Stephen Hawking changes his view on God

[link to news.yahoo.com]

Well if I was twisted, butt ugly and in a chair my whole life i guess id feel the same. monkey lookin motha &*^%#$

Not a single person here has put in a legitimate point let alone an argument that could disprove Hawkings discoveries and theories.
First of all who ever spells stupid as stoopid.. is stupid.
Second, No one controls the future, nor the present and sure as hell not the past.
None of you have even discussed anything related to the topic at hand, dumb fucks..

His theories include quantum gravity.. which is all ideas, he never claimed any of his theories as absolute, he's definetly not a crackpot, he's one of the smartest men in the world. His theories are out there, and if you except them as plausable or not that's up to you, otherwise if you want to act like you have some superior knowledge that disproves him.. either shut the fuck up cause your stupid, or tell the world.

He changed his views again?

He's a drooling vegetable in a wheelchair. I fail to see the brilliance attributed to this retard.

article is gone.

If god created us who created god?

If god created us who created god?



If God is indeed an infinite being then no one created him.

Not a single person here has put in a legitimate point let alone an argument that could disprove Hawkings discoveries and theories.
First of all who ever spells stupid as stoopid.. is stupid.
Second, No one controls the future, nor the present and sure as hell not the past.
None of you have even discussed anything related to the topic at hand, dumb fucks..

His theories include quantum gravity.. which is all ideas, he never claimed any of his theories as absolute, he's definetly not a crackpot, he's one of the smartest men in the world. His theories are out there, and if you except them as plausable or not that's up to you, otherwise if you want to act like you have some superior knowledge that disproves him.. either shut the fuck up cause your stupid, or tell the world.

Y'know I'm starting to suspect that Stevo might be a bit of an attention whore...

If god created us who created god?

So, those of you disparaging the man, what have you done that even comes close to comparing to what this man has accomplished? Are ANY of you respected to the degree that he is? Have any of you risen to the top of your field like he has?

Didnt think so.

Y'know I'm starting to suspect that Stevo might be a bit of an attention whore...

So, those of you disparaging the man, what have you done that even comes close to comparing to what this man has accomplished? Are ANY of you respected to the degree that he is? Have any of you risen to the top of your field like he has?

Didnt think so.


I'm certainly intelligent enough to know that there are infinite wonders in this world that we're no where near discovering, or understanding.

When these physicists make a statement such as that, then I'll have more respect for them. It takes an open mind, and Hawking's is completely closed.

Y'know I'm starting to suspect that Stevo might be a bit of an attention whore...


Is it just me or does anyone else want to tie strings to his arms and legs and make a puppet show?

Not a single person here has put in a legitimate point let alone an argument that could disprove Hawkings discoveries and theories.
First of all who ever spells stupid as stoopid.. is stupid.
Second, No one controls the future, nor the present and sure as hell not the past.
None of you have even discussed anything related to the topic at hand, dumb fucks..

His theories include quantum gravity.. which is all ideas, he never claimed any of his theories as absolute, he's definetly not a crackpot, he's one of the smartest men in the world. His theories are out there, and if you except them as plausable or not that's up to you, otherwise if you want to act like you have some superior knowledge that disproves him.. either shut the fuck up cause your stupid, or tell the world.


Well i agree with you that he is incredibly intelligent and worthy of his notoriety. I simply think that when someone incredibly intelligent in such specific fields begins to discuss his theories regarding the laws of creation he should leave his opinions about the existence or nonexistence of a creator out of it. If he wants to have a conversation regarding divinity he should first prove that he understands that divinity is not found in the physical world. Only hints of divinity can be found within the patterning of physical reality, and once he makes it clear that he understands this then I will be more than happy to take his beliefs on the subject with more than the tiniest fleck of sand.

Not a single person here has put in a legitimate point let alone an argument that could disprove Hawkings discoveries and theories.
First of all who ever spells stupid as stoopid.. is stupid.
Second, No one controls the future, nor the present and sure as hell not the past.
None of you have even discussed anything related to the topic at hand, dumb fucks..

His theories include quantum gravity.. which is all ideas, he never claimed any of his theories as absolute, he's definetly not a crackpot, he's one of the smartest men in the world. His theories are out there, and if you except them as plausable or not that's up to you, otherwise if you want to act like you have some superior knowledge that disproves him.. either shut the fuck up cause your stupid, or tell the world.

So, those of you disparaging the man, what have you done that even comes close to comparing to what this man has accomplished? Are ANY of you respected to the degree that he is? Have any of you risen to the top of your field like he has?

Didnt think so.


I'm certainly intelligent enough to know that there are infinite wonders in this world that we're no where near discovering, or understanding.

When these physicists make a statement such as that, then I'll have more respect for them. It takes an open mind, and Hawking's is completely closed.



So, you advocate believing something until it is proven false?

Not a single person here has put in a legitimate point let alone an argument that could disprove Hawkings discoveries and theories.
First of all who ever spells stupid as stoopid.. is stupid.
Second, No one controls the future, nor the present and sure as hell not the past.
None of you have even discussed anything related to the topic at hand, dumb fucks..

His theories include quantum gravity.. which is all ideas, he never claimed any of his theories as absolute, he's definetly not a crackpot, he's one of the smartest men in the world. His theories are out there, and if you except them as plausable or not that's up to you, otherwise if you want to act like you have some superior knowledge that disproves him.. either shut the fuck up cause your stupid, or tell the world.


Well i agree with you that he is incredibly intelligent and worthy of his notoriety. I simply think that when someone incredibly intelligent in such specific fields begins to discuss his theories regarding the laws of creation he should leave his opinions about the existence or nonexistence of a creator out of it. If he wants to have a conversation regarding divinity he should first prove that he understands that divinity is not found in the physical world. Only hints of divinity can be found within the patterning of physical reality, and once he makes it clear that he understands this then I will be more than happy to take his beliefs on the subject with more than the tiniest fleck of sand.