Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,045 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 980,401
Pageviews Today: 1,362,824Threads Today: 306Posts Today: 7,265
01:10 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

I know Partial Truth about 911

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081053
Canada
08/27/2010 04:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
hmmmm

Google "NAPALM AGM-86" and this thread is listed first.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 992418


because all the military developmental weapons are listed in google with their specs. .. jeez.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081053
Canada
08/27/2010 04:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
Hello my name is Kain. I have told many family members and friends what I know.

I know I'm probably going to be traced and dealt with by our fucked up government for posting this.

I was a 97B2O rank in the united states army I did basic at fort sill OK and my CIASC training at Fort Huachuca.

I had both TS and SCI Clearance

1. I know for a fact we shot a AGM-86D at the pentagon.

2. I know for a fact we shot down a passenger plane flight 93 just to make sure there were deaths involved.

3. I know for a fact we shot 2 experimental NAPALM AGM-86N's at the world trade center towers.

The rest with the explosives inside the buildings I don't have that info .. I'm just giving you the 3 things that I know.

What I've read in TS documents and Heard during the time.

the reason i'm giving up this info is I'm sick and tired of we the american people being manipulated lied to and fucked over.

WE AS THE PEOPLE NEED TO RISE UP AND TAKE THIS COUNTRY BACK
 Quoting: Kain

How do you suggest people can help?
Kain (OP)

User ID: 1080007
United States
08/27/2010 04:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.


They had just finished a multi-year construction project there.
 Quoting: guindog


it could have been sitting inside the construction for all we know

and that was what we were told by our lieutenant general at the time that it was for bettering america ... I don't see how ... was it to make us rise up and be strong ... it didn't .. I think it was a way for us to try and control the oil in iraq
We are genetically engineered beings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 631426
United States
08/27/2010 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL

bump


Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081002



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.
Kain (OP)

User ID: 1080007
United States
08/27/2010 04:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
Hello my name is Kain. I have told many family members and friends what I know.

I know I'm probably going to be traced and dealt with by our fucked up government for posting this.

I was a 97B2O rank in the united states army I did basic at fort sill OK and my CIASC training at Fort Huachuca.

I had both TS and SCI Clearance

1. I know for a fact we shot a AGM-86D at the pentagon.

2. I know for a fact we shot down a passenger plane flight 93 just to make sure there were deaths involved.

3. I know for a fact we shot 2 experimental NAPALM AGM-86N's at the world trade center towers.

The rest with the explosives inside the buildings I don't have that info .. I'm just giving you the 3 things that I know.

What I've read in TS documents and Heard during the time.

the reason i'm giving up this info is I'm sick and tired of we the american people being manipulated lied to and fucked over.

WE AS THE PEOPLE NEED TO RISE UP AND TAKE THIS COUNTRY BACK

How do you suggest people can help?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081053

Fight back for our country .. Get envolved like we are doing now to reinvestigate 911 ... get ahold of the government officials that aren't corrupt and being held back by the corrupt .. in the end I think the military is going to overthrow our government if it keeps up like it is the past 9 years.
We are genetically engineered beings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081497
United States
08/27/2010 04:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL

bump


Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 631426



[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081002
United Kingdom
08/27/2010 04:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me
 Quoting: Kain

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.
Kain (OP)

User ID: 1080007
United States
08/27/2010 04:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL

bump


Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081002

yes google gives all info that is correct .. right .. take 10 minutes do your research .. the missles with napalm were experimental. you think the military discloses all their weaponry
We are genetically engineered beings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1080979
Germany
08/27/2010 04:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
OP, if this is real, just WOW and thanks for your courage.

Are there others privy to this info that want the truth to come out ?

i've always told my close friends and fam ... but with the way our country is becomming .. I'm fed up .. knowing that I fought and friends died to keep our country the way it should be an our government is fucking it up and all of us over ...


The last bit of info that I can share is the military right now is not happy with the way America is being run into the ground .. I'll leave it at that.

I'm a constitutionalist
 Quoting: Kain

You are a mind controlled tard. You are not a constitutionalist. You cannot even saw one complete sentence from the US Constitution without having it in front of your eyes to read it.
Kain (OP)

User ID: 1080007
United States
08/27/2010 04:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081002



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.
We are genetically engineered beings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081002
United Kingdom
08/27/2010 04:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL

bump


Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 631426


All I did was disagree with the claim by the OP. But of course that has to make me a shill in your narrow mind. LOL! But if you want to believe something without any evidence, then don't let ME stop you.
Kain (OP)

User ID: 1080007
United States
08/27/2010 04:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
OP, if this is real, just WOW and thanks for your courage.

Are there others privy to this info that want the truth to come out ?

i've always told my close friends and fam ... but with the way our country is becomming .. I'm fed up .. knowing that I fought and friends died to keep our country the way it should be an our government is fucking it up and all of us over ...


The last bit of info that I can share is the military right now is not happy with the way America is being run into the ground .. I'll leave it at that.

I'm a constitutionalist

You are a mind controlled tard. You are not a constitutionalist. You cannot even saw one complete sentence from the US Constitution without having it in front of your eyes to read it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1080979

i'm done replying to anonymous cowards ... obviously you are just kids trolling.
We are genetically engineered beings.
Tali

User ID: 1018633
United States
08/27/2010 04:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
So who in our wonderful gov't isn't corrupt?
Our perfect companions never have fewer than four feet. ~Colette
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081379
United States
08/27/2010 05:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
So who in our wonderful gov't isn't corrupt?
 Quoting: Tali

The list is very short.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1077916
Spain
08/27/2010 05:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
OP, contact 9/11 organizations and tell them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081053
Canada
08/27/2010 05:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.
 Quoting: Kain


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1043757
United States
08/27/2010 05:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
i'm done replying to anonymous cowards ... obviously you are just kids trolling.
 Quoting: Kain


Not this one. I believe something is very much awry with the 911 thing. There is a definite agenda to it. In order to control oil in Iraq govt had to create a reson to take down Saddam. Iran will be next. They too are not selling oil in US dollars. And BIG BROTHER dont like that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 631426
United States
08/27/2010 05:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
OP, if this is real, just WOW and thanks for your courage.

Are there others privy to this info that want the truth to come out ?

i've always told my close friends and fam ... but with the way our country is becomming .. I'm fed up .. knowing that I fought and friends died to keep our country the way it should be an our government is fucking it up and all of us over ...


The last bit of info that I can share is the military right now is not happy with the way America is being run into the ground .. I'll leave it at that.

I'm a constitutionalist

You are a mind controlled tard. You are not a constitutionalist. You cannot even saw one complete sentence from the US Constitution without having it in front of your eyes to read it.

i'm done replying to anonymous cowards ... obviously you are just kids trolling.
 Quoting: Kain


Only a couple of AC's OP. The rest of us thank you for the disclosure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 837352
United States
08/27/2010 05:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
they had one all painted like an united airline plane...it was on youtube an such...google
 Quoting: PHILLLYDUDE



Proven fake
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081002
United Kingdom
08/27/2010 05:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.
 Quoting: Kain

It is not a matter of aluminum versus steel. The penetrating power of a moving object is all about high fast the object is going, not about the the densities or hardness of object and its target. If an object is travelling faster than the time it needs to reach its "elastic limit",
[link to www.britannica.com]
it will not under plastic deformation or break up on impact. Try studying some physics, then you won't be fooled by the arguments of the no planers.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1043757
United States
08/27/2010 05:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
they had one all painted like an united airline plane...it was on youtube an such...google



Proven fake
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 837352

Ok you win. Now go night night. tomato
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 631426
United States
08/27/2010 05:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL

bump


Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.


All I did was disagree with the claim by the OP. But of course that has to make me a shill in your narrow mind. LOL! But if you want to believe something without any evidence, then don't let ME stop you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081002



What do you have to disagree about? Nothing. You no nothing.
Same as the rest of us. But if you don't think that what happened wasn't engineered from start to finish, you're the one that's delusional.

Fact. The FBI has never released footage of any consequence regarding the Pentagon, in spite of the many camera's that were along the flight path.

The hole wasn't caused by any airplane. Those are the facts.
any evidence placed on the scene was after the fact.

All you're doing is obfuscating the issues and you bring NOTHING to the table.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081002
United Kingdom
08/27/2010 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081053

No missile hit it because Flight 93 was intended to hit WTC7. But it left the airport late and the timing of the plan went astray, with the decision finally being made to shoot it down by the National Air Guard.
Kain (OP)

User ID: 1080007
United States
08/27/2010 05:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.

It is not a matter of aluminum versus steel. The penetrating power of a moving object is all about high fast the object is going, not about the the densities or hardness of object and its target. If an object is travelling faster than the time it needs to reach its "elastic limit",
[link to www.britannica.com]
it will not under plastic deformation or break up on impact. Try studying some physics, then you won't be fooled by the arguments of the no planers.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081002


why don't you look at plane crashes that hit concrete and the plane breaks apart and only leaves scratches on the concrete ... why dont you look at crashes where a plane hits a tree at full speed .. in fact I think there is one of an FA-18 hornet out there where the wings tear off to a tree at supersonic speeds ... I'm sorry but those aluminum wings would have shreaded hitting that building the way it was built.
We are genetically engineered beings.
2012gregg

User ID: 933586
United States
08/27/2010 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
pin it
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081002
United Kingdom
08/27/2010 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL

bump


Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.


All I did was disagree with the claim by the OP. But of course that has to make me a shill in your narrow mind. LOL! But if you want to believe something without any evidence, then don't let ME stop you.



What do you have to disagree about? Nothing. You no nothing.
Same as the rest of us. But if you don't think that what happened wasn't engineered from start to finish, you're the one that's delusional.

Fact. The FBI has never released footage of any consequence regarding the Pentagon, in spite of the many camera's that were along the flight path.

The hole wasn't caused by any airplane. Those are the facts.
any evidence placed on the scene was after the fact.

All you're doing is obfuscating the issues and you bring NOTHING to the table.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 631426

You clearly cannot distinguish between a 9/11 truther like me and a someone who accepts the official story. That speaks volumes. Far from obfuscating the issue, I am trying to add clarity by pointing out that claims need evidence that stands up. The OP has provided none.
Kain (OP)

User ID: 1080007
United States
08/27/2010 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?

No missile hit it because Flight 93 was intended to hit WTC7. But it left the airport late and the timing of the plan went astray, with the decision finally being made to shoot it down by the National Air Guard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081002

Like I said earlier I have no info on what happened inside the builings .. but What hit the buildings .. if there were planted explosives I didn't know about it.
We are genetically engineered beings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1081379
United States
08/27/2010 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?

No missile hit it because Flight 93 was intended to hit WTC7. But it left the airport late and the timing of the plan went astray, with the decision finally being made to shoot it down by the National Air Guard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1081002
Now that explains how fire brought down WTC 7 lol
Rickster58

User ID: 1053237
Australia
08/27/2010 05:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
OP, I admire your courage...to speak out is almost certain trouble for you and yours... if not a death sentence. I hope you have plans for you and your family to keep safe.

Have you contacted Phil Jayhan at Lets Roll Forums? They would be interested in your story.

Good luck mate and ty for sharing.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1043757
United States
08/27/2010 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I know Partial Truth about 911
WTC 7 was imploded. No mistaking that. It takes days and weeks to get that ready. It came down hours into the ordeal.
The Flight 93 theory fits. It never made it, but building had to come down because the charges were there and would have been found if it did not come down.

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob