| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16146
6/28/2005 7:41 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Laura is very fat.....
What the hell is that supposed to mean. You decide that someone has value by their weight?
Then she would have high value.
What if she is a very cute fat girl? does that matter...
stupid post,you are a creep. |
| chandra battershell
User ID: 7314
7/2/2005 10:32 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Laura Knight Jadczyk and her husband Ark stole $150,000 in a fake house raffle scam in 2003 and escaped to France. The reason that she trashes Weidner and bridges is because she stole all of their work on Fulcanelli and doesn´t want to give them credit. In 2001 she wrote a glowing review of their book on Fulcanelli and the end of the world. A few months later she suddenly took the review down and began trashing them relentlessly. Soon after the trash job she then became an expert on Fulcanelli and now has written a book on him where she uses all of weidner and bridges material - again without giving them credit. Laura Knight jadczyk was arrested for attempted murder in 1971 for beating a guy nearly to death. Lincoln Lawerence is currently writing a book about the Cassiopaeans and he claims that they are some kind of intelligence operation, that Laura Knight jadczyk is implanted. I read a short excerpt from the forthcoming book and he speculates that she and her husband are a vacuum cleaner operation. That is they suck up dissidents names and send them off to some intelligence agency. He says that they recieved money from george Soros for this operation. I think Lawernce once wrote a book on Lee Harvey Oswald. Beware of the cassiopaeans - criminals, psychopaths and plagarists! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 992
7/2/2005 10:35 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Chandra, I couldn´t have said it better myself.
Excellent job doing your homework.
Kudos. |
| AC Invictus
User ID: 3888
7/2/2005 10:43 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hah, that´s interesting Chandra. I´d like to hear more of this "intelligence operation" angle. What agency/country were they supposed to be working for? Surely not Israel or the US... unless it´s some kind of really far-out scheme to discredit themselves, which I can´t quite imagine why they would need help doing!
French Intelligence?
I always thought that they were the *real* deal. I mean, you know the US secret services, the CIA/NSA. Britain has MI6. The Russians had the KGB, East Germans had the Stasi. But the French... who do they have? Almost no one knows who they are.
That´s how you know they´re good :P |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10763
7/2/2005 1:39 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Are you talking about this Lincoln Lawrence?
Were We Controlled?. the Assassination of President Kennedy.
by Lawrence, Lincoln. |
| chandra battershell
User ID: 14692
7/2/2005 9:07 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
From what I understand a vacuum cleaner operation poses as if it is against something or someone. That way they can discover their ´allies´ A quick glance at the cassiopaea site indicates a definate anti-Israel stance and George soros is Jewish so I guess they must really be working for either Israel or one of their allies in the US. France is hugely antisemitic right now so they may have moved the operation to France to suck up the anti semites in that country. That way the people in charge know who theie enemies are. That is probably why Laura Knight Jadczyk is obsessed with cointelpro. Do you remember James Jesus Angleton of the C I A ? he was obsessed with a ´soviet mole´ inside the agency. Well it turns out that one of Angelton´s best friends was Kim Philby of Britians MI-5 and Philby turned out to be a soviet agent. Now many in the C I A think that Angleton was the REAL soviet mole and that this is the reason that he was always after a ´mole´. It is the best way to control the investigation, cast suspicion away from one´s self and to destroy all enemies who might find out the truth. I think Laura Knight Jadczyk is actually cointelpro agent and that is why she accuses her ´enemies´ (those she is plagarising) of being cointelpro. It is an insidious game. In an above post we see that she calls Maynerd Most a ´grifter´. What is a grifter? It is a con man who ´drifts´ around. That is a perfect description of Laura Knight Jadczyk. That is why she drifted to France. grifters are always leaving the place where they just finished a scam and going off to another place far away to start another scam. That is why they call themm grifters. Most of Laura´s secrets are told in her accusations. |
| TWIKI
User ID: 3831
7/2/2005 9:41 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Didn´t they have a hit single with, "I´m Your Venus"? |
| Dusty Starr
User ID: 16812
7/4/2005 1:53 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Chandra has nailed Laura Knight jadczyk. I attended the Cassiopaeans quantum school in France last year. I paid a hell of a lot of money and all I learned was that all of Leonardo Da Vinci´s work was about Laura Knight Jadczyk. I couldn´t belive it. The school was in a chateau owned by the leader of the old rock group Flock of Seagulls. Laura lectured at night sometimes. She would chain smoke and she drank copious amounts of cheap French red wine while talking on and on about psychopaths. I don´t even think she knew that she was slurring her words most of the time. What a waste of money and time. When I got back to the US I felt like I had to take a hundred showers to get her cooties off of me. |
| AC Invictus
User ID: 3888
7/4/2005 2:08 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Pretty interesting, Dusty Star. I know someone else who was there last summer, but I think she came away with a pretty positive impression. Anyways, I never thought they were perfect people and nor did I ever have any kidn of inclination to "join them" even on their discussion board (hey, I´ve got GLP, the fountain of all truth and knowledge!).
Still, that doesn´t change the fact that when read with an open mind, their site is one of the most interesting and thought-awakening places on the net. I think I, over the years, have probably read something like 80% that is on it. I have no regrets whatsoever in having taken a good long look at their information.
They do their research, even if sometimes it may take them in the wrong direction. That´s more than I can say for half a dozen other sites that people might group in the same category. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16815
7/4/2005 2:16 PM | | Shrink
User ID: 16819
7/4/2005 2:36 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Dusty Starr : User ID 62
Chandra Battershell: User ID 62
"Dusty" wrote:
"Chandra has nailed Laura Knight jadczyk. I attended the Cassiopaeans quantum school in France last year...."
Huh?? Multiple personalities agreeing with oneanother...that´s sweet!
Dusty and Chandra = Vincent Bridges!  |
| chandra battershell
User ID: 16846
7/4/2005 4:37 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Dusty is my roommate and partner and no she isn´t Vincent bridges and neither am I. When she came home from France last year she was very upset about the waste of money. That is how I got involved in the cassiopaea material. I am a psychologist and I noticed a fearful and paranoid style to Laura Knight Jadczyk´s writing. I did a content analysis of her key words. This is something that psychologists do to determine the real state or pathology of a patient. Laura Knight Jadczyk uses key words hundreds of times in her writings. Words like psychopath, fear, souless. These words are coming from her subconscious and are apt descriptions of her own personal pathology. For instance if I have a straight man who is always using key words like ´gay´ or ´homo´ I can rest assured that he is very likely a closet case. Also people tend to read a lot about their own pathology. I am sure that if I could see Laura´s library there would be many books on psychopaths. People are obsessed with their own disorders. Schizophrenics read constantly about schizophrenia. This also comes out in their words and warnings. For instance Ted Bundy was always warning his friends and family to ´be careful´ when they went out. He would tell them that there ´was danger out there´. My partner Dusty complained to one of the people at the quantum future school about how disappointed she was in the school. She was told to not say anything about her complaints in public becase Laura Knight Jadczyk would seek retribution. So she was and still is very afraid of Laura Knight Jadczyk and really doesn´t want me to be doing this. The truth is that Laura Knight Jadczyk uses material from other sources like the Ra Material and weidner and bridges and then channels it so that no one can say that she is a plagarist. But is she channeling? Now she says that the voices in her head are not the cassiopaeans but herself in the future. This is more evidence of an extensive pathology. I will say this - her psychological disorders are fascinating! |
| Rice Czechs: Not for kidz
User ID: 10160
7/4/2005 4:45 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Laura Knight J adc z yk
sorta reminds me of j z knight
did you create your day today?
hint: change the channel |
| AC Invictus
User ID: 3888
7/4/2005 4:56 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"That is how I got involved in the cassiopaea material. I am a psychologist and I noticed a fearful and paranoid style to Laura Knight Jadczyk´s writing."
Well if you´re not scared and paranoid, then you just really don´t have a good grasp of what´s going on ;)
For example, I had minor surgery last month... for a second there, I was going to ask to keep all samples of my blood. I didn´t want the NWO cloning me in the future... See, I kind of believe that I´m immune to mortal weapons and that no other person could ever kill me... but what if they made a clone of myself? I mean, I could potentially kill myself, even if others couldn´t.
Analyze that.
 |
| May I comment on your frock?
User ID: 10160
7/4/2005 4:56 PM | | Shrink
User ID: 16819
7/4/2005 5:04 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"I am a psychologist and I noticed a fearful and paranoid style to Laura Knight Jadczyk´s writing. I did a content analysis of her key words. This is something that psychologists do to determine the real state or pathology of a patient."
As you may have noticed from the name I´m using here (Shrink) I´m also involved in Psychology,or I will be shortly rather, I´m almost done with my degree.
I do not agree with the above, at all. By that definition all students of demonology for example, are secretly demons. All psychologists who delve into studies of narcissisms to help their patients are secretly narcissists.
Or to turn it around and make it more personal for you - if you did a ‘content analysis’ of the last few posts of your own, which frequent ‘key terms’ do you notice there? “Liar”, “Psychopath”, “Plagiarist” and so on. I do not diagnose you depending on what your interest move you to write about, why would you do it to another? I really doubt that you’re a psychologist; no licensed practitioner would use so cheap a tool, or believe the opinion of room mates or internet gossip to form a professional opinion about someone.
Shrink |
| zangtang
User ID: 2324
7/4/2005 5:13 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
the french have their SDECE - translates as something like society/department for the protection/defense of the state |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16854
7/4/2005 5:26 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
touche´
I think her site is great...but her focus is wasted on politics...and IMO she wastes too much energy trying to change things ... instead of accepting the change that is happening.
does that make sense.
IMO...there is nothing I can do about someone else...I have to make the change I want to see in other in myself first.
perhaps it is true that it is only my perspective that has changed...but the world appears to be a much softer place when looking through rose colored glasses.
The Kabbalists say, when you are looking for faults you will find them...and when you are looking for LIGHT you will find IT...
she wears me out with all the falults she finds...I quit reading her website because it mad me so angry...(like RUSH) like someone else said...change the channel |
| chandra bettershell
User ID: 14873
7/4/2005 5:28 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Shrink
You have made some good points. I will wait until you gradate and have real patients before I judge your skills. However it should be noted that you say that I have used the word ´liar´ repeatedly in my notes here on this forum. As one can easily see I have never used the word even once.
You have to do a better job doing your homework if you expect to graduate! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16819
7/4/2005 5:39 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Shrink
"You have made some good points. I will wait until you gradate and have real patients before I judge your skills. However it should be noted that you say that I have used the word ´liar´ repeatedly in my notes here on this forum. As one can easily see I have never used the word even once.
You have to do a better job doing your homework if you expect to graduate!"
-------------------
You´re right, the word was "criminals" not liars, my mistake. But my point remains...just because you use certain words in your posts, don´t doesn´t make YOU a "criminal", "psychopath", "paranoid"...etc.
The same goes for anyone else writing anything.
My issue was with your ´methodology´ of diagnosing someone from ´key words´ in their texts...that issue you seems to be deflecting from...if I may make a (degree-less & patient-less) observation.
You lack all the common manners of a psychologist. Psychologists usually have a knack for sticking to the core topic, no matter how much their patiens try to deflect and go off on irrelevant tangents.
I still don´t believe you.
Shrink |
| chandra battershell
User ID: 2801
7/4/2005 5:52 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Shrink
I didn´t say the use of a word makes you that, I said the repeated use of a word is what triggers the analysis. I am extremely surprised that you have not been taught this in your university. I used the word ´criminal´ once, I used the word ´paranoid´ once and I never used the word ´liar´. And again it isn´t the use of the word three or four times that is the trigger - it is when one uses the word hundreds of times. That´s what Laura Knight Jadczyk does. And that is what I am pointing out. But don´t believe me. That is fine. Go to her site and look for yourself. That is where the truth comes out. I am not alone in this. I have shown her material to some of my colleagues and they are as fascinated by it as I am. I am sure that you must also find it fascinating or you wouldn´t be interested. By the way an interesting site that goes into Laura Knight Jadczyk´s criminal background can be found at www.cassiopaeacult.com
I don´t agree with the underlying tone of anger on that site but much of the material is useful. |
| AC Invictus
User ID: 3888
7/4/2005 6:06 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Not to seem like a self-appointed protector of Cassiopaea, Chandra, but if you insist on using clinical methods to analyze anyone talking about conspiracies and the occult, then surely most people discussing that on GLP are clinically insane.
I know I would be, at least.
Why, I could tell you stories of a conspiracy going back thousands of years, I could explain to you how history as we know it is a lie, why religions are manufactured, etc, etc, etc.
Quite insane, isn´t it? What Laura has done is some research, and this research has led her to certain conclusoins. Now agree or disagree with her, fine, but it´s an oversimplification to say that all she talks about are psychopaths, fear, and soulless beings.
90% of what´s on the site are other people´s research, covering a huge spectrum of "sciences". |
| Shrink
User ID: 16819
7/4/2005 6:15 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"But don´t believe me. That is fine."
Yeah, well, we’re never going to know whether you are who you say you are - That’s the nature of the internet So we’ll just drop it, and get back to the topic.
"Go to her site and look for yourself. That is where the truth comes out. I am not alone in this. I have shown her material to some of my colleagues and they are as fascinated by it as I am. I am sure that you must also find it fascinating or you wouldn´t be interested."
Many things interest me. Mostly what fascinated me about *this* thread, is the out of proportion negativity you and your roommate (if such a person exists) displayed towards this person and the site in question, yes, that does make me curious. If AC Invictus finds the site useful, and knows someone who also went to France and had a positive experience, then obviously there are two sides to the story, no? It´s the old "there´s three sides to every story: yours, mine and the truth"
You seem to have a very powerful emotional vested interest in convincing people that this site is the Devil Incarnate. My initial thought was that you were Vincent Bridges, because all the information you’ve been sending seems to support him. He would have a emotional vested interest, no? If, as you say, you are not, then what is your vested interest in discrediting this site?
Shrink |
| Shrink
User ID: 16819
7/4/2005 6:34 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"...if you insist on using clinical methods to analyze anyone talking about conspiracies and the occult, then surely most people discussing that on GLP are clinically insane.
I know I would be, at least."
---------------
LOL!, AC Invictus - A quote for you:
"To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites
of sanity."
~Oscar Wilde Irish dramatist, novelist, & poet (1854 - 1900)
Erase ´British´ at will.
Shrink |
| AC Invictus
User ID: 3888
7/4/2005 6:41 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
And here´s one for you:
"If you find yourself on the side of the majority, it´s time to pause and reflect."
-Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens)
:)
Great minds think alike, it seems. |
| chandra battershell
User ID: 16874
7/4/2005 6:48 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Shrink
My invested emotional interest?
The Truth. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8226
7/4/2005 6:48 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"Laura Knight Jadczyk and her husband Ark stole $150,000 in a fake house raffle scam in 2003 and escaped to France. "
She conducted a lottery for the house in order to sell it, and the purpose of selling was to move to France. I remember when she was advertising that on her site a couple years ago. So what happened after that? I searched her site but didn´t see anything about it. I wasn´t interested at the time because I thought Florida would go under the water during the 2003 Planet X flyby. So did she really scam the people who sent in money for the house? How did she explain it? |
| Shrink
User ID: 16819
7/4/2005 6:51 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
:) I know that one, Invictus, and *Think* alike seems to be the operative word. Much of what people do is feeling alike. Take the post I´ve been replying to...Lots of ethos and pathos, but very little logos! ;) It´s all feeling and opinion, no rational argumentation.
What I would prefer, if someone was out to discredit a site, would be to actually attack the contents with logical arguments and outlining the flaws in the research. Instead they pull the classic: character assassination. It´s obvious that the owner of the site is on the poster´s (or his "room mate´s"?) ´List of most hated´. That kind of emotional coloring to someone´s opinion automatically makes me suspicious of what they say. Thinking with their emotions.
Shrink |
| AC Invictus
User ID: 3888
7/4/2005 6:55 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I don´t know what happened to the house raffle. I think the people on her "board" got an explanation, I was told once by my friend I think, but then I forgot...
Anyways, point being, Shrink does have a point. You people are very quick to make "ad hominem" attacks on her as if that proves something. So what if she ran a scam? So what if she´s got 1000 unpaid parking tickets? So what if she´s slightly focused on psychopaths?
My one point is that cassiopaea.org has a lot of very interesting information. Some of it I´m sure, the "ptb" don´t want to be public knowledge. I took what I could use from the site and moved on, and I´m probably a bit smarter from the experience.
If people are going to blindly believe (or disbelieve) someone solely based on their personal life, instead of critically looking at the theories they present, then they are idiots.
If someone thinks that an obsession with psychopaths makes everything else they say invalid, then they are idiots.
People with a critical mind and without a pre-established agenda judge (and criticize) the message on its own merits, not the messenger.
I rest my case :P |
| AC Invictus
User ID: 3888
7/4/2005 6:57 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
LOL, it seems great minds DO think alike, Shrink. I was writing my message before I saw your latest one...
Still, we´re not here to judge ;) If people want to shoot the messenger, that´s fine by me. That´s why, incidentally, I´m not too keen on ever been a messenger of any kind. Let people think what they will, I care not. |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 | |
|
