|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans?
| Anders
User ID: 3668
8/22/2005 8:57 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Thanks Vincent, I was wondering who TK might be. |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 7587
8/22/2005 11:29 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
VB said: I think I just got promoted
Stormy retorts: How is it that you keep getting promoted? I am down around the level of lackey these days. I used to be your CIA handler!
V: Sad but true... You just haven´t done enough to piss them off lately... I´m still a little bemused by that New Age Impresario bit... I´m not the channeling guru with a Mr. G style school in France, sort of the very image of modern New Age Impresario, now am I?
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19086
8/22/2005 2:20 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
SB: ..I used to be your CIA handler!
V: Sad but true...
Say what?
Does this "Mr. G style school in France" really exist?
Is sort of a monastery? How many disciples are there?
What is the tuition fee? Your mind plus expenses?
Any first-hand knowledge about the school? |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 7587
8/23/2005 1:25 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
SB: ..I used to be your CIA handler!
V: Sad but true...
Say what?
V: When the C-cult was claiming that we were all cointelpro agents, Stormy was described as my handler. We were joking about that...
Does this "Mr. G style school in France" really exist?
Is sort of a monastery? How many disciples are there?
What is the tuition fee? Your mind plus expenses?
Any first-hand knowledge about the school?
V: Yes the QFG is a real cultic collective of between 12 and 20 people at Castleopaea in France. I put the Mr. G reference in because it amuses me to think of LKJ in tight riding breeches and with a shaved head... my bad...
VB |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 7587
8/23/2005 2:21 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Let´s have a contest!
Can anyone find just one instance in the early transcripts posted here where the Cs gave a checkable real world fact that was in fact correct? I can´t find one, but maybe I´m missing something...
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8910
8/23/2005 10:04 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| Vincent Bridges
User ID: 7587
8/23/2005 10:48 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Has anything the C´s have stated, come to pass?
Not twisting of words to make it fit any given situation, but actual prediction that happened.
V: Nope... not a one...
VB |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8910
8/23/2005 11:01 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Vincent:
What is your opinion of Val´s Matrix V
material? |
| Tulku
User ID: 10415
8/23/2005 6:06 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Vincent: why a contest? why judge channeled material by hit ratio of future prediction or new facts? predictions are few and you will probably not find them come true, the same goes for edgar cayce, seth and others for that matter. like any dive into the collective unconsciousness channeling contains imagery and archetypes that have their own qualities and meaning depending on context. what´s your point?
Storm: you are spamming the thread with these long question and answers. what´s your point? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9734
8/23/2005 6:07 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
bumpski |
| StormBear
User ID: 9894
8/23/2005 8:44 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Tulku asked:
Storm: you are spamming the thread with these long question and answers. what´s your point?
Stormy says: I was asked a bunch of pages back to begin posting more transcripts, so I thought I would do a few every other day. |
| StormBear
User ID: 9894
8/23/2005 8:46 PM | | John Souttar
User ID: 2824
8/24/2005 2:11 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Thanks Storm will read with interest when I have time |
| Anders
User ID: 793
8/24/2005 9:17 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
stormy, keep the the q and a transcripts coming, the originals, this is good for the newbies to get a grip on understanding what the thread is all about
the transcripts |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7058
8/24/2005 5:30 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
BUMP |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1568
8/25/2005 11:56 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12220
8/25/2005 4:26 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Re: The Most Dangerous Cult in The World
Which part of the article is it that is troubling you? |
| StormBear
User ID: 9894
8/25/2005 9:41 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Like, uh, all of it.
Her Anti-Semitism is seen here at its best. |
| Anders
User ID: 1568
8/25/2005 10:18 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
title: The Most Dangerous Idea in the World
Date: June 3, 2005
It seems like Parabola Magazine denied the Cassies ad space for Laura´s latest spooge of plagerism based on Vincent Bridges work on Fulcanelli; Secret History of the World.
So when Laura starts scanning the pages of Parabola, her blood runs red when she sees ads for Positive Future Consulting´s book; A New America.
They are the exact opposite of L´ark´s fuck you, fear-based Quantum Future Group. The Positive Future Consulting´s purpose is to make a positive difference. I see nothing positive in the Quantum Future Group´s outlook on life. I am supposed to fear everything and hate Jews according to our favorite Wroclaw reject.
Then what really sets Laura off was when she started noticing ads for "A well-rounded look at the Kabbalah." Laura had a one word response, "sheesh."
And the icing on the cake is the ad for Llewellyn Publishing´s Crone´s Book of Charms & Spells. That must have gone over well in Castleopea cause she goes on for THIRTEEN THOUSAND words after that.
good catch Stormy, I go take a peek! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10094
8/25/2005 11:05 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
> ".. but it is a essay by Laura .. calling Judiasm a cult."
> "...and blaming the Jews for the trouble the world was in."
> "Like, uh, all of it. Her Anti-Semitism is seen here at its best."
You didn´t really read the article, did you (let alone understand it)?
Here is an excerpt hopefully short enough to avoid a mental buffer overflow error:
The Christian Church, throughout most of its history, has been anti-Semitic. With the reformation, however, many Christians turned from anti-Semitism to a new kind of discrimination rampant in the world today: philo-Semitism. This is a stance which views the Jews as practically necessary AS Jews, because they have a role to play in the salvation of Christians! This "love of Jews" includes in its parameters the complacent sureness that the Jews ARE different and are destined for extinction once they have performed their assigned task.
Certainly, there are personal and political differences among Christians which make a generalization inaccurate and perhaps even dangerous, but the fact remains that many fundamentalists who are leading the "let´s help Israel every way we can" and "let´s go after the Muslims" charge of the present day have an established history of having taught their followers that Jews were behind all of the world´s troubles.
It was after the full horrors of Nazi Germany had been revealed that Western Christianity realized that promoting anti-Semitism a la The Protocols of the Elders of Zion could be seen as sympathizing with the Nazis. So, those fundamentalist who were blatantly anti-Semitic backed up and regrouped.
With the birth of Israel in 1948, the anti-Semitic Christians changed their tactics. They were still anti-Semitic (still ARE), but they acted differently on the outside; they became "loving" and "grateful", benign and patronizing toward Jews. Thank goodness the Jews were NOW doing what they were supposed to do: regather in Israel so Jesus could return and blast them all to smithereens!
As this new appreciation of the Jewish role merged with dispensationalist beliefs, Western Christians became fiercely supportive of the new Jewish state. Nothing must come between Israel and its destiny! Anybody could criticize any other nation in the world, but NOT Israel. Criticizing France, Germany or even the U.S. was just "political." Criticizing Israel was criticizing God Almighty.
Like, uh, what? |
| anders
User ID: 1568
8/25/2005 11:09 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
1046 read the thread - about laura being a hoover job with her anti israel stance... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17195
8/26/2005 1:47 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
> ".. her anti israel stance..."
What´s wrong with that? Is it now a thought crime? McCarthyism reloaded?
I did read the thread. Much of it I found to be mere emotional drivel written by self-styled ´cult victims´. I failed to understand why these people came in contact with this ´cult´ in the first place. What was their *real* motive? Why didn´t they leave of their own accord when they noticed that something wasn´t right? Is all this bitching around just an attempt to cover up their own psychological problems? Why are they still refusing to learn their lesson?
A sovereign individual does not follow, and feels no desire to lead.
And I also failed to understand why the ´cult´ members intervened in the way they did (page 5). What was their *real* motive? Do they also have something to hide? Is it the raffle thing? They acted as if under some pressure..
April 4, 1997
Q: Would you please tell us what constitutes objectivity?
A: The effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice "at the door."
Right. |
| Anders
User ID: 2522
8/26/2005 9:10 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
What´s wrong with that? Is it now a thought crime? McCarthyism reloaded?
I did read the thread.
Are you the same 1046?
I don´t think you read the thread. If you did you would know that laura and ark have certainly crossed the line of objectivity regarding Israel. But my point is others have pointed out all the connections to intel (inc myself) - that by being so anti-israel (some would say anti-semitic too, that she has crossed that line also), that she serves as a hoovering tool.
Much of it I found to be mere emotional drivel written by self-styled ´cult victims´.
Then that is me. And I take exception to being told I write drivel. And I take exception that you say others, that I know personally, write drivel. WTF are u doing on this thread then, which is all about the CULT that laura and ark have created?
I find your sentence above MOST offensive - coming clearly from a know-nothing that doesn´t even understand the hoovering reference.
I failed to understand why these people came in contact with this ´cult´ in the first place. What was their *real* motive? Why didn´t they leave of their own accord when they noticed that something wasn´t right? Is all this bitching around just an attempt to cover up their own psychological problems? Why are they still refusing to learn their lesson?
I am not going to waste time answering such stupid questions. It is the nature of all CULTS that it is almost impossible to leave.
All your answers are answered in this thread - you know, that 48 pages that you have not read.
Read up on CULT history and educate yourself.
A sovereign individual does not follow, and feels no desire to lead.
Eh???
And I also failed to understand why the ´cult´ members intervened in the way they did (page 5). What was their *real* motive? Do they also have something to hide? Is it the raffle thing? They acted as if under some pressure..
Look, matey boy, read the whole thread again if u are serious about wanting to understand what is going on. It seems you are not grasping much at all.
April 4, 1997
Q: Would you please tell us what constitutes objectivity?
A: The effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice "at the door."
Right.
thanks for nothing
Anders! |
| John Souttar
User ID: 2824
8/26/2005 1:23 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Hoovering sounds good. A bit FBI maybe.
I think we all have to face that she is inspired and probqbly by an external force that is more intelligent than her.
In the cult we belonged to in 1974 the guru was Jewish but he never made anything of this to us. But it was certainly not possible for the cult to become anti-semitic.
Now it is very easy for people to get wound up about Israel or Islam these days and most people take one side or another. I personally see them both like squabbling children. Very difficult to calm down and separate. But what you can do is give the kids a bribe - ice cream, pocket maney, and so on.
It is also very easy to get disorientated over religion.
Laura as a person can fall for this sort of stuff. What she is channelling is plagiarised I am told. Probably is but it is not surprising that people are picking up the same message all over. Their earthlings just differ. Extra Terrestrial is a bit different to Laura but its the same thing. No time (not true only time found here more true).
They are trying to start the cult that saves the world = Laura Saviour. Commendable - but they do it with deception. The material omits important bits. really the questions are the key. If you just looked at the questions you would find out as much. But she is inspired by this thing. It is more intelligent than she (Is that what I hear from you).
I told Extra Terrestrial off a few days ago and his calm hee hee demeanour seemed to change. when you challenge them you find out what you are dealing with. While you are sucked in (hoover) you are inside and part of her. That is why they all turn on you. Anyway these suckers all going to get sucked by the big one soon.
Humans who care to try can exist on all seven levels of the astral light at once. More than aliens can do. We produce the most beautiful arts. They dont. We have a special relationship with the sea (the great salty brain that rules the universe from this flash in time (which doesn´t exist !) We were all fish. They dont have this relationship with the boss. This is why the 200 asked Enoch to intercede with it for them. The sea is very very old but is only now salty. It can now hold a massive electrical charge. Excuse me but I think I missed this stuff in the transcripts. But thanks Anders keep them coming will keep looking.
Sorry for spamming up this site |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1881
8/26/2005 2:34 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1881
8/26/2005 2:35 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
wanna go for 345? |
| kris
User ID: 22046
8/27/2005 12:08 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12336
8/27/2005 11:08 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
bumpski |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22435
8/29/2005 10:27 AM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
Laura Knight Jadczyk has finally admitted that the Cassiopaeans are a cult. After years of angry denial she has finally revealed that she is the author and grand master of a cult devoted to the apocalypse.
This will come as news to most of you. You may peruse her site searching for the documents that report this fact. After you are done searching you will say that I am wrong. Nowhere, you may say, does Laura Knight Jadczyk admit that the Cassiopaeans are a cult.
But as with all things with Laura one must examine the evidence closely. Remember, everything Laura Knight Jadczyk accuses her enemies of doing is actually what she is really doing. This is her modus operandi. This is how she ultimately reveals everything about her and her motives. She cannot hide from this salient fact.
The more she writes, the more she tells us about herself. In a way Laura Knight Jadczyk is like the serial killer in the movies who reveals their motivation through the letters that they send to the well-meaning detective investigating them.
All right, so exactly where does Laura Knight Jadczyk admit that the Cassiopaeans are a cult? If one goes back into her writings (rantings?) they will find a constant and steady stream of denials concerning the cult-like status of the Cassiopaeans.
Frequently, in response to these charges, she asks the rhetorical question: “If you are going to call us a cult then that means that the Christians and others religions are also cults. Why don’t you call them cults also?”
And it is good question.
So what is a cult? A cult is a group who believes in a group of certain ideas. They frequently defend those ideas with violence; personal attacks and by spreading vicious lies about their perceived opponents (who are usually those attempting to expose them as a cult.) A cult usually strips down a persons belief systems (BS) and then replaces their old BS with the cult’s new BS. If someone criticizes the cult, or its leaders, they are driven out or destroyed, if someone leaves the cult they are then considered an enemy, or an apostate.
It is in her latest tirade ‘The Most Dangerous Cult in the World’ that Laura Knight Jadczyk admits that the Cassiopaeans are a cult. It is also in this article that Laura Knight Jadczyk finally reveals why she hates Christians and Jews, and possibly even Muslims.
The article is actually a pretty good blow-by-blow account of how the so-called dispensationalists, the Christian fundamentalists, have created a dangerous mind-set that could destroy the world. She shows that this cult has created belief systems that will ultimately lead to an apocalypse that will destroy the planet.
So far so good. It is difficult to argue with the logic. Although none of this is very original, as many people have been saying the same thing for years about the fundamentalists.
But in this act of declaring that Christians (and Jews) are a ‘cult’, and by showing how they are a cult, Laura Knight Jadczyk is admitting that the Cassiopaeans are also a cult.
Furthermore she reveals exactly why she hates the Christians and the Jews.
She hates them for this reason: They are more successful cults than her cult.
The entire reason for the Cassiopaean site is to draw people into her cult.
The entire reason for the Signs of the Times site is to attempt to destroy all competing cults.
For if the Christians and the Jews are indeed a cult, there can be no doubt that the Cassiopaeans are also a cult. That is what she is really telling us.
But she is not just angry with the Christians (especially the Christians) for being a competitive cult and a more successful cult, she is also angry because this competitive cult may accomplish their apocalypse before the Cassiopaean cult gets the chance to accomplish their apocalypse.
Let’s not forget that while Laura Knight Jadczyk decries the apocalyptic thinking of the Christian Fundamentalist cult she is also actively predicting an apocalypse herself. The Cassiopaeans have told her, in no uncertain terms, that a ‘realm border wave’ (whatever that means) is approaching the Earth and that a stream of comets from the Oort cloud is about to descend upon us all destroying the Earth.
She also believes that the Cassiopaens have offered all of us a way out of this certain apocalypse and that is why she is doing the work that she is doing.
Holy Smoke Batman that is exactly what she says the Christians are doing.
And they are.
Both the Christian Fundamentalists and Laura Knight Jadczyk believe that there is going to be an apocalypse very soon. Both Laura Knight Jadczyk and the Christian Fundamentalists believe that they have the ‘way out’. Even the sub title of her new book (plagiarized as it is) is “How to get out alive”. This is what the Christian fundamentalists believe with their BS that the rapture will ‘get them out alive’.
What I am trying to say is that Laura Knight Jadczyk is angry at the Christians, and the Jews, and the Muslims, because they are more successful cults than hers and that they are going to get their apocalypse before she gets hers.
If she believes in the imminent apocalypse, and there is no doubt that she does, why would she be so angry with the Christians having their apocalypse also? I mean who cares how the world is destroyed; the important thing is that it is being destroyed.
Only a psychopathic leader of a cult would be pissed off because their apocalypse may be superseded by another more successful apocalypse.
Once one understands this all the rest of her writings and activities become comprehensible.
I admit that the entire thing is quite mad and insane. But that doesn’t mean that it isn’t true.
Once one understands that Laura Knight Jadczyk is preaching, and has been preaching: that the Cassiopaeans are predicting an apocalypse then the anger at the Christians becomes apparent and understandable.
She isn’t trying to stop the Christians destroying the world because she wants the world to go on, she is angry with the Christians because they are going to get their apocalypse before she gets hers. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22464
8/29/2005 2:17 PM | | Re: Ok, enough about Nancy and the Zetas. What do you all know about Laura and the Cassiopaeans? | Quote |
yawn..
another one trying to think with his brain stem.
seems they didn´t let you in or what? |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165 | |
|
