|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| OPie
User ID: 45
7/20/2005 8:53 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
When was the last ouija session. Was that the famous mirror session Vincent was in on?
When did the automatic wordprocessing session start?
No, the mirror session wasnīt the last. There were, I believe, quite a few after that (though not nearly as often and not nearly as lucid as before). The two that I transcribed were after Laura and Ark had cancelled their attendance at the conference in California. And there were others that Laura quoted from in the C group. Often it was just Laura and Ark on the board, and they appeared to have some trouble connecting with the source. On the ones I transcribed, much of it was pure rubbish. The Cīs appeared to be talking in tongues.
However, Iīll back up what Anders said. I remember her saying she was often "channeling" directly to the word processor.
I believe that would more correctly be termed automatic (or anatomic) writing -- and the controls would be virtually nonexistent. |
| OPie
User ID: 45
7/20/2005 9:03 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
And speaking of the conference cancellation ...
Lauraīs reason (at least to the C group) was that she had no idea Vincent was so into magic, that sheīd thought he was merely interested from a historical perspective but had absolutely no idea he actually practiced it. She got called on that by a few members (who didnīt last and subsequently went to Matrioshka). I thought it was pretty suspect at the time, because -- well, because we all KNEW he was into it; he was quite open about it on the list. Besides, Iīd read his website; it was hardly hidden. Oh, yes, I forgot -- she hadnīt really read his website in depth either, merely skimmed it.
But my point is ... in reading the emails between Laura and Vincent, which Laura has posted in their pseudo-entirety on the C site, itīs quite obvious that she knew about it from the get-go. She asked him questions about it, and he answered her very directly. Come to think of it, she also talked about reading his website.
So the whole reason she gave for cancelling the conference was an out-and-out lie. And she not only left Vincent and Jay hanging, but all the C group members whoīd made plans to attend.
Jeez. That was quite a long time before I finally got fed up and left. Itīs really difficult for me to believe that I ignored all these signs (knowingly in most cases, I might add) and kept on supporting her.
Stupid OPie. Stupid OPie. |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 1870
7/20/2005 9:07 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
But my point is ... in reading the emails between Laura and Vincent, which Laura has posted in their pseudo-entirety on the C site, it´s quite obvious that she knew about it from the get-go. She asked him questions about it, and he answered her very directly. Come to think of it, she also talked about reading his website.
Yup. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 45
7/20/2005 9:29 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 1870
7/20/2005 9:48 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hit and run merchant BUMP
Is that you Johnno???
Donīt be shy! |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 1870
7/20/2005 10:14 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
And we scream towards the big 12,500 hits on this thread!
500 hits a half day!!!
"They´re on our left, they´re on our right, they´re in front of us, they´re behind us; they can´t get away this time!"
Must be the Castleopea CULT folks, folks!!!
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10092
7/20/2005 10:41 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
<<Because it´s easier to do that than work at writing NEW material? And who´s checking ... most authors are dead (Gurdjieff, Ouspensky, Castaneda, Cayce, dozens and dozens of esoteric writers), other chanellers can hardly sue because the source is dubious...
As VB and others know, Laura can churn out many thousands of words a day, can get into 10k or more, this can only be done with little critical thinking or CARE, and LOTS of REPETITION ... cutting and pasting stuff from the net etc etc>>
You see, this still doesnīt answer my question. Yes it is "easier" to plagiarise, but for what RESULT? Hereīs why it didnīt answer, using a better example:
Letīs say your friend plagiarised a University essay and I ask YOU why HE did it. You merely say because it is easier for him to do, rather than writing it himself.
This is where you stopped.
The bigger picture is that it is easier to get a good grade for his final exam result. This is the final AIM. But you havenīt given me the "final aim" of Laura. Laura is more than aware that deception is STS and oneīs FRV, isnīt monitored by a God (or any external source that says, "Oh well, we can let him up, and her, and her, but not those people", it is oneīs own; it is oneīs own responsibility.
It seems like people are just going round and round in circles with their eyes closed; heading in no direction whatsoever. Also, I think a lot of peopleīs egos have been burned and I see a lot of vanity and bitterness.
But its hardly a revelation... Hopefully, you can actually answer my question, because I think it is a major issue.
 |
| StormBear
User ID: 9894
7/20/2005 10:56 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
And further speaking of the California conference...
I was also scheduled to speak at the conference on the issue of the Grail and the Golem legends.
There were some other writers, if I remember correctly, that had to cancel their flights due to Lauraīs paranoia. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3775
7/20/2005 11:12 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"...This is the final AIM. But you haven´t given me the "final aim" of Laura. Laura is more than aware that deception is STS and one´s FRV, isn´t monitored by a God (or any external source that says, "Oh well, we can let him up, and her, and her, but not those people", it is one´s own; it is one´s own responsibility."
Iīm thinking maybe sheīs under the influence of or possessed by STS or dark forces. There is so much negativity in everything she writes - she only presents the world as hopelessly under the power of evil with little "balanced reporting" that the forces of good are also at work in the world - it just creates the kind of despair and anger that is a fertile field for the STS influences. Getting a wider readership through the internet just spreads the fear and despair all the more. Yes, I think sheīs possessed by dark forces, and maybe also bought and paid for by some secret societies that also serve the dark forces. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 294
7/20/2005 11:15 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
<<V: Yep... And that´s what pisses me off about all the "higher beings" pontficating, and people such as LKJ making money off it... None of it is nurturing anyone´s capacity for enlightenment...>>
The latter sentence is your way of masking [unsuccessfully] your extreme jealousy of Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Do you agree or disagree?
V: Nope... Not even slightly.. there is nothing enviable about LKJīs situation...
VB |
| Infinitea
User ID: 11880
7/20/2005 11:20 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hmmm...if Laura can do this without an ouija board...if she can channel the Cīs at the computer...then, hey, so can I, Iīm as smart as she is 
So, here are the Cīs, folks, channeled thru moi:
The Cīs Speak To Laura
Listen, my love...
Stop...calm down...relax...have fun...laugh...go for walks...eat healthy foods...exercise...meditate...
Get to know YOU
And then what comes through you
Is the highest vibration of us
Then you are us
no separation in this creation
Listen, my love
Listen, listen, my love,
Listen. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 294
7/20/2005 11:23 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Please give examples, unless you want us all to just *believe* what you say. "The transcripts" stopped making sense when Fred left, as in the "whole transcripts"? Wow, it makes you wonder why Laura continues to channel then...
V: She must put out new information for the true believers to consume... The sessions stopped making sense immediately after the July %th mirror session. The sessions from August 2001, which includes the ridiculous claim that I am a hot popper, are the beginning of the silly season...
Here is a snippet from the last session in the exe file:
A: Life is religion.
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: Life experiences reflect how one interacts with God. Those who are asleep are those of little faith in terms of their interaction with the creation. Some people think that the world exists for them to overcome or ignore or shut out. For those individuals, the worlds will cease. They will become exactly what they give to life. They will become merely a dream in the "past." People who pay strict attention to objective reality right and left, become the reality of the "Future."
This makes sense and Fred didn´t participate in this session; therefore, what you said is wrong. But we need EXAMPLES; as Gurdjieff said, "Verify!"
V: OK, if this makes sense, can you explain it to us in your own words?
You will agree (if you have any sense) that your statements are very grand and sweeping, to the point of error. No?
V: Nope, I donīt think it was sweeping enough...
VB |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 294
7/20/2005 11:27 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hey, who would have thought Abe Lincoln was a non-souled being? Now Hitler, that I can understand!
V: Sounds like Tobias has been reading the Cs...
VB |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 294
7/20/2005 11:30 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
People who pay strict attention to objective reality right and left, become the reality of the "Future."
Do the C´s define "objective reality"?
V: Yep... What ever LKJ says it is at the moment...
VB |
| Infinitea
User ID: 11880
7/21/2005 12:04 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Do the C´s define "objective reality"?
V: Yep... What ever LKJ says it is at the moment...
VB
wow, that does sound very objective :/ |
| OPie
User ID: 7547
7/21/2005 12:05 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
You see, this still doesn´t answer my question. Yes it is "easier" to plagiarise, but for what RESULT? Here´s why it didn´t answer, using a better example:
Let´s say your friend plagiarised a University essay and I ask YOU why HE did it. You merely say because it is easier for him to do, rather than writing it himself.
This is where you stopped.
The bigger picture is that it is easier to get a good grade for his final exam result. This is the final AIM.
Yes, it is, and itīs still dishonest as hell. Further, youīre assuming thatīs why he did it. Maybe he simply was lazy. Maybe he is a criminal at heart. Maybe he just wanted to see if he could get away with it.
But you haven´t given me the "final aim" of Laura. Laura is more than aware that deception is STS and one´s FRV, isn´t monitored by a God (or any external source that says, "Oh well, we can let him up, and her, and her, but not those people", it is one´s own; it is one´s own responsibility.
Well, thatīs assuming that she believes what she is saying. And who can ever know what precisely is in anotherīs mind? We can only go by anotherīs actions. And Lauraīs actions (i.e., the house raffle/sale, the lying, the manipulation of the sessions, the attacks on people, etc.) would seem to indicate that she doesnīt care about the consequences. And, in this particular case, not caring about the consequences would indicate that she also doesnīt believe in them. Or maybe it just indicates a profound lack of control and a total inability to undertake self-analysis.
It seems like people are just going round and round in circles with their eyes closed; heading in no direction whatsoever. Also, I think a lot of people´s egos have been burned and I see a lot of vanity and bitterness.
Maybe, maybe not. If so, it would appear to be true for both "sides".
But its hardly a revelation... Hopefully, you can actually answer my question, because I think it is a major issue.
How can anyone answer your question? Youīre calling for a conclusion on the part of the witness. We canīt possibly know whatīs in Lauraīs head, what her motivations are. All we can do is witness her actions, as opposed to what she preaches, and draw some logical conclusions. |
| Infinitea
User ID: 11880
7/21/2005 12:12 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hey, who would have thought Abe Lincoln was a non-souled being? Now Hitler, that I can understand!
V: Sounds like Tobias has been reading the Cs...
VB
According to Tobias, they were both non-souled.
I donīt recall the Cīs ever offering information
like that about people who actually lived.
Tobias and the other entities channeled
by Geoffrey Hoppe (at crimsoncircle.com) are just amazing. Of course, if
you have a preconcieved notion of all channeling being bogus, as you seem to, VB, then it will appear to be just that.
One big difference between his channelings and Lauraīs is that Geoffreyīs ego is totally out of the picture. Tobias refers to him, often in a joking manner, in the channelings, but Geoffrey himself keeps a low profile. The message is the star, not the messenger.
And the message is very positive, yet grounded... |
| Infinitea
User ID: 11880
7/21/2005 12:34 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
a Tobias sample from crimsoncircle.com :
So, dear friends, the New force is no force. It comes naturally, and it comes easy. And, if you are having to use force and discipline, and all this structure in your life, it is time to release that
unless you want to continue that way. It can come to you SO smoothly and peacefully, but yet highly energized. You may find that to be a conflict in the statements. How can life be exciting and fulfilling and energized when you donīt have all this pushing and pulling of forces? It sounds neutral. It sounds anemic.
Ah, dear Shaumbra, you will find it to be quite different. There is a physics of the New Energy that changes the paradigm, that shifts everything, that says you can be in a fulfillment you could have never been aware of before without force and push. You say, Well, how can I survive in traffic? How can I survive at the office? The forces are always pushing on me. I have to push back to protect myself.
Protect yourself from what? From what? What are you afraid of? Feeling? Are you afraid of feeling again? Let those forces come right at you. Let them attack you, if they feel they must because, when they do, and they open their seething mouths, and reach into sink their teeth into you, and take a bite out of you, there wonīt be anything there because you are existing in a different realm
you see
a different energy.
They are into duality. They feed off of weaklings. They feed off of those who are still battling. They want to see who the better warriors are. Let them come at you. You will be like air. You will vaporize and disappear, and they wonīt be able to feed off of anything. And, they will go on to somebody else, take a bite out of them instead.
So, Shaumbra, remember this that the New force is no force. It is is-ness. It is a dynamic and a physics that is contained in this movie if you go watch it about the bleep (referring to the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?). Why did they use the word bleep? Ohamah says he would have used the direct word (audience laughter). |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5881
7/21/2005 12:35 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Does Laura main an extensive hydroponic Hemp garden like Nancy Does? |
| OPie
User ID: 7547
7/21/2005 12:38 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Does Laura main an extensive hydroponic Hemp garden like Nancy Does?
LOL -- well, if she does you can be sure she sells it at a profit. |
| OPie
User ID: 7547
7/21/2005 1:01 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hey, who would have thought Abe Lincoln was a non-souled being? Now Hitler, that I can understand!
V: Sounds like Tobias has been reading the Cs...
I had the same reaction as Vincent. Mainly because it seems that many channelers pick up where another left off. To use a current example, the Cīs sort of picked up where Ra left off, even using the same jargon.
Thatīs not to say that some of it isnīt real and positive food for the soul, but the problem is, we donīt know -- we canīt possibly know -- what the source is. Many of the great religious teachings were channeled; after all, what is revelation? So, Iīm not necessarily against channeling; Iīve just noticed that when someone channels something that ends up being popular, others often follow with the same basic teachings. Now, it could just be that the time is right for those teachings. The Cīs did say that others were being given the same information as Laura, but in a way that made sense for their particular personality/mindset.
But regarding the non-souled beings as described by Tobias, it occurs to me that these are quite different entities than Lauraīs OPīs. They are not human beings with no souls; these are beings (almost archetypal) created by a greater consciousness (whether human, suprahuman, or otherwise) for a very specific purpose -- from what it sounds like, a balancing of group karma.
Thatīs not what the OPīs are at all. Theyīre empty human containers waiting to be filled with a directive from the matrix to perform some action against some poor hapless souled human being who is on the right path, thereby derailing him from said path. And who better to do that than someone close to you -- say, your mother, your husband, your daughter, etc. The concept doesnīt exactly breed trust and support among family and friends.
Tobiasīs description is somewhat noble and smacks of a higher purpose, a purpose leading to some sort of upward evolution. The other is divisive and racist and does anything but bring the human race together. To me, itīs not a concept that would be espoused by a higher intelligence; or, to rephrase that, not a higher intelligence that had the best interests of humankind at heart. It might, however, be pushed by an intelligence that desperately wants to see humanity even more divided, an intelligence that might even despise us.
Or so I think. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7547
7/21/2005 2:03 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
|
| Infinitea
User ID: 11880
7/21/2005 2:06 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Tobias´s description is somewhat noble and smacks of a higher purpose, a purpose leading to some sort of upward evolution. The other is divisive and racist and does anything but bring the human race together. To me, it´s not a concept that would be espoused by a higher intelligence; or, to rephrase that, not a higher intelligence that had the best interests of humankind at heart. It might, however, be pushed by an intelligence that desperately wants to see humanity even more divided, an intelligence that might even despise us.
Or so I think.
I agree, and I was struck by the difference in the two approaches. Itīs a stretch to think of Abe Lincoln as not having a soul, but at least it shows that Tobias doesnīt see the soulless ones as beng necessarily evil.
There is absolutely nothing disempowering or fear-based in the Tobias material. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2631
7/21/2005 2:14 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
>>> The bigger picture is that it is easier to get a good grade for his final exam result. This is the final AIM. But you haven´t given me the "final aim" of Laura. Laura is more than aware that deception is STS and one´s FRV, isn´t monitored by a God (or any external source that says, "Oh well, we can let him up, and her, and her, but not those people", it is one´s own; it is one´s own responsibility.
It seems like people are just going round and round in circles with their eyes closed; heading in no direction whatsoever. Also, I think a lot of people´s egos have been burned and I see a lot of vanity and bitterness.
But its hardly a revelation... Hopefully, you can actually answer my question, because I think it is a major issue. <<<
---
"
RA: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.
That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define the infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.
In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One."
IMO, The above is the heart of the message offered by RA, the Pīs, Cīs and other similar sources to those who are capable of hearing and understanding at the levels from which this perspective arises. Specifically, the level or state where "the complete unity of thought which binds all things" IS the perspective from which life is experienced(not just a concept but a living breathing reality).
Again and again the Cīs attempted to open Laura to the potential of connecting with and embracing this reality within her own consciousness. This was most apparent by their offering of new twists on "gravity" as the binder of all things as contemplation seeds, but her internal resistance to the implications of total unity of thought prevented her ever making the connection. Without this connection her path came to an empass and the effects began to naturally manifest everywhere in her reality. I suspect Fred was the one member of the core group who was most capable of making the connection and thus the life(heart and soul) of the material was lost with his departure.
Laura now lives as a shining example to not only a few but to the majority of mankind who are equally at odds with roughly half of their own existence. The "us vs. them" mentality is the benchmark of STS orientation and the reality it creates can be a real bitch. Just look around the world we live in. Examples abound because this world is an extreme STS manifestation... a world of seperation, fragmentation, opposition and struggle, just like the consciousness from which it is most often experienced.
It is foolish to believe one can live in an STS environment without behaving in STS fashion but one need not be at odds with oneself for doing what is necessary or even chosen for the experience. The problems come when one mistakenly believes that STO is the opposite of STS and attempts to orient STO by taking arms against those they perceive as STS. Such individuals may believe they are fighting the good fight but their actions only enforce the very reality they seek to overcome. Only once it is realized that STO is actually the balance of polarities(us AND them = Unity of thought) rather than one side or the other of the STS(us VS them) equation which seeks to perpetuate imbalance can the individual transcend the empass which could bring them to the truth of themselves and their very existence. This will bring the knowledge which truly protects because where there is unity of thought there is unity of purpose. You see, we DO create our own reality.
The truth will set you free |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15354
7/21/2005 2:30 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
|
| Infinitea
User ID: 11880
7/21/2005 2:47 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
It is foolish to believe one can live in an STS environment without behaving in STS fashion but one need not be at odds with oneself for doing what is necessary or even chosen for the experience.
This is the only part of your post I disagree with. I think it is possible to transcend our
environment and forge our own path in whatever way we wish. Thatīs what free will is about.
Ra says we need to develop a certain percentage of STO in order to make the transition of 4D STO. Thus, it must be possible for us to do that here.
Aside from that, great post, and great insights!
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15354
7/21/2005 3:18 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I ask everyone who is reading this forum to write to Laura Knight Jadczyk and ask her a few simple questions.
1) What is the name of the person who won the House Raffle? Please list a contact address or phone number.
2) Why hasn´t that person laid claim to your house?
2.a) Why did you sell raffled house to the Swanson family for $95,100?
3) Why did you praise Weidner and Bridges work on Fulcanelli, then trash them by calling them psychopaths and then plagiarize their work?
4) Why did yourself in the future lie to yourself in the past and say that you were an alien from cassiopaea when you were really just yourself in the future?
5) How do you reconcile the fact that you channelled aliens from cassiopaea with Fred Ireland, but later discovered that he also was a psychopath.
6) If you are not really channelling aliens from Cassiopaea but are actually channelling yourself in the future, how come you yourself in the future didn´t warn you yourself in the past that your channelling partner, Fred Ireland, was a psychopath?
7) Why didn´t you yourself in the future warn you that Bridges was a psychopath?
8) Why did you change the transcripts of the cassiopaean sessions?
9) Do you really believe that your former husband is a robot?
As of yesterday she was answering emails at the following address so I know it still works.
Her personal email address is at:
lark@cassiopaea.org
Please post her replies on this forum.
I encourage everyone to participate. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2631
7/21/2005 8:33 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
>>> This is the only part of your post I disagree with. I think it is possible to transcend our
environment and forge our own path in whatever way we wish. That´s what free will is about.
Ra says we need to develop a certain percentage of STO in order to make the transition of 4D STO. Thus, it must be possible for us to do that here. <<<
Oh yes, Infinitea, I do agree with you here. Iīm only suggesting that balance is the STO path and thus there is no need to be conflicted when STS actions are called for or necessary, which they often are in an extreme STS environment. Who we are is who we are, no matter the environment and to me, when we consider the wants and needs of others at least as much as we do our own then we are on the balanced(STO) path.
"
[link to cassiopaea.org]
11-12-94
Q: (L) On a number of occasions we talked about the Quorum and the Illuminati. They both seem to be the highest levels of secret organizations. What is their relationship to each other?
A: Quorum mostly alien; illuminati mostly human. They meet; two halves of whole.
Q: (L) The illuminati has been described as being behind or with the Serpent Brotherhood which has been described as being in connection with the Lizard beings...
A: Close. But not that simple. Picture a circle or cycle first now then contemplate for a moment before follow up.
Q: (L) Okay, I am contemplating a cycling circle.
A: Now, two halves representing positive and negative. Two halves.
Q: (L) Well, what I am getting out of that is the two halves and both sides are playing with the human race. Is that it?
A: No. This is complicated but if you can learn and understand, it will be a super revelation.
Q: (L) Well, go ahead and explain.
A: Ask step by step.
Q: (L) Why do we so often have to ask things step by step?
A: In order to absorb the information.
Q: (L) The Quorum is described as the good guys. The Illuminati is described as bad guys. And yet, they are both Masonic. When a person in the Masonic organization reaches the higher levels, are there individuals at the higher levels recruiting masons to one side or the other?
A: First, not exactly one side or another.
Q: (L) I am beginning to not understand something here ...
A: Unblock.
Q: (L) I donīt have a block here. If the brotherhood AKA Illuminati AKA Lizzies AKA Beast are the ones who are going to do detrimental things to this planet, how are they related or connected to the Quorum which is in touch with...
A: This will take time to explain be patient it will be worth it.
Q: (L) Okay. What is the nature of evil?
A: Blend. [Remember Orimulsion and Ormethion]
Q: (L) Are the Lizzies what we would consider to be evil?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Are the Cassiopaeans what we would consider to be good?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) The Lizzies work independently and in opposition to the Cassiopaeans?
A: Independently, not in opposition. We serve others therefore there is no opposition. Careful now. Step by step. If you do not fully understand answer ask another.
Q: (L) Part of a whole. Part of a circle.
A: Blend. Picture a blending colored circle image.
Q: (L) Are you saying that at some levels the two halves overlap?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Are you saying that some of the Quorum are good guys and bad guys and the same for the Illuminati because the two are on opposing sides of the circle but at the point of blending one is weighted more to one side and the other to the other side? And these organizations are where the interactions come together?
A: Closer.
Q: (L) Okay. So it is a blending. Does it have something to do with ... in your case service to others means that you even serve those who serve self, is that correct?
A: Yes; we serve you and the Lizards have programed your race to self service remember.
Q: (L) Well, I am down a notch or two. So, I am still a service to self individual to some extent, is that correct?
A: But moving slowly toward service to others. Not all humans are.
Q: (L) Does this mean that when people who are members of the quorum or illuminati call for information or help, that you, because of your service to others orientation are obliged to answer whoever calls?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) What is the no part?
A: If vibrational frequencies are out of pattern we do not connect.
Q: (L) Is the work of the Lizzies part of an overall grand plan or design?
A: All is.
Q: (L) Letīs go on. Okay. A blending. Yet two halves.
A: Of a circle.
Q: (L) Who designed this circle?
A: Natural frequency wave. Some near conjunction blend both service patterns and each "camp" to create perfect balance.
Q: (L) Okay, so the Illuminati are the higher level on the pathway of service to self and somehow, by reaching these higher levels may have come to realizations or frequencies which have caused their position to be modified or blended to where service to self becomes or incorporates or moves them to service to others realizations, is this correct?
A: Continue.
Q: (L) Okay, the ones in the quorum are those who are focused on service to others and they, in their pathway of service to others begin to understand that some service to self is service to others.
A: Close.Service to others provides the perfect balance of those two realities; service to self is the diametrical opposite closing the grand cycle in perfect balance.
Q: (L) So it is necessary to have a pathway of service to self in order for the pathway of service to others to exist?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And those who are in the Quorum and the Illuminati ...
A: Blends in middle.
Q: (L) So it is necessary to have the darkness in order to have the light...
A: Yes. " |
| Anders (BBM)
User ID: 14311
7/21/2005 9:18 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
1) What is the name of the person who won the House Raffle? Please list a contact address or phone number.
2) Why hasn´t that person laid claim to your house?
2.a) Why did you sell the allegedly īraffledī house to the Swanson family for $95,100?
2.b) What happened to all the monies collected from dupes that bought the phoney raffle tickets? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3933
7/21/2005 12:59 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
"the cass replies, if they are from an intellectually advanced group of seekers after wisdom and truth, seem strangely ineffective, unconvincing, and lame."
|
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | |
|
