I 100% agree with amending that fucked up "right".

bravo.

applause
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 957500


chuckle
"Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself"


:2013:
Email:
Cyndexia@Live.com :)
Cyndexia (OP)

User ID: 704712
United States
07/30/2010 12:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 930337

"Sometimes the object of the Journey may not be the end, but the Journey itself"


:2013:
Email:
Cyndexia@Live.com :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1039743
United States
07/30/2010 12:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
Might save the border state ERs some lost bucks spent on mooch deadbeat deliveries...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1018917
United States
07/30/2010 02:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: No More Anchore Babies? Finally 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 giving Constitutional Rights to Former Slaves Challenged !!
We shall see, eh?

Graham isn't one of the "good guys." He helped get us into Iraq, and we can see how well THAT has gone for us. He's willing to go after Iran, which means more stresses on our troops. Graham has problems with the right of habeas corpus, and would deny it to those deemed "enemy combatants." That might seem all fluffy and good until Joe Schmoe protests a war, is arrested, and deemed an "enemy combatant."

My point is that Graham is not one of the 'good guys.' It's an election year, and he's hoping to gain some points. I'd be more impressed if the man hadn't announced that he was 'considering' introducing a constitutional amendment but went ahead and did the deed right out of the gate.

News