|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 18834
7/17/2005 3:29 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
<<Theft is NOT subjective...>>>
No, no, no. I said that calling people "evil" is subjective. You misunderstood.
no I can spot morons miles away
<<No - it makes it MORE true, because I interacted with L´ark for years and I SAW the demons behind the MASK. I have worked with them PERSONALLY. Get it?>>
There were multiple witnesses to the Pentagon Strike
gimme a break
you said there was no right and wrong
i countered that theft, murder and rape are wrong
now u change the subject to the pentagram strike
LOL
with differing accounts and details. Which is the truth out of those? One will say, "I SAW it personally, so it makes it more true." Then somebody else who saw something completely different will say, "I SAW it personally, so it makes mine more true."
Get it?
i get that u ducked my response about theft, muder and rape
pls don´t play these games with me, you are wasting your time
<<Revenge??? LOL, then look in the MIRROR!!!
LMAO as u shoot yourself in the foot...
Why are you reading about revenge? According to your thesis you must be full of hate and revenge. You accuse me of being bitter - look in the mirror - because you must BE BITTER YOURSELF.>>
I was reading about Revenge and Cancelling because it was another chapter in the book, which I am reading in full. It also contained chapters about "Meaning" and "Magnetic Centre" and "Law of Three"....
nevertheless the main word you chose to accuse me of was REVENGE
now you try and talk your way (as your last two points prove) out of your INTENT
Also, you are mistaken again. I am a different person to the user who was speaking about the "two-way mirror". Perhaps your emotional frenzy is distorting your mental faculties and reading instrument. This is quite obvious and it doesn´t give you any credit.
if you posted as a human being rather than an ac coward we might get somewhere
There was one piece of advice made earlier in the thread: if you have a problem with this alleged "House Raffle Scam", then contact the authorities.
you jave said that how many times now???
we HAVE
deal with it
Why are you milling around on an internet forum? What is stopping you? Are you lazy, scared, unsure of your "observations"?
No - I am talking about the scam, this is a forum in which to talk about things - no???
You seem concerned that I should talk about the subject of the thread;s title... perhaps you should moseu over to the ESPN sports forum where your sage advice might cut it.
It doesn´t here.
<<No, actually what I see here is a coward, and that is YOU, unable to deal with your illusions of the STO L´arks being SHATTERED..>>
Here you assume that I´m familiar with Laura and Ark; and that I have illusions about them; and that I´m a "coward".
You couldn´t SEE if your life depended upon it.
I see someone sticking his oar in, trying to cause trouble, and with no knowledge of Laura at all.
I see a bunch of know-nothings attacking the messenger.
thanks for the bump!
 |
| Infinitea
User ID: 12411
7/17/2005 4:30 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
RA: Consider the example of a man who sees all the poker hands. He then knows the game. It is but childs play to gamble, for there is no risk. In time/space and in the true color green density, the hands of all are open to the eye. The thoughts, the feelings, the troubles, all these may be seen. There is no deception and no desire for deception. Thus much may be accomplished in harmony but the mind/body/spirit gains little polarity from the interaction. In a lifetime the cards are love, dislike, limitation, unhappiness, pleasure, etc. They are dealt and re-dealt continuously. You may, during this incarnation begin to know your own cards. You may begin to find the love within you. You may begin to balance your pleasure, your limitations, etc. However your only indication of other-selves cards is to look into the eyes. You cannot remember your hand, their hands, perhaps even the rules of the game. This game can be won only by those who lose their cards in the melting influence of love. It can only be won by those who lay their pleasures, their limitations, their all upon the table face up and say inwardly: All, all of you players, each other-self, whatever your hand, I love you." This is the game: to know, to accept, to forgive, to balance, and to open the self in love. This cannot be done without the forgetting, for it would carry no weight in the life of the mind/body/spirit being-ness totality. (B2, 133)
I: Of course, itīs easy to love those who behave the way we think they should--the real challenge to love comes with those who we feel have abused us in one way or another. Thot for food... |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 18834
7/17/2005 4:37 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I: Of course, it´s easy to love those who behave the way we think they should--the real challenge to love comes with those who we feel have abused us in one way or another. Thot for food...
Sure. I would īloveī to see these folks (who have ripped off so many) go to jail. RA has it spot on!
Did Jesus turn the other cheek Infinitea? - Cos Laura says he didnīt...
Now whoīs right? Laura or RA?
And who won the raffle??? |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 18834
7/17/2005 5:17 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Infinitea:
This is Laura´s take on turning the other cheek - notice the last sentence
The problem seems to be that there is a serious lack of understanding of the true nature of Free Will, as well as the most fundamental nature of STS - that is, to use others to serve self. As we have been pointing out here on our site, the reason for this is what we are calling Cosmic COINTELPRO. This lack of understanding is due to millennia of propaganda. That is why, as we have learned, no progress can be made until an individual has reached that point of bankruptcy in terms of what he accepts as real or true in this reality. As a couple of the Quantum School Teachers wrote,
AXJ & HS: People are unconsciously led to believe a distorted view of the world, and they are not noticing that such a manipulation is happening. The reason why this is unnoticed is because, if this manipulation is noticed, it is no longer as effective as before. Unnoticed manipulations are for example the *basic unquestioned premises*, which "everyone knows" and which go unquestioned. For example a basic premise is that "unconditional love" has been touted so much with the "conventional understanding" that it means to give love in the sense of "turn the other cheek," or "give until it hurts," "love them no matter what they do," and also in the sense of an "outpouring of energy," that what seems to be so is that this is a clever deception designed to obtain energy in the STS manner: giving love with the intent that it will change something, i.e. STS.
The problem (as always) is with the understanding of the term love. People interpret it as a command, an obligation to give all regardless. It is the concept of love without knowledge that ensnares people into a manipulative feeding dynamic. However if we understand that to love is to know and vice versa, then unconditional love becomes unconditional knowledge also, knowledge without conditions is objective knowledge, which will allow us to see the manipulation inherent in the idea of "turn the other cheek".
This type of manipulation shapes the way people perceive the world. It is very powerful. After a certain threshold is reached, the manipulatively distorted worldview becomes self-sustaining. That is, people start to impose this ´way of thinking´ upon each other, and most importantly upon their children. This is how the system is sustained, I think.
Since everyone is ill with the same mental disease, it becomes "normal" to have the disease. And since there is no reference point of how it is without the disease, hardly anyone tries or even realises that it is possible to heal it.
Most people have been conditioned to think that STS means something that is "in your face negative." They think that identifying STS is easy - it´s Lizzies, or its bad men who are trying to do bad things that are obvious. They think it is overt violation of free will where a person can clearly see that their will is being violated. STS is "murderers," or "robbers," or "liars" who deliberately lie to get something for themselves or to harm another. STS is always connected to "fighting," or "conflict" of some kind. STS is always a "battle" that is "out there in the open" in some way. And therefore, fighting, conflict, battling in any respect is seen as STS.
Now, in one session the C´s said that you do not fight fire with fire; the suggestion was made to disconnect, to not have "negative emotions," that one should not "send them back" their own energy amplified. The point that is missed by many is that STS activity consists of "assimilating" others to itself. It doesn´t matter whether it is overtly dominating and obvious, or whether it is sweet and seductive, and seemingly loving. And this suggests to us that sending love to someone who hasn´t asked for it quite literally is STS.
In a later session, the issue of pity was brought up - that the biggest hook of STS was to get one to pity them. The C´s then said that we must "act for our destiny" which was quite different IN INTENT from acting against others.
I pointed out that my experience had been that when you do this, they often perceive it as "acting against them" because, in fact, you are refusing their domination, their control, their lies, their games. The end result is, of course, that you have to repeatedly DEFEND your stand against their repeated attempts to regain control of you, and this certainly, on the outside, looks like "fighting."
The difference is, of course, in INTENT.
The group had a really graphic lesson in this process in the saga that is partly recounted in the Adventures Series. In this experience we were exposed to the tactic of someone who used lies and distortions and great "helpfulness" to attempt to gradually "move in and take over."
Waking up to this via the various clues, the decision was made to simply disengage. And everyone saw what a battle it was to do this. And of course, the battle was not our choice. We believed that if we just "ignored it," it would go away. If we just "turn the other cheek," it will go away. If we just "love the guy," or "send good thoughts and surround ourselves with light," it will just go away. And what we saw was this: when you do that, you are dead in the water.
Dead in the water? That sound like RA???
Pity those who pity?? (A Laura-channelled C quote)...That sound like RA?
[link to www.cassiopaea.org] |
| Infinitea
User ID: 12411
7/17/2005 5:56 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Anders, hi...responding to selected quotes:
L: Now, in one session the C´s said that you do not fight fire with fire; the suggestion was made to disconnect, to not have "negative emotions," that one should not "send them back" their own energy amplified.
I: Yep. This is what it means to "resist not evil."
L: The point that is missed by many is that STS activity consists of "assimilating" others to itself. It doesn´t matter whether it is overtly dominating and obvious, or whether it is sweet and seductive, and seemingly loving. And this suggests to us that sending love to someone who hasn´t asked for it quite literally is STS.
I: The point is that we are all asking for love, consciously or not, STS. STO, or STA (Service To All).
And weīre all STA...
L: In a later session, the issue of pity was brought up - that the biggest hook of STS was to get one to pity them. The C´s then said that we must "act for our destiny" which was quite different IN INTENT from acting against others.
I: "Act for our destiny", not against others: a great spiritual truth. The question is, what is it that ultimately furthers our
destiny? Isnīt it what gives US peace of mind and heart? And does that ever come from being suspicious and judgmental of
others, holding a grudge etc.?
L: I pointed out that my experience had been that when you do this, they often perceive it as "acting against them" because, in fact, you are refusing their domination, their control, their lies, their games. The end result is, of course, that you have to repeatedly DEFEND your stand against their repeated attempts to regain control of you, and this certainly, on the outside, looks like "fighting."
I: But we are not so much defending ourselves against them, as we are acting for our own destiny. That is where we need to focus our energies. Building love within ourselves, rather than more divisiveness.
A: Dead in the water? That sound like RA???
I: Ra is actually highly recommended by Laura, as is Seth, but it does not seem to me sheīs incorporated their insights into
her life and work.
A: Pity those who pity?? (A Laura-channelled C quote)...That sound like RA?
I: I think thatīs in sync with Raīs p.o.v. To pity someone is to see them as powerless. We see what we are, or what we
feel ourselves to be.
And thatīs not just woo-woo New Ageism--itīs quantum physics. |
| OPie
User ID: 13329
7/17/2005 6:21 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Regading the question about what we would like to see happen:
I would like to see Laura and Ark address the questions about the lottery and house sale. I would like to see them explain exactly what happened. Do they owe us an explanation? Certainly. It was a public lottery, advertised internationally over the internet. And it appears to have been a scam. The house, quite simply, was never given away to a winner; it was sold in 2003. Presumably the money from the lottery and the house sale went into Laura and Arkīs pockets. At least thatīs the only conclusion I can come to, because thatīs what the evidence shows. Now, if thereīs another explanation, letīs hear it. But I suspect there really is no other explanation. Because of something Laura said to the group while I was still a member, I think they probably are considering all the tickets bought as donations.
Again, where is the explanation? And simply saying "we didnīt do it" explains nothing.
If it was a scam, then they need to pay for it. They need to take responsiblity for their actions, just as they say others need to do.
Anders, you donīt need to defend yourself to anyone. If these people posting above really donīt know Laura and really donīt care about the whole situation, then they can simply ignore the thread. The fact is (and, yes, it is a fact)that Laura and Ark mount calculated attacks against anyone who questions them, both those who know them and question their motives and those who are simply critiquing their work from an outside vantage (such as Anab Whitehouse). Youīve seen it on this thread and on their website where they are responding to this thread.
Again, if there was no scam, then why in the world not answer directly and explain what happened. I would think that if they hadnīt done anything wrong, theyīd be most anxious to quickly explain. |
| anders
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:24 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
STO, or STA (Service To All).
same thing, so leave as STO |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:28 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
A: Dead in the water? That sound like RA???
I: Ra is actually highly recommended by Laura, as is Seth, but it does not seem to me she´s incorporated their insights into
her life and work.
you can say that again
she does not walk the talk
correctimundo, neither does ark |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:29 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
A: Pity those who pity?? (A Laura-channelled C quote)...That sound like RA?
I: I think that´s in sync with Ra´s p.o.v.
I donīt.
semantics
i thought you said RA was sto? |
| Infinitea
User ID: 12411
7/17/2005 6:30 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
STO, or STA (Service To All).
same thing, so leave as STO
I: Hey, seems you want to get rid of people with opinions that differ from yours. Sound like someone you know?
|
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:33 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Anders, you don´t need to defend yourself to anyone. If these people posting above really don´t know Laura and really don´t care about the whole situation, then they can simply ignore the thread. The fact is (and, yes, it is a fact)that Laura and Ark mount calculated attacks against anyone who questions them, both those who know them and question their motives and those who are simply critiquing their work from an outside vantage (such as Anab Whitehouse). You´ve seen it on this thread and on their website where they are responding to this thread.
one of the critters was science only in drag ... attack the messenger, yes, why not ... LOL
FOLLOW THE MONEY |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:35 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I would like to see Laura and Ark address the questions about the lottery and house sale. I would like to see them explain exactly what happened. Do they owe us an explanation? Certainly. It was a public lottery, advertised internationally over the internet. And it appears to have been a scam. The house, quite simply, was never given away to a winner; it was sold in 2003. Presumably the money from the lottery and the house sale went into Laura and Ark´s pockets. At least that´s the only conclusion I can come to, because that´s what the evidence shows. Now, if there´s another explanation, let´s hear it. But I suspect there really is no other explanation. Because of something Laura said to the group while I was still a member, I think they probably are considering all the tickets bought as donations.
Again, where is the explanation? And simply saying "we didn´t do it" explains nothing.
If it was a scam, then they need to pay for it. They need to take responsiblity for their actions, just as they say others need to do.
Precisely.
I heard those īdonationī rumours too.
Wonīt wash in court.
|
| Infinitea
User ID: 12411
7/17/2005 6:36 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
You are certainly right, Anders, Laura and Ark
donīt walk their talk. Maybe they are OPīs? 
A: i thought you said RA was sto?
I: I donīt recall saying that, but yes, Ra
is STO, and acccording to the material, resides
on the 6th density. At that level, one sees
the big picture and how the All serves the All.
The Cīs themselves say they "serve both sides."
Ra says there is no real or eternal polarity--that itīs all just part of the game
we play on this level. And the descriptions of STO and STS are meant to be understood in that context. |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:40 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Again, if there was no scam, then why in the world not answer directly and explain what happened. I would think that if they hadn´t done anything wrong, they´d be most anxious to quickly explain.
They donīt want to incriminate themselves. As Vincent said.
Now Infinitea, you get the picture yet?
How can one take seriously anything Laura utters?
In view of her behaviour?
Ripping off VB for 5k, bad cheque in France for 61k, 33k donation sucker drive, all Cass menbers forced to donate monthly, 150k house raffle scam, 95.1k illegal house sale scam, 3 or 4 French nationals suing her and Ark???
Boy - what an Ambassadeor for the USA in France!
NOT!
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10343
7/17/2005 6:42 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
do you two really think that "they" give a flying fuck what YOU think...
are they affected, in the LEAST by what is being discussed here? NOTī
this is just a bunch of BACKBITTING and EGO tripping on both your parts...and changes nothing...if you really had something to say and wanted to actually see a change for the better in these people...you would address THEM
this has got to be one of the dumbest threads ever posted on glp...and hasnīt acomplished one thing
you both would be the last person I would want for friends...knowing you would post your personal problems for the world to see if we ever should disagree
pathetic |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:46 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I: I don´t recall saying that,
sorry, I should have said īimpliedī
because the entity comes across as STO in the one large Book of Ra I have read...
thing is, it is quite apparent that Laura read all these books too, and Marciniak, seth, Cayce - u name it sheīs plagiarised the ideas and put them into a C mish-mash, altered at will as is her wont
but yes, Ra
is STO, and acccording to the material, resides
on the 6th density.
yup and the Cs (Lauraīs 10k books metaphysical/science/history etc she boast of having read) stole all the density and dimension stuff from 1 thru to 7
At that level, one sees
the big picture and how the All serves the All.
The C´s themselves say they "serve both sides."
Ra says there is no real or eternal polarity--that it´s all just part of the game
we play on this level. And the descriptions of STO and STS are meant to be understood in that context.
Fair enough - but do remember Laura plagiarised it all and put her spin on it.
Fred was the source I think and some contact to discarnate entities was made
It is essential to go to the source mayerial... |
| OPie
User ID: 13329
7/17/2005 6:49 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
do you two really think that "they" give a flying fuck what YOU think...
are they affected, in the LEAST by what is being discussed here? NOT´
Yes, they do. And not just us, but anybody who says anything against them or dares to question their intentions or honesty. They care quite a bit, which is why they attack anybody who even sounds as though they disagree with them. If they didnīt care, there would be nothing on their website about the thread -- and there probably wouldnīt be over 9,000 peeks at the thread. |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:50 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
o you two really think that "they" give a flying fuck what YOU think...
are they affected, in the LEAST by what is being discussed here? NOT´
see the whole GFQ reply on page 6, goes on for ages, the whole Gang went into damage limitation mode
Laura wrote a bunch of excuses in her Swerdlow section
so to answer your question
YES
they give a flying fuck
therefore your statement above is flat out wrong!
|
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:52 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Yes, they do. And not just us, but anybody who says anything against them or dares to question their intentions or honesty. They care quite a bit, which is why they attack anybody who even sounds as though they disagree with them. If they didn´t care, there would be nothing on their website about the thread -- and there probably wouldn´t be over 9,000 peeks at the thread.
they do it as you know OPie as they are terrified of being found out and the whole charade come collapsing down
the only thing they understand is attack
ark is probably having convulsions because he cannot erse this thread, like he does on his uber-sto groups on yahoo
truth will out
|
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:54 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
his is just a bunch of BACKBITTING and EGO tripping on both your parts...and changes nothing...if you really had something to say and wanted to actually see a change for the better in these people...you would address THEM
what do you think this thread is doing?
we have done nothing but address them and ask that they answer our questions.
u seem to have a problem with that
tough
|
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:56 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
this has got to be one of the dumbest threads ever posted on glp...and hasn´t acomplished one thing
you both would be the last person I would want for friends...knowing you would post your personal problems for the world to see if we ever should disagree
pathetic
DOOR
ASS
WAY OUT
YOU KNOW THE DRILL
|
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 6:58 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
ScienceOnly
User ID: 7278
7/17/2005
3:32 pm EDT
Send Private Msg
Add to Buddy List
Add to Favorites
7278 WASSUP U SHY??? |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 7:04 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I: Hey, seems you want to get rid of people with opinions that differ from yours. Sound like someone you know?
i AM NOT TRYING TO GET RID OF YOU. yOU SEEM TO HAVE MADE UP THE TERM sta, WHICH IS PERFECTLY ADEQUATELY COVERED BY sto, BECAUSE AN sto OOPS caps lock off person/entity/soul will do the STA thang to STS - am I right? it is basic algebra, i suppose
|
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 7:12 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
And we scream towards the big 10,000! (wink)
Must be the wolf´s lair folks, folks!!!
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10343
7/17/2005 7:19 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
nothing is acomplished by "he said -she said"
it is all HEAR-SAY
and your LIMITED perspective
and that is my point
If either of you could PROVE anything...
you would take it to court and sue each other for the supposed crimes of the other
how dumb do you agents of hate think we are |
| anders
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 7:50 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
nothing is acomplished by "he said -she said"
it is all HEAR-SAY
and your LIMITED perspective
and that is my point
If either of you could PROVE anything...
you would take it to court and sue each other for the supposed crimes of the other
how dumb do you agents of hate think we are
stick to science you oaf, and emily, go keep an eye on Tulum
|
| Infinitea
User ID: 12411
7/17/2005 7:58 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Anders, I got the idea for STA from this piece by Story Waters. By the way, I share these things because I think they contain much truth. Of course, you donīt have to agree.
If you wonīt rest until you see Lark rotting in jail, by all means go for it. Itīs just not something that particularly inspires me, even though I am not fans of theirs - I.
Messiah Seed 52
All
Messiah, know that the mass shared dream can only be realized by your own realization and living of your soul dream. This is the case, no matter what your soul dream is, even if on the surface it appears that your dream is at odds with the mass. Realize that your dream fits perfectly into the mass dream. As you start to live your dream, so you will start to see its part in the overall harmony and motion of the All. You are harmonious with the All, whether you can see it or not.
Know that even those that appear to be purely of service to themselves are being of service to the All. The distinction of service to Self and service to others is an illusion. All service is service to the All. All action is an action for the All. All love is love for the All. All hate is hate for the All. All all is for the All.
To see this is to see that you are free and in a state of limitlessness. To see this is to be without restriction. To see this is to be free from fear. It is to know that all action is right action. Let go of the īwhat ifsī for they are hypothetical projections and not reality. Look at your now. Look at the choices on your plate in this moment and know that you can make whatever decisions you want. Realize that, whatever you decide, will be perfect for All and not just for you. Embrace this freedom and know that, even if at this point you are not yet ready to act, then that is right action also.
Realize that just as the deepest desires stem from the desire for limitlessness, so the root of all fear is fear of freedom. In limitlessness there is no plan, no God to rule over you; no necessity for consistency and no direction that is best to follow. There is only your will, and from your will you form all that you experience. Trust your Self to give your Self love and know that all will be loved by that love; all will be freer as a result of your freedom.
[link to www.limitlessness.com] |
| anders
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 8:09 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
If you won´t rest until you see Lark rotting in jail, by all means go for it. It´s just not something that particularly inspires me, even though I am not fans of theirs - I.
I really did ask myself over and over if this is an STO thing to do. Vincent has too, as have OPie and others. But hey, how many other lives is she going to ruin down the line???
Frankly everything has been set in motion before this thread appeared and the train wreck is just a matter of time.
Thanks for the STA info... |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 11750
7/17/2005 8:37 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
nothing is acomplished by "he said -she said"
it is all HEAR-SAY
and your LIMITED perspective
and that is my point
If either of you could PROVE anything...
you would take it to court and sue each other for the supposed crimes of the other
how dumb do you agents of hate think we are
V: I donīt know about dumb, but you clearly are not listening. What we have been saying is NOT hearsay, it is first hand evidence, reported by those who experienced it. Also, one doesnīt sue over crimes such as fraud and grand theft, one reports to the authorities and then waits until they make a decision. Like everything else, the squeaky wheel gets the grease... Oh and just try suing someone over something like libel, and youīll see what an expensive headache it really is. Personally, I wish to hell they would sue me, that would be a cheaper way to get all this into court... But donīt hold your breathe on that one, folks...
As for proof, well in this thread you can find links to solid evidence, proof, that the House raffle Scam happened, where the money went, the Lies the C-cult has told about it, and the actual deed and sale price of their supposedly given away house... How much more do you need? Laura confessed, and tried to blame it on the folks left behind in Florida just days before the house was sold... Talk about lying in a pathological way...
Iīm still waiting for an explanation of how this ISN"T a crime...
VB |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 5290
7/17/2005 8:58 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Infinitea, u may want to check this out, if u havenīt already...
[link to amanesis.org] |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | |
|
