Is it unethical to serve cloned human meat?

Don't forget about starting with embryonic stem cells, that would be a treat...

Only if the cloned human had a name.

disgusting OP all of it

no need. you can use skin and other cells now. maybe the donor doesn't even need to know they've been cloned.

Oprah Rump Roast. $4200/lb

you can grow the meat in a lab fairly easily. I think they are still working out some issues with the consistency and the fat marbling, but those are just details..

why is it disgusting? you don't kill any animals, and don't keep them in deplorable conditions. how is it any more disgusting than eating pork, beef or chicken?

people bite their nails and cuticles all the time. ever bite a chunk out of your cheek?

human blood sausages. I think we could get $40/lb or more for that.

Definitely a niche market.

I see, getting a head start on the Anunnaki market I see.

If you provide them with meat, they will not eat you. Very clever.

Big Meat Eater

I dont know why it would be restricted to the palate of the elite. Cloning means mass production, and low per unit cost. Celebrity burgers could be sold to the common man!

You don't find cannibalism disgusting? Well you are a tard.

that's why you choose celebrity cuts. the forced scarcity boosts the price enormously. it would have to be certified authentic.

anyone can eat human steak, but not everyone can have celebrity cuts (patent pending)

How is it cannibalism? No people are killed. We only grow their beef. It is much more humane than how chickens, pigs and cows are raised, killed and processed.

How is it cannibalism? No people are killed. We only grow their beef. It is much more humane than how chickens, pigs and cows are raised, killed and processed.

Seventh Law is No Limb from Living Creature
[link to 7for70.net]

This could by extension also include vat grown meat.
Sure it is not really an animal, but it would have to be alive in some sense of the word, or it wouldn't really be food.
So if you slice off a chunk and eat it, you would be partaking of a portion of a living thing while it is still alive.

Not sure why this is a law, but maybe people had this problem in the past.

Only on Thanksgiving.

"But while it may not be commonplace for another couple of decades, artificial meat is already a reality.

Late last year, researchers in the Netherlands claimed they had grown artificial pork in a laboratory, which they described as not ready for a taste test and “soggy”.

The Royal Society papers also claimed one of the unexpected hindrances to producing more food was the increased role of multinational corporations in agricultural research."

[link to theland.farmonline.com.au]

The Charlton Heston wafers would be ironic.

I'd think it'd depend a lot upon what particular wine was served along with it.

OP that defines cannabilism.

Sick , The earth provides all we need, there is plenty of food why resort to that??? These are things we should not meddle with... it'll effect our evolution.

The bible proscribes pork, so do several other books and religions.

The reason being is because pork and humans taste very similar, so similar that in Asia the last surviving cannibalistic societies call human 'long pig'.

There would be moral consequences for eating cloned human flesh. Which in turn would become an question of ethics and would be presented as an ethical issue one which would forbid the eating of cloned human flesh.

Morality would form ethics as morality has formed many ethical questions in the past.

This topic works on so many levels.

Good job OP!