Flat Earth Society | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1112258 Ireland 09/27/2010 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i am a member of f.e.s... to emphasise the point that it is possible for a flat earth to be the correct model. Quoting: trailerparkboy...the earth may well be flat, hollow, concave, reversed spheroid or have a five-mile wide ball of molten spinning steel at its centre, they are all fantastic in their own way. Nonsense, utter nonsense. You're a member because you're an smug contrary douchebag who likes to pretend you're some wise insightful philosopher who can 'see things from many angles' blah blah blah. I bet you love announcing it to strangers don't you Marsha? Flat Earth theory was based on small scale direct observation, because at the time that is all we could do. When we gained the ability to observe the planet on a larger scale and in context (ie its place relative to other objects like planets and the sun) we realised very quickly that it was not flat and in fact could not exist in such a state. We know it is in fact impossible for it to be flat... or indeed take any form other than the one it has. It is not a model, it is not a theory, it is FACT. It is (I know this is hard for you Susan) OBJECTIVE TRUTH. Do you know why Billy? Do you? Gravity YOU DUNBASS... figure it out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1112258 Ireland 09/27/2010 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1111226 United Kingdom 09/27/2010 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1111226 United Kingdom 09/27/2010 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i am a member of f.e.s... to emphasise the point that it is possible for a flat earth to be the correct model. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1112258...the earth may well be flat, hollow, concave, reversed spheroid or have a five-mile wide ball of molten spinning steel at its centre, they are all fantastic in their own way. Nonsense, utter nonsense. You're a member because you're an smug contrary douchebag who likes to pretend you're some wise insightful philosopher who can 'see things from many angles' blah blah blah. I bet you love announcing it to strangers don't you Marsha? Flat Earth theory was based on small scale direct observation, because at the time that is all we could do. When we gained the ability to observe the planet on a larger scale and in context (ie its place relative to other objects like planets and the sun) we realised very quickly that it was not flat and in fact could not exist in such a state. We know it is in fact impossible for it to be flat... or indeed take any form other than the one it has. It is not a model, it is not a theory, it is FACT. It is (I know this is hard for you Susan) OBJECTIVE TRUTH. Do you know why Billy? Do you? Gravity YOU DUNBASS... figure it out. ive never told anyone actually, but thankyou for the insights to my personality, you are clearly a wise owl. or a cock. |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1111226 United Kingdom 09/27/2010 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1111226 United Kingdom 09/27/2010 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
danman User ID: 994330 United States 09/27/2010 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 09/27/2010 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I own several telescopes. The Earth is not flat. We as a species are quite beyond such a simplistic assumption. There is a plethora of observational and physical evidence which effectively kills your flat-Earth claim. There is zero evidence for such a claim. I suggest you leave eighth century thought to the eighth century. |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1111226 United Kingdom 09/27/2010 05:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I own several telescopes. Quoting: Returner 997The Earth is not flat. We as a species are quite beyond such a simplistic assumption. There is a plethora of observational and physical evidence which effectively kills your flat-Earth claim. There is zero evidence for such a claim. I suggest you leave eighth century thought to the eighth century. several telescopes? what is the correct name for a group of telescopes? a wank of telescopes? i made no claim for a flat earth, read the op thicky. and look into the history of who thought what when. |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1111226 United Kingdom 09/27/2010 05:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1114821 United Kingdom 09/30/2010 05:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1115004 United States 09/30/2010 05:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1114821 United Kingdom 09/30/2010 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
trailerparkboy (OP) User ID: 1114821 United Kingdom 09/30/2010 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17825984 Brazil 06/12/2012 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
grasptheuniverse User ID: 17322050 Australia 06/13/2012 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |