|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| Hypocrite
User ID: 308398
5/7/2008 11:04 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
DARPA Ark is having a hypocritical moan here, LOL, what a stench...
[link to www.sott.net]
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1120
About freedom of speech, where all are equal yet some more
equal than others. These are just examples of what Vincent Bridges, Storm Bear and the gang were writing on the net again and again about me:
"Soros is a Rothschild agent who funded Ark's many trips to the US"
"Ark is a spy "
"Ark Jadczyk worked with George Soros on a plan to depopulate the earth. "
"„It was the Ark/Stasi connection plus the European business men that showed up at the Montana Avenue home of Laura (about the same time some other European business men were buying flight schools in the area of New Port Richey where terrorists trained).”
"Exposing a DARPA counter intelligence operation like Laura Knight jadczyk and Ark Jadczyk may be boring to some but it is also necessery"
Hmm,.... So it is the freedom of speech, right? Well, I am a public person, so any dirty comments by one square idiot or another about me are OK.
The facts are these.
This hypocrite is married to a woman who (with him) engineered a $250,000 theft from their own followers in Florida, USA, to enable them to abscond to France, where, for the last 7 years or so, both have written highly critical essays about the USA government (understatement), and both have started up websites and forums, as well as writing books (i.e. the 911 pamphlet) wich paint the USA as the devil incarnate, responsible for all the misery on this planet.
What Laura and Ark fails to divulge to their readership is that Ark was employed by the Pentagon/DARPA as a defence contractor.
This means that Ark passed all the security checks as a good right wing citizen, and was given a top secret security clearance.
This means that Ark WORKED for the (IMO obscene) USA military-industrial complex.
You heard it right - this hypocrite worked for the USA war machine - he AIDED the USA war machine, he SUPPORTED the USA war machine, and he was PAID by the USA war machine.
Clearly, Ark's background is HIGHLY questionable.
Their involvment in the 911 truth movement is also highly questionable. Their involvement in any progressive political website is highly questionable.
WHY?
Well, amongts others, google 'poisoning the well'... |
| ANIMAL FARM
User ID: 308398
5/8/2008 3:55 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
As I said several times recently, these 2 hypocritical grifters, shysters, and criminals, Laura Knight-Jadczyk and her controller lover, Ark Jadczyk, cannot ***help*** themselves reading this outlet of TRUTH at this ongoing GLP blog/diary (for that is what it is) ... every day...
They are going berserk right now.
WHY?
Because they have opposition, opposition that cannot be censored by their 10-strong team of brainwashed fools (see below) on the SnOTTie forums.
And they are going berserk because the truth is seeping out bit by bit, and, deep down, they know that they are ***finished*** ...
[link to www.sott.net]
Ark sez:
Orwell was right.
RIGHT? ARE YOU SURE ... OR MAYBE ...
But Orwell was only partly right.
PARTLY RIGHT? TSK TSK TSK! PLEASE BE ACCURATE! TOU JUST SAID RIGHT? WHICH NEGATES PARTLY RIGHT! DEBIL!
ARK HAS CLEARLY LOST THE PLOT HERE (SEE BELOW) - HE SPOKE YESTERDAY OF 'LOOSING' THE COURT CASE, NOW HIS NORMALLY PRECISE (LMAO!), RAZOR SHARP (LMAO!) MATHEMATICAL JELLY SACK CANNOT DECIDE IF ORWELL WAS RIGHT, PARTLY RIGHT, WRONG, OR PARTLY WRONG.
MAKE YOUR MIND UP, RIGHT OR PARTLY RIGHT?
YOU FAIL, DEBIL...
Orwell did not know about the species of psychopaths
OH!
SO NOW ARK JADCZYK HAS A TIME MACHINE AND A PERSONAL DIALOGUE WITH THE DECEASED ORWWELL, AND CAN COMMENT ACCURATELY ABOUT ORWELL'S INTERACTIONS WITH FELLOW HUMANS BACK IN HIS TIMELINE? PSYCHOPATHS, PLAYING DEVIL'S ADVOCATE, DID NOT EXIST IN ORWELL'S TIME? CLEARLY ARK, IN HIS DELUDED STATE, IS NOW POSITING THAT A NEW SPECIES OF PSYCHOPATH HAS ARRIVED!!! LMAO!!!! MIGHT THEY BE MOURAVIEFF ORGANIC PORTALS? DAEMONS? MATER FAMILIA??????? LOL LOL LOL!!!
ORWELL WAS A GREAT WRITER, AND KNEW A DAMN SIGHT MORE ABOUT HUMANITY THAN SOME SERIALLY POMPOUS STUPID INBRED MONEY-GRUBBING POLSIH NON-ENTITY LIKE ARK JADCZYK, A NON-ENTITY THAT GREATLY UNDERESTIMATES ORWELL, A WRITER KNOWN AND RENOWNED FOR HIS ABILITY TO SEE THROUGH THE DISSEMBLING CORRUPT AND MORALLY BANKRUPT PEONS LIKE THE AFORESAID JADCZYK AND HIS ILK.
that took over the Animal Farm hiding behind the masks of sanity
I BET THIS POLISH ARSEHOLE HAS NEVER BEEN TO WIGAN PIER ... AND AS FOR AN ANIMAL FARM, WHO DOES MR JADCZYK HAVE CORALLED ON HIS FARM AT THE CHATEAU?
WEEEEELL, WE HAVE...
Joe - PINKEYE - PYGMY MOUSE/PUPPY/PIGLET, ULTIMATE BROWN-NOSER
Johnno - MINIMUS - PUPPY/PIGLET, ULTIMATE BROWN-NOSER
arkmod - NAPOLEAN - A BERSKSHIRE BOAR, IN REALITY: A PIGLET OF CHIEF BORE, LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK, AKA SNOWBALL
Scott - WHO CARES, THINK PIGLET! ULTIMATE BROWN-NOSER
anart - BROWN-NOSED SQUEALER/ULTIMATE BROWN-NOSER
atreides - SIMPLETON PIGLET, BROWN-NOSED BROWN-NOSER
henry - SQUEALER - PUPPY, ULTIMATE BROWN-NOSER
mudrabbit - ULTIMATE BROWN-NOSER WANNABE
sam - SQUEALER - PIGLET, ULTIMATE BROWN-NOSER
laura - SNOWBALL
DON'T THEY ALL JUST SOUND LIKE ANIMAL FARM - ANIMALS?
I THINK THEY DO.
NONE HAVE A BRAIN.
NONE CAN ENTERTAIN ANY THOUGHTS THAT GO AGAINST THE TOP 2 PIGS - LAURA AND HER ALTER-PIGGO.
THIS IS ALL QUITE AMUSING ARK, THANK YOU FOR, IN YOUR IGNORANCE, BRINGING IT UP.
P.S. Are they, using the literary term invented by Gurdjieff,
AGAIN, JUST LIKE LAURA, THROWING IN SOME NAMES TO ADD SPURIOUS 'WEIGHT' TO ... NOTHING ...
P.S.
GURDJIEFF WAS A CON MAN
JUST LIKE YOU, ARK.
NO WONDER YOU FEEL A KINSHIP WITH HIM.
becoming somewhat more rounded idiots?
WHO'S THE IDIOT HERE?
NOT ME, I HAPPEN TO HAVE A LIFE. ACTUALLY, NOT FAR FROM NEW PORT RICHIE AND TAMPON STRINGS, YOUR OLD, VERY BRIEF, STOMPING GROUND ... I KNOW ALL ABOUT THE SCAM YOU PULLED IN PINELLAS COUNTY ... AND SO DO PEPIN'S LAWYERS, AND SO WILL THE JUDGE...
SO, WHO'S THE IDIOT HERE ARK, I SAY AGAIN?
I KNOW WHO IT IS! I HAPPEN TO KNOW THAT IT IS THE GREAT POLISH DEBIL ARK JADCZYK, THE DEBIL SO HYPOCRITICAL THAT HE ATTACKS THE USA GOVT AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY WHILST SIMULTANEOUSLY SUCKING FROM THE FOUNDING FATHERS' TIT, ALWAYS ON THE BRINK OF A KNOB-'ELL PRIZE, ALWAYS REDUCED TO FOREVER HIDING FROM THE AUTHORITIES IN EUROPA, REDUCED TO BEGGING FROM STRANGERS ON THE INTERNET FOR DAILY BREAD AND WINE, REDUCED TO IN DUE COURSE BEING INCARCERATED BY YOUR VICTIMS...
The most recent rant reads:
RANT? TELL IT TO THE JUDGE MATE, HE/SHE WILL BE *VERY* INTERESTED IN THE MEAT AND SUBSTANCE THAT YOU INACCURATELY LABEL RANTS ...
This means that Ark passed all the security checks as a good right wing citizen, and was given a top secret security clearance.
This means that Ark WORKED for the (IMO obscene) USA military-industrial complex.
Did you notice "IMO"????
DID YOU NOTICE THAT THIS WHACK JOB ARK JADCZYK DID NOT EVEN *******ATTEMPT******* TO ***DENY*** THAT HE WAS SO EMPLOYED BY DARPA AND THE MIC (MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX)?
I DON'T NEED 4 QUESTION MARKS TO PROVE MY POINT ARK.
IMO.
Something new? Are they learning something? Even Vinnie the Pooh, the bear of Very Little Brain, has learned something from the bees....
I THINK THE LAST TINY PARAGRAPH PROVES THAT ARK JADCZYK HAS LOST THE PLOT COMPLETELY - IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN, HE SOUNDS LIKE HE IS IMBIBING FROM THE TRAPPISTE MONKS' STRONGEST BEER IN HIS LOCAL GIN HOUSE.
I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEXT MONTH OR THREE - IT WILL BE FUN WATCHING THE LAW CATCH UP WITH YOU TWO CRIMINALS. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398
5/8/2008 4:40 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
[link to lawprofessors.typepad.com]
May 7, 2008
Speaking of safe harbor issues, here's a report of a lawsuit filed against the Sign of the Times web site by Eric Pepin and his company, the Higher Balance Institute. It seems that forum members criticized the HBI program. The complaint states that some of the defamatory statements (taken verbatim from paragraph 20 of the court document) include:
a. HBI is a "front for pedophilia";
b. HBI is a "cointelpro" organization
c. Meditation, as sold by HBI, is an act of "falling into confluence with a psychopathic reality";
d. Those associated with HBI must be careful to avoid sexual molestation by HBI members;
e. HBI is "conning" the public;
f. "Fishy" sexual conduct is occurring at HBI; and
g. HBI "leads people more deeply into sleep."
Without a context, that last one seems a bit odd as a statement of libel. But hey, the lawyers get paid good money to craft these complaints.
Sign of the Times and its parent have invoked the safe harbor provision of the DMCA as a defense, and most of the case law tends to support that view. Again, lawyers get paid good money to handle these things.
More details on the issues and an explanation of the possible basis for the sexual misconduct statements in this case are at the Inquirer. |
| Laura K-Criminal
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:03 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Laura
Administrator
From: France
Registered: 2006-01-18
Posts: 3962
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
Looks like Vinnie has shown up to defend Pepin in the comments to the Inquirer article as follows:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
It seems to me that Laura is once again confusing issues regarding
protection of free speech. She has done this in the past and apparently
did not learn from her experiences. Not surprising, for those who know her.
The First Amendment to the US Constitution protects the **right** to free speech. It does *not* protect one from any and all possible consequences which may result from speaking freely.
As such, it would seem to me that her motion to dismiss is beside the point. This is a civil action, not a criminal action. The issue at hand is not whether or not Laura Knight-Jadczyk has the right to free speech. The issue is whether or not the results of her speaking freely about someone else has resulted in financial and/or other damages occurring to that person and/or his enterprise. And further, whether or not the plaintiff has the right to demand compensation as overseen by the Court for these alleged damages.
I would think that Pepin's lawyers would be competent enough to be able to make that distinction before the Court in their counter argument. Likewise, I am a bit surprised that Laura's counsel would try to take this tack, considering that protection of free speech is not the issue here.
And that brings the issue back to just what the First Amendment provides for one with regard to free speech. It appears that Laura, as in the past, honestly believes that she and QFG are to be allowed to say whatever they want to, anytime they want to and about anyone, anywhere and in any way that they could possibly conceive, without suffering any sort of consequences for this in any form or fashion or from any direction or entity whatsoever.
But again, this is a civil action. The State has not stepped into the fray, demanding punishment for criminal malfeasance. A private individual has sought financial damages in a civil court, relating strictly to civil matters.
Libel is normally pursued as a civil action and no division of government manages its conveyance. It is only when someone requests a hearing in a civil proceeding that the issue is debated and only then does the court pronounce a verdict.
It will be interesting to see how the Court in Oregon responds to this motion to dismiss.
_ [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
He's never gotten over being exposed as a con-artist with no credentials who lied about his whole life and background. Pepin really ought to find a better class of supporters. |
| Squealer
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:05 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
anart
Moderator
From: Colorado
Registered: 2006-01-18
Posts: 3168
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
Laura wrote:
He's never gotten over being exposed as a con-artist with no credentials who lied about his whole life and background. Pepin really ought to find a better class of supporters.
The man is FULL BLOWN insane - I mean, seriously - first of all, he writes this as if you have launched this legal maneuver - as if you are your lawyer - what the heck is this guy smoking????
At this point, one wonders if he can even dress himself? (yes, as long as it is black clothing... and his pony tail isn't mussed) - Then - he starts on one of his classically pathological pontifications (CPP : vinny bridges registered trademark) - about what you can or cannot say when he spends more time than most of us spend at our day jobs spewing lies of black bile about you whenever he gets the chance?
This man is seriously - totally - completely - insane. No wonder the 'big dogs' would never really give him any play - no wonder he has to spend his life trying with all his pathological might to build a reputation off of you - no wonder he's hooked up with the likes of Pepin - how ultimately sad for him that - ultimately; when all is said and done - absolutely nothing can ever - ever - trump the Truth.
Perhaps this 'bear of very little brain' can learn a mimic from the bees - yet he will always end up muttering 'oh bother' to himself as his impotent attempts prove nothing other than how truly insane he is. |
| Brown-Noser
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:07 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
christx11
Padawan Learner
From: Portland, Oregon
Registered: 2006-03-02
Posts: 86
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
VinnieBear wrote:
It seems to me that Laura is once again confusing issues regarding protection of free speech. She has done this in the past and apparently did not learn from her experiences. Not surprising, for those who know her.
The First Amendment to the US Constitution protects the **right** to free speech. It does *not* protect one from any and all possible consequences which may result from speaking freely.
There has never been any claim otherwise.
VinnieBear wrote:
As such, it would seem to me that her motion to dismiss is beside the point.
Is beside what point? Now VinnieBear wants to tell the lawyers and the courts what is the law and what is not. Shame on you Laura and shame on you QFG and shame on you the defendants' lawyers for not fitting into VinnieBear's reality and serving his image of reality.
VinnieBear wrote:
This is a civil action, not a criminal action.
What is this guy smoking? What kind of little manipulative psycho games is he playing? Has he even read the briefs and motions? Where in any of the court documents does anyone on any side claim this is a criminal action? Why even inject that into the conversation? It just shows the psychological projection of trying to paint someone or something in a specific framework that does not even exist in reality. If we want to look at someone's behavior and history it is evident every time this guy tries to project his reality onto the world at large.
VinnieBear wrote:
The issue at hand is not whether or not Laura Knight-Jadczyk has the right to free speech. The issue is whether or not the results of her speaking freely about someone else has resulted in financial and/or other damages occurring to that person and/or his enterprise. And further, whether or not the plaintiff has the right to demand compensation as overseen by the Court for these alleged damages.
Horse Hockey! Or Bear Pooh! Did the guy even read the motions. Notice how VinnieBear keeps saying 'Laura' this and 'Laura' that ... blah, blah, blah... We see who the target is VinnieBear. Did you even read the motions? Laura was not even served. The only entity served was QFG. Every document shows "Defendant Quantum Future Group". What an idiot. VinnieBear wants to tell everyone what the issue is about and he does not even know the facts of the case. VinnieBear does not even know who the defendant is in the case and he wants tell (project) to everyone what the case is about and what the issue is (Laura saying bad things damaging an upstanding citizen). Laura is not even the defendant in the case. Can the transparency be any clearer?
VinnieBear VB wrote:
I would think that Pepin's lawyers would be competent enough to be able to make that distinction before the Court in their counter argument. Likewise, I am a bit surprised that Laura's counsel would try to take this tack, considering that protection of free speech is not the issue here.
Here we continue with the swindle of the mind of the reader. VinnieBear, this isn't about Laura. Laura is not the named defendant. Quantum Future Group is and only Quantum Future Group. QFG was the only served party. I am not surprised that VinnieBear is surprised at what the issues are. VinnieBear does not even know who the Defendant is in the case. VinnieBear continues his Laura OCD, his target, his life's purpose.
VinnieBear wrote:
And that brings the issue back to just what the First Amendment provides for one with regard to free speech. It appears that Laura, as in the past, honestly believes that she and QFG are to be allowed to say whatever they want to, anytime they want to and about anyone, anywhere and in any way that they could possibly conceive, without suffering any sort of consequences for this in any form or fashion or from any direction or entity whatsoever.
Brings the issue back? Please teach everyone what the law is VinnieBear. What is the issue VinnieBear?
VinnieBear wrote:
But again, this is a civil action. The State has not stepped into the fray, demanding punishment for criminal malfeasance. A private individual has sought financial damages in a civil court, relating strictly to civil matters.
And here we go again with that projection that someone somewhere has painted this event as a criminal action. The only person injecting even the thought of this having anything to do with a criminal prosecution is VinnieBear. What in the heck is he even mentioning the 'State' for? Stepping into the fray? What kind of twisted mind can even speak about this case that does not even know what it is about, who is the defendant, projecting the 'State' and 'Criminal' into the issue when it has never had anything to do with it. Speaking as if State and Criminal were some kind of angle presented by QFG. Who is absolutely manipulatively bonkers here? VinnieBear. Your Pooh is showing VinnieBear. Your Pooh is showing.
VinnieBear wrote:
Libel is normally pursued as a civil action and no division of government manages its conveyance. It is only when someone requests a hearing in a civil proceeding that the issue is debated and only then does the court pronounce a verdict.
As if we all didn't know that this is a civil action. In case the projection of State and Criminal sunk in and now we are learnt how uneducated we silly folk was.
VinnieBear wrote:
It will be interesting to see how the Court in Oregon responds to this motion to dismiss.
The only manipulative free sentence in this entire PoohFest.
Offline |
| Brown-Noser
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:08 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
mada85
Jedi Knight
From: UK
Registered: 2007-01-27
Posts: 234
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
VB: The Bear of Exceedingly Tiny Brain wrote:
Likewise, I am a bit surprised that Laura's counsel would try to take this tack, considering that protection of free speech is not the issue here.
Huh?? Say again? How can it be possible for VB to deny the very issue that forms the crux of the case? This is truly a case of someone saying that white is black and up is down! I tried to understand VB's mind, to empathically feel my way into the mind of one who would be able to write as he has.
I read the documents, as I assume VB has, although my assumption may be wrong; the attorneys' approach is logical, well thought-out and clear - there is really no other course to take. In my mind, I compare the case documents and VB's ranting, and I cannot, however hard I try, put myself into VB's shoes to understand where he's coming from. Sure, I can understand his mindset on the theoretical level, but to truly empathise with him I find impossible. The VB mind is completely alien. I experience a strange sensation of disconnection, like trying to empathise with a blank.
It seems there is something essential missing from his Exceedingly Tiny Brain. |
| Napolean
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:10 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
ark
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1125
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
mada85 wrote:
It seems there is something essential missing from his Exceedingly Tiny Brain.
In fact this is called, technically, a "one-way logical gate".
He, Stormy and godlikeproduction over 2000 pages produced by their activities, can publicly call me a "spy", a "Stasi agent, working for DARPA on depopulating the Earth" etc. etc. and damage my business by this (using the funny legal terms: "but not less than $xxx millions" ). This is "just a free speech".
But nothing else is a free speech. I do not know if there is any cure for this defect, probably it is irreversible. |
| Snowball
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:11 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Laura
Administrator
From: France
Registered: 2006-01-18
Posts: 3962
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
Ark wrote:
In fact this is called, technically, a "one-way logical gate".
He, Stormy and godlikeproduction over 2000 pages produced by their activities, can publicly call me a "spy", a "Stasi agent, working for DARPA on depopulating the Earth" etc. etc. and damage my business by this (using the funny legal terms: "but not less than $xxx millions" ). This is "just a free speech".
This "one-way logical gate" is a funny thing, as Ark has noted.
When the history of the Bridges gang activity is examined, we note the basic facts:
1) Vinnie maneuvered his way into our lives and work based on lies. We didn't know they were lies at the time (which is kinda obvious - that's why they are called lies).
2) Because his behaviors did not match his words, we began to have serious doubts about his intentions. Those doubts were tested, Vinnie failed. We still, at this point, did not know that his "life and work" was a pile of lies, we only knew we did not want to be associated with him at all.
3) We made steps to disassociate ourselves from Vinnie, canceling conference attendance, book editing/publishing arrangements, etc. This was done in a professional way, and Vinnie certainly had the option of responding professionally. Had he done so, nothing else that followed would ever have happened.
4) In reaction to our choice to not be associated with him, Vinnie launched his attacks on us. Not only Vinnie, but his pal StormBear and Jay Weidner. This was done publicly and we also received a number of emails that were vicious and vituperative beyond belief.
5) After enduring the most unbelievable assault of lies, manipulations, defamation, libel, etc, for three months, in defense, we exposed the instigator of this assault for the liar and poseur he was/is.
And Vinnie (assuming it is Vinnie) has the nerve to write:
Poster at GLP wrote:
It seems to me that Laura is once again confusing issues regarding
protection of free speech. She has done this in the past and apparently
did not learn from her experiences. Not surprising, for those who know her. [...]
It appears that Laura, as in the past, honestly believes that she and QFG are to be allowed to say whatever they want to, anytime they want to and about anyone, anywhere and in any way that they could possibly conceive, without suffering any sort of consequences for this in any form or fashion or from any direction or entity whatsoever.
One wonders, of course, what he is referencing when he writes "did not learn from her experiences" and "without suffering any sort of consequences" ???
Does he mean that I should have learned something from the years of attack subsequent to the expose of Vinnie as a fraud and poseur? I'm supposed to have learned that Vinnie is allowed to say anything he wants about us, but we cannot defend ourselves by exposing the fact that the person making the statements lied about literally everything he claimed as his background and professional standing?
Is that the lesson that pathological deviants seek to "teach" their victims? "Resistance is futile! Do not fight back! Submit and be assimilated or it will be the worse for you!"
Aside from that, this case is interesting for a lot of reasons. We were talking about it the other day and one thing that came up was the fact that, should Pepin prevail, it will set a precedent that would almost instantly flood every court in the U.S. with similar claims. It would, in fact, even set a precedent that WE could use to sue Vinnie, StormBear, Jay, and the whole gang. Not only that, but we would be enabled to include GLP and abovetopsecret.com and rense.com and a number of other bulletin boards and websites in the suit with a good chance of prevailing to the tune of multiple millions of bux! Pepin's complaints would pale into insignificance beside the suit we could file if he wins!
And yeah, we have web snapshots of literally thousands of pages of libel and defamation. We have the entire Matrioshka group discussion downloaded and saved on a CD that was dated and notarized. We have all of Vinnie's website rants snapped as web images, and the thousands of pages on GLP, not to mention pages on ATS, etc. We have so much evidence that any judge looking at it would probably faint at the volume of viciousness!
Bottom line is: either way, we win. If Pepin loses, well... that's the simplest thing; everything proceeds as before and we get our money back. But, if he wins, we have precedent for some bodacious suits with very good chances of getting significant damages that will more than cover anything we would owe Pepin. If Pepin ridiculously claims 4.7 million in damages for a couple of months of discussion, what can we get for YEARS of defamation and libel. And here, of course, we are talking about lies that can be proved to be lies! As was written in our article "Is Truth Defamatory":
WHAT IS NOT DEFAMATION The following is where defamation does not occur:
Opinions, properly worded and identified as such, are not defamatory. It's called "Free Speech."
Statements that lack any of the three required elements: 1) they are true 2) they are not communicated to a third person 3) they do not damage character or reputation.
In other words, whether a statement is TRUE or NOT is the very crux of defamation. In other words, the court will FIRST inquire as to whether the statement itself is sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false. See Partington v. Bugliosi, 56 F.3d 1147, 1153 (9th Cir.'94) (applying three-factor test as the starting point for analysis); Unelko Corp. v. Rooney, 912 F.2d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir.'90), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 961 (1991).
The entire article is worth reading for some background on Vinnie and Gang.
Finally, I see the post written by Vinnie or whoever as a "fishing expedition." The writer makes a number of assumptions about the legal doings that are just that: assumptions. I'm not going to bite, sorry. You may carry on in your delusional world of thinking you know stuff when, in fact, you are just making a fool of yourself. |
| GLP Supporter
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:38 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Laura Knight Jadczyk is the whack job that stole $250,000 in a fake house raffle scam in FL in 2001. She fled to France with the loot where she has been holing up in a 17th century Chateau and living high on the hog for the last seven years, begging from her supporters and running a 911 and faux-progressive truth movement 'poisoning the well' site called Signs of The Times.
She is pissed at Trinity for exposing her activities in the GLP thread linked above. Trinity has had the balls to keep the thread running for all these years, exposing this woman's transgressions year in year out, and for that he must be profusely thanked.
Laura Knight-Jadczyk is currently being sued for $4,700,000 by Eic Pepin of the Higher Balance Institute in Oregon - Laura has been libeling and defaming Pepin all over the net calling HBI a 'front for pedophilia' and Pepin a padephilic sexual predator and 'COINTELPRO' agent - i.e. paid by the FBI.
During the last 10 years or so Laura Knight-Jadczyk has made many many enemies all over the net (specifically Trinity/GLP, Jeff Rense, Above Top Secret) and now she intends to sue them all...
snip from Laura Knight-Jadczyk
"Should Pepin prevail, it will set a precedent that would almost instantly flood every court in the U.S. with similar claims. It would, in fact, even set a precedent that WE could use to sue Vinnie, StormBear, Jay, and the whole gang. Not only that, but we would be enabled to include GLP and abovetopsecret.com and rense.com and a number of other bulletin boards and websites in the suit with a good chance of prevailing to the tune of multiple millions of bux! Pepin's complaints would pale into insignificance beside the suit we could file if he wins."
Here she specifically threatens to bring down Trinity and GLP...
"And yeah, we have web snapshots of literally thousands of pages of libel and defamation. We have the entire Matrioshka group discussion downloaded and saved on a CD that was dated and notarized. We have all of Vinnie's website rants snapped as web images, and the thousands of pages on GLP, not to mention pages on ATS, etc. We have so much evidence that any judge looking at it would probably faint at the volume of viciousness!
Bottom line is: either way, we win. If Pepin loses, well... that's the simplest thing; everything proceeds as before and we get our money back. But, if he wins, we have precedent for some bodacious suits with very good chances of getting significant damages that will more than cover anything we would owe Pepin. If Pepin ridiculously claims 4.7 million in damages for a couple of months of discussion, what can we get for YEARS of defamation and libel."
Anyone who has been libelled/defamed by Laura Knight-Jadczyk or her husband, Ark, or their web site, SOTT or the QFG - should contact Eric Pepin's lawyers in Oregon to aid in their lawsuit against this reprehensible woman. |
| Jail Time
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 7:48 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
[ link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Laura Knight Jadczyk is the whack job that stole $250,000 in a fake house raffle scam in FL in 2001. She fled to France with the loot where she has been holing up in a 17th century Chateau and living high on the hog for the last seven years, begging from her supporters and running a 911 and faux-progressive truth movement 'poisoning the well' site called Signs of The Times.
She is pissed at Trinity for exposing her activities in the GLP thread linked above. Trinity has had the balls to keep the thread running for all these years, exposing this woman's transgressions year in year out, and for that he must be profusely thanked.
Laura Knight-Jadczyk is currently being sued for $4,700,000 by Eic Pepin of the Higher Balance Institute in Oregon - Laura has been libeling and defaming Pepin all over the net calling HBI a 'front for pedophilia' and Pepin a padephilic sexual predator and 'COINTELPRO' agent - i.e. paid by the FBI.
During the last 10 years or so Laura Knight-Jadczyk has made many many enemies all over the net (specifically Trinity/GLP, Jeff Rense, Above Top Secret) and now she intends to sue them all...
snip from Laura Knight-Jadczyk
"Should Pepin prevail, it will set a precedent that would almost instantly flood every court in the U.S. with similar claims. It would, in fact, even set a precedent that WE could use to sue Vinnie, StormBear, Jay, and the whole gang. Not only that, but we would be enabled to include GLP and abovetopsecret.com and rense.com and a number of other bulletin boards and websites in the suit with a good chance of prevailing to the tune of multiple millions of bux! Pepin's complaints would pale into insignificance beside the suit we could file if he wins."
Here she specifically threatens to bring down Trinity and GLP...
"And yeah, we have web snapshots of literally thousands of pages of libel and defamation. We have the entire Matrioshka group discussion downloaded and saved on a CD that was dated and notarized. We have all of Vinnie's website rants snapped as web images, and the thousands of pages on GLP, not to mention pages on ATS, etc. We have so much evidence that any judge looking at it would probably faint at the volume of viciousness!
Bottom line is: either way, we win. If Pepin loses, well... that's the simplest thing; everything proceeds as before and we get our money back. But, if he wins, we have precedent for some bodacious suits with very good chances of getting significant damages that will more than cover anything we would owe Pepin. If Pepin ridiculously claims 4.7 million in damages for a couple of months of discussion, what can we get for YEARS of defamation and libel."
Anyone who has been libelled/defamed by Laura Knight-Jadczyk or her husband, Ark, or their web site, SOTT or the QFG - should contact Eric Pepin's lawyers in Oregon to aid in their lawsuit against this reprehensible woman.
How's LKJ gonna sue all these fine folks?
Anothet round of begging from her supporters? Fleece them of even more money than they have already wasted on here? (Her first round of begging recently netted her $128,000 in just a few weeks...)
And when Pepin wins, Laura's sites will all be shut down. So how's she gonna beg from all her supporters for all the lawsuits she intends to file?
Is she gonna act in contempt of court by keeping her sites up?
If so, that = jail time for Laura Knight-Jadczyk. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 404991
5/9/2008 8:10 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
[ link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Laura Knight Jadczyk is the whack job that stole $250,000 in a fake house raffle scam in FL in 2001. She fled to France with the loot where she has been holing up in a 17th century Chateau and living high on the hog for the last seven years, begging from her supporters and running a 911 and faux-progressive truth movement 'poisoning the well' site called Signs of The Times.
She is pissed at Trinity for exposing her activities in the GLP thread linked above. Trinity has had the balls to keep the thread running for all these years, exposing this woman's transgressions year in year out, and for that he must be profusely thanked.
Laura Knight-Jadczyk is currently being sued for $4,700,000 by Eic Pepin of the Higher Balance Institute in Oregon - Laura has been libeling and defaming Pepin all over the net calling HBI a 'front for pedophilia' and Pepin a padephilic sexual predator and 'COINTELPRO' agent - i.e. paid by the FBI.
During the last 10 years or so Laura Knight-Jadczyk has made many many enemies all over the net (specifically Trinity/GLP, Jeff Rense, Above Top Secret) and now she intends to sue them all...
snip from Laura Knight-Jadczyk
"Should Pepin prevail, it will set a precedent that would almost instantly flood every court in the U.S. with similar claims. It would, in fact, even set a precedent that WE could use to sue Vinnie, StormBear, Jay, and the whole gang. Not only that, but we would be enabled to include GLP and abovetopsecret.com and rense.com and a number of other bulletin boards and websites in the suit with a good chance of prevailing to the tune of multiple millions of bux! Pepin's complaints would pale into insignificance beside the suit we could file if he wins."
Here she specifically threatens to bring down Trinity and GLP...
"And yeah, we have web snapshots of literally thousands of pages of libel and defamation. We have the entire Matrioshka group discussion downloaded and saved on a CD that was dated and notarized. We have all of Vinnie's website rants snapped as web images, and the thousands of pages on GLP, not to mention pages on ATS, etc. We have so much evidence that any judge looking at it would probably faint at the volume of viciousness!
Bottom line is: either way, we win. If Pepin loses, well... that's the simplest thing; everything proceeds as before and we get our money back. But, if he wins, we have precedent for some bodacious suits with very good chances of getting significant damages that will more than cover anything we would owe Pepin. If Pepin ridiculously claims 4.7 million in damages for a couple of months of discussion, what can we get for YEARS of defamation and libel."
Anyone who has been libelled/defamed by Laura Knight-Jadczyk or her husband, Ark, or their web site, SOTT or the QFG - should contact Eric Pepin's lawyers in Oregon to aid in their lawsuit against this reprehensible woman.
YEA! GLP lets her bogus crap get posted on here. It IS WELL KNOWN THAT "LAURA AND THE CASSIOPAENS" IS NOTHING MORE THAN DELUSIONAL FANTASY.
There's no accounting for people who REALLY believe this crap...but perhaps that;s "entertainment" for these poor folks.
Nevertheless, Laura is a whack job who needs to be brought down at all costs.
HELP DEFEND GLP FOR EXPOSING THIS PIECE OF TRASH!!!
 |
| GLP Supporter
User ID: 308398
5/9/2008 11:12 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"And yeah, we have web snapshots of literally thousands of pages of libel and defamation. We have the entire Matrioshka group discussion downloaded and saved on a CD that was dated and notarized. We have all of Vinnie's website rants snapped as web images, and the thousands of pages on GLP, not to mention pages on ATS, etc. We have so much evidence that any judge looking at it would probably faint at the volume of viciousness!
The above is an example of how absolutely *delusional* Laura Knight-Jadcztk is - she thinks there are 'thousands of pages' about her on GLP.
There are in fact only 155 pages.
This is hardly 'thousands of pages'...
You need to up your meds Laura ya fucking idiot.
LMAO!!! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 430802
5/10/2008 4:50 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
VinnieBear wrote:
The issue at hand is not whether or not Laura Knight-Jadczyk has the right to free speech. The issue is whether or not the results of her speaking freely about someone else has resulted in financial and/or other damages occurring to that person and/or his enterprise. And further, whether or not the plaintiff has the right to demand compensation as overseen by the Court for these alleged damages.
Horse Hockey! Or Bear Pooh! Did the guy even read the motions. Notice how VinnieBear keeps saying 'Laura' this and 'Laura' that ... blah, blah, blah... We see who the target is VinnieBear. Did you even read the motions? Laura was not even served. The only entity served was QFG. Every document shows "Defendant Quantum Future Group". What an idiot. VinnieBear wants to tell everyone what the issue is about and he does not even know the facts of the case. VinnieBear does not even know who the defendant is in the case and he wants tell (project) to everyone what the case is about and what the issue is (Laura saying bad things damaging an upstanding citizen). Laura is not even the defendant in the case. Can the transparency be any clearer?
VinnieBear VB wrote:
I would think that Pepin's lawyers would be competent enough to be able to make that distinction before the Court in their counter argument. Likewise, I am a bit surprised that Laura's counsel would try to take this tack, considering that protection of free speech is not the issue here.
Here we continue with the swindle of the mind of the reader. VinnieBear, this isn't about Laura. Laura is not the named defendant. Quantum Future Group is and only Quantum Future Group. QFG was the only served party. I am not surprised that VinnieBear is surprised at what the issues are. VinnieBear does not even know who the Defendant is in the case. VinnieBear continues his Laura OCD, his target, his life's purpose.
[link to www.sott.net]
can this guy be serious?! surely he's read the documents, and from what i can see they clearly name Laura Knight-Jadczyk as a defendant, alongside Quantum Future Group ... am i missing something here? or is this guy missing a brain? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 430474
5/15/2008 6:46 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
He's missing a brain. It says on all the legal stuff posted that she is named. I even called Higher Balance to tell them about this thread and a few other sites if they didn't already know. They said they did and had gotten good information from them. Soooo curiosity got me and I fished for some info...
they wouldn't say anything
kinda figured. but they did say the day Laura sent out her last self-serving, give-momma-some-money news release claiming nobody but QFG had been served... she was served!! lol
Either they just wanted to throw that out to the world for some reason as some F-U that she's in France and they can't do crap or it's some seriously funny timing that she opens her mouth and gets nailed right after she does it! Now she's going to have to defend herself and she can't say all the junk they used to defend QFG which is... we didn't say it and we don't own this site and ya ya ya... because she did say it!
hahaha |
| Here come Da Judge!
User ID: 308398
5/16/2008 11:03 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
He's missing a brain. It says on all the legal stuff posted that she is named. I even called Higher Balance to tell them about this thread and a few other sites if they didn't already know. They said they did and had gotten good information from them. Soooo curiosity got me and I fished for some info...
they wouldn't say anything
kinda figured. but they did say the day Laura sent out her last self-serving, give-momma-some-money news release claiming nobody but QFG had been served... she was served!! lol
Either they just wanted to throw that out to the world for some reason as some F-U that she's in France and they can't do crap or it's some seriously funny timing that she opens her mouth and gets nailed right after she does it! Now she's going to have to defend herself and she can't say all the junk they used to defend QFG which is... we didn't say it and we don't own this site and ya ya ya... because she did say it!
hahaha Quoting: Anonymous Coward 430474
Ho ho ho! Excellent stuff, please do keep it coming - I am so pleased that we are, behind the GLP facade, a cohesive group, and that we are gonna get justice eventually - this has been a long time a comin', so many YEARS for this thread alone.
All good things come to those who wait...
He's missing a brain.
Sounds like the oz 'moderator' at SOTT, Johnno - the criminal that witnessed and signed off on the house transfer so that Laura and Ark could collect their stolen $250,000+, undoubtedly one of the biggest mugs on the planet.
It says on all the legal stuff posted that she is named.
Yes indeedy.
I even called Higher Balance to tell them about this thread and a few other sites if they didn't already know.
So have others, most anonymously, but not all!
They said they did and had gotten good information from them. Soooo curiosity got me and I fished for some info...
they wouldn't say anything
Unlike Big Momma!
kinda figured. but they did say the day Laura sent out her last self-serving, give-momma-some-money news release claiming nobody but QFG had been served... she was served!! lol
LOL! Karma!
Either they just wanted to throw that out to the world for some reason
Big yapper syndrome - they cannot help themselves - after all, they are invincible, right?
as some F-U that she's in France and they can't do crap or it's some seriously funny timing that she opens her mouth
Serendipity...
and gets nailed right after she does it!
The gods are not on her side - she's fucked over too many people, Ark too, and all the little Hitler Nazi-like goose-stepping 'mods'...
Now she's going to have to defend herself and she can't say all the junk they used to defend QFG which is... we didn't say it and we don't own this site and ya ya ya... because she did say it!
Hey! It's all over the wayback machine, she cannot erase anything, she and Ark are fucked...
Happy days! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398
5/17/2008 9:32 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
SAMPLE BOT RUN ON THE SEARCH TERM: LAURA-KNIGHT JADCZYK
WITHOUT THE HYPHEN:
GOOGLE Results 1 - 10 of about 51,600 for LAURA KNIGHT JADCZYK
WITH THE HYPHEN:
Results 1 - 10 of about 98,000 for LAURA-KNIGHT JADCZYK.
METHINKS SHE IS GOING TO USE ALOT OF POSTAGE FROM FRANCE TO MAIL OUT THE SUBPOENAS, AS SHE IS 'EVERYWHERE' ONLINE NOW
HERE SHE IS IN ALL HER GLORY, HALO AN ALL. 'UNRETOUCHED'
[link to www.cassiopaea.org]
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
5/13/2008 5:35 AM
Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
HERE SHE IS IN ALL HER GLORY, HALO AN ALL. 'UNRETOUCHED'
[link to www.cassiopaea.org]
Quoting: HIDEOUS KINKY 380516
Mommy, I'm scared!!!!
"Normalcy is returning to Iraq."
-- George W. Bush, on the third day
of a new wave of violence
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at
DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Winningjob
ALL-IN!
User ID: 385114
5/13/2008 5:37 AM
Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
I'd actually give her may address if she had the gull to come in person and sue me...hand to hand combat..woo hoo!
"If Thou 'Canst Believe; All Things Are Possible!"
Yes. I would check-raise my own mother!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 383362
5/13/2008 7:03 AM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
sounds like a real deausche job
gooderboy
User ID: 70108
5/13/2008 7:33 AM
Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
... lol, lions and tigers and bears, oh my!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 431856
5/13/2008 7:35 AM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
[link to www.cassiopaea.org]
Quoting: HIDEOUS KINKY 380516
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398 (OP)
5/16/2008 10:49 AM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
Bump for the AM crowd...
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
5/16/2008 6:21 PM
Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
Still waiting on that lawsuit. Would it help if I called
Laura Knight-Jadczyk a fraud? Because she really is a phony.
"Normalcy is returning to Iraq."
-- George W. Bush, on the third day
of a new wave of violence
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at
DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 430178
5/16/2008 7:02 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
That is an opinion and here say. as such it is not admissible as any form of legal consideration. You need proof in a court of law. Laura has proof by your own admition.
Back off guys .real fast. Take it from one who has a legal backgroud.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 402700
A legal background? Doubtful. You're barely literate. Someone of your obviously inferior intelligence couldn't even pass an exam to get into any reputable law school, let alone a bar exam.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 431954
5/16/2008 7:50 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
308398
Are you only here about that LKJ person? Searching your number showed this post and the Cassaeopian thread. When I checked again, the search didn't even show this thread. Odd.
Frigg Stuyvesant
User ID: 398933
5/16/2008 8:03 PM
Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
I hope the bitch fails miserably.
Stay strong TRINITY!!
MJ-13
User ID: 434268
5/16/2008 8:14 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
As a forum moderator of an open forum, Trinity should not have a problem with her or anyone for that matter. This forum of course does not mean everything that is said is gospel truth. Even the motto indicates this: "conspiracy theorist and the lunatic fringe". I don't know how, with that premise, that her claims would stand up in court against any moderator of any open forum, not to mention Trinity of this one.
Grower
User ID: 434274
5/16/2008 8:19 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
What a load of fucking bull shit. Cunts like this person needs not to reproduce.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398 (OP)
5/16/2008 8:21 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
That is an opinion and here say. as such it is not admissible as any form of legal consideration. You need proof in a court of law. Laura has proof by your own admition.
Back off guys .real fast. Take it from one who has a legal backgroud.
A legal background? Doubtful. You're barely literate. Someone of your obviously inferior intelligence couldn't even pass an exam to get into any reputable law school, let alone a bar exam.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 430178
A legal background?
Yes, Bruce has been in jail several times, had many brushes with the law I understand.
Acetate OWNS Ark! LOL!
User ID: 308398 (OP)
5/16/2008 8:31 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
308398
Are you only here about that LKJ person? Searching your number showed this post and the Cassaeopian thread. When I checked again, the search didn't even show this thread. Odd.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 431954
I've been 'here' for 8 years +...
Over at SOTT they are squirming...
[link to www.sott.net]
acetate
The Force is strong with this one
Sorry to make this my first post, but i'm a bit confused ... I've been following this free speech issue with interest, and have read most of the source material, including the hbi.pdf legal documents - which seem to state that QFG and Laura are both defendants in this case. Have I read the documents wrongly?
Ark replies...
ark
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1134
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
acetate wrote:
Sorry to make this my first post, but i'm a bit confused ... I've been following this free speech issue with interest...
Well, if this is your first post, it is not very communicative. You create noise by extensive quoting and asking just one question. It would be better if you first described the nature of your "interest" and then asked your question. But, in fact, it seems that you are able to answer your question yourself. So, what exactly is your point? Please, be informative and precise in your next posts, if any.
acetate
The Force is strong with this one
Registered: 2008-05-07
Posts: 4
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
ark wrote:
But, in fact, it seems that you are able to answer your question yourself. So, what exactly is your point? Please, be informative and precise in your next posts
Well, if Laura actually is a defendant I can't understand why nobody corrected christx11's mistake ... I know it's a little awkward, but when someone says they've read documents that they actually haven't, and then accuse others of not having read the documents, then they should be pulled up on it. As I said - sorry for this being my first post, but I found this thread via articles on news sites and have been following it for a few weeks now - but after nobody pointed out the error I thought maybe I was as much an idiot as VinnieBear because I was under the same impression as him. Hence the question, and my point ... if a question can be a point.
Online
#300
Today 11:02:59
ark
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1134
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
What mistake EXACTLY. Please, spell it explicitly, and please, provide the EXACT basis, why do you think it WAS a mistake. But, please, be precise, avoid vague words.
(Ark using his usual bullyboy tactics, panties in a twist now...LOL)
IT GETS BETTER!!! LOL LOL LOL!!!
Acetate OWNS Ark, LOL LOL LOL!
acetate
The Force is strong with this one
Registered: 2008-05-07
Posts: 4
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
Is christx11 mistaken in saying this:
Laura was not even served. The only entity served was QFG. Every document shows "Defendant Quantum Future Group" ... Laura is not even the defendant in the case ... this isn't about Laura. Laura is not the named defendant. Quantum Future Group is and only Quantum Future Group. QFG was the only served party
The exact basis for my thinking it is a mistake is this document here: [link to laura-knight-jadczyk.com]
Online
#302
Today 1317
ark
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1134
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
acetate wrote:
The exact basis for my thinking it is a mistake is this document here: [link to laura-knight-jadczyk.com]
Notice that the civil cover sheet you reference was prepared by Pepin's attorneys... Not QFG's. You can read all of QFG's filings which are linked from this post:
[link to www.sott.net]
Pepin's attorneys can write whatever they imagine ....
So, if your basis is what Pepin attorneys imagine, then you will certainly find more contradiction between what they possibly say and what the real facts are. They are being paid for what they do, their goal is clear, probably also to you, but if you are looking for the real data, they are not necessarily there to look for.
You can as well rely on StormBear's posts to godlikeproductions:
Simple crap (StormBear being not a careful reader, just trying to defame):
"Deeper into the Ark academic swamp.
In his CV, he lists this paper...
"TIME OF EVENTS IN QUANTUM THEORY.
Helv. Phys. Acta 69 (1996) 613-635, (with Ph. Blanchard)"
But Penn State lists the paper as being published in 1966.
[link to citeseer.ist.psu.edu]
stormbear, 9/3/2006 12:35 PM
and a more dangerous one:
"Ark's CV is riddled with errors and is probably manufactured to be part of an old academic
espionage cover. Whether it was for the Stasi or the Soviets only further investigation will
show."
StormBear, 9/11/2006 4:19 PM
Or, if you wish, on that of Vincent Bridges
"The new C-Cult movement is a White Op vacuum
cleaner; and as you'll find if read this thread carefully, good auld DARPA Ark seems to have
had some kind of early warning on 9/11."
Vincent Bridges, 3/12/2007 8:18 AM
``And so, let me repeat: who wants to believe - let them believe. But I do not want to believe, I want to know."
(An old philosopher in "The lost future" by K. Borun and A. Trepka, SF novel - in Polish)
Offline
#303
Today 20:24:07
acetate
The Force is strong with this one
Registered: 2008-05-07
Posts: 4
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
ark wrote:
Notice that the civil cover sheet you reference was prepared by Pepin's attorneys... Not QFG's. You can read all of QFG's filings which are linked from this post:
[link to www.sott.net]
Let's pretend that your distinction is relevant - which it isn't (you see, christx11's post was obviously in reference to the civil motion prepared by Pepin's attorneys). Every single one of the documents prepared by QFG's (and, I assume, Laura's) attorneys that you linked to also names Laura as a defendant. I can't make the basis for my claims that christx11 was mistaken any more objective, clear, or irrefutable than this. Laura is a defendant.
Even if your anti-SLAPP motions are successful, it doesn't change the fact that Laura is a defendant in this case.
ark wrote:
So, if your basis is what Pepin attorneys imagine, then you will certainly find more contradiction between what they possibly say and what the real facts are. They are being paid for what they do, their goal is clear, probably also to you, but if you are looking for the real data, they are not necessarily there to look for.
I'm sorry, it is pointless to respond to such dissembling obfuscation.
You can as well rely on StormBear's posts to godlikeproductions:
Simple crap (StormBear being not a careful reader, just trying to defame):
I don't know why you thought this would be relevant? What do the ramblings of third-parties who have nothing to do with the case have to do with my post?
Acetate OWNS Ark, contd...
User ID: 308398 (OP)
5/17/2008 2:19 AM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
This asshole Ark claims to have a brain the size of a planet, and claims to be a Physics Professor...
Yet he is BIATCH-slapped tiem and time again by Acetate, who is simply stating the facts, whilst Ark squirms and dissembles and tries to obfuscate...
It is quite clear to me that LKJ and darth-Ark have lost the plot big time...
ark
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1135
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
"I don't know why you thought this would be relevant? What do the ramblings of third-parties who have nothing to do with the case have to do with my post?"
If you can't see, well ... you can't see. Sometimes eyes' problems can be helped. But not always. In "The Art of Seeing" Aldous Huxley was telling us that (Bates method) palming helps. And relaxation, and looking into the light - just glancing at it. Sunlight, apparently, is the best.
"The most important of these techniques of (predominantly) passive relaxation is the process which Dr. Bates called 'palming.' In palming the eyes are closed and covered with the palms of the hands. To avoid exerting any pressure upon the eyeballs (which should never be pressed, rubbed, massaged or otherwise handled) the lower part of the palms should rest upon the cheek bones, the fingers upon the forehead. In this way light can be completely excluded from the eyes, even though the eyeballs remain untouched."
"This fantastic craze for blacking out the eyes had its origin in certain medical circles, where a panic terror of the ultra-violet radiations in ordinary sunlight developed about a generation back; it has been fostered and popularized by the manufacturers and vendors of coloured glass and celluloid spectacle frames. Their propaganda has been effective. In the Western world, millions of people now wear dark glasses, not merely on the beach, or when driving their cars, but even at dusk, or in the dim-lit corridors of public buildings. Needless to say, the more they wear them, the weaker their eyes become and the greater their need for ' protection' from the light. One can acquire an addiction to goggles, just as one can acquire an addiction to tobacco or alcohol.
This addiction has its origin in the fear of light—a fear which those who have it feel to be justified by the discomfort they experience when their eyes are exposed to too intense a brightness. The question arises: why this fear and this discomfort? Animals get on very happily without goggles; so do primitive men. And even in civilized societies, even in these days when the virtues of coloured glass are everywhere persuasively advertised, millions of people face the sunlight without goggles and, so far from suffering any ill effects, see all the better for it. There is every reason to suppose that, physiologically, the eyes are so constructed that they can tolerate illuminations of very high intensity. Why, then, do so many people in the contemporary world experience discomfort when exposed to light even of relatively low intensity?"
Of course, Huxley was not right in everything. Here and there he was wrong. Yet concerning the palming and looking into the light - I tend to think, based on my own eperience, that may have been right ....
Read the above - Acetate is simply stating that LKJ is a DEFENDANT on HBI's lawsuit for defamation...
This asshole Ark simply cannot and will not acknowledge the reality...
This is BIZARRE in extremis - unless of course you know the l'Arks and their MO...
LMAO!
The judge will cut to the chase in no time at all if these lame upon lame tactics are used...
LOL!!! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 434671
5/17/2008 2:14 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
If she wins against Pepin then anyone can say anything and she can't sue Trnity or anyone. Anything goes right?
If she loses against Pepin then she has no money to sue anyone.
Logic anyone? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 434908
5/17/2008 11:36 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
just in case the ark nazis decide to start deleting posts again:
acetate2
The Force is strong with this one
Registered: 2008-05-17
Posts: 1
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
Well, I guess when your powers of reason and logic are found wanting, the only thing left to do is censor those who expose your failings. Taking away my posting priviledges because I pointed out a glaring factual error from one of your posters - which wouldn't be so bad if this poster hadn't used this factual error as the basis for publicly attacking someone. You guys can't even admit/correct a simple mistake let alone discover any new truths about our world and universe.
And, as I said in my last post which you deleted:
If you can't explain things without resorting to vague and irrelevant insults, well ... don't explain things.
And if the only way you can create an impression of superiority is to delete the posts of responders, then that's pretty weak Ark. Grow up and stop acting like a petulant child. When you have grown up, you will not need to censor, insult, and belittle others in order to strengthen your self-esteem.
Online
[link to www.sott.net] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398
5/19/2008 2:46 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
User
Registered: 2008-05-18
Posts: 1
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
I guess there are limits to Free Speech, eh?
Offline
#306
Yesterday 10:24:03
ark
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1167
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
acetate3 wrote:
I guess there are limits to Free Speech, eh?
On this forum, yes. You need to have a functioning brain and proper (according to the standards set by us) manners. If you don't like it - go and exercise your rights to free speech on your own web site, set your own rules, but not in our house, where we set the rules. Do you let anybody into your house and curse you and your family? It's a free speech, isn't it.
Capito? |
| LOL!!!
User ID: 308398
5/19/2008 2:49 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
ark
Administrator
From: Toulouse, France
Registered: 2006-01-31
Posts: 1167
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
I deleted the consecutive post of acetate (this time registered as acetate4). He/she seems to be unable to understand one simple meta-rule:
This forum is not the appropriate place for debating the policies of administrators and moderators of this forum.
He/she may freely do it somewhere else - the internet is a huge space!
LOL, Ark's ass well and truly OWNED! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398
5/19/2008 3:45 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
If she wins against Pepin then anyone can say anything and she can't sue Trnity or anyone. Anything goes right?
If she loses against Pepin then she has no money to sue anyone.
Logic anyone? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 434671
Precisely. Personally I hope she loses and her and the cronies she has on the QFG board are wiped out - then let's watch them show contempt for the ruling and start up clone sites, then we'll see some jail time go down... |
| dirty dancing
User ID: 238693
5/19/2008 5:20 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
now selling my book @ amason / asswipes category |
| Beautiful O)))
User ID: 308398
5/19/2008 11:16 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Infinite Acetate
User ID: 435908
5/19/2008 6:56 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
ark wrote:
Do you let anybody into your house and curse you and your family? It's a free speech, isn't it.
I never cursed you and your family, so please don't accuse me of such.
Laura, I appreciate your more informative, balanced and reasonable reply. It is a lot easier to communicate when people are direct and honest, rather than insulting and superior (I mean is it really appropriate for Ark to say that I don't have a functioning brain, or that I have some problem with opening my eyes and exposing them to light?).
Laura wrote:
we simply cannot talk about certain things while legal issues are being discussed by attys
While I can understand this, I find it hard to believe that confirming who is actually a defendant in the case would be a problem. As evidenced by the legal documents filed by both Pepin's and your attorneys (all of which are publicly available and even linked to in these threads), it is quite clear who is a defendant ... and surely confirming who is a defendant can't have any negative impact on the case. Please, correct me if I'm wrong ...
laura wrote:
As I mentioned already, the post that focuses on me is a "fishing expedition." The fact that YOU have continued to fish makes you look "interesting" to say the least!
In the post I was referring to, I'm not really interested in what Vinniebear is saying ... only christx11's mistaken assumptions, which is quite clear from my posts. I can only imagine that the flame war that seems to be raging between you and Vinniebear has made you a little bit paranoid about newbies to this forum ... however, all I was fishing for was a clarification of the facts (pretty harmless, but basic facts), which is still left wanting - however, I'll accept your statement that you can't confirm the defendants in this case on advice from your attorneys ... as hard as I find that to believe.
laura wrote:
The fact that YOU have continued to fish makes you look "interesting" to say the least!
hey, so long as i look "interesting" i'm happy.
Infinite Acetate
User ID: 435908
5/19/2008 7:08 PM Re: Laura Knight-Jadczyk threatens to sue Trinity/Godlike Productions Quote
ark wrote:
AcetateX seems to be friendly with the internet, as he/she is able to register using several IP's from different parts of the world, and they do not seem to be simply proxies.
indeed, i am pretty hip ... maybe i am COINTELPRO?
perhaps you don't want to be so free with your IP address banning then? maybe you'll ban one of your zombies by accident.
but i've had enough of your glib superiority, arrogance, and pseudo-research, so i'll -flick- off .... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 436087
5/20/2008 2:10 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Precisely. Personally I hope she loses and her and the cronies she has on the QFG board are wiped out - then let's watch them show contempt for the ruling and start up clone sites, then we'll see some jail time go down... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 308398
Thank you, Alphabet Agency Shill.
You fucks are really having a nut-on about Laura since the Political Ponerology book came out.
Psychopathy hitting a little to close to home, eh what?
Here is the Amazon link to reviews of Political Ponerology. [link to www.amazon.com]
Read the reviews. Buy the book. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 436093
5/20/2008 2:21 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
indeed, i am pretty hip ... maybe i am COINTELPRO?
perhaps you don't want to be so free with your IP address banning then? maybe you'll ban one of your zombies by accident.
but i've had enough of your glib superiority, arrogance, and pseudo-research, so i'll -flick- off .... Quoting: Beautiful O))) 308398
Later, Barfy |
| NSA Guy...
User ID: 308398
5/20/2008 11:54 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Precisely. Personally I hope she loses and her and the cronies she has on the QFG board are wiped out - then let's watch them show contempt for the ruling and start up clone sites, then we'll see some jail time go down...
Thank you, Alphabet Agency Shill.
You fucks are really having a nut-on about Laura since the Political Ponerology book came out.
Psychopathy hitting a little to close to home, eh what?
Here is the Amazon link to reviews of Political Ponerology. [ link to www.amazon.com]
Read the reviews. Buy the book.
LOL, I'm a writer living in Florida - very close to New Port Richey, which is where Laura stole $250,000 in her fake house raffle scam, the money used to set up her mindwashink kult in France.
This thread has been going for years, WAY before the PORNEROLOGY book was resurrected and stolen from the original Polish author - this thread contains hundreds of personal testimonies about Laura's felonies, lies and control-freak tactics - this thread documents the Laura and Ark mind control kool aid train wreck in complete gory detail.
This thread is NEVER mentioned or linked to at SOTT for fear that the mass of brainwashed brown-nosers (just like yourself) might wake up and get a clue.
Roll on the court case - Pepin has the money to pursue Laura in CA should the OR case get thrown out.
Just a matter of time now :O))) |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 436477
5/20/2008 6:25 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Dear 436087
I am so glad that someone has come on here to defend that useless piece of pseudo science called ponerology.
How do you quantify evil?
Who gets to decide who is evil and who is not?
This thread is about to celebrate its 3rd anniversary. 2 years before the pornology book came out.
So please, before you say something check the facts. With such sloppy research I would think that you might be Laura Knight jadczyk herself.
Dorothy the evil witch of the west is calling you! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398
5/22/2008 2:35 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
LAURA
Administrator
From: France
Registered: 2006-01-18
Posts: 4012
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
One wonders if Eric Pepin uses something like this:
_ [link to www.conversational-hypnosis.com]
" Who Else Wants To Discover A
Rebel Psychiatrist's Amazing Secret
That Lets You Put People Under Your
Control Quickly & Easily … and Get
Them to Do Anything You Want?"
Now you can unleash your natural ability to...
* Influence anyone to follow your lead
* Get clients & customers to buy from you
* Command new respect with everyone
* Negotiate with stellar success
* Compel colleagues to do what you suggest
* Get just about anyone to say “Yes”
* Have children & teens obey your commands
* Keep your lover(s) eternally loyal
And best of all, they will thank you for the
opportunity to do as you say.
#310
Today 02:05:40
Nathan
Jedi
From: Melbourne, Australia
Registered: 2006-03-06
Posts: 199
Website
Re: Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion
And best of all, they will thank you for the
opportunity to do as you say.
This would have to take the cake as one of the most ridiculous examples of justifying the unjustifiable.
Well OK, there are far more ridiculous examples ... *cough* Israel.
Pardon me, I had something stuck in my throat.
People stumble over the truth from time to time, but most pick themselves up and continue on as if nothing happened.
Offline
Pages: 1 … 29 30 31
Index » Channel Watch & New Age COINTELPRO » Eric Pepin - Higher Balance Institute - Discussion |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 437407
5/22/2008 9:10 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
ROTFLMAO!
So now I'm Vinnie the Pooh? How scarey is that?
Unfortunately, but as usual, the cult is just flat out wrong. I didn't write the piece they attributed to me, and parsed for pages on their forum. Once again, their assumptions are completely faulty.
But of course, the truth, to the cult, matters not at all...
These are people who lie constantly, and even about things such as how many people have visited their site, or whether Laura was named as defendent in legal papers they posted for public derision.
Acetate really had them going on that one, and the results would be obvious for all to see, except, again as usual, they are edited out of existence... Mustn't allow the minions access to too much of the truth, they start thinking...
So now Laura has another go at the Big Lie/Blame the Victim routine:
[link to www.sott.net]
It's like the post that purplehaze made on another thread, quoting a blogpost by Anna Valerious:
A Force of Nature
by Anna Valerious
If you've withheld forgiveness from the narcissists in your life then I am sure you have experienced some particular accusations. These come from the narcissist and their sympathizers. They accuse you of "refusing to forget the past", "holding a grudge", "being resentful", "not letting go".
Boy, do I ever know that one! According to the Bridges gang, it's all my fault because I can't forgive and forget and let bygones be bygones and remove that pesky series of reports about Vinnie from the web! What an evil, unforgiving, un-spiritual, vicious, vindictive person I am (according to them, forgetting that they are the ones that started the whole thing, carried it on for months before I decided that I was not going to be a victim).
VB: This is textbook classic blame the victim, based on a blatant bald faced lie, one that can be proven to be a lie just by looking at their webpage, Retreat from Zaca [link to www.cassiopaea.com]
Note that they removed their seriously flawed original attack article at
[link to www.cassiopaea.com]
leaving only the refund information. Most of that attack can still be read in the second article, where I reply to their lies and attacks. Keep in mind all of this happened within days of their departure from the conference, not months. And nowhere in any of all this is anything that points to my having done the slightest wrong to them! I spoke up about their attack on me and my conference, and that's all, But of course, any contradiction is an attack in C-world...
And at the same time, on her private e-groups, Laura is cooking up her campaign of " |
|
|
