Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,369 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 282,726
Pageviews Today: 414,764Threads Today: 73Posts Today: 2,314
04:59 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is

 
SaveUSa - NLI
User ID: 164563
United States
10/01/2010 06:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
I posted this on another thread not really related, but believe it to be relevant to many of our discussions here today, so I thought I'd start it's own thread...

This was emailed to me by a friend today, and I think it well worth the read if you are trying to understand why we are where we are today in this country...


Below are two articles covering the fact that, since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.

In 1871 the Congress changed the name of the original Constitution by changing ONE WORD — and that was very significant as you will read.

Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any “legal” document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this.
1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871*

With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).

The act — passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War — was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.

Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.

The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.

* Info from yet unpublished book, “Pentimento: Freedom Revisited.” As you will see when reading, just as much of my knowledge of the Trading with the Enemy Act came from Gene Schroder, et al. this, too, came from elsewhere — from Lisa Guilian of Babel Magazine, whom I first “met” by way of an article by Patrick Bellringer. So, we cooperate as we study and learn the truth. C. E.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not! Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.

What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution.

Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. [Information courtesy of Lisa Guliani, www.babelmagazine.com. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.]

The UNITED STATES Isn’t a Country – It’s a Corporation!
In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain’s banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what the common herd believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed the common herd all rights of sui juris. [sovereignty]

Congress, with no authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land. WHY and HOW did they do so? First, Lisa Guliani of Babel Magazine, reminds us that the Civil War was, in fact, “little more than a calculated front
with fancy footwork by backroom players.” Then she adds:
“It was also a strategic maneuver by British and European interests (international bankers) intent on gaining a stranglehold on the coffers of America. And, because Congress knew our country was in dire financial straits, certain members of Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone’s pie). . . . . There you have the WHY, why members of Congress permitted the international bankers to gain further control of America. . . . . .

“Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers read: ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ [note that neither the words 'united' nor 'states' began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”

To fully understand how our rights of sovereignty were ended, you must know the full meaning of sovereign:

SOVEREIGN
“Chief or highest, supreme power, superior in position to all others; independent of and unlimited by others; possessing or entitled to; original and independent authority or jurisdiction.”
–Webster–

In short, our government, which was created by and for us as sovereigns — free citizens deemed to have the highest authority in the land — was stolen from us, along with our rights. Keep in mind that, according to the original Constitution, only We the People are sovereign. Government is not sovereign. The Declaration of Independence says, “government is subject to the consent of the governed.” That’s us — the sovereigns. When did you last feet like a sovereign? As Lisa Guliani explained:
“It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that the U.S. Government has NOT been subject to the consent of the governed since long before you or I were born. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia. In fact, it has invaded every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction beyond the District of Columbia. You just think it does.

“You see, you are ‘presumed’ to know the law, which is very weird since We the People are taught NOTHING about the law in school. We memorize obscure facts and phrases here and there, like the Preamble, which says, ‘We the People. establish this Constitution for the United States of America.’ But our teachers only gloss over the Bill of Rights. Our schools (controlled by the corporate government) don’t delve into the Constitution at depth. After all, the corporation was established to indoctrinate and ‘dumb-down’ the masses, not to teach anything of value or importance.

“Certainly, no one mentioned that America was sold-out to foreign interests, that we were beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress, or that we were in debt to the international bankers. Yet, for generations, Americans have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay a massive debt that they did not incur. There’s an endless stream of things the People aren’t told. And, now that you are being told, how do you feel about being made the recipient of a debt without your knowledge or consent?

“After passage of the Act of 1871, Congress set a series of subtle and overt deceptions into motion, deceptions in the form of decisions that were meant to sell us down the river.

“Over time, the Republic took it on the chin until it was knocked down and counted out by a technical KO [knock out]. With the surrender of the people’s gold in 1933, the ‘common herd’ was handed over to illegitimate law. (I’ll bet you weren’t taught THAT in school.)
“Our corporate form of governance is based on Roman Civil Law and Admiralty, or Maritime, Law, which is also known as the ‘Divine Right of Kings’ and the ‘Law of the Seas’ — another fact of American history not taught in our schools. Actually, Roman Civil Law was fully established in the colonies before our nation began, and then became managed by private international law. In other words, the government — the government created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 — operates solely under Private International Law, not Common Law, which was the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.

“This fact has impacted all Americans in concrete ways. For instance, although Private International Law is technically only applicable within the District of Columbia, and NOT in the other states of the Union, the arms of the Corporation of the UNITED STATES are called ‘departments’ –i.e., the Justice Department, the Treasury Department. And those departments affect everyone, no matter where (in what state) they live. Guess what? Each department belongs to the corporation — to the UNITED STATES.

“Refer to any UNITED STATES CODE (USC). Note the capitalization; this is evidence of a corporation, not a Republic. For example, In Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), it is unequivocally stated that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Translation: the corporation is NOT a separate and distinct entity; it is not disconnected from the government; it IS the government — your government. This is extremely important! I refer to it as the ‘corporate EMPIRE of the UNITED STATES,’ which operates under Roman Civil Law outside the original Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a corporation? You say you’ll ask your Congressperson about this? HA!!

“Congress is fully aware of this deception. So it’s time that you, too, become aware of the deception. What this great deception means is that the members of Congress do NOT work for us, for you and me. They work for the Corporation, for the UNITED STATES. No wonder we can’t get them to do anything on our behalf, or meet or demands, or answer our questions.

“Technically, legally, or any other way you want to look at the matter, the corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY State of the Union (the Republic) beyond the District of Columbia. Let that tidbit sink in, then ask yourself, could this deception have occurred without full knowledge and complicity of the Congress? Do you think it happened by accident? If you do, you’re deceiving yourself.

“There are no accidents, no coincidences. Face the facts and confront the truth. Remember, you are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don’t know the law or, for that matter, your history. Why? Because no concerted effort was ever made to teach or otherwise inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of all facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to ‘give’ you.

“Remember also that ‘Ignorance of the law is no excuse.’ It’s your responsibility and obligation to learn the law and know how it applies to you. No wonder the corporation counted on the fact that most people are too indifferent, unconcerned, distracted, or lazy to learn what they need to know to survive within the system. We have been conditioned to let the government do our thinking for us. Now’s the time to turn that around if we intend to help save our Republic and ourselves — before it’s too late.

“As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES owns you from birth to death. It also holds ownership of all your assets, of your property, even of your children. Think long and hard about all the bills taxes, fines, and licenses you have paid for or purchased. Yes, they had you by the pockets. If you don’t believe it, read the 14th Amendment. See how ‘free’ you really are. Ignorance of the facts led to your silence. Silence is construed as consent; consent to be beneficiaries of a debt you did not incur. As a Sovereign People we have been deceived for hundreds of years; we think we are free, but in truth we are servants of the corporation.

“Congress committed treason against the People in 1871. Honest men could have corrected the fraud and treason. But apparently there weren’t enough honest men to counteract the lust for money and power. We lost more freedom than we will ever know, thanks to corporate infiltration of our so-called ‘government.’

“Do you think that any soldier who died in any of our many wars would have fought if he or she had known the truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his/her life for a corporation? How long will we remain silent? How long will we perpetuate the MYTH that we are free? When will we stand together as One Sovereign People? When will we take back what has been as stolen from the us?

“If the People of America had known to what extent their trust was betrayed, how long would it have taken for a real revolution to occur? What we now need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We need to change our thinking, then we can change our world. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty our ancestors fought to preserve, the legacy of a Sovereign and Fully Free People.”

From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House: “Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) “Hypothecated” all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve – in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a “beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend THE FEDERAL United States CORPORATION [emphasis added] all the credit “money substitute” it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their “economic slaves”, the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.
Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 164563
United States
10/01/2010 06:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1060871
United States
10/01/2010 06:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
Bit winded, you should put a summary of the basics and then maybe point to the rest with a link for people who are interested enough to do their own research.

The sheeple are easily bored and distracted.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1088763
United States
10/01/2010 06:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
OP,

How do you think the Civil War affected this act being put into law 6 years after the war ended?

What would have happened if the South would have won the war? Would the Act of 1871 still have been passed?
SaveUSa

User ID: 671825
United States
10/01/2010 07:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
OP,

How do you think the Civil War affected this act being put into law 6 years after the war ended?

What would have happened if the South would have won the war? Would the Act of 1871 still have been passed?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1088763


I do not believe that the Act would have even been considered if the South had won, but also believe there may have been another British incursion had this not passed. Whether or not that attempt would have been successful - we'll never know.

Nonetheless, we are where we are today as a result, and the true culprits of our societal demise are increasingly being exposed more and more every day - at an exponential rate.

As more light shines on the darkest corners of our history (and the roaches that reside therein), the true culprits behind our ever-degrading society will become apparent to all that care to see. Your guess is as good as mine as to what will happen when that exposure reaches critical mass.

Last Edited by SaveUSa on 10/01/2010 07:06 PM
Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth.
SaveUSa

User ID: 671825
United States
10/01/2010 07:05 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
Bit winded, you should put a summary of the basics and then maybe point to the rest with a link for people who are interested enough to do their own research.

The sheeple are easily bored and distracted.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1060871


Agreed....I hesitated to post it for that reason, but maybe a few at least will appreciate it.
Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1088763
United States
10/02/2010 09:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 967484
United States
10/02/2010 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 941185
United States
11/20/2010 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
When will Congress repeal the Act of 1871?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 862727
United States
02/10/2011 08:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
When will Congress repeal the Act of 1871?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 941185


February 21, 2011 = 140 years

headbang
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1157608
United States
02/10/2011 08:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
When will Congress repeal the Act of 1871?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 941185


Not any damn time soon.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 317023
United States
02/10/2011 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 317023
United States
02/10/2011 10:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
Why does Ron Paul NEVER mention the corporate aspect of our so-called government?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 972552
United States
02/10/2011 07:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
When will Congress repeal the Act of 1871?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 941185


February 21, 2011 = 140 years

headbang
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 862727


^THIS!

popcorn
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 862727
United States
02/20/2011 03:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
When will Congress repeal the Act of 1871?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 941185


February 21, 2011 = 140 years

headbang
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 862727


bump
Forever the Student
User ID: 1269970
United States
02/20/2011 03:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
OP,

How do you think the Civil War affected this act being put into law 6 years after the war ended?

What would have happened if the South would have won the war? Would the Act of 1871 still have been passed?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1088763


Hegelian Dialectic...

The slaves were the excuse used to create a second class of citizenship UNDER congress, so We the People (state citizens) could be "moved" to a position UNDER Congress (federal citizens).

We the People (state citizens) existed for 90+ years before the UNCONSTITUTIONAL 2nd class US (federal) citizenship was created by the 14th amendment for the emancipated slaves.

Constitutional power flow:

Creator -->

man -->

We the People -->

county (sheriff and one supreme court) -->

state constitution -->

state -->

fed constitution -->

fed (legislative / executive / judicial) -->

US citizens and corporations (under Congress (legislative branch))


US citizens have no direct access to the Constitution or Bill of Rights.. as Congress (your master(s)) stand in a position superior, between You and the Constitution, and will interpret the Constitution for you. (look at the chart)

The slaves were NEVER freed... they were STOLEN from UNDER the southern plantation owner, and were placed UNDER Congress... Congress became the NEW slave owners / masters. (look at the chart)


Upon full disclosure... NO SANE MAN would CHOOSE to be a US citizen.


There are TWO classes of citizen in the USA...

Before the 14th Amendment

A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions. The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States. - Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)

It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none other; it was formed by them, and for them and their posterity, but for no one else. And the personal rights and privileges guarantied [sic] to citizens of this new sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members of the several state communities, or who should afterwards, by birthright or otherwise, become members, according to the provisions of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded. - Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 404 (1856)


... [F]or it is certain, that in the sense in which the word "Citizen" is used in the federal Constitution, "Citizen of each State," and "Citizen of the United States," are convertible terms; they mean the same thing; for "the Citizens of each State are entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States," and "Citizens of the United States are, of course, Citizens of all the United States. - 44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting



After the 14th Amendment

"There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the United States and one of the state". Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)

"The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other".
Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)

"...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship". Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)

"There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such". Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)

"We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it's own..."
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

"It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a state, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual". Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36; 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873)




US citizens have ONE Right:
"The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States,"
US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957(D.P.R.1968)

US citizens have no access to the Constitution:
"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship." - Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226 (1993)

"The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment." Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99


"The persons declared to be citizens are, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject..." Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94, 101, 102 (1884)



hf
Anthropomorphosizeme

User ID: 1030073
United States
02/20/2011 06:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ACT of 1871, and WHY the UNITED STATES "OF" AMERICA is NOT as free as you think it is
An amazing amount of truth. Btw every judge under the de facto and lawyer knowingly operate as foreigners over us. Lol infiltrated by the enemy and ruling us in plain sight! Our ENEMIES create our laws and we voluntarily abide ;) we really are fools lol
I'm here to chew bubble gum and kick ass

News