'God is the Product of Human Weakness' a letter by Albert Einstein

HUMAN IS IN SLAVERY TO THE LIE....ALBERT EINSTEIN WAS A SLAVE TO HUMMANITY......GOD IS ONLY A PRODUCT TO THIS IF AND ONLY IF HUMMANITY IS ITS OWN GOD...WHICH IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!

[link to knol.google.com]

belief in unauthenticated letters allegedly from albert einstein is a product of human weakness

That Einstein fellow was a pretty smart man. In regard to religious apologists using the spurious quote attributed to Einstein, "God does not play dice with the Universe" he more correctly was using the term God metaphorically:

Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'old one'. I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice.

AMEN!!!!!!!!THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH IS EVERYTHING...THE LIE IS WHATS LEFT.....TEH TRUTH IS JESUS CHRIST!!!!!

the bible is bunch of bullcrap written and rewritten to suit the people who read it...

if you're going to bash one of the legends of SCIENCE.

BTW, Science wants their computer back!

THE HUMMANITIES OF WHICH SCIENTIFIC THEORY IS ONE, SPENDS THE TIME ARGUING AGAINST THE TRUTH........WHY NOT ARGUE AGAINST THE LIE!!!!!!

YOU HAVE TAKEN OFFENCE.....THE OFFENCE IS AN ACT AGAINST THE LAW...ARE YOU THE JUDGE OF THE LAW??????PASSING JUDGEMENT FOR SCIENCE?????

YOU BELIEVE IN YOUR MIND CERTAIN FACTS ABOUT THE BIBLE.....
THAT IS YOUR FREEWILL.....WHY GET SO UPSET ABOUT SOMETING THAT IS NOT TRUE??????UNLESS IT IS!!!!!

You might want to read Journey of Souls and Destiny of Souls by Dr Michael Newton....a noted professional person that dealt with hypnosis and age regression to research life after death over many years...or between lives.

You scream about truth (and I must say its not nice yelling at people via Caps Lock)...this might be a way of engaging your brain in what might be the actual truth by someone that has delved more deeply than just the bible. I can only give you a link to both books (you need to add the name of the title and author in the search bar) but can tell you that downloading the ebooks are free (and dont lead to any promotions);

[link to www.4shared.com]

Last Edited by Red Red Whine on 08/19/2010 09:01 AM

YOU ARE A REALIST, DEFINED BY A PERSON WHO IS PRACTICAL AND CONCERNS HIMSELF WITH THE FACTS.......SO WHAT ARE THE FACTS??? THEY ARE A PRACTICAL PERSON CONCERNED HIMSELF WITH THE FACTS AS THEY RELATE TO HIMSELF.....IN OTHER WORDS(NOT THE WORD) YOU HAVE DECLARED YOURSELF GOD.....

CLEARLY THIS IS YOUR TRUTH....BUT WHAT IS THE TRUTH???????

Its not MY truth.....but its probably as valid as any other. You will only know if you read them. I dont care if you do....as I dont care if you read the bible or any other religious texts.

Romans 1
1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,

2 (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,)

3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

5 By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:

6 Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ:

7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.

9 For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers;

10 Making request, if by any means now at length I might have a prosperous journey by the will of God to come unto you.

11 For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established;

12 That is, that I may be comforted together with you by the mutual faith both of you and me.

13 Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

14 I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.

15 So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.

16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

THERE IS ONLY AND CAN BE ONLY ONE TRUTH, JUST LIKE PROGRAM CODE.....A SEQENCE OF INFO TO CREATE...ONE MISTAKE, IT ALL FALL APART!!!!!

YOUR GOING TO GIVE MY FREEWILL BACK....THANK YOU GOD!!!!!

1 Corinthians 1:25-27

Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:

But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

Listen, we all know "God" was made up to control the sheeple. You don't have to be an Einstein to see it.
It's easier to get some people to believe in fairy tales to control them, then it is to tell them the truth.

I just wish I could be alive when we finally make contact with other worlds and they have no concept of our "God", which apparently is many gods.

If its any help....the books do say there is a Presence, a Creator.....that one might deem as a God....maybe not in a way you perceive, so you may get some value or confirmation of what you are looking for.

Last Edited by Red Red Whine on 08/19/2010 09:19 AM

Democratic Fundamentalism

[link to www.youtube.com]

He was speaking about religion, not God.

He said these things too.

-Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish.

-I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil.

-I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty.

-I want to know God's thoughts... the rest are details.

-It was the experience of mystery - even if mixed with fear - that engendered religion.

what the hell would Al know?
read this - more at url
[link to www.biblebelievers.org.au]

just google einstein plagiarist and start reading


Albert Einstein
-- was he a thief, a liar and a plagiarist?

ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as 'The Often-Repeated Lie=Truth,' he has been made an idol to young people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius.

THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept and moronic person, who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary -- he stole the ideas of others, and the Jew-controlled media made him a 'hero.'

When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only 'brilliance' was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story.

The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.

This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering school!

Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that he was not competent to hold a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.

He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.

Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.

Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education. THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.

Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:

1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4. The special theory of relativity.

Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915).

This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises:

1. In the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and
2. Since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same place.

This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.

This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's. FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.

Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature.

James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.

This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity.

They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light. In response to this problem, in 1880, the Irish physicist George Fitzgerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the Michelson Morley experiment could be explained if, ". . . the length of material bodies change, according as they are moving through the either or across it by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."

THIS IS THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, 13 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN'S PAPER!

FURTHER . . . IN 1892, HENDRIK LORENTZ, of the Netherlands, proposed the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and Fitzgerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction.

In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, "Lorentz transformations," the series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in "Einstein's paper" regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.

The Frenchman Poincaré‚ had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper: ". . . we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."

Professor Umberto Bartocci, a mathematical historian, of the University of Perugia claims that Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation E=mc^2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903. Einstein allegedly used De Pretto's insight in a major paper published in 1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed.

De Pretto had stumbled on the equation, but not the theory of relativity, while speculating about ether in the life of the universe, said Prof Bartocci. It was republished in 1904 by Veneto's Royal Science Institute, but the equation's significance was not understood.

According to Professor Bartocci, a Swiss Italian named Michele Besso alerted Einstein to the research and in 1905 Einstein published his own work. It took years for his breakthrough to be grasped. When the penny finally dropped, De Pretto's contribution was overlooked while Einstein went on to become the century's most famous scientist. De Pretto died in 1921.

"De Pretto did not discover relativity but there is no doubt that he was the first to use the equation. That is hugely significant. I also believe, though it's impossible to prove, that Einstein used De Pretto's research," said Professor Bartocci, who has written a book on the subject. ( The Guardian Unlimited).

Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.

Thus, we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of Relativity.' EVERYTHING ELSE WAS PLAGIARIZED. Over the next few years, Poincaré‚ became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein.

'god' is necessary because of human weakness. when people can't believe in themselves they need something else to believe in or they will go nuts and become self destructive.
people choose the 'god' that best suits their needs.

If you must believe in anything, believe in yourselves, in your senses, in your minds. To accept a religious creed is to accept another mind in place of your own and generally contrary to your own. When religious belief comes in, brains go out ---Marrila M. Ricker (1840-1920)

One of the cruelest of all the Roman emperors, a man named Caligula, used to say,

"Crosses and corpses are so educational. Let the scum see their blood or the blood of some of their kin and it will so cower them in fear that then we can rule them."

Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura; "religion is just a crutch for weak-minded people."

OLD JESSE LOOKS LIKE HALF A MAN NOW.....MAYBE HE NEEDS SOME RELIGION.......HE ALSO TALKS LIKE HALF A MAN!!!!!!!!!

I LOVE YOU SISTER!!!!!!!!!!GRACE AND PEACE TO YOU.....

So, Einstein hails Spinoza that layed the groundwork for the 18th century "Enlightenment".

Interesting.

the point i was trying to make is that Einstein probably didn't write that shit. people will believe any unauthenticated BS they find online.

who cares about another flawed human's opinion?

you care and most other people do as well. ive seen numerous posts youve made with your opinion or someone else's opinion on various issues.