Yeah, It's called social-engineering (I won't get into the deep technical and psychological principles, concepts and techniques as it would take several hundred pages). I think the op has been hurt and is using the american woman as a "scapegoat" for what happened... Although I think he may be a little excessive and irrational due to a fiery emotional reaction to his unsuccessful relationship/s, it's not all women, rather it's most american women and men as well. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 973795
And as you'll notice, it's not all their fault as has been claimed, when you look at the engineering of the current culture of archetype's and paradigm's of both women and men, via their favorite shows and movies, propaganda networks, publications, church's, etc...
I myself prefer my girlfriend being eastern european born and raised.
Being born and raised outside hollywood and media's social-engineering and propaganda machine allows a woman (and men) to naturally develop the "roles" and respect necessary for a respectful and dynamic relationship.
I've noticed that my gf, as well as the majority of foreign born/raised women (and men) has a very strong, yet respectful and supporting attitude. She doesn't have a "princess" sense of entitlement and would, for example, accept a natural "role" of raising the kids and keeping the house while I'm at work laboring my ass off for some good money.
Oh yeah...she's very health conscious, know's how to cook, sexy face, sexy body, sexy attitude, fiery attitude...and a great sense of humor. If she keeps these overall traits (I'm sure she will)...then shel'll be as as awesome and sexy as her mom is at her age.
I think it comes down to this In america, women are "socially engineered" to take on certain un-natural traits (for lack of better term). Men as well...
I say most, not all of these american women learn that certain "roles" means "submissive" or "old school"...when looked at logically, is simply irrational. If that same women takes on the "role" of money-maker, performing a well-paying labor-intensive job while the dad stay's at home to raise the kids, then it's switched up a bit and the man is labeled as being a lazy "non-man".
In a sense, men just can't be "equal" in today's society. They are either being labeled "sexist/abusive" or "lazy/irresponsible".
In certain countries, women are born without the social-engineering of certain un-natural archetypes...as well as men This is starting to have an effect on men in america who are recognizing these more natural and appealing traits that include physical...and more-so behavioral, of most foreign women.
Due to this discovery, more and more men are going to, for lack of a better term, "boycott" the american women "type" out of fear of regret...A.K.A. "buyer's remorse".
This is a shame for the few single authentic american women simply because of the feminism movement's ability to demonize men and essentially drive a wedge between men and women, destroying the natural dynamic.
it's not just an emotional liability to settle down with an american women but it is also a financial liability. I cringe when I say this because it's true.
I think this is the most honest and realistic statement regarding American women on this thread.
This is a known fact to many people in other non westernized countries. The NATURAL roles of Men AND Women in America and other westernized nations have been twisted and their natural affections and patriarchal family orders are being destroyed by the Elite in order to take control of the populace.
As Henry Makow put it: "Heterosexual relationships are about the exchange of female (worldly) power for male power expressed as love. Men want power. Women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two, sealed by exclusive sex.
Heterosexual relationships are about a man getting a woman to do what he wants. This is called "courtship" i.e. proving that his aims are worth supporting and he will protect and nurture her.
When he earns this trust (tantamount to her love,) she surrenders her worldly power to him. This is the heterosexual contract: power for love. (Of course, the contract is voided if he doesn't keep his end of the bargain. i.e. love. Thus he will consult her. Depending on mutual rapport and competence, power might be divided or delegated.)
Men should project power and never show weakness. They should establish their authority from the get-go. A woman can have power or love. But she can't have both. This is the litmus test. If she doesn't agree, move on. You'll save yourself a lifetime of grief."
[link to www.henrymakow.com
[link to www.savethemales.ca