Zetatalk Exposed

My final analyzes is what came first..the photo or the video


Original picture:
[link to www.livingbeing.com]

Photoshopped picture on Zetatalk:
[link to zetatalk.com]

Question: I took this picture while camping is it what I think it is?

Answer: Note this recent photo underwent extensive examination to determine if it was a PhotoShot job, and it was determined it was not.

^ Dunno what you are babbling about a video ... a dude took a photo, photoshopped a PX/second sun (whatever) into it ... and Nancy fell for it ...

... what is your problem understanding this ?

UMMM: for those who think Photoshopping can only ADD things... it can also be used to REMOVE images from a picture. Why could this not be the case here - with a reverse spin [by the OP's unimpeachable source] on what actually occured - with the "artist" removing PX from a frame to provide the "original image" and thereby "prove" that it doesn't exist? I regularly take pics from online and then "doctor" them to see how skillfully I can delete sections of a picture without it being obvious.

NOT TOO TOUGH TO DO, FOLKS! Methink's the OP's "source" may just be a liar... or, there really IS no Px. Take your pick.

It's all a matter of faith and perception [or lack thereof] anyway.

I'm not into for the most part photos and videos. Actual weather and earth phenomena are my sign tellers


But the question remains. If it was photographed by Paul Smyres then who took the video of it?..

Still, the earth and sky are looking meaner by the day is what I'm interested in...That can't be debunked

UMMM: for those who think Photoshopping can only ADD things... it can also be used to REMOVE images from a picture. Why could this not be the case here - with a reverse spin [by the OP's unimpeachable source] on what actually occured - with the "artist" removing PX from a frame to provide the "original image" and thereby "prove" that it doesn't exist? I regularly take pics from online and then "doctor" them to see how skillfully I can delete sections of a picture without it being obvious.

NOT TOO TOUGH TO DO, FOLKS! Methink's the OP's "source" may just be a liar... or, there really IS no Px. Take your pick.

It's all a matter of faith and perception [or lack thereof] anyway.

My final analyzes is what came first..the photo or the video


Original picture:
[link to www.livingbeing.com]

Photoshopped picture on Zetatalk:
[link to zetatalk.com]

Question: I took this picture while camping is it what I think it is?

Answer: Note this recent photo underwent extensive examination to determine if it was a PhotoShot job, and it was determined it was not.

^ Dunno what you are babbling about a video ... a dude took a photo, photoshopped a PX/second sun (whatever) into it ... and Nancy fell for it ...

... what is your problem understanding this ?


It just shows the dishonesty in the debunker ranks

I'm not even focused on if Nancy got it right or wrong

Still, the earth and sky are looking meaner by the day is what I'm interested in...That can't be debunked

1054784:



I think I know what you mean about each persons truth and I agree with this when it comes to metaphysical stuff ... but: We are talking about a physical object 4 times the size of jupiter which is supposed to be hovering near the sun ...

My final analyzes is what came first..the photo or the video


Original picture:
[link to www.livingbeing.com]

Photoshopped picture on Zetatalk:
[link to zetatalk.com]

Question: I took this picture while camping is it what I think it is?

Answer: Note this recent photo underwent extensive examination to determine if it was a PhotoShot job, and it was determined it was not.

^ Dunno what you are babbling about a video ... a dude took a photo, photoshopped a PX/second sun (whatever) into it ... and Nancy fell for it ...

... what is your problem understanding this ?


It just shows the dishonesty in the debunker ranks

I'm not even focused on if Nancy got it right or wrong

Still, the earth and sky are looking meaner by the day is what I'm interested in...That can't be debunked

Now: don't be bitchy with me or try to put words into my mouth. Trust me on this singular point: I BITE when provoked.

BTW: You are dangerously close to suggesting that if Nancy would conform to YOUR personal concepts it would be a better world. That's a troublesome approach, my friend! And one that may eventually cause you grief.

One more thing: not to put too fine a point of your arguement, but NASA has been proven to have misrepresented it's data many, many times. As an employee of the U.S. federal government I can ASSURE you that there's not a single federal agency in existence that has any concept of transparency and honesty where the public is concerned. TRUST me on this point, as well!

PS: I'd say L. Ron hubbard opened as many minds as he closed. Personally: I feel than anyone/anything that causes people to THINK is a good thing. It's the aftermath that usually causes the greatest problems... when people start to take themselves [or their beliefs] too seriously.

Zetas are not the good guys.

:rightmug:

I'm not into for the most part photos and videos. Actual weather and earth phenomena are my sign tellers


But the question remains. If it was photographed by Paul Smyres then who took the video of it?..


Right... like a distant planet could affect our weather, when there is no evidence for that having been caused in the past by, say, Jupiter or Venus or Saturn.

1054784:
Would it make a significant difference if they did? The professional community -and public forums such as this- would ridicule them for their efforts and merely brand them amatuers [while overlooking the solid fact that many of those so-called amatuers have inadvertantly stumbled upon some pretty amazing things in the past]. No: EVERYTHING is open to scrutiny in our world today. But again: this is not neceassarily a bad thing, now is it? If it was, then opinions like yours and mine would never be shared and the learning processes diminished.

I've really got to get back to what I laughingly call "reality" - so please excuse me for now. I've genuinely enjoyed our exchanges! Here's hoping you find the answers you seek!

My final analyzes is what came first..the photo or the video


Original picture:
[link to www.livingbeing.com]

Photoshopped picture on Zetatalk:
[link to zetatalk.com]

Question: I took this picture while camping is it what I think it is?

Answer: Note this recent photo underwent extensive examination to determine if it was a PhotoShot job, and it was determined it was not.

^ Dunno what you are babbling about a video ... a dude took a photo, photoshopped a PX/second sun (whatever) into it ... and Nancy fell for it ...

... what is your problem understanding this ?


It just shows the dishonesty in the debunker ranks

I'm not even focused on if Nancy got it right or wrong

Still, the earth and sky are looking meaner by the day is what I'm interested in...That can't be debunked

I received this message in my inbox today at Nancy lieders site poleshift.ning.com
Dear friends,
What I am about to tell you is very difficult. A few months ago someone posted a video on here of a camera tied to a balloon that, according to Nancy, the Zeta's said captured planet x. I knew this was a lens flare the second I saw it and expected Nancy and the Zetas to realize the same. Needless to say I was quite shocked when they said it was real.
At that moment, after years of following Nancy and ZT, I felt crushed and disillusioned. I believed everything out of this woman's mouth. Now, I believe nothing she has to say. I'm sure that most of you are probably aware by now that Nancy has been using ZT to badmouth her enemy's. According to Nancy, former moderator of this site, Cheryl Nelson is having a nervous breakdown and is STS in nature. According to her the zetas have also stated that those joining Cheryl's Ning site are STS.
I decided I had to put Nancy and her Zeta's to the test. Thanks to a talented friend of mine, I planted a photo on here this week that supposedly captured px. This photo was confirmed to be the real thing by the Zeta's...at least thats what Nancy said. The photo was not real...it
was photo shopped. This link will take you to the original photo - with NO PX in it!
[link to www.livingbeing.com]

How long has Nancy being lying to us and using ZT to back up those lies? Has she ever been in contact with them? I believe the answer is yes, but they turned their back on her a long time ago. The real question is why? Were they done with her? Had she served them well in their hidden agenda to exterminate the human race under this falsehood of benevolent beings come to save us? Or was it that she had failed them and proven to be a self serving liar and they truly are these wonderful beings? If this is the case, then why didn't they see her for who she is? Did they not read her mind? For that matter, why did they not stop me from exposing their alleged emissary?
I hope that at least some of you will think twice before blindly following another.
This weeks Zetalies: [link to zetatalk.com]
I will post a side by side comparison of the two photos at [link to earthchanges.ning.com]

1054784:



I think I know what you mean about each persons truth and I agree with this when it comes to metaphysical stuff ... but: We are talking about a physical object 4 times the size of jupiter which is supposed to be hovering near the sun ...




No. Nancy's claim is that PX is 4 times the size of Earth.

I'm not into for the most part photos and videos. Actual weather and earth phenomena are my sign tellers


But the question remains. If it was photographed by Paul Smyres then who took the video of it?..


Right... like a distant planet could affect our weather, when there is no evidence for that having been caused in the past by, say, Jupiter or Venus or Saturn.


Well Menow since the last time we talked the Sun now is brighter and whitter than I have ever seen it in my whole life. I don't leave the house without my shades

NASA won't address the phenomena of why it is so damn bright and white. Same as they say extra terrestrials do not exist.

Funny how the Brits say they do with the release of their files..Same with France

Do you believe everything NASA tells you, Menow

I'm not into for the most part photos and videos. Actual weather and earth phenomena are my sign tellers


But the question remains. If it was photographed by Paul Smyres then who took the video of it?..


Right... like a distant planet could affect our weather, when there is no evidence for that having been caused in the past by, say, Jupiter or Venus or Saturn.


Well Menow since the last time we talked the Sun now is brighter and whitter than I have ever seen it in my whole life. I don't leave the house without my shades

NASA won't address the phenomena of why it is so damn bright and white. Same as they say extra terrestrials do not exist.

Funny how the Brits say they do with the release of their files..Same with France

Do you believe everything NASA tells you, Menow


The Sun has not changed as your delusion causes you to
believe.

Soo... how could a distant planet alter our weather?

Menow believes every word NASA says...Just what I thought

The Sun has not changed as your delusion causes you to
believe.

Soo... how could a distant planet alter our weather?


I think I am a little older than you are so I remember what the Sun looked. That is a given

Menow believes every word NASA says...Just what I thought


Freestore tosses out this strawman argument instead of addressing the question I asked... Just what I thought.

Why don't you get just ONE photograpy expert to agree with you that the Sun's light output has changed dramatically? Just ONE! I know why... no such thing has happened, that's why!

The Sun has not changed as your delusion causes you to
believe.

Soo... how could a distant planet alter our weather?


I think I am a little older than you are so I remember what the Sun looked. That is a given


What is a given is that you can not find ONE professional photographer to agree with you. I guess, along with all the astronomers, ALL the photographers are in on the coverup too?

Heh.

Oh.. you STILL haven't said how a distant planet could affect our weather.

Heh, again.

Menow believes every word NASA says...Just what I thought


Freestore tosses out this strawman argument instead of addressing the question I asked... Just what I thought.

Why don't you get just ONE photograpy expert to agree with you that the Sun's light output has changed dramatically? Just ONE! I know why... no such thing has happened, that's why!


Why Menow, I can tell a yellow Sun from a White Sun

And the two snap poles conducted on this topic showed a greater number of GLP'rs agreed to the yes the Sun is Whiter and Brighter than before


So I used the experts here to tell me if I was all alone on this subject or not

The Sun has not changed as your delusion causes you to
believe.

Soo... how could a distant planet alter our weather?


I think I am a little older than you are so I remember what the Sun looked. That is a given


What is a given is that you can not find ONE professional photographer to agree with you. I guess, along with all the astronomers, ALL the photographers are in on the coverup too?

Heh.

Oh.. you STILL haven't said how a distant planet could affect our weather.

Heh, again.



I don't know..you tell me

I think I am a little older than you are so I remember what the Sun looked. That is a given

So Menow thinks GLP'rs aren't expert enough to do a visual check

OK, have it your way

991880: You don't study history much, do you? Check meteorological records. Check global rainfall data. Check Volcanic data. Check oceanic temperature charts. ALL current data is vastly different from the time when such records were first established. There's nothing cyclical about current global patterns.




So, go ahead and post something that you think is happening today that has never happened before. Let's see what you have.

So Menow thinks GLP'rs aren't expert enough to do a visual check

OK, have it your way

So Menow thinks GLP'rs aren't expert enough to do a visual check

OK, have it your way



Here's 562,000 images of a yellow sun.

[link to images.search.yahoo.com]

Need any more?