No, I won't. You see, whenever evidence is presented that is inconsistent with your claim, you call it fake. It's typical of the no planers. You will have to come up with better evidence than that. Quite why you need no planes is beyond me. Oh I know! You cannot understand the physics of high-momentum objects piecing hard objects like towers. Or the fact that the left wing of Flight 175 became invisible because it was in shadow and reflected the light from the wall of the South Tower. Yes, that's it. You follow people who invented another theory of 9/11 because they were too stupid to understand what they were seeing in the TV footage. Yes, that's it.



show me this wing that showed up ... show me how aluminum stayed intact against 4x4 steel beams ... use general logics please.


Good answer! Don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

one last question from an AC. why did no missile hit WTC7? what did they expect us to think, was it a mistake?

No missile hit it because Flight 93 was intended to hit WTC7. But it left the airport late and the timing of the plan went astray, with the decision finally being made to shoot it down by the National Air Guard.