| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 684
7/15/2005 9:22 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hi Delphine,
While I can appreciate that the C material opened your eyes to some fundamentals truths about reality, I think you must realize that they are not, literally, real...
There are no 6th density enlightened beings riding some kind of wave toward our reality nexus. And they are not in touch with LkJ, BM or Zeta Nancy, since they do not exist...
[Delphine]
Hi Vincent, to clarify, that post you are talking about was something I pasted in for a friend, who was involved in the early group ouija board sessions.
As for the C´s not being real, I guess an argument can be made that nothing is realy real,
that it´s all an illusion--as Fred Alan Wolf says, the universe dreaming itself.
V: From a Buddhist perspective, all is the Void... But within that void are dissipative structures called beings, and some of these are more "real" than others... My point is that we shouldn´t be looking to some kind of literal and real higher beings with kind intent to clue us in on the nature of reality. The Cassiopaeans, at their best, are symbols, myths if you will, that describe part of the process we are all undergoing.
[Vincent]
Extraordinary claims required extraordinary proof, period.
[Delphine]
Is there any way we could ever prove the C´s are "real"?
V: Indeed yes... If they were actually, literally, what they claimed to be then there would be several ways to test the hypothesis. Truly advanced knowledge for instance, or true foreknowledge, or knowledge beyond LKJ and Fred´s ability to perceive. In the material that LKJ gave me, way back at the beginning, was a session that clearly had information that LKJ and Fred could not have known. OK, I thought, this is something interesting... Imagine my surprise, when I examined the unedited transcripts, that the miraculous information did NOT appear in the original. LKJ had blatantly added information that she received by normal sources, ie she looked it up, to an original session.
As I said, all of these phenomenon appear to be the debris thrown back in time by the approaching Singularity. LKJ, and plenty of others who are not channelers, have used the Wave metaphor to describe the approaching cultural implosion.
Here´s a portion of an article I am working on at the moment, concerning the actual "Wave" that is influencing every aspect of our lives at the moment:
Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard were depression era graduates of Stanford University when they pooled their resources in 1938 to build “audio oscillators” out of their garage in the valley. Their first customer was Walt Disney, who bought eight oscillators for his new movie Fantasia. Twenty years later, the area was full of new tech companies. In 1959, just as Kesey was discovering LSD up at Stanford, Robert Noyce, one of the founders of Fairchild Semiconductors, discovered a way to mass produce thousands of transistors on a single piece of silicon, inventing, along with Jack Kilby, the computer chip as we know it.
Six years later, Noyce’s co-worker, director of Fairchild’s Research and Development Laboratories Gordon E. Moore, made an even more fascinating discovery. Since the first prototype microchip, complexity, the amount of transistor power on a single slice of quartz, had been doubling roughly every year. And, Moore predicted in the April 1965 35th anniversary edition of Electronics magazine, this doubling would continue at the same rate for at least the next ten years.
At the end of that decade, Moore revised his prediction to a doubling every two years. Even this however was conservative. Moore’s prediction, and by 1975 it was “Moore’s Law,” became the core faith of the entire global computer industry and the complexity doubling had settled at around 18 months. This growth curve has continued right to the present day, 2005, with the 28th doubling, an increase of over 1,000 billion times the processing power of that prototype chip in just 45 years.
Such radical change is unprecedented in human history. Exponential change, the series of doublings, creates a curve that quite quickly goes straight up. The industrial revolution of the 19th century presented a few examples of such exponential growth; the railroads between 1830 and 1840 doubled their track mileage at almost the same rate as the microchip. This Curve drove the radical changes of the 1880s in America, when a farm boy from Ohio, such as Gordon Moore’s grandfather, could catch a train to a new life out in the vastness of the west for 25 cents. Millions rode this wave of technology and America was transformed as record numbers of immigrants signed on to settle the frontier. The trip to California went from four months, on the fastest Clipper ship, to six days and San Francisco went from a gold rush boomtown to a sophisticated city with pretensions of culture.
It was the greatest such Curve in human history to that point, but it leveled out after roughly 14 doublings in 85 years. That Curve was limited by material constraints, land, steel, coal and so on, but the electronic Curve of Moore’s Law doesn’t recognize such constraints. Basically, the only limits are imagination and quantum mechanics. This lack of material limits means that the cost of this technological miracle shrinks as well. The cost of shipping a ton of wheat on the transcontinental railroad was halved at most three times during the era of the railroads’ greatest expansion. By contrast, the price of computing power, transistors on a chip, has halved 30 times. I just bought a memory chip for my PSP that has eight times the computing power of NASA’s Apollo program for under a hundred dollars, and for $5 wholesale you can buy a “smart card” that has the computing power of a 386 PC, circa 1990. Soon, very soon, computers will be so common, and cost so little, that microchips with power that seemed miraculous in 1965 will in fact be as disposable as pocket lint.
Everyone older than 45 or so has lived through the entire shockwave of the Curve. Unlike our parents and grandparents, who had as much as a generation to absorb the shock of the 19th and early 20th century’s technological Curves, this microchip driven Curve shows no sign of slowing down long enough to allow anyone to adjust and become comfortable. Fortunately, the early incremental changes were small enough at each jump that only recently have the shockwaves been sharp enough to shake the nature of our culture, and perhaps very soon, to shape the nature of what it means to be human.
As with the changes, which were global in scale, produced by the rapid technological growth stimulated by the railroads, the exponential and unstopping Curve of information technology is also driving changes in everything from biology to robotics to human interactions. And these curves of accelerating change are now proliferating exponentially. Innovation is happening so fast, literally, that people are incapable of defining what they are inventing. All of these Curves are now a Wave, and they add up to a world that is profoundly different from the past, even the recent past.
With each doubling of Moore’s Law, every 18 months or so, we are coming closer to a shock wave event horizon where, perhaps very suddenly, our everyday reality stops making sense. The idea that the exponential growth of the Curve would result in huge and unpredictable social changes was first floated in 1993 at a NASA colloquium by science fiction author Vernor Vinge. He borrowed from astrophysics the idea of a Singularity to describe the event and in many ways it is a very apt description. Vinge argued “…that we are on the edge of change comparable to the rise of human life on Earth.” Meaning of course the possibility of greater-than-human intelligence, a Dr. Strange level transcendence event.
According to Vinge, it could happen on several levels at once. The Curve could create a supercomputer, intentionally or not, that has super-human intelligence. Or the Internet could interconnect so thoroughly as to wake up as a kind of global brain. Or, cyborg technology could wire a human into these expanding cyber-awarenesses and thereby create the greater-than-human consciousness. Or, perhaps, genetic research will produce humans with truly enhanced intelligence and abilities. Any of these are not only possible but also likely in the next few decades. Vinge believes that if the Singularity is possible, and everything suggests it is, then its advent is truly unstoppable.
At the present, all serious discussions on the impact of the Curve start with Vinge’s ideas on the Singularity. The major point of discussion has become what affect the critical uncertainties - such as: Is the Curve smooth; Is it driven by natural or mathematical forces; Will software keep up with hardware; if the Curve is predetermined will it result in infinite change? – will have on the immediate future. The game now is looking for “early warning” signs of the approaching Cultural Singularity.
Because, if the Singularity can happen, it will happen, then early nodal points of human electronic interaction and expanded awareness demonstrate that it is happening. These are points where the future seems to be bootstrapping itself. Joel Garreau, in his book Radical Evolution, points to the 2003 Shadow Bowl operation by a group of geeks from San Diego State as a sign post. The group, called The River, wired the entire Super Bowl for human cognition. This is indeed a marker, an early warning sign that, at least on a technological level, the Singularity is rapidly approaching.
(From Dr. Strange and the Psychedelic Origins of the Future
(C) Vincent Bridges 2005)
VB |
| Delphine
User ID: 7373
7/15/2005 12:51 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Proof, what a concept...Bashar addresses that here. - Delphine
B: Define evidence.
Q: Well, more information that logically leads to the conclusion that this is true.
B: Yes, I know. However, our definition of evidence is a self-
reinforcing reflection based on what you most likely believe to be true already. In other words, have you not, in any way, shape or form, at any time in your life, heard about the idea that one individual may say "But there is so much evidence for this," and yet another individual will say there is absolutely none.
Q: Yes
B: Well doesn´t that tell you something? It tells you that there really is no empirical evidence. It tells you that evidence shows up to reinforce a belief that´s already there; in the likelihood of that thing having evidence to back it up. But you create, in a sense, the attraction of your attention to the evidence. There is evidence for everything being true and there is evidence for nothing being true. The degree to which you perceive evidence for any one particular facet of everything has to do with your orientation and that´s all it has to do with. Does that make sense?
Q: Yes.
B: So the evidence you see gives you an opportunity to understand what belief systems are within you. Perhaps that means what fears are being reinforced, by you, to show you, you have certain orientations and to decide whether or not to change them. Again, evidence to some degree, now understand, what you mean by certain kinds of evidence, and I will not debate, necessarily, the pragmatism of that on a certain level, that is how your reality works on a certain level, by the idea of evidentiary information.. I understand that. We are talking about a very high level here, because we are talking about the fundamental creation of your reality and that level is different. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 684
7/15/2005 2:11 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Proof, what a concept...Bashar addresses that here. - Delphine
V: Uh, is this Bashar one of those disincarnate higher beings? If he is, then this kind of sophistry is very suspicious to me. I would think that some one like that would understand the difference between an event, subject to verification, and an nterpretation, which is open to personal perspective. If he does, and is just fooling with our heads, then he ain´t so advanced...
B: Define evidence.
Q: Well, more information that logically leads to the conclusion that this is true.
B: Yes, I know. However, our definition of evidence is a self-
reinforcing reflection based on what you most likely believe to be true already. In other words, have you not, in any way, shape or form, at any time in your life, heard about the idea that one individual may say "But there is so much evidence for this," and yet another individual will say there is absolutely none.
Q: Yes
V: My car speeds around a corner and hits yours. We may have two different interpretations of that event, but just because you think it was my fault, or the other way ´round, that doesn´t mean it didn´t happen.
B: Well doesn´t that tell you something? It tells you that there really is no empirical evidence. It tells you that evidence shows up to reinforce a belief that´s already there; in the likelihood of that thing having evidence to back it up. But you create, in a sense, the attraction of your attention to the evidence. There is evidence for everything being true and there is evidence for nothing being true. The degree to which you perceive evidence for any one particular facet of everything has to do with your orientation and that´s all it has to do with. Does that make sense?
Q: Yes.
V: No, makes no "sense," in the meaning of rational interpretaion, at all... Pur sophistry...
B: So the evidence you see gives you an opportunity to understand what belief systems are within you. Perhaps that means what fears are being reinforced, by you, to show you, you have certain orientations and to decide whether or not to change them. Again, evidence to some degree, now understand, what you mean by certain kinds of evidence, and I will not debate, necessarily, the pragmatism of that on a certain level, that is how your reality works on a certain level, by the idea of evidentiary information.. I understand that. We are talking about a very high level here, because we are talking about the fundamental creation of your reality and that level is different.
V: Now this is the kicker... Any higher being who condescends to me that way is definitely out of here... "I´m on a higher plan and don´t need to prove it..." sounds like a con to me.. Look, I´ve never met a higher being that had any problem at all proving the point. It´s only the lower order astral critters that indulge in such BS to avoid the request.
VB |
| Delphine
User ID: 7373
7/15/2005 2:58 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
V: From a Buddhist perspective, all is the Void... But within that void are dissipative structures called beings, and some of these are more "real" than others... My point is that we shouldn´t be looking to some kind of literal and real higher beings with kind intent to clue us in on the nature of reality.
J: Oh, I think we should, indeed, look to kindly higher beings. Eventually we will be led back to our own, inner kindly higher being. In the meantime, it appears to us in projected form, in different guises--along with the projections of our own, inner, unkind demon. It comes down to, which will you choose to focus on more?
V: The Cassiopaeans, at their best, are symbols, myths if you will, that describe part of the process we are all undergoing.
D: And as Seth said, myth has its own reality, which is more real than fact:
"Myth is not a distortion of fact, but the womb through which fact must come. Myth involves an intrinsic understanding of the nature of reality, couched in imaginative terms, carrying a power as strong as nature itself. Myth-making is a natural psychic characteristic, a psychic element that combines with other such elements to form a mythical representation of inner reality."
--Seth, The Individual And The Nature of Mass Events
[Vincent]
Extraordinary claims required extraordinary proof, period.
[Delphine]
Is there any way we could ever prove the C´s are "real"?
V: Indeed yes... If they were actually, literally, what they claimed to be then there would be several ways to test the hypothesis. Truly advanced knowledge for instance, or true foreknowledge, or knowledge beyond LKJ and Fred´s ability to perceive. In the material that LKJ gave me, way back at the beginning, was a session that clearly had information that LKJ and Fred could not have known. OK, I thought, this is something interesting... Imagine my surprise, when I examined the unedited transcripts, that the miraculous information did NOT appear in the original. LKJ had blatantly added information that she received by normal sources, ie she looked it up, to an original session.
D: And this, to you, says that ALL of the C´s material is thus necessarily BS?
Perhaps we are being challenged to trust our intuition more--in this case, not to throw the C´s out because
of some bad news about certain things. It ultimately all comes down to whether it resonates; in a way, it doesn´t matter that they´ve been tampered with or whatever. Ultimately, this myth is OUR creation, in all its varied aspects.
Ii am not an ardent C´s fan, and rarely visit their site these days, but I´ve been struck by some of both Laura and the C´s stuff, just lately. There ARE some gems in that material. I´m far more interested in those than in what does NOT resonate with me (and there´s plenty).
V: As I said, all of these phenomenon appear to be the debris thrown back in time by the approaching Singularity.
D: That´s an interesting phrase, could you elaborate on the meaning of "debris thrown back in time"? How is this a part of the Singularity you speak of?
V: LKJ, and plenty of others who are not channelers, have used the Wave metaphor to describe the approaching cultural implosion.
D: I believe most of them are describing something very different than a purely technological Singularity.
V: Here´s a portion of an article I am working on at the moment, concerning the actual "Wave" that is influencing every aspect of our lives at the moment:
Thanks Vincent, excellent article. Snipping and responding:
<snip>
With each doubling of Moore’s Law, every 18 months or so, we are coming closer to a shock wave event horizon where, perhaps very suddenly, our everyday reality stops making sense. The idea that the exponential growth of the Curve would result in huge and unpredictable social changes was first floated in 1993 at a NASA colloquium by science fiction author Vernor Vinge. He borrowed from astrophysics the idea of a Singularity to describe the event and in many ways it is a very apt description. Vinge argued “…that we are on the edge of change comparable to the rise of human life on Earth.” Meaning of course the possibility of greater-than-human intelligence, a Dr. Strange level transcendence event.
According to Vinge, it could happen on several levels at once. The Curve could create a supercomputer, intentionally or not, that has super-human intelligence. Or the Internet could interconnect so thoroughly as to wake up as a kind of global brain. Or, [...]
D: As far as "connecting with a greater-than-human intelligence", a "transcendence event", and "connecting as a global brain"--the technological rises are not THE means for this happening. They are just reflections of what is transpiring within us. It´s what has so often been called the "second coming of Christ." This is not about an external messiah, but about linking up with that transcendent intelligence and Oneness that resides within each of us.
Does your concept incorporate this idea?
Delphine |
| Not Stupid
User ID: 8218
7/15/2005 3:20 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Maybe a discussion of the C´s themselves could be on a separate thread. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7373
7/15/2005 3:25 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Some snips and responses - D
V: Uh, is this Bashar one of those disincarnate higher beings? If he is, then this kind of sophistry is very suspicious to me. I would think that some one like that would understand the difference between an event, subject to verification, and an interpretation, which is open to personal perspective. If he does, and is just fooling with our heads, then he ain´t so advanced...
Hi Vincent, I think he clarifies that here:
B: So the evidence you see gives you an opportunity to understand what belief systems are within you. Perhaps that means what fears are being reinforced, by you, to show you, you have certain orientations and to decide whether or not to change them. Again, evidence to some degree, now understand, what you mean by certain kinds of evidence, and I will not debate, necessarily, the pragmatism of that on a certain level, that is how your reality works on a certain level, by the idea of evidentiary information.. I understand that. We are talking about a very high level here, because we are talking about the fundamental creation of your reality and that level is different.
D: IOW, Bashar is saying that he does understand the necessity of the concept of evidentiary information, at the 3D level. He´s talking about taking this to another level, to where the events are created in the first place. He´s talking about living from Cause rather than Effect.
V: Now this is the kicker... Any higher being who condescends to me that way is definitely out of here... "I´m on a higher plan and don´t need to prove it..." sounds like a con to me.. Look, I´ve never met a higher being that had any problem at all proving the point. It´s only the lower order astral critters that indulge in such BS to avoid the request.
D: On the contrary, Bashar took a lot of time to answer all the questions and doubts of the querent, and frequently checked to be sure they were making sense to him. |
| Delphine
User ID: 7373
7/15/2005 3:27 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
That wuz me in the last post, forgot to
type in my username  |
| Not Stupid
User ID: 8218
7/15/2005 3:49 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11349
7/15/2005 4:23 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
what not stupid said
put basher on another thread too |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 4:43 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Delphine
Yes u have a lovely name indeed!
I note that you brushed off what I said about Ark´s UBER-STO robot-repetition-attack technique - making it obvious to all, tsk tsk, silly me!!! - that EVERYBODY knows that Ark uses THIS technique!!!
Why - ???
<<Interesting that you know intimately Dr Ark´s party piece - I am minded of kids that knew Dr Mengele, and never forgot.
I expect you saw or suffered this technique yourself?
Do tell.>>
There is nothing to tell. There is an example of this "technique" on the Cassiopaea website.
Because Delphine says it is readily readable to the rubes and newbies on the Cassiopaea site!
Everybody should know this, stupid!!!
I beg to disagree - I think Delphine is telling porky pies (LIES)...
Delphine seems intent on IGNORING the information I have provided.
I want to ask Delphine NOT to blow me off again about Ark´s culpability - I want to know what an allegedly clued up individual such as Delphine makes of the house scam - I want to know how Delphine can equate anything that went on with Laura stands up when it is quite apparent a HUGE SCAM and CULT JOB has taken place.
I am not holding my breath.
Prediction ---> Delphine will come back with crapola - guaranteed.
 |
| Not Stupid
User ID: 8218
7/15/2005 5:21 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Here’s something I don’t understand.
Mojo (and maybe a few of the other C group members) mentioned earlier in this thread that we should all go look at the entire correspondence between Laura and Vincent, that it would prove that Vincent contacted her first in order to steal all her knowledge and use it in “Monument”. So I followed the link and looked. Huh?
The first letter is from Vincent to Laura. However, it’s very obviously an answer to a letter from her to him. Where’s the letter that started the correspondence? Apparently it, in fact, is NOT the entire correspondence, and either she contacted HIM first or there is more correspondence missing. Furthermore, if this is supposed to prove that Vincent stole from Laura, it’s doesn’t. It shows Laura’s almost complete ignorance of the entire subject of Vincent and Jay’s book (including pointing out that she had never read Fulcanelli, because she hadn’t been able to get the book); moreover, it shows her gathering information from him. And being rather flirtatious while doing so (Vincent, I do believe Laura had a crush on you!). This whole accusation of plagiarism really surprised me when I saw it – that’s a new one from when I was in the C group. They apparently thought that one up after I left.
But, for the life of me, I don’t understand why they would even post this correspondence to their website and expect that it would prove to be anything other than a deep embarrassment. Yet they must really believe it proves something or they wouldn’t post it.
Weird. |
| Delphine
User ID: 4240
7/15/2005 5:25 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Delphine
Yes u have a lovely name indeed!
I note that you brushed off what I said about Ark´s UBER-STO robot-repetition-attack technique - making it obvious to all, tsk tsk, silly me!!! - that EVERYBODY knows that Ark uses THIS technique!!!
Why - ???
D: Hi Anders, I like your name, too.
Please don´t jump to conclusions just because I didn´t respond to some of your points. In fact, I agree with you that Ark´s repetitions are
super, or Uber, annoying.
I had my own run-in with Ark at Casschat, he jumped on me and a friend almost immediately when we dared to voice a dissenting opinion.
And, later, Laura even wrote a long article calling me and my friend Cointelpro.
<<Interesting that you know intimately Dr Ark´s party piece - I am minded of kids that knew Dr Mengele, and never forgot.
I expect you saw or suffered this technique yourself?
Do tell.>>
There is nothing to tell. There is an example of this "technique" on the Cassiopaea website.
Because Delphine says it is readily readable to the rubes and newbies on the Cassiopaea site!
D: I never said what you are responding to here. Do you have me mixed up with another person? Is another person posting as me and I haven´t noticed? Geez...
<skip>
I want to ask Delphine NOT to blow me off again about Ark´s culpability - I want to know what an allegedly clued up individual such as Delphine makes of the house scam - I want to know how Delphine can equate anything that went on with Laura stands up when it is quite apparent a HUGE SCAM and CULT JOB has taken place.
I am not holding my breath.
Prediction ---> Delphine will come back with crapola - guaranteed.
D: You can call it crapola if you wish, but I think this is just a misunderstanding. I never said that I condoned the house scam or any of that kind of thing.
But, if we are waiting for them to apologize or take any responsibility for this, we´ll be waiting a loooooong time. I´m not waiting around, myself.
Hope this clears things up a bit.
Delphine |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 5:39 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Delphine
Yes u have a lovely name indeed!
I note that you brushed off what I said about Ark´s UBER-STO robot-repetition-attack technique - making it obvious to all, tsk tsk, silly me!!! - that EVERYBODY knows that Ark uses THIS technique!!!
Why - ???
D: Hi Anders, I like your name, too.
Please don´t jump to conclusions just because I didn´t respond to some of your points. In fact, I agree with you that Ark´s repetitions are
super, or Uber, annoying.
I had my own run-in with Ark at Casschat, he jumped on me and a friend almost immediately
Delphine are u Chandra and Dusty? They have bothe gone AWOL lately
also the original lucid Chandra seemed to morph into a rather hateful person a few pages back - OK maybe hateful is too strong a word, but definitely IMHO the latest Chandra posts do not equate to my mind with the original Chandra psts
different wod counts, sentence and paragraph sgadows and etc etc
whatever
when we dared to voice a dissenting opinion.
And, later, Laura even wrote a long article calling me and my friend Cointelpro.
<<Interesting that you know intimately Dr Ark´s party piece - I am minded of kids that knew Dr Mengele, and never forgot.
I expect you saw or suffered this technique yourself?
Do tell.>>
There is nothing to tell. There is an example of this "technique" on the Cassiopaea website.
Because Delphine says it is readily readable to the rubes and newbies on the Cassiopaea site!
D: I never said what you are responding to here. Do you have me mixed up with another person? Is another person posting as me and I haven´t noticed? Geez...
maybe must be my mistake, no matter, we have clarified the remark was not yours...
it is tough here at GLP sometimes with GLP rools...
<skip>
I want to ask Delphine NOT to blow me off again about Ark´s culpability - I want to know what an allegedly clued up individual such as Delphine makes of the house scam - I want to know how Delphine can equate anything that went on with Laura stands up when it is quite apparent a HUGE SCAM and CULT JOB has taken place.
I am not holding my breath.
Prediction ---> Delphine will come back with crapola - guaranteed.
D: You can call it crapola if you wish, but I think this is just a misunderstanding. I never said that I condoned the house scam or any of that kind of thing.
Then please give us all your foresnsic take on this - I used to correspond with a lovely gal on the C list, she was a Prof at an East Coast Uni, and she was Bashar mad ----> I think maybe Bashar stuff maybe is anothet 500 threads on its own
Interesting tho...
But, if we are waiting for them to apologize or take any responsibility for this, we´ll be waiting a loooooong time. I´m not waiting around, myself.
Hope this clears things up a bit.
Not really Delphine.
You were hijacking the thread big time and taking it off onto/into channelling avenues.
That is fair enough - however, we need now to focus and get to the heart of this issue.
It is not a good use of this thread to fulminate on channelling per se.
But hey!!! This is GLP - do what u like.
I have another question for u while I have your attention - is there any chance your friend could contribute here, in the 1st person? |
| anders
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 6:12 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
timespresident@sptimes.com
Subject FYI your editors are ignoring this major story - I am in London UK - not one has had the courtesy to even reply to me! Show full header
Tom French wrote the excellent article, The Excorcist in Love, still
available online at St Pete Times online.
ONE of you journalists needs to pick up the ball here and do a follow
up!
Looks like Laura and Ark Knight-Jadczyk have done a runner to France and
stolen circa a
quarter of a million dollars in a house raffle scam (6322 Montana Av
sold illegally to the Swanson family in August 2003...)
Check out the pasco county house appraisal links below - all the proof
is there for you guys.
I emailed Tom about this 18 months ago and got no reply - folks have
been ripped off big time in New Port Richey FL and all around the world
and it is your duty to follow this one
up.
GLP thread here explains all, with all latest Laura and Ark addresses in
France and the trail of libel suits and bounced cheques they are
offloading in France - one for $61,000 allegedly.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
I have a copy of a legal document in front of me, prepared by sharon
pittman and david carter, attorneys at law, 7419 US highway 19, new port
richey FL 34652-1240
YOU CAN SEE IT FOR YOURSELF HERE
[link to appraiser.pascogov.com]
AND HERE
[link to appraiser.pascogov.com]
it is the sale document, the plot no-09-26-16-0030-11700-0070
it describes the sale by Laura and Ark of the house that was supposed to
have been give away in a raffle 5 days after the raffle draw date of
16th january 2003
the document lists Laura´s address in France, and Laura and Ark signed
the sale deed via a French Notary - with a French Notary´s official
stamp
an August 22nd 2003 sale (7 months, 28 weeks LATE - 28 weeks AFTER the
house title deed should have been signed over for ZERO DOLLARS!) of an
alleged $200,000 property (LMAO), as per Laura´s sc, er, raffle blurb
see here
[link to web.archive.org]
to generate a heady and greedy $300k
(Anders - and to my interpretation of the relevant NON-PROFIT AND
CHARITY laws, totally illegal...)
which went for a measly, MEASLY $95,100!!!!!
LMAO! If it wasn´t such a rip-off!
that is $105,000 LESS than Laura said to all the raffle ticket buyers!
´One lucky ticket holder will win the approximately 3,000 sq. ft,
6-bedroom, 2-bath, 2 living room, double lot (100X 150 feet) home
located in the quiet, picturesque, small town of New Port Richey,
Florida. The home´s market value is $200,000. You may obtain more than
one ticket, however, a limit of 6,000 are available.´
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY - IT WAS ***SOLD*** BY LAURA AND ARK TO THE SWANSON
FAMILY!!!
YES, YOU HEARD IT - SOLD FOR $95,100
$104,900 BELOW LAURA´S FICTIONAL MARKET PRICE!
WHEN ACCORDING TO LAURA AND ARK THEY HAVE SAID FOR YEARS THAT THEY
***GAVE*** THE PROPERTY AWAY IN A HOUSE SC, ER, RAFFLE!!!
SO WHERE IS THE WINNER LAURA AND ARK???
IS IT THE SWANSONS???
DO ´WINNERS´ OF RAFFLES NORMALLY PAY $95,100 FOR THEIR PRIZE???
IF I ENTER A RAFFLE TO WIN A PORSCHE 911, I DO NOT EXPECT TO BE GIVEN A
PORSCHE BOXSTER AT HALF THE VALUE!
AND I DO NOT EXPECT TO SEE THE ORGANISERS OF SAID RAFFLE TO NOT GIVE THE
PORSCHE 911 AWAY, FREE, TO A RANDOMLY CHOSEN WINNER PER THE TERMS OF THE
RAFFLE, THEN TO FIND OUT YEARS LATER THAT THE ORGANISERS SECRETLY SOLD
THE PRIZE 911 (REALLY A LOUSY BOXSTER) YEARS BEFORE, SOME 28 WEEKS AFTER
THE LEGAL DRAW DATE!!!
WHAT AN ALMIGHTY RIP-OFF!!!!!!! THEY SELL THE HOUSE AND POCKET ALL THE
RAFFLE MONEY TOO???
EVEN IF THE HOUSE SC, ER, RAFFLE WAS LEGIT - YOU HAVE FALSELY ADVERTISED
A $200K HOME TO BE WON, AT $50 A TICKET, WHEN IN FACT THE DUMP IS WORTH
LESS THAN HALF THAT - BY RIGHTS ALL TICKET HOLDERS, AND THERE ARE
SEVERAL THOUSAND OF THEM BY ALL ACCOUNTS, SHOULD HAVE SOMETHING IN THE
ORDER OF $27 PER TICKET RETURNED TO THEM! |
| Delphine
User ID: 4240
7/15/2005 6:47 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
D: Hi Anders, I like your name, too.
luv
Please don´t jump to conclusions just because I didn´t respond to some of your points. In fact, I agree with you that Ark´s repetitions are
super, or Uber, annoying.
luv
Hi Anders, glad we´ve kissed and made up 
I had my own run-in with Ark at Casschat, he jumped on me and a friend almost immediately
Delphine are u Chandra and Dusty? They have bothe gone AWOL lately
Nope, Andy, I´m not. If you look back over this thread, I was posting not long after this discussion began, while they were still active here.
A: also the original lucid Chandra seemed to morph into a rather hateful person a few pages back - OK maybe hateful is too strong a word, but definitely IMHO the latest Chandra posts do not equate to my mind with the original Chandra psts
different wod counts, sentence and paragraph sgadows and etc etc
whatever
D: I noticed the changeover, too--puzzling.
But again, I´m me, and she´s she, and we´re all One, and--nevermind! 
<skip>
D: I never said what you are responding to here. Do you have me mixed up with another person? Is another person posting as me and I haven´t noticed? Geez...
oops maybe must be my mistake, no matter, we have clarified the remark was not yours...
it is tough here at GLP sometimes with GLP rools...
D: right, and there´s the limits of cyber-communication in general, can´t hear tone of voice, see facial expression etc.
<skip>
I want to ask Delphine NOT to blow me off again about Ark´s culpability - I want to know what an allegedly clued up individual such as Delphine makes of the house scam - I want to know how Delphine can equate anything that went on with Laura stands up when it is quite apparent a HUGE SCAM and CULT JOB has taken place.
I am not holding my breath.
Prediction ---> Delphine will come back with crapola - guaranteed.
D: You can call it crapola if you wish, but I think this is just a misunderstanding. I never said that I condoned the house scam or any of that kind of thing.
Then please give us all your foresnsic take on this - I used to correspond with a lovely gal on the C list, she was a Prof at an East Coast Uni, and she was Bashar mad ----> I think maybe Bashar stuff maybe is anothet 500 threads on its own
Interesting tho...
D: I don´t plan to quote extensively from Bashar or any other channelings, I pick and choose from various sources whatever resonates with me.
And I´ve said all I and willing to say or can say at this point, about the house scam etc., if that´s what you meant by "forensic take."
But, if we are waiting for them to apologize or take any responsibility for this, we´ll be waiting a loooooong time. I´m not waiting around, myself.
Hope this clears things up a bit.
Not really Delphine.
You were hijacking the thread big time and taking it off onto/into channelling avenues.
That is fair enough - however, we need now to focus and get to the heart of this issue.
D: I had already thought to myself that it was time for me to shut up and let others take this thread where they will. Been fun tho...
A: It is not a good use of this thread to fulminate on channelling per se.
But hey!!! This is GLP - do what u like.
D: I might pipe up here and there 
A: I have another question for u while I have your attention - is there any chance your friend could contribute here, in the 1st person?
D: She´s reading this, and I´ll let her decide. I know she wants to keep her identity private--as do I, for that matter.
Delphine |
| Delphine
User ID: 4240
7/15/2005 7:06 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I said I might speak up here and there, but
I´ve reconsidered--just in case my identity might
be hijacked by someone, to say stuff I never
meant or intended, as may possibly have happened
with Chandra. So if you see the username Delphine
here again, you will know it´s a pretender.
Goombye!
Delphine  |
| The Lost Cruisade
User ID: 13637
7/15/2005 7:23 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Ok, sorry for not having able to write myself all the answers of this thread, but as you all know by now, I work for the DOD of the MI5, speciality C.I.A. cryingwolfer, section gray´n´watching with the afghan drugs sub-guroup ...
Nonetheless I have been monitoring the discussion under several identities and specially this one: (Bumping Bumping Myself).
I also apologize to have entertained you all along the first ten pages before revealing the real subject of OP in p. 11...
Abstract:
p. 11
"1) What is the French anti-cult law?
2) Who is targeted by this law?
3) When was the law passed?
4) Where can I find the original anti-cult law in English?
5) Is the law a threat to religious freedom?
666), er, 6) Is the anti-cult law supported by mainstream religions in France?
7) Who else is opposing the anti-cult law?
8) Are there historical precedents?
9) Where can I find documents and web pages related to the anti-cult law?"
See above for the solution, but because my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, I´ll give you a clue: for instance Church of Scientology is not concerned by this, butt, shhht...
Indeed since 1993 it´s a real true religion in this beautiful land of liberty where a fresh elected president swears on the bible and where money is marked with this flamelian incantation: "in gold we trust". But not yet in France nor in Germany.
Not yet convinced that it is a verrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyy bad law? So here is the PROOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF!!!!! (gimmick of mine LOL ROFL ROAFLM LAOLILAMFLOA????? please laugh here!!!!!)
1a) Meeting with the french Interior Minister of the cults:
[link to www.rickross.com]
1b) French Interior Ministry got its antivirus from a well-known software society:
[link to www.skeptictank.org]
2a) Receiving the “medaille de citoyen d’honneur” from Marseille mayor:
[link to www.rivieratimes.com]
2b) True miracle with the disappearence of judicial documents in Marseille:
[link to www.raids.org]
Are you beginning to get the picture? So can you tell me why, let´s say Scientology (((but don´t forget that it´s just an example here, Ok))), is still considered as a cult in France and toMMy is still banned in Germany??? Why such an injustice??? Whhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyy????? That´s a really Große deception!!!
Soooooooooooo, as you subtly guessed, all these fine GL PO threats have nothing to do with the dangerous shape-shifters aka The Barbapapaieans, their bubble-house and their cunning messages: "Hello Yes No Open Close Vague Surf Mirth Bingo Good knight"...
[link to www.barbapapa.fr]
Therefore, p. 10:
"If you really want the Barbapapaieans back in the States and in jail by Christmas, write to the local magistrate."
And please do it yourself, even from Uantanamo-States-Asylum, because my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, and We can assure you that it´s hard to fool french and german guys about so-called religions or real crooks.
But if you are fully motivated, I´ll give you this letter as a model to send to the president of the french republic aus FrankReich:
[Here in the upper left corner, put your moniker and your avatar]
[Below your GL PO ID but only if you accept to be tracked by UPS or NSA]
[And sorry, but don´t use smilies, you could be misunderstood, create a diplodomaticus incident or unwillingly engage a nuclear WoWIII — pronounced dubya of dubai or War of the Words Free]
"Dear Myster President ChIraq,
Versailles Castello
P.O. Box mayor of Ca c´est Paris
First of all, I want to thank you very much for authorizing your successor and his future prime minister to meet our ambassador, spiritual son of Ronny C.I.A. Cloowney & the Junior Woodchucks. Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!
BTW, I warn you that there is a massive collateral risk for your fro, er, young people because of the enormous kabbala of alchem, er, terrorysts plotting in the SouthWest of your landscape, known as the Barbapapaieans, whose agenda is to destroy all your wine industry and change all your gold into... say cheese?... You already sold your stocks?
[link to www.forbes.com]
Excellen, er, sad... But never mind...
You can´t even imagine how powerful they are (much muuuuuuuuuuuucccccccch more than the fantastic four maybe the fab four themselves): for instance they succeed to enrol me, (and as you can imagine using you own brain or a think-tank, Myself and all My avatars We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things), yeah really man, they enrolled me despite the fact that I´ve bean a former Sick/Mo(r(W))on/PacMan/Choko/Rehal loyalist!!!!
They can at will summon a big UFO to hoover over your palazzio for six days and three quarters of 24 hours long or command a shift flip-flop-like in your picnic so your Lewis XIV carpet will appear in Philadel, er, Antartica and you´ll be romelecularezid as a Roswe, er, Corona shaken polar beer...
All I can add is this: take a look at their website: HERE ARE PICTS OF WHAT YOUR ENEMEY IS DOING (WARNING VERY GRAPHIC):
The Barbahouse:
[link to www.bookofjoe.com]
The Barbarireiqi Playing Cards:
[link to www.barbapapa.fr]
Hmmm... Now don´t you feel fear? Aren´t you afraid... a little bit frightened... or much better... terrorized? Non abbiate paura? Haben-Sie keine Angst?
So I won´t repeat it twice Myster President, please be very panicked facing these AliTheChemysts and right now, otherwise the situation could soon come out of control like in say armageddon or... deep impact in your respectfully fac, er, discheneyland, with my best regards of (Big Brother Merchandiser), ok, enough with the Barbapapaieans, that´s what you all do have to shut up about toMMy and the Scientologists (((but don´t forget that it´s just an example here, Ok)))?"
Remember to sign with a menaci, er, cryptic "." or "...".
Ok, now, sorry but I´ve to finish to bring home all the orange/blue T-shirts and plastic industrial banners rented to the ukrainian revolutionnaries and to send all these advertisements-gadgets to the so-called but hopefully same-colored opponents in Israel...
I can assure you that my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, but I´ve still so many threads to cry wolf in, using all my Double You, avatars, monikers and so on...
For sure my report to my puppete, er, C.I.A. chiefs will never be ready in time and once again I will be late to my daily session of aikido-dance...
Exhausted... usual smilies |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 7:24 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Bloody hell Delphine you really DID duck my question!!!
and gere is what ´Delphine´ said!
Prediction ---> Delphine will come back with crapola - guaranteed.
D: You can call it crapola if you wish, but I think this is just a misunderstanding. I never said that I condoned the house scam or any of that kind of thing.
Then please give us all your foresnsic take on this - I used to correspond with a lovely gal on the C list, she was a Prof at an East Coast Uni, and she was Bashar mad ----> I think maybe Bashar stuff maybe is anothet 500 threads on its own
Interesting tho...
D: I don´t plan to quote extensively from Bashar or any other channelings, I pick and choose from various sources whatever resonates with me.
And I´ve said all I and willing to say or can say at this point, about the house scam etc., if that´s what you meant by "forensic take."
Anders!!! I am here again to lead the lambs - what the GUCK does Delphine expect us all sophisticated pople to believe after the BULLSHIT abobe???
I said Delphine would come out with Crapola and I was right.
Hey Delphine you fraud! I am a wordsmith and forenssic liar expert and etc etc - I won´t go into it ... now...
BUT!!!
OK
Maybe i have gone OTT ´Delphine´...
The stage is Ark and Laura´s, the omes that send DUPES to do their dirty work... |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 7:29 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
Ok, sorry for not having able to write myself all the answers of this thread, but as you all know by now, I work for the DOD of the MI5, speciality C.I.A. cryingwolfer, section gray´n´watching with the afghan drugs sub-guroup ...
Nonetheless I have been monitoring the discussion under several identities and specially this one: (Bumping Bumping Myself).
I also apologize to have entertained you all along the first ten pages before revealing the real subject of OP in p. 11...
Abstract:
p. 11
"1) What is the French anti-cult law?
2) Who is targeted by this law?
3) When was the law passed?
4) Where can I find the original anti-cult law in English?
5) Is the law a threat to religious freedom?
666), er, 6) Is the anti-cult law supported by mainstream religions in France?
7) Who else is opposing the anti-cult law?
8) Are there historical precedents?
9) Where can I find documents and web pages related to the anti-cult law?"
See above for the solution, but because my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, I´ll give you a clue: for instance Church of Scientology is not concerned by this, butt, shhht...
Indeed since 1993 it´s a real true religion in this beautiful land of liberty where a fresh elected president swears on the bible and where money is marked with this flamelian incantation: "in gold we trust". But not yet in France nor in Germany.
Not yet convinced that it is a verrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyy bad law? So here is the PROOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF!!!!! (gimmick of mine LOL ROFL ROAFLM LAOLILAMFLOA????? please laugh here!!!!!)
1a) Meeting with the french Interior Minister of the cults:
[link to www.rickross.com]
1b) French Interior Ministry got its antivirus from a well-known software society:
[link to www.skeptictank.org]
2a) Receiving the “medaille de citoyen d’honneur” from Marseille mayor:
[link to www.rivieratimes.com]
2b) True miracle with the disappearence of judicial documents in Marseille:
[link to www.raids.org]
Are you beginning to get the picture? So can you tell me why, let´s say Scientology (((but don´t forget that it´s just an example here, Ok))), is still considered as a cult in France and toMMy is still banned in Germany??? Why such an injustice??? Whhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyy????? That´s a really Große deception!!!
Soooooooooooo, as you subtly guessed, all these fine GL PO threats have nothing to do with the dangerous shape-shifters aka The Barbapapaieans, their bubble-house and their cunning messages: "Hello Yes No Open Close Vague Surf Mirth Bingo Good knight"...
[link to www.barbapapa.fr]
Therefore, p. 10:
"If you really want the Barbapapaieans back in the States and in jail by Christmas, write to the local magistrate."
And please do it yourself, even from Uantanamo-States-Asylum, because my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, and We can assure you that it´s hard to fool french and german guys about so-called religions or real crooks.
But if you are fully motivated, I´ll give you this letter as a model to send to the president of the french republic aus FrankReich:
[Here in the upper left corner, put your moniker and your avatar]
[Below your GL PO ID but only if you accept to be tracked by UPS or NSA]
[And sorry, but don´t use smilies, you could be misunderstood, create a diplodomaticus incident or unwillingly engage a nuclear WoWIII — pronounced dubya of dubai or War of the Words Free]
"Dear Myster President ChIraq,
Versailles Castello
P.O. Box mayor of Ca c´est Paris
First of all, I want to thank you very much for authorizing your successor and his future prime minister to meet our ambassador, spiritual son of Ronny C.I.A. Cloowney & the Junior Woodchucks. Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!
BTW, I warn you that there is a massive collateral risk for your fro, er, young people because of the enormous kabbala of alchem, er, terrorysts plotting in the SouthWest of your landscape, known as the Barbapapaieans, whose agenda is to destroy all your wine industry and change all your gold into... say cheese?... You already sold your stocks?
[link to www.forbes.com]
Excellen, er, sad... But never mind...
You can´t even imagine how powerful they are (much muuuuuuuuuuuucccccccch more than the fantastic four maybe the fab four themselves): for instance they succeed to enrol me, (and as you can imagine using you own brain or a think-tank, Myself and all My avatars We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things), yeah really man, they enrolled me despite the fact that I´ve bean a former Sick/Mo(r(W))on/PacMan/Choko/Rehal loyalist!!!!
They can at will summon a big UFO to hoover over your palazzio for six days and three quarters of 24 hours long or command a shift flip-flop-like in your picnic so your Lewis XIV carpet will appear in Philadel, er, Antartica and you´ll be romelecularezid as a Roswe, er, Corona shaken polar beer...
All I can add is this: take a look at their website: HERE ARE PICTS OF WHAT YOUR ENEMEY IS DOING (WARNING VERY GRAPHIC):
The Barbahouse:
[link to www.bookofjoe.com]
The Barbarireiqi Playing Cards:
[link to www.barbapapa.fr]
Hmmm... Now don´t you feel fear? Aren´t you afraid... a little bit frightened... or much better... terrorized? Non abbiate paura? Haben-Sie keine Angst?
So I won´t repeat it twice Myster President, please be very panicked facing these AliTheChemysts and right now, otherwise the situation could soon come out of control like in say armageddon or... deep impact in your respectfully fac, er, discheneyland, with my best regards of (Big Brother Merchandiser), ok, enough with the Barbapapaieans, that´s what you all do have to shut up about toMMy and the Scientologists (((but don´t forget that it´s just an example here, Ok)))?"
Remember to sign with a menaci, er, cryptic "." or "...".
Ok, now, sorry but I´ve to finish to bring home all the orange/blue T-shirts and plastic industrial banners rented to the ukrainian revolutionnaries and to send all these advertisements-gadgets to the so-called but hopefully same-colored opponents in Israel...
I can assure you that my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, but I´ve still so many threads to cry wolf in, using all my Double You, avatars, monikers and so on...
For sure my report to my puppete, er, C.I.A. chiefs will never be ready in time and once again I will be late to my daily session of aikido-dance...
Exhausted... usual smilies
BINGO!!!!
A Castleopiaea INSIDER has posted to entertain us good GLP Folks!!! Sounds like Joe Quinn (aka Ignatius O´Reilly)!!!
Course it could be Orri Erling on too much Carlsberg!!!
We may never know!!!!!!!!!! |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 7:41 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
said I might speak up here and there, but
I´ve reconsidered--just in case my identity might
be hijacked by someone, to say stuff I never
meant or intended, as may possibly have happened
with Chandra. So if you see the username Delphine
here again, you will know it´s a pretender.
Goombye!
why don´t you just log in like me and sol, and others???
no problems
hey!!
throw caution to the wind
call your self Delphine
have a greek cup avatar or sumthing!
Delphine Fawandu
Open Society and Soros Foundation ... Delphine Fawandu 1998. Crown Heights Youth
Collective Project Taught basic video-production skills to students ages ...
www.soros.org/initiatives/cf/focus_areas/ nyc_fellowships/grantees/fawandu_1998 - 23k - Cached - Similar pages |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10118
7/15/2005 7:42 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18550
7/15/2005 7:50 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 for teh The Lost Cruisade! |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 7:55 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
call your self Delphine
have a greek cup avatar or sumthing!
Delphine Fawandu
Open Society and Soros Foundation <<<<<<<<==============
... Delphine Fawandu 1998. Crown Heights Youth
Collective Project Taught basic video-production skills to students ages ...
www.soros.org/initiatives/cf/focus_areas/ nyc_fellowships/grantees/fawandu_1998 - 23k - Cached - Similar pages |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 8:16 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
And we scream past the big 8000! (wink)
Must be the wolf´s lair folks, folks!!!
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18550
7/15/2005 8:22 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Delphine Fawandu
Open Society and Soros Foundation <<<<<<<<==============
Was that a joke too? i dont geddit. |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 8:26 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
Ok, sorry for not having able to write myself all the answers of this thread, but as you all know by now, I work for the DOD of the MI5, speciality C.I.A. cryingwolfer, section gray´n´watching with the afghan drugs sub-guroup ...
Nonetheless I have been monitoring the discussion under several identities and specially this one: (Bumping Bumping Myself).
I also apologize to have entertained you all along the first ten pages before revealing the real subject of OP in p. 11...
Abstract:
p. 11
"1) What is the French anti-cult law?
2) Who is targeted by this law?
3) When was the law passed?
4) Where can I find the original anti-cult law in English?
5) Is the law a threat to religious freedom?
666), er, 6) Is the anti-cult law supported by mainstream religions in France?
7) Who else is opposing the anti-cult law?
8) Are there historical precedents?
9) Where can I find documents and web pages related to the anti-cult law?"
See above for the solution, but because my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, I´ll give you a clue: for instance Church of Scientology is not concerned by this, butt, shhht...
Indeed since 1993 it´s a real true religion in this beautiful land of liberty where a fresh elected president swears on the bible and where money is marked with this flamelian incantation: "in gold we trust". But not yet in France nor in Germany.
Not yet convinced that it is a verrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyy bad law? So here is the PROOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF!!!!! (gimmick of mine LOL ROFL ROAFLM LAOLILAMFLOA????? please laugh here!!!!!)
1a) Meeting with the french Interior Minister of the cults:
[link to www.rickross.com]
1b) French Interior Ministry got its antivirus from a well-known software society:
[link to www.skeptictank.org]
2a) Receiving the “medaille de citoyen d’honneur” from Marseille mayor:
[link to www.rivieratimes.com]
2b) True miracle with the disappearence of judicial documents in Marseille:
[link to www.raids.org]
Are you beginning to get the picture? So can you tell me why, let´s say Scientology (((but don´t forget that it´s just an example here, Ok))), is still considered as a cult in France and toMMy is still banned in Germany??? Why such an injustice??? Whhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyy????? That´s a really Große deception!!!
Soooooooooooo, as you subtly guessed, all these fine GL PO threats have nothing to do with the dangerous shape-shifters aka The Barbapapaieans, their bubble-house and their cunning messages: "Hello Yes No Open Close Vague Surf Mirth Bingo Good knight"...
[link to www.barbapapa.fr]
Therefore, p. 10:
"If you really want the Barbapapaieans back in the States and in jail by Christmas, write to the local magistrate."
And please do it yourself, even from Uantanamo-States-Asylum, because my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, and We can assure you that it´s hard to fool french and german guys about so-called religions or real crooks.
But if you are fully motivated, I´ll give you this letter as a model to send to the president of the french republic aus FrankReich:
[Here in the upper left corner, put your moniker and your avatar]
[Below your GL PO ID but only if you accept to be tracked by UPS or NSA]
[And sorry, but don´t use smilies, you could be misunderstood, create a diplodomaticus incident or unwillingly engage a nuclear WoWIII — pronounced dubya of dubai or War of the Words Free]
"Dear Myster President ChIraq,
Versailles Castello
P.O. Box mayor of Ca c´est Paris
First of all, I want to thank you very much for authorizing your successor and his future prime minister to meet our ambassador, spiritual son of Ronny C.I.A. Cloowney & the Junior Woodchucks. Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!
BTW, I warn you that there is a massive collateral risk for your fro, er, young people because of the enormous kabbala of alchem, er, terrorysts plotting in the SouthWest of your landscape, known as the Barbapapaieans, whose agenda is to destroy all your wine industry and change all your gold into... say cheese?... You already sold your stocks?
[link to www.forbes.com]
Excellen, er, sad... But never mind...
You can´t even imagine how powerful they are (much muuuuuuuuuuuucccccccch more than the fantastic four maybe the fab four themselves): for instance they succeed to enrol me, (and as you can imagine using you own brain or a think-tank, Myself and all My avatars We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things), yeah really man, they enrolled me despite the fact that I´ve bean a former Sick/Mo(r(W))on/PacMan/Choko/Rehal loyalist!!!!
They can at will summon a big UFO to hoover over your palazzio for six days and three quarters of 24 hours long or command a shift flip-flop-like in your picnic so your Lewis XIV carpet will appear in Philadel, er, Antartica and you´ll be romelecularezid as a Roswe, er, Corona shaken polar beer...
All I can add is this: take a look at their website: HERE ARE PICTS OF WHAT YOUR ENEMEY IS DOING (WARNING VERY GRAPHIC):
The Barbahouse:
[link to www.bookofjoe.com]
The Barbarireiqi Playing Cards:
[link to www.barbapapa.fr]
Hmmm... Now don´t you feel fear? Aren´t you afraid... a little bit frightened... or much better... terrorized? Non abbiate paura? Haben-Sie keine Angst?
So I won´t repeat it twice Myster President, please be very panicked facing these AliTheChemysts and right now, otherwise the situation could soon come out of control like in say armageddon or... deep impact in your respectfully fac, er, discheneyland, with my best regards of (Big Brother Merchandiser), ok, enough with the Barbapapaieans, that´s what you all do have to shut up about toMMy and the Scientologists (((but don´t forget that it´s just an example here, Ok)))?"
Remember to sign with a menaci, er, cryptic "." or "...".
Ok, now, sorry but I´ve to finish to bring home all the orange/blue T-shirts and plastic industrial banners rented to the ukrainian revolutionnaries and to send all these advertisements-gadgets to the so-called but hopefully same-colored opponents in Israel...
I can assure you that my tiger and myself We are not stupid, and We are not imagining things, but I´ve still so many threads to cry wolf in, using all my Double You, avatars, monikers and so on...
For sure my report to my puppete, er, C.I.A. chiefs will never be ready in time and once again I will be late to my daily session of aikido-dance...
Exhausted... usual smilies
Hmmmm
A psychiatrsit/psychologist will have a field day here!!!
Oh dear for the unfortunate person.
Please - go to the local Prefecture - they will look after you Joe! |
| kris
User ID: 16066
7/15/2005 8:33 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Laura used to tell us that people who could not
answer a direct question and who responded with words without end or apparent meaning were not to be trusted. |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 2240
7/15/2005 8:40 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
9684
correctimundo!
Delphine Fawandu
Open Society and Soros Foundation <<<<<<<<==============
Was that a joke too? i dont geddit.
me neither, that fucker Soros just is not funny
neither is Ark
they are twins |
| OPie
User ID: 13018
7/15/2005 8:50 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Lots of distractions and deflections here ...
Let´s get back to the most important question of all.
What about the lottery? This is a very simple question, really. Very simple, and it should have been answered long ago.
Laura and Ark may have addressed this question in the main cass group; I left before the supposed lottery actually took place. Nonetheless, it has not been addressed to the public. Again, it´s very simple.
Was there a winner? If not, was the money given back to everyone who "donated" or did you use the fact that it was considered a donation as reason enough not to have to give it back? (But can there be a donation if you were not legally a non-profit?) There was very definitely a house sale. That cannot be disputed, as it´s in the public records. How can you sell a house that was supposedly to be given away in a lottery?
THAT is the crux of the issue here. Why don´t you answer? Do you understand how it makes you look; i.e., guilty as sin? If there´s an honest answer, even a misunderstanding, for what happened, why not explain it? |
| OPie
User ID: 13018
7/15/2005 8:53 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Good point, Kris.
Bumpity, bumpity ... |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 | |
|
