| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3520
8/9/2005 6:49 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
269
they can both take a flying fuck through a rolling donut...
I used to say that alot when I was 15 years old. R U 15? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15863
8/9/2005 11:35 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Q: (L) What are the dogs barking at?
A: Someone in alley.
Q: (L) What are they doing in the alley?
A: Passing.
. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15863
8/9/2005 11:44 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Q: (L) J__ was telling me that his friends S__ and S__ have bought
into M__´s thesis that I am the wicked witch of the west, is this true?
A: Yes.
. |
| kris
User ID: 18940
8/9/2005 4:36 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
maybe is too easy to dwell on the
wicked witch west aspects, this
lady is a diamond, she has many
facets, if you had only known her
when she was sweet to us and kind
and even loving, you would know
the depth of the grief. i will
remember her for ever the way
she was when she stood by us with
so much care. |
| kris
User ID: 18940
8/9/2005 4:46 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
cos people are complicated,
they fall into various pits,
abyssal depths, get in with
a bad crowd, etc.
and maybe steal stuff,
forge cheat lie and deal,
but ... but ... theres so many
shades of meaning, even when the
lynx pounces on the snowshoe
hare, the isle royale wolfs
surround the moose, the griz
strips bare the berry bushes
some of my best friends would
be griz, wolf, lynx, if i knew
any. just got to remember to
stay out of their way at lunch
time. |
| Anders
User ID: 14376
8/9/2005 9:39 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
And we scream towards the big 22,000 hits on this thread!
500 hits a half-day!!!
"They´re on our left, they´re on our right, they´re in front of us, they´re behind us; they can´t get away this time!"
Must be the Castleopea CULT folks, folks!!!
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17580
8/9/2005 9:51 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
hmmmmmmmmmmm... maybe not, but... hmmmmm.... LOL
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Re: ++I AM A EXTRA TERRESTRIAL++ ASK ME A QUESTION AND I WILL RESPOND++
Greetings: Truth2
User ID: 7741
ST,
Quote:
"*The illuminati are controlled by 4th Density Reptiles that live underground
**No !! ... Actually These Beings Are In 3rd Density Bodies In Plain Sight !! ... But Controlled/Ruled By Those Of A Higher Postion ... In Certain Societies ... It Is The Female That Is "Of Power" ... Of Which All Others Answer To !!"
Are we speaking of all the female illuminati being in power or one particular one? If it is one would we recogonize her name? I think that the females would have to be very greedy to encourage and guide
their males to do the things that they do.
*We Are Speaking Of Such A Female Individual That Is Not What She Appears To Be !! ... Is Actually Draconian In Nature !! ... Comes From A Termed: "Royal Draconian Background" & In This Embodiment Holds This Same Power !! ... As To Who She Is ... Let Us Just Say That She As The Ability To "Knight" Individuals !!
Thank you
**You Are Quite Welcome !!
ST In BG |
| Anders
User ID: 14376
8/9/2005 10:10 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hmmmm
rather disturbing q and a on a thread i started about the moon
one chap came along and recommended the montalk site
i said montalk is fair enough until he gets onto the organic portal BS
this is how it played out
starless says...
Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
This article discusses the moon as a hyperdimensional portal.
ever wonder why people go crazy during full moon?
the hyperdimensional link is stronger at that time allowing the "controllers" to exert influence more easily.
[link to montalk.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4014
8/9/2005
9:39 pm EDT Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
it´s a life emiter!
man havn´t any of you read The First Men in the Moon by H.G. Wells? it explains it all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 718
8/9/2005
9:39 pm EDT Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
Hi Anders.....a belated ´nice that you´re back´.
What do you think of the image at:
[link to www.lpi.usra.edu]
bundy
User ID: 16282
8/9/2005
9:42 pm EDT Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
Iapetus also appears artificial, and they were talking about Phobos being artificial back in the esienhower administration.
It seems that Phobos cant have the orbit it does unless its hollow.
AND its long been thought that the moons orbit is that of an artificial satellite.
It seems that "scientists" beleive in the facts as long as those facts fit into their neat little world view.
But Phobos does have an exaust port(see pic on this site) as does Iapetus, and decidedly artificial features
You see, if an ancient high civilization didnt START on Earth them why bring industrialization to a garden planet?
SO maybe the deitrus of this ancient civilization is OUT there, all over the solar system.
Maybe when looking at these odities, some of which arent "moons" but "parked" spacecraft,maybe we´re looking at the skyscrapers of an ancient civilization
Anders
User ID: 175
8/9/2005
9:47 pm EDT
Edit Your Post Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
Starless, thanks, but once my old buddy Montalk gets into the Nazi eugenics of organic portals he loses it completely
montalk is a dupe of laura at cassiopaea.com
she is a con artist and fraud
see this thread here
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
organic portals do not exist
but this is good
Food for the Moon
The moon is more than just a pale satellite of interest to poets and astronomers. Its influence goes beyond merely creating ocean tides or driving biological cycles. More importantly, the moon exerts a significant influence upon the mechanical, emotional, and psychological states in man. The werewolf myth and superstition concerning full moon lunacy are not far from the truth. Certain lunar phases heighten the possibility for emotionally draining situations and stimulate reactivity and sensitivity in vulnerable individuals.
Personal observation reveals what numerous esoteric sources have explained at length, namely that we are food for the moon. In this article I shall summarize these sources and then give an account of how through personal experience I independently arrived at similar but more expansive conclusions framed in context of the matrix control system. This is an incredibly fascinating and practical subject since the lunar factor can be observed by anyone with eyes to see and knowledge of such cycles can be used to bypass obstacles normally exacerbated by the fog of ignorance.
Gurdjieff and Ouspensky
Fourth Way philosophy aims to strip man of his mechanical behavior and hypnotic programming in order to build within him a core of heightened consciousness. It is an esoteric system assembled from incomplete fragments of inner Christianity and Sufism. It’s founder, Georges Gurdjieff, frequently admonished the thoughtless mechanical behavior of humanity and was fond of saying that we are “food for the moon.”
What did Gurdjieff mean by this phrase? Many have interpreted “food for the moon” as a figure of speech, that perhaps Gurdjieff meant we are slave to our mechanical conditioning and feed our baser impulses. While it can be additionally interpreted that way, Gurdjieff was primarily being literal. Peter Ouspensky, one of Gurdjieff’s most prolific disciples, lectured at length concerning the moon’s role in human affairs and its place in the cosmological scheme of things. It is reasonable to assume what Ouspensky wrote about the moon accurately reflects what Gurdjieff taught him.
According to Ouspensky, the moon acts as a giant electromagnet pulling upon all organic life on earth and sucking into itself the soul essence of dying creatures. The moon is an embryonic planet receiving its nutrition from organic life on earth through an etheric umbilical cord, an energy conduit between earth and moon.
In man, the moon drives his mechanical aspects like a pendulum moving the gears of a clock. The degree to which one’s actions are driven by the moon is proportional to one’s level of reactivity and non-being. For people incapable of moving themselves through life by nobler spiritual impulses, the moon provides a propulsive force. Without this force, mechanical individuals would be passive as puppets without a puppeteer.
Ouspensky went so far as to say that the very physical motion of our limbs was made possible thanks to the moon. Other Fourth Way initiates like Rodney Collin explained that because our body was largely made of water and the moon pulls on water to create the ocean tides, our bodies are made to move in similar but more complicated ways through hydraulic principles. Though I find this explanation dubious, I have included it only to be complete in my summary. The moon’s gravitational field pulls on all masses equally and is not strong enough to have any physical influence over the motion of water within the body. It would be more accurate to say that the moon exerts some subtle influence upon the organs of our etheric body responsible for initiating neurochemical impulses that trigger mechanical motion. So mechanical behavior is driven by the moon but not necessarily via crude physical means.
The moon is therefore an important factor in driving physiological motion. As long as its influence is limited to such effects, the moon is doings its job properly. Ouspensky warned, however, that if lunar influences trespassed into one’s emotional and mental aspects, then emotional and mental imbalances would occur. How can the moon affect our emotional and intellectual centers? By the very fact that these lower centers have their own mechanical aspects.
Ouspensky was asked whether there was any truth to the connection between full moons and lunacy. He said there was none and that lunar phases are irrelevant because the moon is always around earth exerting the same pull regardless of its phase. That much is true, however as i shall explain later, it is the alignment between earth, sun, and moon that colors the lunar influence, therefore lunar phases do correlate with cycles of mental and emotional stability and instability.
In the cosmological schema, earth is like a mother to the moon which is still a fetus in the sense that it cannot yet “breathe” on its own, hold an atmosphere, or support life. Gurdjieff said: “The Moon is actually a fragment of this Earth, which must now constantly maintain the Moon’s existence.” In that sense, the moon is like a parasitic thoughtform. Nevertheless, the equation is balanced because in exchange for the moon propelling our mechanical movement, we feed the moon so that it may grow and one day be born as a living planet. As to how organic life feeds the moon, Ouspensky explained that upon death the physical body returns to the earth but the soul essence, the astral and etheric energies sloughed off by the evacuating spirit, float toward and deposit themselves upon the moon. This comes with the dissolution of the body’s mechanical center. During life, however, unprovoked emotional turmoil and unconscious psychological suffering produce subtle energies that feed the moon, and this much is detrimental to personal esoteric evolution.
In line with the objectives of Fourth Way, to escape the more deleterious lunar influences Ouspensky said we must “create moon within ourselves.” By this he meant we must develop within us a driving mechanism that can take the place of the external lunar influence; in this way we would break free of the puppeteer. Assuming for a moment a more general and practical interpretation, this simply says that in order to become free from mechanical conditioning and reactive behavior we must reinforce our sense of self-awareness so that conscious choice and awareness reigns supreme over any external stimuli that might provoke an unconscious reaction. In this way we stop feeding the moon while living, and still properly pay our dues upon death.
Starless
User ID: 6881
8/9/2005
9:50 pm EDT
Send Private Msg
Add to Buddy List Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
anders....why throw the baby out with the bathwater?
the concept of organic portals makes sense to me and i have been subject to them in my life
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6616
8/9/2005
9:51 pm EDT Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
Anders,
The Lord of Lords and the King of Kings constructed the Moon. It is plain for all to see. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool and a buffoon. From tides to solar and lunar eclipses, even a slight variation in orbital mechanics would render these phenomena null and void---they couldn´t happen.
Deal with it.
Anders
User ID: 175
8/9/2005
9:53 pm EDT
Edit Your Post Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
starless
read the thread and wise up
i was part of the laura cult for 3 years
good luck
PS
´throw the baby out with the bath water´ is laura and especially ark-speak
it appears u have been duped badly
i urge you to read the thread
come over and we´ll talk there
A
Anders
User ID: 175
8/9/2005
9:56 pm EDT
Edit Your Post Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
hi 718!
i really don´t know what to make of it, i am not too clued up in that way, on the surface it looks extremely lame, why the crack and holes at the bottom
is BS
i also have investigated the hollow earth theory and history etc big time
it is no surprise that all maps and sat images on n and s pole are classified
is all BS
all lies
Starless
User ID: 6881
8/9/2005
10:00 pm EDT
Send Private Msg
Add to Buddy List Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
anders that thread is too long
tell me why op´s dont exist
Anders
User ID: 175
8/9/2005
10:03 pm EDT
Edit Your Post Re: WHO BUILT THE MOON?
anders that thread is too long
tell me why op´s dont exist
You must be an organic portal if you cannot read the thread. |
| Anders
User ID: 14376
8/9/2005 10:17 PM | | Anders
User ID: 17420
8/10/2005 10:13 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
me too
afternoon bump |
| a7thson
User ID: 3605
8/10/2005 2:00 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
> *We Are Speaking Of Such A Female Individual
> That Is Not What She Appears To Be !!
> ... Is Actually Draconian In Nature !! ...
> In This Embodiment Holds This Same Power !! ...
> As To Who She Is ...
> Let Us Just Say That She As The Ability To
> "Knight" Individuals !!
haha, this claim´s a little self-importance reinforcing but indeed interesting. I doubt it but it´s still funny. the ability to "Knight", clever interpretation, I´ll give it that... it would be irony of ironies perhaps, but I don´t seriously think it´s L of the C´s that´s being referred to - we´d never truly know of course :-)
LOL, this made my day! the thread it came from is really long but, so far, entertaining as well. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11144
8/10/2005 6:12 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Keepen Jive alive BUMp |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13322
8/10/2005 6:42 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8738
8/11/2005 9:46 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
To recap:
Perhaps the best and most comprehensive overview of the conflict, as of last spring, is the article by Rollo Tomassi entitled “Sex, Lies and Ouiji Boards.” For those wanting an even more basic breakdown, here is a simple outline of events:
1994 – Laura Knight and Fred Irland began to channel the Cassiopaeans.
1995 – Laura met Tom French, a writer at the St. Pete Times, at a UFO conference. He begins an article on her.
1996 – Laura decided that her husband, Lewis Martin, was a zombie replacement sent to stop her from evolving by evil lizard aliens and divorced him.
1997 – Ark Jadczyk’s first visit.
1998 – They marry.
1999 – In May, I began exchanging emails with Ms. Laura Knight Jadczyk. This continued until March of 2000.
February 2000 – The long awaited article on Laura and the Cassiopaeans appears in St. Pete Times on the day before Valentine’s Day. Our first exchange ended soon after.
July 2000 – Laura got in touch with me wanting help with a curious email. We re-established our discussion and I was invited to a session at her house in Florida in October. I decided to write about her and the Cassiopaeans.
October 2000 – Fred Irland called it quits, and does not show up for proposed session. All channelling stopped when Fred left…
December 2000 – As our discussions continued, I verified some of the Cassiopaeans most curious remarks and so became their new “catch.”
January 2001 – Laura cements the connection even further with part 13e of The Wave, where she declared that I was the only person, beside her, that truly understood the Cassiopaeans.
February 2001 – My involvement deepened as I helped Laura and Ark undermine another group member. I was preparing a conference for the fall of 2001 and invited them to participate. They immediately put an announcement up on their website.
March 2001 – I visited Laura and Ark in Florida, staying four days at their house in New Port Richey. During that time, I participated in two ouiji board sessions, the transcripts of which can be found on their site in the “Mirror Sessions” article. At that meeting, we also came to an agreement concerning publishing “The Noah Syndrome,” Laura’s pre-Cassiopaean book. They agreed to send me a completed text, with annotations by Ark, and I agreed to read it, and if I thought it good enough, then to edit and design it, get it ready for publication basically. If at that point we thought it would work, then we would do contracts for publication. Fairly standard operating procedure in the publishing industry… I also joined several of their discussion groups, where I was touted as the new guru.
April 2001 – The drafts for “The Noah Syndrome” arrived from Laura and Ark. The ads for the conference went up on my website. I became more involved in the discussions groups, where I and everyone else was encouraged to share details of their personal history. These details would later be used against me in my public “expose,” an excellent example of the cult’s tactics.
May 2001 – Problems arose over Fred Irland’s role in the channelled material as I read the drafts of the new “Amazing Grace.” Laura sent me emails partially from Fred that seemed to indicate that he wanted nothing further to do with the Cassiopaeans. It did not however imply that Laura could do whatever she wanted with their jointly produced material. I made the decision that I wouldn’t publish any Cassiopaean books until the matter of Fred’s copyrights were resolved. Work however began on “The Noah Syndrome.”
June 2001 – A major problem arose when one of Laura’s former “hypnotherapy” clients threatened to sue over Laura’s use of her pictures and story on the website. Warning sign of serious trouble to come…
July 2001 – At the end of June, I received an urgent invitation to come to Florida for a session with the Cassiopaeans over the weekend of July 4th. (It should be noted that between October 2000, when Fred Irland left and August of 2001, when Ark took over at the board, the only contact Laura had had with the Cassiopaeans came through me. Although they tried several others on the planchette, only the two sessions in which I participated in March are at least as coherent as the average Cassiopaean “transmission.” This unexpected development put me in a rather awkward position. I had no desire to become Laura’s new channelling partner.) They also told me directly that a rich Finnish businessman was coming to visit and they wanted their publisher there to give them an extra dollop of credibility. The idea was to get the Finn to donate a large chunk of money for anti-gravity and time travel research based on the Cassiopaean information.
July 4th – 6th 2001 - I decided to go because I thought “The Noah Syndrome” had possibilities, and I needed to discuss with them the business aspect of our publishing deal, as well as details of the fall conference. I was also troubled by the latest developments, and wanted to figure out what was really going on with these folks. Several things happened. We did a mirror session, available as an mp3 on the Cassiopaean site, in which something very dark appears to have seized control of Laura. The afternoon before that session, I listened for many hours to Laura and Ark as they tried to convince a legitimate businessman to give them several million dollars to build an anti-gravity device as suggested by the Cassiopaeans. It came across as a direct and naïve attempt at a con job. After the Finnish businessman had gratefully escaped, I tried to have my conversation about publishing, money and the dubious morality of running anti-gravity scams. All Laura heard was that there was no way publishing her book with my company was going to produce the immediate hundreds of thousands of dollars they needed to pay their bills. And then it was mirror time… On the way home, I realized that I had been had.
Mid-July 2001 – However I felt about Laura and the Cassiopaeans after the events of my visit, I found I was stuck with them. First, there was the conference… By mid July, more than a month after the deposit was paid on the retreat center, and with the space at the conference was more than 2/3rds filled with Cassiopaean followers, the conference itself depended on Laura. And then there was the book… I had included it as one of our three books for publication that quarter for a large book distributor and received a very positive response, so my small publishing company now also depended on them. After a few conversations in the weeks after my visit, I concluded that something was seriously askew. But I couldn’t quite figure out what they were up to… I went away for a week to do a psychic kids camp and came back with pneumonia, and so for the last two weeks of July and the first week of August I was completely out of touch, away from my computer and off the discussion groups.
August 2001 - When I recovered somewhat in early August, I discovered that the first round of what Laura would later call her “campaign of systematic harassment” had already begun. About the time I dropped out of touch, they posted a very negative disclaimer about the conference on their website. But they didn’t drop out entirely because the timing wasn’t right. Ark sent me an email about wanting a contract on “The Noah Syndrome,” and when I recovered he received one. They were in contact with my wife, Darlene, who was designing and pre-pressing the book while I was sick, and so they knew that work was progressing. Between August 5th and 8th, it all came to a head. Laura and Ark dropped out of the conference, waiting carefully to do so until the deposit became un-refundable, with less than six weeks to go. They also decided to renege on our agreement to publish “The Noah Syndrome,” two days before I was to sign the deal with the distributor. In other words, they made a very carefully considered decision to cause me as much damage as they possibly could. Since they had pulled out of the conference, they actively encouraged everyone to demand a refund, and since the Cassiopaeanists were the majority of the participants at the conference, that meant virtually no conference at all. Since I had focused on Noah as my third book, I was now one book short and so the book deal was at risk. I had explained all this to them, so they knew exactly when and how to attack and destroy. They carefully waited an entire month, until it was too late to get a refund and therefore cancel the conference and until I was locked into publishing their book, before they made their move. A simple direct communication from them during that month, saying that they just didn’t want to do it, would have corrected the entire situation with minimal loss all around. They chose not to.
Mid-August 2001 – Laura did all this publicly on the discussion groups without a word to me personally. Then she banned me from the groups before I could respond. In an attempt to present my side of what was a rapidly disintegrating situation, I compiled an email list from everyone who had ever replied to an email from the Cassiopaean groups and sent those folks all the relevant banned emails. Apparently, Laura and Ark figured that I would take such a massive financial hit without saying a word of complaint. They acted shocked when I tried to set the record straight and said I considered that wrecking the conference and the book deal in the way they did were very unfriendly acts. I explained to those wanting refunds that since we were going on with the conference, refunds would be given after the conference date to anyone who didn’t attend because of the Cassiopaeans and wanted one. Laura insisted to her minions that this was not good enough and encouraged them to charge their refund back on their credit cards. This resulted in several folks getting multiple refunds that took months to track down and sort through. Bottom line: I lost $5,000 dollars on the conference. The results of loosing the book deal were even worse; loss of our Christmas distribution window meant the death of the company, a net loss of many thousands of dollars. Laura, on her private discussion group, gloated and described her “campaign of systematic harassment” designed to “do the maximum amount of damage.”
September/October 2001 – It took over a month, but cracks appeared in the ranks of the Cassiopaean faithful. As more folks questioned the emerging “party line” they were similarly banished and attacked. I waited until the refunds for the conference had been dispatched and then went semi-public on another discussion group formed by ex-Cassiopaeanists. More refugees crossed over and it became apparent that the cult was undergoing a purge. Anyone who questioned their behaviour was dismissed from their presence. However, I still seemed to be the enemy. The reason why emerged obliquely. Before I left their house in July, Ark had given me a CD with the complete and unedited Cassiopaean transcripts. As I read the unedited sessions I was appalled. I joked in one of our last conversations in July that she would be wise to never left anyone else read the unedited version; it was that damning… Toward the end of October, I mentioned on the anti-cassiopaean discussion group that the unedited transcripts were far from flattering, and someone else joked about publishing them anonymously, and suddenly, the Cassiopaeanists went on the attack.
November 2001 – As the discussion group flame war died down somewhat in mid-November, I began to receive emails and calls from friends and associates, people I had worked for or had written articles for. Seemed that someone named Andrew C. Rowland, claiming to be an official of the Perseus Foundation and suggesting that he was a lawyer, was contacting them and asking for information on my background. When an individual would respond positively, Mr. Rowland would write back with a series of scurrilous allegations and threaten to blacken the individual’s reputation with guilt by association, if they didn’t pull my articles etc. Over Thanksgiving weekend, they published their “expose” based on the results of the above “investigation.” Basically they discovered that one version of my bio blurb on the Internet had an error in it and from that they decided that everything else in my credits was false and then just ran with it. Anything negative in my life was held to be true, but anything positive was held to be a lie. By carefully asking the wrong questions, and sometimes to the wrong organizations, they managed to acquire some responses that could be used to prove their point, and no matter what else is presented to them, they remain unmoveable on these “facts.” Even the person who found the original error on the bio blurb has publicly stated that they are misrepresenting the facts. It was not enough to destroy the conference, damage my company almost beyond repair, and cause me massive financial loss; they were now going for my reputation and my work as a writer in a very public way.
December 2001 – Foolishly, I replied to their accusations, and while this addressed every point in their “expose,” and apologized for the error, they found a way to cut and paste and ignore enough to use it as a springboard for further attacks. At that point, I offered to mutually back off, and to try for the third time to return their CD of the unedited sessions. (They had twice refused delivery.) This was ignored as their attack went into its next phase. They approached my co-author on A Monument to the End of Time, Jay Weidner, and began a subtle campaign of bait and switch designed to turn him against me. By mid-December, they had succeeded and he demanded that I stop publishing AMET. This was of course the final blow to my publishing company, and I let it all go out of business on January 1st 2002.
January 2002 – Early in January, the momentum shifted. By diligent detective work Fred Irland was located. Since he had been avoiding the Cassiopaean website, he had no idea how things had changed. He was, frankly, stunned to see how his work was being distorted and warped to support Laura’s cult of personality. He immediately gave permission for the publication on the unedited transcripts, as was his right as the inviolable co-author of the material. This led to a new round of attacks from the Cassiopaeans. Laura began a mammoth second volume of her autohagiography in which Fred and I were the chief villains. I announced the closure of the old Aethyrea Books and released all copyrights and braced for the next round.
February 2002 – As Laura wrote thousands and thousands of words on her new Adventures series, the real struggle developed over the unedited transcripts and the copyrights to the material. By the end of the month, Fred had acquired a copyright attorney. The anti-cassiopaean discussion groups flourished. I began serious work on my Cassiopaean book, now entitled “The Psychopathology of Channeling.” Laura provided material with almost every instalment of the Adventures with the Cassiopaeans series.
March/April 2002 – I settled all the outstanding problems with my co-author and challenged his right to Aethyrea Books. As we resolved these problems, and as Laura failed to provide any proof whatsoever of her accusations against me, he began to catch on to her manipulation. He attempted to moderate a settlement between us, to which I was basically agreeable, but everything fell through when the rest of the folks on the various “Rebel Alliance” groups took it public, on Usenet groups, without permission. At the same time, Laura and Ark threatened, intimidated and finally tricked Fred into a copyright settlement that left them free to do whatever they want with the edited transcripts. In return, Fred’s name was changed to Frank. I went through a few name changes as well, some of which can still be found on the web, before my real name reappeared. In the mean time, I instituted the “Don’t Feed the Demon” policy and took down all the discussion groups.
May 2002 – Laura expanded her reach in May with an article on the Universal Seduction website claiming that I was some kind of COINTELPRO agent. I, and two of the other key participants, my co-author Jay Weidner and Dr. Terri Burns, who did the original research on which Laura based her “expose,” wrote extensive refutations of her comments, all of which the folks at the Universal Seduction decided was not as good a story as her claims of COINTELPRO infiltration. In that article, I also announced that I was working on “The Psychopathology of Channeling.” Eventually, I put the whole mess up on my website, along with snippets from our earlier discussion group, and braced for the next attack. It wasn’t long in coming. I found that I had now morphed into a super-computer hacker who stole another group member’s cyber identity just to leave taunting notes on their discussion board. This was so ludicrous as to be pure paranoid parody. Their “evidence” was the fact that one member had trouble with her phone bill, possibly caused by unauthorized internet service, at the same time that I posted a few comments to their supposedly open discussion forum. From this I realized that they would go to any lengths possible to attribute a “crime” to me personally. They were playing for keeps, and emboldened by their “victory” over Fred, I was their next target…
May – October 2002 – After the Universal Seduction exchange, I tried my best to ignore the whole Cassiopaean affair. I concentrated on getting my life back together after the long struggle. I hoped that if we all went away, and stopped giving her anything to rant about, she would move on to a new fascination. In a way, that’s what happened… Except now her experiences with me, seen through the lens of COINTELPRO delusion and shaped by the innate racism of Mouravieff, transformed into the Doctrine of the Organic Portals, a pernicious paranoid delusion became a very dark and fear-ridden worldview. However, since I am in no way any kind of an agent for anybody or anything, and certainly not any kind of COINTELPRO agent, then her assumptions based on that view of our interactions is seriously and basically flawed. It appears somewhat obvious that her desire to rationalize her very negative and aggressive behaviour, not just to me, but to almost everyone who has ever crossed her path, led her to formulate a metaphysical theory that would allow her to de-humanize anyone, anytime, as needed. This allows her to justify years of very negative anti-social behaviour, from attempted murder to promiscuity and divorce, to mail order scam, SSI and insurance fraud, and trashing friends and co-workers, as simply fighting off the non-humans. If the offending person is actually a non-human soulless energy-sucking vampire being, then any kind of dirty trick or aggressive tactic is allowed. Any sane person can see how this perspective is very dangerous, yet the people inside the cult seem to think this is somehow all right, and even a valuable insight. These developments have more than proved my basic contention that the Cassiopaeans are a dangerous cult led by a very disturbed individual. |
| kris
User ID: 20260
8/11/2005 2:35 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| kris
User ID: 20260
8/11/2005 2:39 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
the black cat walked past twice ! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13613
8/11/2005 3:00 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| a7thson
User ID: 20273
8/11/2005 3:28 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
bump bump
the dying thread
ending this thread now would be highly illogical! |
| ACToday
User ID: 2996
8/11/2005 4:52 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
#177, I just read throught your "To Recap" post and found it odd that 9/11/01 didn´t seem to impact any of you at the time?
This is a friendly question, probably not phrasing it well. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 351
8/12/2005 7:05 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
we need more transcripts on this thread. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 18954
8/12/2005 9:32 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
#177, I just read throught your "To Recap" post and found it odd that 9/11/01 didn´t seem to impact any of you at the time?
V: Actually, it had an enormous impact. LKJ went nuts and began blaming all sorts of obscure groups with the job. She wrote, or cobbled together, a whole book about the occult significance of 9/11. Mostly culled from her discussions with my former co-author, Mr. Weidner, I might add... Look on the archives for Mossad Happy dance, and you will see that she even got me involved in the conspiracy...lol!
VB |
| Jodido
User ID: 10120
8/12/2005 10:07 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Well frig...
What I have found, reading so called channelled material, is that there seems to be some rule whereby if we are given some kind of truism we must also be given some kind of lie. It seems to fall under the thumb of duality. Ya know, this universe is run by duality and free will. A free will given by God.
About all the Jesus channelled stuff. The best portrayal of Him I have found is Edgar Cayce. But, again it seems this duality thing is always in play. Why can´t they just come out with it and tell us what is going on?
I will tell ya why; the veil of ignorance. Its funny; I know who I am, and yet am still in this veil of ignorance. How do I know who I am? Stuff has happened to me throughout my life... I know God is real, but am very secular, comparatively. In other words I do not believe all the dogma. But, something happened to me, back in 2003, which really showed me who I am. Now? I am just waiting, hehe. But, about this veil of ignorance; it needs to be inplace to keep Earth going the way Earth is supposed to. You see, Earth is the heart of this universe. This means all the blood pumps through Earth. Humans, on Earth, represent a kind of thing. Everything on Earth is representative (as in much more than on other habited planets in this universe...). It happens to be that humans on Earth are co-creators with God. That is one reason for the veil of ignorance. But, if this is the heart of the universe, and the universe is God; maybe that would show you why things are the way they are on Earth; that is the ´heart´ of the issue (laughs hysterically, only stopping after falling off his hair and hitting his head).
I AM JODIDO! |
| stgeorge
User ID: 8271
8/12/2005 10:20 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
So this is your best disinformation effort.
But why Nancy? Because she writes so well? |
| Anders
User ID: 13193
8/12/2005 10:31 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Good work Stormy, memories... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13929
8/12/2005 11:07 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
You guys are not really believing their shit are you?? Channellimng demon worshipping crap, thats what it is! I´ve had a bump into these, what a bunch of pricks, high and mighty! I remember someone off STA as well, saying they were a member of that "cult" and when she tried to leave they got a bit rowdy with her. I think these guys run off the fear factor. Well theres no fear here, you bunch of fuckin demonic wankers. and if I sound out of tone, thats because I am directing this at the demonic entities that call themselves the cassiopeans. Bring your fuckin demonic shit here, you have no power over me, you fools! I´ll give you less than a year and your demonic charades will be over.  |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16253
8/12/2005 11:42 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Am I missing something here? What is the point of all these transcripts???
. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 351
8/12/2005 11:48 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
thanks for posting the transcripts.
but...
can you post transcrips from 1998-2005? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13929
8/12/2005 11:51 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
To User ID: 474
Actually, we are here to DEBUNK their teachings and expose their cult for what it is.
Care to join in?
-------------------------
NO!
You are here to expose the truth? Thats what all the conspiracy sites say, when really, all you tend to do is promote the material, you do the opposite of what your so called intentions are. Nothing comes to light, the only thing you are doing is promoting the material you want the masses to believe. Its probably called reverse psychology, and I´ll stick to my truths and my reality, not something thats been promoted |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 992
8/12/2005 12:00 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
I AM JODIDO!
~~Aren´t you the same dude posting here a few years ago claiming to be god and trolling to get laid?
From what I remember, everything was about sex, women and you being some chosen god looking to get laid. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8055
8/12/2005 12:14 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Christ is going to teach upon his return? BS. Remember that the C´s themselves, in one session, said that all of the Revelations were given by the Lizzies.
But, its like this (see), all these, even the 12th planet, are scenarios that could have happened. They won´t.
There is somethimg else I have seen here. The questioner of the C´s switches between 4th density and dimension, as if they are they same thing. They are not. The 4th dimension is time. The 4th desnity is all relative. Density is viscosity. It is rumored there are 9 densities here. The C´s are correct, in their take on the Eden story; do not parameters on it. Who cares how many densities there are. About us living for 400 years; no, sorry. About some big change in the physical make-up of things; no, C´s playing with ya there; trying to say there is some big difference which we cannot even relate to because we are in the third density (not third dimension...).
Something did happen back in the spring of 2003. Because of what happened; things like doomsday events may or may not transpire; and I was a good boy :) Not even the twins will come.
This VISA being 666. Well, that is one way of looking at it, but it pales in comparison to the way I experienced it. --trust me all this doomsday stuff is not going to happen, but neither is this rapture shit... |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 | |
|
