ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH HIT THE AMERICAN MAINSTREAM

~ For truth!!

I think you meant to write "MAINSTRAM MEDIA" (caps included of course).

Things get a one-off or whitewash of the (possible) truthall the time. The question is not the "MAINSTREAM" viewing to think about, it's whether it affects the "MAINSTREAM" minds.

Cool..

It is always the smart one who figure it out last.

Actually, the chief architect and structural engineer that designed the WTC were the first ones to say they couldn't be knocked down by jet airliners, and that they were actually built to withstand hits from several of them at once.

I was at home watching as they fell.
I have seen more than one building dropped inside itself during a demo. Collapsing buildings do not readily stay within the lines as they tumble, only demos do. Anyone with common sense doesn't even have to have seen a demolition live to understand the simple fact those buildings should have broken at any weak points and toppled over hitting other buildings. That did not happen.
I told my wife at time of 1st fall that those were demo drops and she laughed saying why would they kill all those people. I said money probably, but those are demos. She knew then I had been on many demos as an electrician and have seen enough to know what I saw, yet didn't want to believe our country is that sick. Guess what, we are.

On September 9 and 10, 2010. AE911 Truth gave presentaions to several congress critters and staff, in DC. It's only a matter of time.

have you signed the petition yet?

[link to www.ae911truth.org]

its a good thing!

Like you, I saw the collapses as demos immediately. I'd witnessed a few prior. I didn't see anything that major, but if the stuff is rigged properly, it collapses in on itself neat and quick. I'm not the only one who believed they were demolitions...people I talked to that day and for the next two days believed they watched demolitions. But the MSM kept repeating the new official lie about it being 19 men with box-cutters who rammed aluminum planes into steel and concrete buildings and made them fall down, people began to doubt themselves.

I didn't. If I needed a refresher, I just watched the videos I made that day and the next. Damn, I sure did mess up my copy of "Band of Brothers" when I did that, though. It was in the machine when I first turned on the TV on the 11th. I instantly hit 'record' when I saw the first reports, and then the collapses started. Had to purchase the DVD set later.

11,000 seems like a lot.





Z

Like those above, I knew, too, that those building were brought down by implosions. The questions in my mind were who and why?

The question of who has been partially answered (no named culprits), and the why has been partially answered because the amount of asbestos made the buildings hazardous. They had to go, but coupled with that was the amount of insurance collected. Insurance won't pay if something is deliberately destroyed, which then was the perfect excuse to blame Saddam and go to war.
.

Well, while I support these guys (I signed the petition), you have to consider the problem that if congress and the media allow the truth to come out now, then they all implicate themselves as accessories. Furthermore, endorsement of it would invite all the things that have already happened to people who have spoken out...destroyed careers, vilification in the media, etc.

So I think the development of this whole thing is more like an open secret...everyone with a background in engineering and building construction knows the physics prevent the official story from being true, but the media and the government will keep covering it up and just pretend that the whole world has gone insane instead of acknowledging that the official story is the one that violates all of newtons well established and unbreakable laws of the physical world.

My husband's company is one of them. He is a structual steel engineer and i will never forget his face on 9/11. His entire office was in shock. They couldn't believe what they saw. My hubs was never into anything "conspiracy" minded until then. Now he dosen't know what to believe. He said "I don't know why, who, or what exactly happened that day, but I do know that the official story is bullshit".

Such a sad day.

It is a lot. 11,148 to be exact.

If you sign as an engineer or architect, they will verify your credentials before you go on the list. It's a thorough check, I signed on as a masters degree engineer (high honors) from a good school.

1321 verified architectural and engineering professionals
and 9827 other supporters including A&E students
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation. The petition is open to everyone.

[link to www.ae911truth.org]

It took me a little longer...now I feel like a retard for the truth taking so long to sink in.

SHR would argue they're all idiots.

that's old news... that was aired a long time ago

Indeed. He probably would...


It's funny, I always thought science was the one thing we could all agree upon. It seems Ideology trumps all.

and yet it only about 1/10th of 1% of working A&Es. Which in turn seems statistically insignificance.

There's a much much higher percentage of gay Americans than Engineers that believe in 9/11 truth.

The other thing is, if you ACTUALLY knew shit about demos, you guys would realise that DON'T look like demos, at all.

But hey, what's a little honest truth.

So Mr Engineer, what type of Engineer are you? Why do you not believe the "official story"?

Right, this doesn't look anything like a demo...




Just find a way to account for the free-fall acceleration, pulverization, and extreme temps... otherwise the official story is bullshit, plain and simple.

But hey, what's a little honest science.

right...

Google Landmark Implosion and report back what you discover.

sure, explain, why the entire building didn't move at once, as it does in demos.

explain why NO ONE heard or saw the dozens of very bright and loud timed explosion present at demos...



All you get out of this crowd is bs answers like:

(Though I have no proof I believe) the buildings were built with explosives in them

(Though I have no proof I believe) the government was using secret weapons

etc.

Real demos require explosions, and LOTS of them.

Real demos aren't top down... they are an entire building at near free-fall, all at once.

So, yeah, it looks like a building collapsing, but not a demo.

In real demolitions, all the concrete doesn't get turned into powder!!!