|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 454472
6/19/2008 4:18 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Over at SOTT they are claiming that Chad Colton, the chief HBI Attorney, has committed perjury (LMAO!) by submitting a false screenshot of the original LKJ feeding frenzy - what the duped minion does not realise is that he has it ass-backwards - it is LAURA that has misled the court and filed DOCTORED exhibits. Laura of course backs up the duped minion, further digging her own grave even deeper.
It is Laura that has gone in and doctored everything on that thread, including claiming that Beay and Ryan were NOT moderators, when everyone knows they are and have been for quite some time. They, along with Anart, were policed by Laura - so all 4 are culpable.
Unfortunately for these 4 the HBI Attorneys were taking plenty of screenshots day by day and can prove to the judge exactly how the pornerologist in chief has tried to corrupt due process.
This will NOT go down well. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 308398
Indeed, it will not... The judge, if angry enough, can charge LKJ and gang with perjury, a criminal offense, for lying on their court documents. That's unlikely to happen. Contempt of court and an immediate judgement for the plantiffs is much more likely.
Once the HBI lawyers shot down all the jurisdictional wrangling, and they have now done so brilliantly, then LKJ and cult have only three options:
1) They didn't say it. Unfortunately for them, this is beyond dispute.
2) The story is true. Unfortunately for them, they seem to have no evidence whatsoever to back up their claim. Except of course the reference to reading Gurdjieff...
or 3) The story is satire or hyperbole such that anyone reading it would see at once that it was untrue. Given the general nuttiness of the cult, this might just work... Except for the oft proclaimed and many times agreed upon value of the truth and how SnOTT is the only purveyor of the same...
So, what it comes down to is this: Either LKJ claims the whole thing, the Cassiopaeans, SnOTT, all of it, was just a joke - "Hey, I said Ouiji Board, that should have been a clue!" - or face economic ruin.
Somewhat ironic, don't ya think?
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308398
6/19/2008 11:14 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
A fat womman's greed turned fifty long years
She won a house lottery and lied the next day
It's a black fly in your Chardonnay
It's a death row pardon two minutes too late
And isn't it ironic... don't you think
It's like rain on your wedding day
It's a free ride when you've already paid
It's the good advice that you just didn't take
Who would've thought... it figures
Mr. Play It Safe was afraid to fly
He packed his case for France and kissed his kids goodbye
He waited ten cult years life to take that flight
And as the Chateau crashed down he thought
"Well isn't this nice..."
And isn't it ironic... don't you think
It's like rain on your wedding day
It's a free ride when you've already paid
It's the good advice that you just didn't take
Who would've thought... it figures
Well life has a funny way of sneaking up on you
When you think everything's okay and everything's going right
And life has a karmic way of sorting you out when
You think everything's gone right yet everything blows up
In your face
A traffic jam when you're already late
A no-smoking sign on your cigarette break
It's like ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife
It's meeting the man of my dreams
And then meeting his beautiful wife
And isn't it ironic...don't you think
A little too ironic...and, yeah, I really do think...
It's like rain on your wedding day
It's a free ride when you've already paid
It's the good advice that you just didn't take
Who would've thought... it figures
Life has a funny way of sneaking up on you... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 455351
6/20/2008 5:11 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
We read on SnOTT today that Andrzej M. Łobaczewski, the pornology author died last November.
And they just reported it today?
He died 8 months ago and Laura just found out?
What about the payments to him from Red Pill for his book?
They did not know that their celebrated author died eight months ago?
Something is very wrong here. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428310
6/21/2008 2:07 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hello Vincent.
If you please, could you elaborate on your reasons for being so confident that LKJ, QFG, SOTT, et al. are going to lose in the court case of Eric Pepin and HBI
vs. the aforementioned?
I ask this of you for a couple of reasons.
1. You seem to be very knowledgeable about the details of this case and you seem to have at least some grasp of various aspects of libel law.
2. You clearly have a long and storied history with these people as an adversary of theirs. You have also made clear your prior associations with them and seem to be clued-in as to the details of LKJ's personality traits and how these may well play into the case at hand.
One other question that perhaps you could answer:
Since the defendants appear to all be living and operating out of France and the plaintiffs are in the US, just how would or could this affect possible future efforts to collect any damages which may be awarded by the court?
I assume that you yourself are not an attorney, based upon all that you have indicated prior to this, but you do appear to have some degree of legal knowledge. And as I stated before, you are obviously very familiar with the defendants in the case. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 455351
6/21/2008 6:02 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hey Fool
Vincent Bridges wrote an article that also says that Patsy Ramsey did it.
He also passed around a dangerous and irresponsible rumor that Jirka Rysavy did it, maybe he did it with Patsy!
He met Jirka in NC in 1996. Jirka was looking for good researchers to give money to. Jirka apparently passed on Vincent Bridges and decided to give money to Dan Winter and Jay Weidner.
Vincent got his revenge on Jirks by going around the country telling as many people as possible that Jirka was the killer of Jon Benet.
There are at least 5 people who have heard Vincent Bridges say this. And the list is growing.
Face it. Bridges is a psychopath and you are defending him.
The Pubic Wig strikes again!
Yes, I wrote, with Jay's help, an article on the JonBenet case that is still circulating
on the web. See [link to www.rense.com]
In that article, we speculate that Patsy did do it, because of many extraordinary pieces of evidence, but the possibility is still open, that the child died the next before at the Christmas party and the staging at the scene was done to confuse the issue.
If that is so, and the connections of at least some of those at that Christmas party to pedophilia hold up, then it is possible that Mr. Karr actually does have information that only the killer would know. He heard it through the pedophilia grapevine.
From what I have heard and seen on the news of Mr Karr, I don't think he did the deed. False confession and a major obsession, IMHO...
I met Jirka in 1996, and turned his offer down flat, and warned Dan that it was a bad idea. I met Jay while he was working for Jirka. Everyone who has ever been involved with Jirka's quest to buy up the newage has regreted it, sooner or later. Including both Dan and Jay.
Yes, I said Jirka was involved with JonBenet's death. Jay worked for Jirka, and we wrote the article, which doesn't mention Jirka at all. Jay's only comment was that since Jirka and John Ramsey were on the same cover of Business Week or what ever, they might have known each other. IMHO, that is very unlikely...
Now Laura, wasn't impressed by the JonBenet article and failed to make the connection that Jirka must have had something to do with JonBenet's death. I never said it outright, because there is and has never been any evidence of even a connection between them. But there it is... draw your own conclusions
VB
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62718
The link does not work.
Lots of syntax errors and spelling mistakes in the alleged VB piece above.
Seems like someone is trying to smear VB yet again.
And what does this have to do with Laura Knight-Jadczyk and her various scams and felonies?
Let's see, it proves that Merkin is right. It proves that Laura was telling the truth. It proves that VB is a liar. Golly gee whiz VBis such a scumbag that he attacks an innocent man like Jirka and insinuates that he actually killed JonBenet without any evidence. He is just like Laura and they are both stone-cold crazy.
VB was saying that Jirka did it despite his many denials some right on this thread.
Shall I dig them uo for you?
That is what is has to do with LKJ. She was always telling the truth about VB trashing Jirka and VB was always lying. Just like on his CV, his business, his education, his writing credits. It is a long string of endless lies. |
| DrPostman  
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
6/21/2008 6:36 PM
 | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Wasn't Laura supposed to sue GLP?
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
People like Nancy and Laura are not mentally well and the
people who "support" them are doing anything but.
"I don't have any idea."
-- Dick Cheney, on why he has such low approval ratings
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at
DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Want to know if a site is down, or if
the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 457546
6/24/2008 3:43 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hello Vincent.
If you please, could you elaborate on your reasons for being so confident that LKJ, QFG, SOTT, et al. are going to lose in the court case of Eric Pepin and HBI
vs. the aforementioned?
I ask this of you for a couple of reasons.
1. You seem to be very knowledgeable about the details of this case and you seem to have at least some grasp of various aspects of libel law.
2. You clearly have a long and storied history with these people as an adversary of theirs. You have also made clear your prior associations with them and seem to be clued-in as to the details of LKJ's personality traits and how these may well play into the case at hand.
One other question that perhaps you could answer:
Since the defendants appear to all be living and operating out of France and the plaintiffs are in the US, just how would or could this affect possible future efforts to collect any damages which may be awarded by the court?
I assume that you yourself are not an attorney, based upon all that you have indicated prior to this, but you do appear to have some degree of legal knowledge. And as I stated before, you are obviously very familiar with the defendants in the case. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 428310
Okay AC,
Yes, as I have been studying the legalities of libel for the last seven years as the C-Cult attacked me, I have indeed learned a thing or two. The first thing I learned, back in the spring of 2002, was that a libel suit was simply not worth the cost or the trouble unless you could prove specific damages. The bulk of LKJ’s lies never seemed to have that much effect on me; the book came out, I continued to write and publish and do TV shows. On that level it was hard for me to show damages, since in fact their insane hatred of me actually increased my credibility in mainstream circles.
So, I never had much of a case in that sense, although if I had had the money to throw at it, I could have easily won a suit for defamation, and for the same reasons that HBI will win in the end: LKJ and the cult are incapable of telling the truth.
The HBI case though is a perfect storm in the sense that they have all the pieces necessary to really nail LKJ and the rest. They can show that the defamation/libel happened and that the cult tried to tamper with the evidence; they can show damages; they can show a consistent pattern of attacks from an assumed position of authority; they can show that it wasn’t meant as satire or hyperbole; and so on…
You might say it is the perfect textbook case of defamation. The cult's lawyers seem to realize this, and their motions concerning the basic allegations all focused on juridictional issues; you can't sue QF or SnOTT because they don't really exist; the comments were a public service; they concerned a well known figure, and so on. The cult has never said they didn't commit the defamation, just thrown out many costly attempts to avoid responsibility for it...
Links to all of LKJ's motions can be found at:
[link to www.sott.net]
Here's where the links to HBI's response can be found:
[link to www.sott.net]
And here's the original complaint:
[link to www.sott.net]
The cult has been silent for a week or so, and we can only guess at the furious brain storming and C channeling that is going on at Castleopaea...
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428310
6/24/2008 4:49 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
--Vincent:
Thank you for your thorough response and for all of the helpful information.
Just as I suspected, you do indeed have considerable legal knowledge with relation to civil actions and most particularly, libel cases. Additionally, it does appear -- as you have stated -- that your knowledge is partially derived from direct experience and partially taken from extensive research.
From what I know, once a court date has been set to hear a civil case, if the defendant(s) fails to show up to court, the judge will (almost) automatically pass judgement in favor of the plaintiff(s).
Based upon what you and a number of others have claimed in this very long and detailed thread, it appears that an eligible representative for QFG, et al. might encounter some degree of difficulty in returning to the US in order to participate directly in the case and offer a suitable defense in court.
This is purely and solely speculation here but it is based upon a careful reading of the history of QFG and based upon what has been detailed both at this forum and elsewhere. If accurate, this would then present some further problems for the defendants.
It is possible for an entity to "skip out" on a judgement against same which has been proffered by a civil court. However, one normally must either maintain a very low profile, undergo a stealthy relocation or perhaps undertake both of those options in order to successfully evade a civil judgement.
Merely from observation, it appears as if the members of QFG, SOTT, etc. may find the concept of maintaining a low profile to be wholly unfamiliar.
If this is the case and if your observations about these folks now having "been silent" for a week or more are accurate, then the drama could be interesting to observe going forward from this point. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 457879
6/25/2008 6:23 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Let's see, it proves that Merkin is right. It proves that Laura was telling the truth. It proves that VB is a liar. Golly gee whiz VBis such a scumbag that he attacks an innocent man like Jirka and insinuates that he actually killed JonBenet without any evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 455351
Actually, it proves nothing... I never said or insinuated anything about JR "killing" JBR, and the mangled quote you cite demonstrates that.
JR is quite clear on who is promoting this lie and where it came from, and it wasn't me.
Nice try, though, at misdirection.
VB |
| hit
User ID: 272341
6/25/2008 7:11 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
they put out a single in 1981 - " ooh wop , when you do wop " -
it was quite catchy , but paradoxically it never caught on |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 457997
6/25/2008 11:55 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Anonymous Coward 428310:
--Vincent:
Thank you for your thorough response and for all of the helpful information.
VB: You are quite welcome...
Just as I suspected, you do indeed have considerable legal knowledge with relation to civil actions and most particularly, libel cases. Additionally, it does appear -- as you have stated -- that your knowledge is partially derived from direct experience and partially taken from extensive research.
From what I know, once a court date has been set to hear a civil case, if the defendant(s) fails to show up to court, the judge will (almost) automatically pass judgement in favor of the plaintiff(s).
VB: Yep...
Based upon what you and a number of others have claimed in this very long and detailed thread, it appears that an eligible representative for QFG, et al. might encounter some degree of difficulty in returning to the US in order to participate directly in the case and offer a suitable defense in court.
VB: They could let their lawyers appear for them in court, since that would be little more than a judge reading motions and making a decision on that basis. Their basic testomony has already been given in LKJ and others declarations. That would change only if LKJ were called upon to give testimony in court. If she didn't show then, the judge could issue a bench warrant for contempt of court. But the cult's real problem is something called discovery, where the plantiffs and their attorneys get to ask questions under oath concerning anything remotely pertinent to the case. The goal of the cult's lawyers has been to get the case dismissed before a judge orders a "hostile" discovery. In such a situation, the plantiffs get to question LKJ and the others about everything from their mental health, ouiji board channeling of aliens, the cult-like nature of the group, the house raffle scam and so on. This information could then be used in any IRS or federal case involving wire fraud, money laundering etc., as well as a basis for having France declare them a dangerous cult. So they really, really don't want that to happen...
This is purely and solely speculation here but it is based upon a careful reading of the history of QFG and based upon what has been detailed both at this forum and elsewhere. If accurate, this would then present some further problems for the defendants.
It is possible for an entity to "skip out" on a judgement against same which has been proffered by a civil court. However, one normally must either maintain a very low profile, undergo a stealthy relocation or perhaps undertake both of those options in order to successfully evade a civil judgement.
VB: The court would be able to seize all assets in the US, bank accounts, websites, QFG, Red Pill Press and so on. France will also do the same regarding assets. Since she is being sued personally, anything she writes or publishes under her own name will be fair game for garnishment.
Merely from observation, it appears as if the members of QFG, SOTT, etc. may find the concept of maintaining a low profile to be wholly unfamiliar.
VB: Indeed...
If this is the case and if your observations about these folks now having "been silent" for a week or more are accurate, then the drama could be interesting to observe going forward from this point.
VB: Silent in the sense that they have avoided making any comments on the case, and related matters. Up until the 18th, they were still libeling and ridiculing EP and HBI at top speed. Then Laura posted her "we were just kidding" excuse and everything went quiet. LKJ herself is now discussing T. Lobsang Rampa and anti-war movies, and hasn't pronounced anyone a psychopathic cointelpro agent in over a week...
VB |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 457997
6/25/2008 12:39 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Actually, I should have name checked myself at SnOTT before I posted that response. They're at it again:
[link to www.sott.net]
This is worth the read, as it shows the herd/cult mentality at work...
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 458127
6/25/2008 4:25 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Vincent's quote exactly as it appeared:
"Yes, I said Jirka was involved with JonBenet's death. Jay worked for Jirka, and we wrote the article, which doesn't mention Jirka at all. Jay's only comment was that since Jirka and John Ramsey were on the same cover of Business Week or what ever, they might have known each other. IMHO, that is very unlikely...
Now Laura, wasn't impressed by the JonBenet article and failed to make the connection that Jirka must have had something to do with JonBenet's death. I never said it outright, because there is and has never been any evidence of even a connection between them. But there it is... draw your own conclusions"
Despite the fact that he never met Jirka. Just in case, I asked Jirka in Colorado less than a month ago if he ever met Vincent Bridges. He said No.
How about showing us the quote unmangled Mr. Bridges?
There are five people willing to say that they heard you say that Jirka was involved. He knows this because I am telling him. He is very interested in the story that I have to tell. I am turning the whole mess into a book about new age con artists like Jadczyk and Bridges.
You won't show us the unmangled quote becaause I can prove that this is what you said. You are an absolute liar, a thief, a con artist. You lied on your cv you lied about Paul Duffy, you lied to Stormbear, you lie on this thread all of the time.
I am here watching you all the time and when you lie it will be called upon. Until you apologize to all those you have hurt, until you cop to the truth, until you pay people the money that you owe them, I will be here reminding everyone who you really are. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 458112
6/25/2008 4:34 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
6/25/2008 4:56 PM
| | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
:dramallama:
"I don't have any idea."
-- Dick Cheney, on why he has such low approval ratings
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at
DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Want to know if a site is down, or if
the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 458215
6/25/2008 6:58 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
quoting Merkin/Anonymous Coward 458127:
Vincent's quote exactly as it appeared:
"Yes, I said Jirka was involved with JonBenet's death. Jay worked for Jirka, and we wrote the article, which doesn't mention Jirka at all. Jay's only comment was that since Jirka and John Ramsey were on the same cover of Business Week or what ever, they might have known each other. IMHO, that is very unlikely...
Now Laura, wasn't impressed by the JonBenet article and failed to make the connection that Jirka must have had something to do with JonBenet's death. I never said it outright, because there is and has never been any evidence of even a connection between them. But there it is... draw your own conclusions"
Despite the fact that he never met Jirka. Just in case, I asked Jirka in Colorado less than a month ago if he ever met Vincent Bridges. He said No.
VB: Yeah, right, just like you also talked to Moira Timms and Dr. Paul LaViolette, you lying scumbag...
How about showing us the quote unmangled Mr. Bridges?
There are five people willing to say that they heard you say that Jirka was involved. He knows this because I am telling him. He is very interested in the story that I have to tell. I am turning the whole mess into a book about new age con artists like Jadczyk and Bridges.
VB: Funny, these five people get mentioned alot, but they never seem to have names...
You won't show us the unmangled quote becaause I can prove that this is what you said. You are an absolute liar, a thief, a con artist. You lied on your cv you lied about Paul Duffy, you lied to Stormbear, you lie on this thread all of the time.
VB: Mind citing your source for the quote? And the quote clearly says that I am not accusing JR of anything, just offering the only possible connection on which LKJ could have built her lie that I said anything about JR and the Ramsey case. Yes, I have admitted and apologized for the mistakes in that one bio blurb that is a decade old and for a radio show that no longer exists; but I have never lied about Paul, or to Stormy, and I have never, ever, told an intentional lie on this thread.
I am here watching you all the time and when you lie it will be called upon. Until you apologize to all those you have hurt, until you cop to the truth, until you pay people the money that you owe them, I will be here reminding everyone who you really are.
VB: Actually Merkin, you are just reminding everybody who you are...
VB |
| StormBear
User ID: 452058
6/26/2008 12:21 AM
 | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Ahhhh... Merkin.
No wonder it smelled like third grade in here.
It Came From Cassiopiea, only at
[link to www.towncalleddobson.com] |
| StormBear
User ID: 452058
6/26/2008 12:27 AM
| | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Actually, I should have name checked myself at SnOTT before I posted that response. They're at it again:
[ link to www.sott.net]
This is worth the read, as it shows the herd/cult mentality at work...
VB
I find it interesting that they like to capitalize "Work."
It Came From Cassiopiea, only at
[link to www.towncalleddobson.com] |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 458524
6/26/2008 7:52 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Actually, I should have name checked myself at SnOTT before I posted that response. They're at it again:
[ link to www.sott.net]
This is worth the read, as it shows the herd/cult mentality at work...
VB
I find it interesting that they like to capitalize "Work."
That's one their Gurdjieff buzz words...
Which is unintentionally humorous, because they seem to do no "Work" of any meaningful sort... Gurdjieff taught through movement and dance as well as through music and intellectual analysis, learning these tools were called the Work, or the "group's work." However, Gurdjieff himself said that "professional" occultists, including mediums, spirtiualists and clairvoyants, were incompatible with the Work. LKJ tends to ignore that comment...
VB |
| Great White Whale Watcher
User ID: 459082
6/27/2008 7:04 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Ya gotta admit that the Great White Whale (tm) is nothing if not consistent!
Here she is having a BALL, a belly full of laughs, at Eric Pepin' expense.
Here she is continuing to defame Mr Pepin at her site:
[link to www.sott.net]
'This one is actually a fun read.
[Notice the ST terminology!!!]
Note where it is pointed out that "Although HBI professes no connection to the sex abuse charges against its founder, president and owner, the facts reported in the Oregonian show otherwise. The articles report that the victim was an HBI employee who accused Pepin of coercing sex with him with the knowledge that the victim was a minor. ... The sex acts, which included three-way sex with a third HBI employee, allegedly occurred at the HBI office, as well as at Pepin's home. The articles also report that Pepin admitted to having sex with most of HBI's eleven employees. The judge at Pepin's trial said that he believed that the charges were probably true, but that he could not find Pepin guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The deputy district attorney is quoted as saying that HBI is nothing more than a "sex cult."'
What the GWW fails to address is that she is claiming that HBI is a 'front for pedophilia.' The onus is on her to prove this.
She is also claiming that HBI is a CIA/FBI sham corporation, a front, a COINTELPRO operation.
HBI have already proven that they have lost, already, some $1.5m as a result.
It is up to the GWW to prove this repeated assertion also, also.
Fact is, she can do NEITHER.
She is all piss and wind, as those of us who have known her for 10 years plus will be able to testify.
So far the GWW, far from being the Joan d'Arc of internet freedom, spoiling for a ground-breaking legal showdown, all she is doing is wriggling and squirming to aaoid having to go to court - at all costs. The costs being the $150,000 raised by her duped minions at SnOTT.
Read between the lines - what is the GWW afraid of? |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 459418
6/27/2008 9:42 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Ya gotta admit that the Great White Whale (tm) is nothing if not consistent!
Here she is having a BALL, a belly full of laughs, at Eric Pepin' expense.
Here she is continuing to defame Mr Pepin at her site:
[ link to www.sott.net]
'This one is actually a fun read.
[Notice the ST terminology!!!]
Note where it is pointed out that "Although HBI professes no connection to the sex abuse charges against its founder, president and owner, the facts reported in the Oregonian show otherwise. The articles report that the victim was an HBI employee who accused Pepin of coercing sex with him with the knowledge that the victim was a minor. ... The sex acts, which included three-way sex with a third HBI employee, allegedly occurred at the HBI office, as well as at Pepin's home. The articles also report that Pepin admitted to having sex with most of HBI's eleven employees. The judge at Pepin's trial said that he believed that the charges were probably true, but that he could not find Pepin guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The deputy district attorney is quoted as saying that HBI is nothing more than a "sex cult."'
What the GWW fails to address is that she is claiming that HBI is a 'front for pedophilia.' The onus is on her to prove this.
She is also claiming that HBI is a CIA/FBI sham corporation, a front, a COINTELPRO operation.
HBI have already proven that they have lost, already, some $1.5m as a result.
It is up to the GWW to prove this repeated assertion also, also.
Fact is, she can do NEITHER.
She is all piss and wind, as those of us who have known her for 10 years plus will be able to testify.
So far the GWW, far from being the Joan d'Arc of internet freedom, spoiling for a ground-breaking legal showdown, all she is doing is wriggling and squirming to aaoid having to go to court - at all costs. The costs being the $150,000 raised by her duped minions at SnOTT.
Read between the lines - what is the GWW afraid of?
Basically, they are afraid that any kind of discovery will reveal the details of the cult and its scams. They might in fact avoid this because the judge can render a summary judgement on the agreed upon facts after ruling on all the motions to dismiss. With the jurisdictional issues resolved, then there is no defense except the "Uh, we weren't really serious" defense.
[link to quantumfuturegroup.org]
In her Reply memorandum in support of the motion to strike, LKJ and her lawyers have all but gutted any credibility she or SnOTT may have by claiming that the general tenor of the discussion forum negates any chance that anyone will its subject literally. The COINTELPRO comment was just hyperole, not to taken seriously and the pedophilia comments was just her opinion taken from her reading of the newspaper articles.
Unfortunately, all of this is made ridiculous by LKJ and SnOTT's insistance on their being the only one with the truth. If you write an article on how to spot COINTELPRO, then it is hard to claim that it is just hyperbole...
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 460481
6/30/2008 12:00 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
The reason VB doesn't take LKJ to court us because he would have to admit under oath all the lies and crap he has been throwing around for years. We would find out about his fake company his fake bio, his fake education, his fake psycotherapy practice, the number of people he has stolen money and research from many people.
How about that quote unmangled VB? Oh that's right you're a liar and the quote is about Jirka is 100 % correct.
How about I show all the times on this thread you denied saying just what you say in the quote?
Let's rock and roll dude! |
| StormBear
User ID: 452058
6/30/2008 1:57 AM
| | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
How about I show all the times on this thread you denied saying just what you say in the quote?
Let's rock and roll dude! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 460481
Y A W N
It Came From Cassiopiea, only at
[link to www.towncalleddobson.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 461070
7/1/2008 1:54 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Yes Stormbear let us get angry at LKJ for her lies but YAWN at VB for his. Such courage from you, such a demand for equal ethics.
But that is okay. VB cannot show us the unmangled quote because the quote is correct.
Like when he could not show us his business registration for his company, like when he could not show us his real bio until after his fake bio had been revealed, like when he could just not remember what articles he had written for Rolling Stone, High Times, Life Magazine and Playboy. Yes he says he wrote them, but he just cannot remember the titles, or the dates or his pseudonyms.
You, meanwhile, continue to exhibit the mindless sheeplike attitude that you accuse Americans of having over Bush and his BS. Yet you never question VB on his BS.
That is because you are a sheep like the sheeple of the US. Only you are a sheeple of VB and his CIA, Puharich, mind control crap.
YAWNing Mr Stormbear is a sign that you are asleep. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 461079
7/1/2008 2:17 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
But that is okay. VB cannot show us the unmangled quote because the quote is correct. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 461070
Okay Merkin, show me your source for the quote and we'll talk about it...
You wrote:
"Yes, I said Jirka was involved with JonBenet's death. Jay worked for Jirka, and we wrote the article, which doesn't mention Jirka at all. Jay's only comment was that since Jirka and John Ramsey were on the same cover of Business Week or what ever, they might have known each other. IMHO, that is very unlikely...
Now Laura, wasn't impressed by the JonBenet article and failed to make the connection that Jirka must have had something to do with JonBenet's death. I never said it outright, because there is and has never been any evidence of even a connection between them. But there it is... draw your own conclusions"
Only the real quote goes like this:
"I never said Jirka had anything to do with JonBenet's death. Jay worked for Jirka, and we wrote the article, which doesn't mention Jirka at all. Jay's only comment was that since Jirka and John Ramsey were on the same cover of Business Week or what ever, they might have known each other. IMHO, that is very unlikely...
Now Laura, who was more impressed by the JonBenet article than anything in any bio blurb, added the totally invalid conclusion that Jirka must have had something to do with JonBenet's death. I never said it, period, because there is and has never been any evidence of even a connection between them. If you have someone, other than a C-minion, who says overwise, let's hear from them..."
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
So Merkin, how about it?
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 461070
7/1/2008 2:49 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Rock and Roll Verse One.
I am not Merkin.
This is another mistake by Vincent Bridges. Another in a long list of mistakes.
The many mistakes aside, what I want to know about you is about your fake biography posted on Lauralee.com from 1998 to 2002, which you said was posted by an unknown intern.
You have never answered the questions on this thread about these discrepancies in your bio. Since you are beginning to answer one of these questions perhaps you can begin to answer the rest.
Why did you not correct the bio? Who is the unknown intern? What is their name and why would they make such things about you?
Whatever bullshit you write will never be believed but since you will say it anyway why don't you tell us about is your claim to have a Master's degree in History when you have a couple of months of college at best?
What I want to know is how you practiced Psychotherapy in NC without a medical license?
What I want to know about your fake business which did not exist until 2002 yet you copyrighted your book with this name in 1999.
Where is the proof that you had a business until 2002? Where is your business license? What is your tax id number for that time?
I want to know what articles you wrote for Rolling Stone, Life and High Times?
I want to know why the publisher of your book, DAW Press, cannot remember ou or the book that you claim that they published?
Please answer all questions as soon as possible. I have a publishing deadline!
Don't worry folks. He will never give an adequate answer.
That's because he cannot tell the truth! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 461383
7/1/2008 3:35 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
That's Rock and Roll? I was hoping for shock and awe, you delivered spit and dribble. Cooome on, if you are going to be so obvious about posting things to try and distract from the details coming out on this thread recently at least make them a little interesting.
He lied on his bio? That's like saying someone fudged a little on their resume. It's so weak it's not even worth typing on a keyboard. I'm amazed that's even near the top...
He copyrighted a book in 1999 yet made a company in 2002. This is a joke right? Copyright is made the year a work is completed, not the year it's published. If someone were smart they would push the copyright date up to make it look new so 99' date only hurts the publisher by needling the details.
Man, the rest is like, why even bother? It's almost comical with what was written on the thread the past few pages and then post *that* thinking you've made some great comeback and all of a sudden you're waggin' the dog and everyone will forget.
Compare what you wrote there with the real heavy hitters like, you have this cult living on a compound in France who took their brainwashing to a whole new level by making an alternative news site, pretty clever really, feeding people their version of reality, maintain total control over every, single post on your 'open' discussion forum to control all forms of thought and how they got to all of this is by - wait, are you ready, are you ready -
Stealing a bunch of money from people in a fake house raffle. See, stealing hurts people. You lie, you gain, other people lose. Changing your own bio does, um, yeah, does nothing. But creating a whole scam to steal $250,000 after you stole the house from under your current husbands nose by saying you'd take him to the cops saying he did something awful to your kids, that's beyond psychotic. It's almost L. Ron Hubbard playbook.
See, to me, *that's* a good hit. Then you add in some things like altered evidence in a court case, then submitted sworn testimony saying said altered evidence has not been altered, then when you are caught by the opposing side who point out you lied to the court and manipulated evidence thinking you could lie to a court of law completely glaze over said fact with mindless following and ban anyone who might mention it - that's really something.
Sooo, you got any good hits.. or are you gonna say now that he got a C in Math in elementary school and sometimes doesn't punctuate correctly - gasp!. Which means we should all be shocked and ignore the spewings of a woman who would stop at nothing to destroy anyone and everything that gets in the way of what she believes she deserves - to be hailed on high as the ultimate controller of all, which is a hell of a lot more serious. Look at where Hubbard began and what he created and the lives he destroyed. I see a lot of similarities with SOTT, the way they enforce control, and the total exploitation of the truth regardless of the price. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 461652
7/2/2008 3:42 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Anonymous Coward 461070:
Rock and Roll Verse One.
I am not Merkin.
This is another mistake by Vincent Bridges. Another in a long list of mistakes.
VB: Or just another one of your lies... Such as changing the text of that quote to make it look like I said something I didn't. I notice you don't comment on that...
The many mistakes aside, what I want to know about you is about your fake biography posted on Lauralee.com from 1998 to 2002, which you said was posted by an unknown intern.
VB: Another lie... I never said it, and if you claim otherwise, show us your source...
You have never answered the questions on this thread about these discrepancies in your bio. Since you are beginning to answer one of these questions perhaps you can begin to answer the rest.
VB: I have answered all these questions at length on this thread...
Why did you not correct the bio? Who is the unknown intern? What is their name and why would they make such things about you?
VB: The blurb was on a website over which I had no control. They finally took it down when they re-did the site. The intern nonsense is a lie you seem to enjoy repeating. Again, show us a source, one you haven't changed, or shut the fuck up...
Whatever bullshit you write will never be believed but since you will say it anyway why don't you tell us about is your claim to have a Master's degree in History when you have a couple of months of college at best?
VB: Your source for this, other than your own imagination? Even the Cassiopaeans admitted that I never claimed any degrees: "Mr. Bridges is correct. He never claimed any degrees."
[link to www.cassiopaea.com]
What I want to know is how you practiced Psychotherapy in NC without a medical license?
VB: Slow on the uptake, or willfully stupid? Psychiatrists need a medical license or degree... There are many types of therapists... Remember?
What I want to know about your fake business which did not exist until 2002 yet you copyrighted your book with this name in 1999.
VB: Right... willfully stupid... Aleph Books was incorporated in 1995, and was in the process of officially becoming Aethyrea Books when LKJ and Jay trashed it in late 2001/02.
Where is the proof that you had a business until 2002? Where is your business license? What is your tax id number for that time?
VB: Oh, I don't know, just books and publications printed, bookkeeping records, mentions in court documents, those kind of things...
I want to know what articles you wrote for Rolling Stone, Life and High Times?
VB: Never said I wrote anything for Life. I wrote a draft text and supplied "exhibits" for the article on blotteracid designs in the May/June 1981 High Times. Including that was an exaggeration.
I want to know why the publisher of your book, DAW Press, cannot remember ou or the book that you claim that they published?
VB: Because it was almost 30 years ago and the deal never went through...
Please answer all questions as soon as possible. I have a publishing deadline!
Don't worry folks. He will never give an adequate answer.
That's because he cannot tell the truth!
VB: Actually Merkin, or not-Merkin as the case may be, you are the one cannot tell the truth as you have demonstrated time and time again in your obsessive and pointless attacks on someone you don't even know.
Let's not forget why you're here:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Were you personally wronged by this man? With all the insistance behind these attacks, one would think that you would have personal claims as it sounds extremely personal.
Did you have any business ties with VB?
Did you lose something because of VB?
ME - Thanks for your questions. I have a good friend that was absolutely fucked over by Bridges. Because he will not say anything against Bridges and I saw the way that his life was destroyed by Bridges I began looking into the man myself. I was appalled by the way that he skirted around the truth, the way that he hid behind Stormbear and Anders while acting as if he was up front and honest.
He would have never answered the questions concerning his bio if I had not stepped forward. He still has not answered the many lies that are there for all to see.
Let us hear about your personal experience; it might explain the impression that may be gotten that you are a stalker and put some light on the emotionally hyper-charged content of these posts.
ME - Vincent Bridges has a terrible reputation. He has practiced black magick on people and caused much pain in this world. He is an obvious liar by the fact that he morphs his answers depending on how the question is asked. He personally caused Laura to go over the brink with his many decpetions concerning his non-existant publishing company. He refuses to take an ounce of responsibility for any of this. Even going to the extent of blaming an unknown inept intern for his lies, a cowardly act if there ever was one.
VB: Thank you for finally explaining your fascination with attacking me. I suspected it might be you after Paul made his brief appearance.
So, do you really believe that I can talk inside your head, give you nightmares and bad luck, and so on, as Paul claims? Or isn't it more likely that Paul is delusional and that his life falling apart was the result of the onset of his illness?
Stormy, who has known me much longer than anyone else here, and Anders, who actually was part of the harrassment campaign, simply know or see the basic truth. That Anders should support me should be very telling. And that I hold no grudge against him or any of the others who have apologized is also telling. That, I think, is the main difference here.
Because I do care about the truth, I have been apologizing for my mistakes in that one damn bio, which I NEVER blamed on anyone, since 2002. I have never made any secret of my acadmic irregularity and I have never claimed to be anything but what I am, a pioneer in a certain field of trauma work involving light and sound brain entrainment.
As you have yet to present any evidence to the contrary, I think that should stand as basic fact.
Obsessively, you keep repeating the same misconceptions, without any supporting evidence, and pretend that since you "know" it to be true, then everyone else should agree with you? How delusional is that?
You say: "He has posed as a scholar, a writer, a psycho analyst and many other things when none of them are true."
Yet all these things, in the strict sense of the word in one case, are quite true. What scholarly journals have you been published in? How many books of yours translated into Russian? Published anything? Done any scholarly work? Ever tried to create new ways to help people?
No? Then maybe that is the problem. What have you done?
Yet, to you, because your friend has some delusions, and the C-Cult has made a very distorted "expose" out of the mistakes in one bio more than eight years old, that hasn't been on the web anywhere but the Cult's site since 2002, I am an evil black magician, psychopath, etc.
I think it is quite clear now what your motives are, and that's fine. Your loyalty to Paul is commendable, but frankly, you are barking up the wrong tree.
You can see me as the most evil resume inflator in the world, with a non-existant company that puts out real books, and that's fine with me.
You've had plenty of opportunity to spread your version of the truth, and we can all judge your ability to discern a litte clearer now.
So perhaps it is time to give it a rest, OK?
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 452058
7/2/2008 12:53 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
While Merkin, or maybe another anon we should call "Merkin On Meds" (MOM - that still makes me giggle), is beating the shit our of a horse that died make in the 70s, they are probably trying to take our eye off the ball once again.
Every time, and I do mean every single solitary time, one of these Merkin Clones pop up, it turns out to be an effort on the cult's part to divert our attention from something else. Get us all gassed up and yapping about "black magic" and Rolling fucking Stone.
I would like to take this opportunity to point you to another article on the Pepin trial...
[link to wweek.com]
Please feel free to make your voice heard in the comments section. |
| StormBear
User ID: 452058
7/2/2008 1:38 PM
| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | |
|
