Dark Side of the Moon: The inside story on the Moon Landing(Hoax)

thanks for posting, well worth the watching

One of the strangest things I've ever seen. Not sure how to take it. Seeing as how there are so many former high level administrators participating in the video it's impossible to believe the movie is only satire.

NASA themselves inadvertantly told Joe Public that the Apollo program was a vast hoax, when they made several press releases admitting that radiation in the Van Allen Belts, in free space, and on the surface of the Moon was a massive problem for human beings, which has yet to be solved.

NASA's ass has been busted!

Limited hangout?

Most convincing evidence I've seen so far is in that film. People who think this is all conspiritard nuts should watch this film.

The whole movie has SPOOK all over it. Intel services wouldn't be involved if it were just nonsense.

The USA will probably soon pass a law making questioning of the Moon Hoax a capital crime!

The Apollo moon landing never happened. Or, if it did, the TV images you saw were falsified, the images faked.

Got your attention? Good.

According to DARK SIDE OF THE MOON, the most important film of its kind since Oliver Stone's JFK - or since Rob Reiner's This is Spinal Tap, at any rate - images of Neil Armstrong's walk on the moon on July 20, 1969 were shown to the world through the lens of master film-maker Stanley Kubrick and were staged on the same Borehamwood, U.K., soundstage where Kubrick made his landmark film, 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Don't believe it? Consider the evidence. Still images taken of the American flag on the moon showed it waving this way and that, but, as Dark Side of the Moon points out, there is no wind on the moon.

The moon is affected by extreme temperature changes, which are exacerbated by its lack of atmosphere. The camera supposedly used to take the lunar stills, a Hasselblad 500, would not operate at temperature extremes that cause chemical changes in film emulsion. Mechanical parts expand and lenses loosen in extreme heat. Exposure meters fail and film shatters like glass in extreme cold.

X-rays from the sun would fog the film, and ultra-violet rays would distort the colours - yet the colours in the Moon landing pictures are perfect.
Neo: Why do my eyes hurt?
Morpheus: You've never used them before.

A lot of "news" and other media is like a Rorschach test, seemingly designed to deliver contradictory information to different audiences.

April 1st any1?

Chief Apollotard, Dr. Postperson, will probably weigh in on this thread at some point.

He is a devout believer and NASA fan boi.

I suggest watching the last clip only. Ignore the credits, just watch it carefully from the beginning to the end...

No, if you only watch the end you'll get the wrong impression; it's only satire. If you're not a resident of the USA with some political memory the people interviewed earlier probably will be dismissed too easily. The fact is something significant is going on in this movie. It isn't a "mockumentary" except in style.

In the original JANE FONDA movie, Fun with Dick and Jane, the Apollo program is depicted as a scam wherein all these defense contractors create a political slush fund to keep their gravy train in motion.

"Capricorn One" spilled the beans, too.

Did you hear Donald Rumsfeld say they should have killed the film crew quicker then goes to say that he was against the decision?

False.

shit i was really interested then the end bit ruined it for me did i watch 50 minutes of truth or 50 minutes of fiction.

I think you mean Spock, not Spook.

Perhaps we can all just agree with Neil Armstrong. Here is what he says on the summary page of his biography--the final page that is meant to sum up the entire book.

[link to www.amazon.com]
---
As for walking on the moon, sometimes I wonder if that really happened. I can honestly say--and it's a great surprise to me--that I have never had a dream about being on the moon. It's a great disappointment to me.

- Neil Armstrong
---

Exactly. This movie, like Capricorn One, is an example of Hollywood's frequently used technique of hiding the truth in a veil of fiction.

Many, many a Hollywood movie has legal language declaring it to be fictional even when everyone knows very well that the movie is based on real-life people or events. The writers must include some fictional elements in order to maintain the charade, but everyone knows that the bulk of the movie is reality.

This video puts a huge amount of facts to ridicule them all.

They forget explain why if it was so easy go mission after mission after mission with astronauts there, why it is not done today. Lack of motivation? Then why all the nations are trying do it themselves? Why Japan Kaguya mission, why China orbital missions, why India wants also, why ESA. Why not join all these countries money in one mission and put a base in the Moon? Because it can't be done with the "public technology". With hidden technology I think it is possible but not with public one.

Exactly!

Let us all get together and blame the DEAD guy since there is no credibility left in ANYTHING relating to the us gov. Those old f**cks are a joke, a sick,pathetic and dangerous joke... Gee I wonder if Nixon was vulnerable to blackmail after this possibly happened.

Double bluff?

for a good watch.

Stupid from start to finish.

Why is it that small-minded little fucks can't stand the thought that a group of brilliant, brave men really did put humanity on the Moon?

We went. One day we'll go back.

Dumbasses.