Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,426 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,167,825
Pageviews Today: 1,551,188Threads Today: 319Posts Today: 5,689
12:25 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 469806
New Zealand
09/25/2010 02:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
By way of background, Genesis is explicit. Noah had 3 sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.



The 1st son, Shem, had 5 principal sons and other "sons and daughters". He was the progenitor of the line of Avraham (Abraham or Ibrahim)--giving rise to Israelites/Jews, early Christians and Muslims.



The 3rd son, Japheth, had 7 sons, giving rise to the peoples of Greece, Germany, etc.



The 2nd son, Ham, had 4 sons: Kush, Mitzraim, Put, and Canaan. Kush refers to Northeastern (Black) African peoples. Mitzraim is the Hebrew name for Egypt (referring to the Ancient Egyptians, not modern day Egyptians who are of Arab origin; note: modern Egypt is also called Mitzraim in Hebrew or Masr in Arabic).
Ham’s descendant (Cush) is black skinned as a punishment for Ham’s having had sexual intercourse in the ark
fillantpre
User ID: 1109480
United States
09/25/2010 02:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838

when will you people realize SCIENCE IS A THEORY....they change them all the time........find something to believe in and quit blowing in the wind with science.........
Nikki_LaVey

User ID: 1044099
United States
09/25/2010 02:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
The man is a Geographer this is FAR out of his field.



Good catch, Nikki. Just like the geographer Patton (who knows NO physics!) commenting on catastrophic cosmogenesis.. LOL
 Quoting: SmartestOne


Yeah just because someone has a PhD doesn't mean he is an expert in all fields.
How Can You Be Two Places At Once When You're Not Anywhere at all
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1109455
United States
09/25/2010 03:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
crikey
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
09/26/2010 07:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
crikey
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1109455


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1111283
United States
09/26/2010 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
ohappydid someone say afrika?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
09/27/2010 05:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
ohappydid someone say afrika?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1111283


not all are from africa
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
09/29/2010 02:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
Just about 37,000 years ago, a few thousand years after the first appearance of Modern Man, a taller, more powerfully built, more rugged man suddenly “invades” the western shores of Europe and North Africa. This rugged, innovative, large-brained man is dubbed Cro-Magnon.

[link to www.articlesafari.com]

Cro-Magnon villages consisted of houses (we don’t know what they were made of: all we have is the post hole patterns). They had spear throwers, harpoons, bows and arrows, arrow straighteners, obsidian razors, needles, musical instruments, even bone calendars.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
09/29/2010 02:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
All depends on who you believe; man has always been a lying bastard
 Quoting: Heavyheadfred


Just about 37,000 years ago, a taller, rhesus negative, more powerfully built man suddenly “invades” the western shores of Europe and North Africa. This rugged, innovative, larger-brained man is dubbed Cro-Magnon.

Cro Magnon Man and Atlantis
[link to www.blavatsky.net]



Cro Magnon Man and Atlantis
[link to www.blavatsky.net]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
03/15/2011 02:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist


Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
03/20/2011 12:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
Obviously.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1097538


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1260305
United States
03/20/2011 12:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
bsflag
If everyone was different we wouldn't be able to reproduce together.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 254879


What an ioditic statement with no basis in fact. Several different animal SPECIES can intermate but are NOT the same and produce a hybrid!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1305605
United States
03/20/2011 12:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838

yes, present-day DNA studies say that all humans
are derived from a small group in NW Africa that
survived an extinction event 70,000 years ago.
that means that the original humans were black,
and that "white people" are some kind of
albino mutants.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
03/20/2011 01:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838

yes, present-day DNA studies say that all humans
are derived from a small group in NW Africa that
survived an extinction event 70,000 years ago.
that means that the original humans were black,
and that "white people" are some kind of
albino mutants.
 Quoting: jordyy


RH negative is not from Africa

Either is any form of civilization

I dare you to explore the origins of that blood type ;)

and may you discover who your gods were brotha
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 959838
United States
03/20/2011 01:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
bsflag
If everyone was different we wouldn't be able to reproduce together.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 254879


What an ioditic statement with no basis in fact. Several different animal SPECIES can intermate but are NOT the same and produce a hybrid!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260305


Libtards can't grasp science

only political correct propoganda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1092277
United States
03/25/2011 08:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838


makes sense
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1225402
United States
03/25/2011 08:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
BUllshit!! If it were true they would not be able to reproduce together.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1225402
United States
03/25/2011 08:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
bsflag
If everyone was different we wouldn't be able to reproduce together.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 254879


What an ioditic statement with no basis in fact. Several different animal SPECIES can intermate but are NOT the same and produce a hybrid!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1260305


example
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1225402
United States
03/25/2011 08:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
Everything is coded..if the codes don't match they can't reproduce. Simple. Stupid thread.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1300899
United States
03/25/2011 08:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838


this is just a half truth. the whole story is more interesting.
Comedian

User ID: 1304014
United States
03/25/2011 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
"Bakshi admitted to the Sunday Times that “some of my points may prove to be wrong, and may be seen as politically incorrect."

This gives him CREDIBILITY, as anyone who passed college-level debate can tell you.
 Quoting: SmartestOne


Absolutely.
Don't run. You'll just die tired.
worm man
User ID: 1313562
Australia
03/25/2011 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
the truth is man first left the old world gondwanaland via tasmania though australia timor asia europe to africa. the big q is why would an unseaquesting man (aust aboridgine ) leave aust to head south to tasmania(very cold)wearing possum skins,and how did he get there?
worm man
User ID: 1313562
Australia
03/25/2011 10:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
the truth is man first left the old world gondwanaland via tasmania though australia timor asia europe to africa. the big q is why would an unseaquesting man (aust aboridgine ) leave aust to head south to tasmania(very cold)wearing possum skins,and how did he get there?
 Quoting: worm man 1313562


of course they didnt go south to antarctica they were going north,,morans
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1121571
United States
03/26/2011 12:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
No Shit....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1097974




The introduction of RH-negative blood type is not a naturally occurring part of evolution, it was introduced by an outside source. Many ancient texts, including the Bible, speak of gods coming down from the Heavens and creating man in their own image. Ancient texts also tell us that they began to take humans as their spouses, and had many children. But not all humans were a result of interbreeding. The first human was a result of scientific research combining primates with the god’s genes. The first humans were not a product of interbreeding, but small portions of humans are a result of this interbreeding and their blood type can support this.


If the RH-negative factor is a ‘normal’ presentation of blood, then why is there a problem when a mother of the RH-negative blood group gives birth to an RH-positive blood group baby. This Hemolytic disease, actually an allergic reaction, can cause death when the two different blood groups are mingled during pregnancy. When the antigenic substances attack the negative blood group it can destroy the blood cells. So why does the human body produce antigens to this blood type? Is the blood group alien?

Comprehensive studies of blood types also show that Mayans, Incas and Auracanians are all virtually 100% group O, with 5-20% of the population being rhesus negative. This was the blood type of the original Europeans and stems from Cro-Magnon man (Kurlansky, 2001). The races that possess this blood type are races of the Americas, the Canary Islands, the Berbers, the Basques, and Gaelic Kelts. Due to the larger weatern European numbers, it is a safe bet that was where it was introduced into the human genetic code, possibly from the fabled Atlantis to the west in the distant past. Could this also be where the Caucasian was introduced? Is the introduction of Caucasian related to the RH-blood factor?

The only other time this occurs in nature is, as an example, when donkeys and horses are crossed to produce mules. This is not ‘natural’ because left alone in the wild, these animals would never cross breed. Only with intervention would this happen. Was there a cross breeding of two human like beings, similar but genetically different?

In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had, nothing more and nothing less. Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. If mankind evolved from the same African ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the Rh negatives come from? Why does the body of an Rh negative mother carrying an Rh positive child reject her own offspring?


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838


The Rh negative mother's body is rejecting the Rh positive fetus, because it is alien to her, and her body attacks it.

Some claim Rh-O is the first original blood type. All others are the result of evolution, Gorillas mating with African women, genetic engineering, and experiments changing human DNA in the vaccines over generations.

Rh-O blood types are said to have been created by God, in his image ( not a monkey) and that All Rh+ blood types are from the rhesus monkey experiment ( Darwin theory ).

I was made in the image of God, we are the remnant of Gods people. We are not rhesus monkeys.
Haile Menelik

User ID: 1261196
Netherlands
03/26/2011 12:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
the white man just dont want to admit the truth that blacks were created by God and we are in His image and likeness.

 Quoting: Haile Menelik



the word "God" that you use is really "gods", and guess what color those "gods" were? Google all the tribes from the Dogan to the Maya and find out the skin color of their creator "gods", assuming you can handle some reality which i doubt


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838


Blacks are made of the dust of the eart! We are earth aliens!

alien16

Last Edited by Haile Menelik on 03/26/2011 12:32 AM
Marcus 11: 22 And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God.
something
User ID: 1177016
United States
03/26/2011 12:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
IQ Differences: Do they exist and can we admit it?
...the vast majority of people scoring in the genius range are whites, white men actually. The IQ range of white women is similar to that of East Asians - they are overwhelmingly scoring in the 'normal' range, and very few are either particularly dull or spectacularly gifted.

[link to www.globalpolitician.com]
 Quoting: ermurrow 1082682


If I'm so smart, why didn't I know this before?
I can't confirm this article's accuracy with my own knowledge -- interesting, though. If the assertion, quoted above, is based upon solid testing data, this suggests that some of our PC dogmas are outmoded. Question is, were those PC dogmas ever based logically upon really well-assembled research too?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1177016
United States
03/26/2011 12:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
What an ioditic statement with no basis in fact. Several different animal SPECIES can intermate but are NOT the same and produce a hybrid!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward


I couldn't understand what this said, but if two can produce fertile offspring, that meets an important criterion of belonging to the same species.
Revelation Now

User ID: 1278834
United States
03/26/2011 12:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
How many mitochondrial DNA lineages were on the Ark? The answer: three. Yes, there were four women, but the Bible does not record Noah’s wife as having any children after the Flood (in this case, girl children). And notice the claim in Gen 9:19, “These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated.” This is a strong indication that Noah’s wife did not contribute anything else to the world’s population. With no prohibition against sibling marriage, yet,4 one or more of the daughters-in-law may have been her daughter, but this does not change the fact that, at first glance, we expect a maximum of three mitochondrial lineages in the current world population. There is a chance that there will be less, if there was very little mutation before the Flood or if several of the daughters-in-law were closely related. At most, we do not expect more than four.

How many X chromosome lineages were on the Ark? That depends. If you count it all up, you get eight. If, by chance, Noah’s wife passed on the same X chromosome to each of her three sons (25% probability), then there were seven. If Noah had a daughter after the Flood (not expected, but possible), there could be as many as nine X chromosome lineages. Either way, this is a considerable amount of genetic material. And since X chromosomes recombine (in females), we are potentially looking at a huge amount of genetic diversity within the X chromosomes of the world.

Does this fit the evidence? Absolutely! It turns out that Y chromosomes are similar worldwide. According to the evolutionists, no “ancient” (i.e., highly mutated or highly divergent) Y chromosomes have been found.5 This serves as a bit of a puzzle to the evolutionist, and they have had to resort to calling for a higher “reproductive variance” among men than women, high rates of “gene conversion” in the Y chromosome, or perhaps a “selective sweep” that wiped out the other male lines.6 For the biblical model, it is a beautiful correlation and we can take it as is.
Revelation Now

User ID: 1278834
United States
03/26/2011 12:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
LOL. Aliens, and space dust...
These crowds were obviously not big on science in GED program.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1314569
United States
03/26/2011 12:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors – and did not come from Africa, claims scientist
A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as “dangerous”, “wrong” and “racist”.

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India’s prime minister, claims that “Negroid”, “Caucasian” and “Mongoloid” peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the “Out of Africa” model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

*****ARTICLE EDITED TO KEEP WITH GLP COPYRIGHT POLICY*****

[link to www.articlesafari.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 959838


makes sense

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!