I know Partial Truth about 911

hmmmm

Google "NAPALM AGM-86" and this thread is listed first.

Hello my name is Kain. I have told many family members and friends what I know.

I know I'm probably going to be traced and dealt with by our fucked up government for posting this.

I was a 97B2O rank in the united states army I did basic at fort sill OK and my CIASC training at Fort Huachuca.

I had both TS and SCI Clearance

1. I know for a fact we shot a AGM-86D at the pentagon.

2. I know for a fact we shot down a passenger plane flight 93 just to make sure there were deaths involved.

3. I know for a fact we shot 2 experimental NAPALM AGM-86N's at the world trade center towers.

The rest with the explosives inside the buildings I don't have that info .. I'm just giving you the 3 things that I know.

What I've read in TS documents and Heard during the time.

the reason i'm giving up this info is I'm sick and tired of we the american people being manipulated lied to and fucked over.

WE AS THE PEOPLE NEED TO RISE UP AND TAKE THIS COUNTRY BACK

Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.


They had just finished a multi-year construction project there.

HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL




Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!

Hello my name is Kain. I have told many family members and friends what I know.

I know I'm probably going to be traced and dealt with by our fucked up government for posting this.

I was a 97B2O rank in the united states army I did basic at fort sill OK and my CIASC training at Fort Huachuca.

I had both TS and SCI Clearance

1. I know for a fact we shot a AGM-86D at the pentagon.

2. I know for a fact we shot down a passenger plane flight 93 just to make sure there were deaths involved.

3. I know for a fact we shot 2 experimental NAPALM AGM-86N's at the world trade center towers.

The rest with the explosives inside the buildings I don't have that info .. I'm just giving you the 3 things that I know.

What I've read in TS documents and Heard during the time.

the reason i'm giving up this info is I'm sick and tired of we the american people being manipulated lied to and fucked over.

WE AS THE PEOPLE NEED TO RISE UP AND TAKE THIS COUNTRY BACK

How do you suggest people can help?

HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL




Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.

Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me

HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL




Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!

OP, if this is real, just WOW and thanks for your courage.

Are there others privy to this info that want the truth to come out ?

i've always told my close friends and fam ... but with the way our country is becomming .. I'm fed up .. knowing that I fought and friends died to keep our country the way it should be an our government is fucking it up and all of us over ...


The last bit of info that I can share is the military right now is not happy with the way America is being run into the ground .. I'll leave it at that.

I'm a constitutionalist

Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.

HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL




Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.

OP, if this is real, just WOW and thanks for your courage.

Are there others privy to this info that want the truth to come out ?

i've always told my close friends and fam ... but with the way our country is becomming .. I'm fed up .. knowing that I fought and friends died to keep our country the way it should be an our government is fucking it up and all of us over ...


The last bit of info that I can share is the military right now is not happy with the way America is being run into the ground .. I'll leave it at that.

I'm a constitutionalist

You are a mind controlled tard. You are not a constitutionalist. You cannot even saw one complete sentence from the US Constitution without having it in front of your eyes to read it.

So who in our wonderful gov't isn't corrupt?

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.

i'm done replying to anonymous cowards ... obviously you are just kids trolling.

OP, if this is real, just WOW and thanks for your courage.

Are there others privy to this info that want the truth to come out ?

i've always told my close friends and fam ... but with the way our country is becomming .. I'm fed up .. knowing that I fought and friends died to keep our country the way it should be an our government is fucking it up and all of us over ...


The last bit of info that I can share is the military right now is not happy with the way America is being run into the ground .. I'll leave it at that.

I'm a constitutionalist

You are a mind controlled tard. You are not a constitutionalist. You cannot even saw one complete sentence from the US Constitution without having it in front of your eyes to read it.

i'm done replying to anonymous cowards ... obviously you are just kids trolling.

they had one all painted like an united airline plane...it was on youtube an such...google

Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.

they had one all painted like an united airline plane...it was on youtube an such...google



Proven fake

HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL




Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.


All I did was disagree with the claim by the OP. But of course that has to make me a shill in your narrow mind. LOL! But if you want to believe something without any evidence, then don't let ME stop you.

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?

Disinfo. The turbofan jet engine of an AGM-86C is far too small to be that photographed inside the Pentagon.
[link to www.aerospaceweb.org]

that could be planted .. remember they took all video feeds away from the pentagon and no news crew showed up till about 30 minutes after the attack.

kain...what was the reasoning for what was meant be,,," you would be bettering america with this attack?

Not true. The first photographer came on the scene a few minutes after the hit.

If you really think they would take the risk of planting a large object like that after the explosion, you live in la-la land. They could not take the risk of being seen.

another fake photographer .. like all the amateur video of the planes done by CGI students and Special effects students


like I said you don't have to believe me

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.

It is not a matter of aluminum versus steel. The penetrating power of a moving object is all about high fast the object is going, not about the the densities or hardness of object and its target. If an object is travelling faster than the time it needs to reach its "elastic limit",
[link to www.britannica.com]
it will not under plastic deformation or break up on impact. Try studying some physics, then you won't be fooled by the arguments of the no planers.

HOLY SHIT! THIS IS FOR REAL




Nah! Just a guy in the military who is duping you with military jargon. Check out the details. They don't fit the evidence. One cruise missile does not even exist with the nomenclature he gave for it. Check it out with Google.

Wake up!



Hey Fucko! You wake up! All you've done is shill and you know shit. Get off this thread asshole.


All I did was disagree with the claim by the OP. But of course that has to make me a shill in your narrow mind. LOL! But if you want to believe something without any evidence, then don't let ME stop you.



What do you have to disagree about? Nothing. You no nothing.
Same as the rest of us. But if you don't think that what happened wasn't engineered from start to finish, you're the one that's delusional.

Fact. The FBI has never released footage of any consequence regarding the Pentagon, in spite of the many camera's that were along the flight path.

The hole wasn't caused by any airplane. Those are the facts.
any evidence placed on the scene was after the fact.

All you're doing is obfuscating the issues and you bring NOTHING to the table.

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?

No missile hit it because Flight 93 was intended to hit WTC7. But it left the airport late and the timing of the plan went astray, with the decision finally being made to shoot it down by the National Air Guard.

No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?

No missile hit it because Flight 93 was intended to hit WTC7. But it left the airport late and the timing of the plan went astray, with the decision finally being made to shoot it down by the National Air Guard.