Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,013 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,542,444
Pageviews Today: 2,451,371Threads Today: 738Posts Today: 15,977
08:15 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3632012
United States
11/21/2011 02:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
I think I will stick with the real stuff, OP.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/21/2011 02:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Who is the "...prince of the power of the aether..."?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4342402


The Servant to Our Desires.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/21/2011 02:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
I think I will stick with the real stuff, OP.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3632012


Like rainbows and unicorns?
watcher
User ID: 2206413
United States
11/21/2011 02:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Thanks for the Kopernicky paper, that was something I noticed as a kid, but you forget as an adult believing yourself to be wiser.

In comment to the detractor who posts "no aether" I would simply ask where does the 377 ohm impedance of free space come from then?

Finally does anyone here know what Hilbert spaces are and can explain them to us or point me to an understandable introduction?

Thanks!
just a dude

User ID: 1080654
United States
11/21/2011 02:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Thanks for the Kopernicky paper, that was something I noticed as a kid, but you forget as an adult believing yourself to be wiser.

In comment to the detractor who posts "no aether" I would simply ask where does the 377 ohm impedance of free space come from then?

Finally does anyone here know what Hilbert spaces are and can explain them to us or point me to an understandable introduction?

Thanks!
 Quoting: watcher 2206413


[link to www.youtube.com]
Discretionary email only, please.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/21/2011 03:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Thanks for the Kopernicky paper, that was something I noticed as a kid, but you forget as an adult believing yourself to be wiser.

In comment to the detractor who posts "no aether" I would simply ask where does the 377 ohm impedance of free space come from then?

Finally does anyone here know what Hilbert spaces are and can explain them to us or point me to an understandable introduction?

Thanks!
 Quoting: watcher 2206413


 Quoting: just a dude
Fabian10

User ID: 1527128
Argentina
11/21/2011 03:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
5 Stars and Favorite for you SS.. again....
I love this kind of thread, and most of them here on GLP comes from you :)
Life isn't short.It's the longest thing anybody ever does
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/21/2011 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
5 Stars and Favorite for you SS.. again....
I love this kind of thread, and most of them here on GLP comes from you :)
 Quoting: Fabian10


Thanks Fabian! Just trying to get people to look at things differently, and think about things differently.
LiveinAwe

User ID: 1509202
United States
11/21/2011 03:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
5 Stars and Favorite for you SS.. again....
I love this kind of thread, and most of them here on GLP comes from you :)
 Quoting: Fabian10


Thanks Fabian! Just trying to get people to look at things differently, and think about things differently.
 Quoting: SickScent


And for some...affirm what we're already thinking! Thanks and 5* for this!
I am AWhereness...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/21/2011 03:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
5 Stars and Favorite for you SS.. again....
I love this kind of thread, and most of them here on GLP comes from you :)
 Quoting: Fabian10


Thanks Fabian! Just trying to get people to look at things differently, and think about things differently.
 Quoting: SickScent


And for some...affirm what we're already thinking! Thanks and 5* for this!
 Quoting: LiveinAwe


hi

hugs
ShadowDancer

User ID: 287857
United States
11/21/2011 03:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
bump for info


hiding
************************************
fortitudo et spes
************************************

When Japan happened I responded: "The Excrement Has Impacted the Rotary Oscillator." and clearly it has.
Thread: The Excrement Is Striking the Rotary Oscillator
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Ego et Dominus sumus amici"
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ego et mea umbra
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

'Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.’
- U.S. government mind manipulator, Dr. Jose Delgado, Congressional Record, No. 262E, Vol. 118, 1974
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Realeyesrealizereal​lies. C.

Thread: GIRD uP as GRID Collapses

Thread: Eugenics 101 (Page 27)

Thread: Frankenfoods for YOU (Page 2)

Thread: I Do Not Consent

Thread: FOOD

Thread: Cern Power___Colder than Space

Thread: Hempilation Compilation Contemplation
Thread: Harmonics and Healing (Page 35)
Thread: Sarah's Nightmare (Page 10)
Thread: Destination Maccabees
Thread: Let's Play a GAME

Thread: Throat Singing
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/21/2011 03:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
bump for info


hiding
 Quoting: ShadowDancer


:sofahide:
watcher
User ID: 2206413
United States
11/21/2011 04:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Just-a-Dude, thanks for that Youtube video link.
watcher
User ID: 2206413
United States
11/21/2011 04:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Question for Just a Dude:

Can we extend or define Hilbert spaces for fractal dimensions? Similar to say the Hausdorff dimension? While the Hilbert space extends to cover the positive dimensions, can we extend this the other direction?

What are your thoughts here?

(btw: I am familiar with vector spaces, so learning about Hilbert space was fairly easy)
ShadowDancer

User ID: 287857
United States
11/21/2011 04:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
bump for info


hiding
 Quoting: ShadowDancer


sofahide
 Quoting: SickScent


sofahide

I like it-who can find enough granite to build an adequate bunker...a sofa may be the key. :)
************************************
fortitudo et spes
************************************

When Japan happened I responded: "The Excrement Has Impacted the Rotary Oscillator." and clearly it has.
Thread: The Excrement Is Striking the Rotary Oscillator
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Ego et Dominus sumus amici"
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ego et mea umbra
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

'Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.’
- U.S. government mind manipulator, Dr. Jose Delgado, Congressional Record, No. 262E, Vol. 118, 1974
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Realeyesrealizereal​lies. C.

Thread: GIRD uP as GRID Collapses

Thread: Eugenics 101 (Page 27)

Thread: Frankenfoods for YOU (Page 2)

Thread: I Do Not Consent

Thread: FOOD

Thread: Cern Power___Colder than Space

Thread: Hempilation Compilation Contemplation
Thread: Harmonics and Healing (Page 35)
Thread: Sarah's Nightmare (Page 10)
Thread: Destination Maccabees
Thread: Let's Play a GAME

Thread: Throat Singing
just a dude

User ID: 1080654
United States
11/21/2011 04:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Question for Just a Dude:

Can we extend or define Hilbert spaces for fractal dimensions? Similar to say the Hausdorff dimension? While the Hilbert space extends to cover the positive dimensions, can we extend this the other direction?

What are your thoughts here?

(btw: I am familiar with vector spaces, so learning about Hilbert space was fairly easy)
 Quoting: watcher 2206413


Yah maan

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Discretionary email only, please.
just a dude

User ID: 1080654
United States
11/21/2011 04:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Question for Just a Dude:

Can we extend or define Hilbert spaces for fractal dimensions? Similar to say the Hausdorff dimension? While the Hilbert space extends to cover the positive dimensions, can we extend this the other direction?

What are your thoughts here?

(btw: I am familiar with vector spaces, so learning about Hilbert space was fairly easy)
 Quoting: watcher 2206413


Yah maan

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: just a dude


see also another one of SS' threads:

Thread: The One is not the Sum of Many/All - THERE CAN BE NO SUM OF EVERYTHING IF IT IS INFINITE
Discretionary email only, please.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5808194
Brazil
11/21/2011 05:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
bsflag
midisandy

User ID: 864437
United States
11/21/2011 05:18 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Apparently the author didn't like the "if" statement about wavelength being proportional to sqrt(A+k)... critical of a young Einstein.

A is the elastic aether force, a priori a constant which we have to determine empirically, and k the (variable) strength of the magnetic field

Would seem to me that if A is constant, it deters from the "intelligent" nature of an aetheric node.

According to further reading from the author, the Unified Force Theory provides for 2 charge "manifestations", so charge is distributed as charge squared.

I like the use of "manifestations" -)

So far so good, two spinning opposing vortices, but like anything with momentum, that inherent momentum is subject to external biases... (RLC // Spring-Mass-Damper)

Seems aether has to be pinned between two high density fields/masses to really get a grasp for high stress/strain elastic behavior, otherwise it flows like a sheet in the wind... A shearing high amplitude bias near 0 K, could produce vortex separation, which would most likely result in either light generation as entropy or a tear in 3D and thus time. Doing so, in a controlled environment at higher temperatures should allow for "conduit" formation between the two receding vortices. As a vortex elongates into a tube, ajacent charge pairs (around the vortex "mouth") would then participate in the process...

It appears to me that the aether behaves like a fine migrative as well as electrophoretic medium that can also gel like an electrorheological fluid in a static field.

A is intrinsically a dominant sub-elastic component of k (the elasticity of aether underlies all other fields), then at a particular magnetic field strength both should exhibit similar elastic behaviour.

A behaves as k does, relative energy density dictates charge flow, but an artificial magnetic field warps charge flow and even more so when charge set separation occurs.

Anyway, I'm rambling...
 Quoting: just a dude

Seems aether has to be pinned between two high density fields/masses to really get a grasp for high stress/strain elastic behavior, otherwise it flows like a sheet in the wind... A shearing high amplitude bias near 0 K, could produce vortex separation, which would most likely result in either light generation as entropy or a tear in 3D and thus time. Doing so, in a controlled environment at higher temperatures should allow for "conduit" formation between the two receding vortices. As a vortex elongates into a tube, ajacent charge pairs (around the vortex "mouth") would then participate in the process...


Could this be a mechanism that would cause "light" to exist BEFORE the sun was created?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/21/2011 05:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5808194


:scarydog:
just a dude

User ID: 1080654
United States
11/21/2011 05:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Apparently the author didn't like the "if" statement about wavelength being proportional to sqrt(A+k)... critical of a young Einstein.

A is the elastic aether force, a priori a constant which we have to determine empirically, and k the (variable) strength of the magnetic field

Would seem to me that if A is constant, it deters from the "intelligent" nature of an aetheric node.

According to further reading from the author, the Unified Force Theory provides for 2 charge "manifestations", so charge is distributed as charge squared.

I like the use of "manifestations" -)

So far so good, two spinning opposing vortices, but like anything with momentum, that inherent momentum is subject to external biases... (RLC // Spring-Mass-Damper)

Seems aether has to be pinned between two high density fields/masses to really get a grasp for high stress/strain elastic behavior, otherwise it flows like a sheet in the wind... A shearing high amplitude bias near 0 K, could produce vortex separation, which would most likely result in either light generation as entropy or a tear in 3D and thus time. Doing so, in a controlled environment at higher temperatures should allow for "conduit" formation between the two receding vortices. As a vortex elongates into a tube, ajacent charge pairs (around the vortex "mouth") would then participate in the process...

It appears to me that the aether behaves like a fine migrative as well as electrophoretic medium that can also gel like an electrorheological fluid in a static field.

A is intrinsically a dominant sub-elastic component of k (the elasticity of aether underlies all other fields), then at a particular magnetic field strength both should exhibit similar elastic behaviour.

A behaves as k does, relative energy density dictates charge flow, but an artificial magnetic field warps charge flow and even more so when charge set separation occurs.

Anyway, I'm rambling...
 Quoting: just a dude

Seems aether has to be pinned between two high density fields/masses to really get a grasp for high stress/strain elastic behavior, otherwise it flows like a sheet in the wind... A shearing high amplitude bias near 0 K, could produce vortex separation, which would most likely result in either light generation as entropy or a tear in 3D and thus time. Doing so, in a controlled environment at higher temperatures should allow for "conduit" formation between the two receding vortices. As a vortex elongates into a tube, ajacent charge pairs (around the vortex "mouth") would then participate in the process...


Could this be a mechanism that would cause "light" to exist BEFORE the sun was created?
 Quoting: midisandy


Kind of recently validated on a larger scale, using microwaves (as discussed in other threads):

[link to www.sciencedaily.com]
Discretionary email only, please.
just a dude

User ID: 1080654
United States
11/21/2011 05:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Wrote this last year, but apparently never got around to posting:

From: [link to bourabai.narod.ru]
(emphasis mine)

The suggested concept of the ether medium [69, 91] allows predicting most elementary perturbations (particles) that may arise in it. It was shown above that the ether medium is a regular spatial lattice composed of two particles that are equal in size but opposite in sign. Their mutual attraction will make these particles occupy a strict and exact position relative to each other. Thus, the spatial lattice of the ether medium will be rather homogeneous in the end. However, we can imagine initiation of dislocations or heterogeneities in the vacuum spatial structure due to some reasons. For instance, as discussed earlier, heterogeneities arise in the vacuum in the presence of atoms, ions, electrons, i.e. bodies possessing a physical mass. However, to our mind, in some cases heterogeneities may arise in the absence of a physical body. Imagine the simplest types of such heterogeneities. For instance, one can imagine the presence of an excess particle with a positive sign located in the middle of a homogeneous lattice. That will be the example of the simplest heterogeneity that may be called the heterogeneity "with the positive excess". One can also imagine an excess negative particle in the middle of the lattice. This heterogeneity may be called the heterogeneity "with the negative excess". Two other types of heterogeneity can exist. One of them is represented by the absence of the positive charge in the middle of the lattice. Let us call this type the heterogeneity "with the positive deficit". The opposite type will be called "with the negative deficit". Thus, there can be four types of the simplest heterogeneities. Interestingly, combining heterogeneities "with the positive excess" and "with the positive deficit" will result in their mutual annihilation, elimination. A similar situation holds when combining heterogeneities "with negative excess" and "with negative deficit".

Four types of simple heterogeneities are mentioned, but possible variations in "amplitude" are omitted. This is bothersome since the blanket statement regarding annihilation must presume equal and opposite amplitudes and allows for no elastic behavior.

... Such heterogeneities (mini-particles) will not possess the mass that is typical of a physical body. But these "excess" and "deficient" mini-particles must have some charge (lack of charge) and electromagnetic mass (lack of this mass). They must be the smallest and most elementary of all possible. The heterogeneities "with positive deficit" and "negative deficit" are kinds of holes in the ether medium. Note that D. Willer [92] presents a diagram in which antineutrinos play the role of holes.

The surrounding nodes in the spatial "lattice" would scatter these charge dislocations quickly or bend and oscillate accordingly.

The ether medium or vacuum is really a shoreless ocean, as Paul Dirak wrote. This ocean is filled with electromagnetic matter. Now it is difficult to say how this energy can be released and used. But enormous quantities of energy can be undoubtedly transferred without any loss through the ether medium, free cosmos by means of electromagnetic waves of great intensity.

Seems to me that electrostatic orientation as a result of the presence of a uniform magnetic field could be exploited to manipulate the "lattice". This is not much different than what haarp does at an atmospheric level.
Now let's picture a second opposing magnetic field creating an opposite polarization in a secondary "lattice" facing the forementioned one. The result would be electron/anti-proton or positron/proton "ends" facing their common polarity. What would proximity and/or shear result in? Or what would be the reaction from the surrounding "lattice" adjusting to the local deformations?

One could posit that 'time' being more tenuous than geometric dimensions, depending on orientation, either the electron/anti-proton or positron/proton end would "open" and expand as a funnel (due to angular momentum of the aether unit). This 'endwise'' disconnect would produce a vortice shaped end opening a "path" to the singularity where reverse and forward time meet.

The beauty of the "aether" is not in its enormous energy potential (especially considering that the effect of such tampering is unknown). It lies in properties associated with information and energy transfer. The butterfly effect is created, realized, transmitted and amplified through the aether. It is the neuronal base lattice of the universe.

Human polarity can be used to influence on a "weak" level the "lattice", thus in turn effecting change/movement in lighter and then to heavier elements through transitivity. This is in direct opposition to brute force manipulation of "lattice" units or small unit groupings. The former is more of an act of compassion with desire for "positive" effects to ensue. To do so "negatively", results in quick degradation of "lattice" response and distorted outcome.

Through meditative and respiratory techniques, the human anatomical function allows for manipulation of time within one's auric space. This "information" being supported by intent and energy fields emanating from the body, then transitions through "communication" to the surrounding aetheric "lattice". Body and appendage orientation can then project directional, focused or expansive, time warped fields.

Entropic decay (e.g., from disease) can then be countered via a regressive "flush" of excess positive time engendering constructs or similarly by targetted (love-based) negentropic "information". The key is to picture one's body as a macroscale 'aether' unit with the ability to modulate time while behaving as a capactive system with surrounding and internal means of dissipation and intake of polarized energies.
Discretionary email only, please.
scimitar

User ID: 4121735
United States
11/21/2011 07:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
SS....

Actually I rather enjoy your threads. In some ways your expanded area thinking is a bit like mine. I seldom have the opportunity to express my self these days.

I have over the years I have come to believe that we exist in a construct that includes hyper-dimensionality. We are isolated in our universe from the entirety of existence.

I hold the view that our physical universe is actually infinite and that hyper-dimensionality creates the possibility of an infinity of infinities. To me this translates to "Things are not as they seem", therefore a discussion about our physical reality that seems to talk about things being actually hard physicality to me is folly.

Obviously we cannot disconnect our thought processes from it and me must deal with the apparent reality that we exist in, but I, when in imagination mode must drastically alter my views.

energy is spin, that is the act of spinning. If you can imagine two photons 180 degrees out of phase occupying the same path of propogation at he same time. Do they exist?

The concept of Aether is valid, but its existence does not necessarily require it to be made of anything it must only support the force of spin. Imaginarily spin needs no support structure merely angular momentum of nothing creates something.

Mathmatics deal with multidimensional number spaces all the time. However moving from a view at one aspect to another is not simplistic.

If matter consists of purely photons then there would be a requirement for them to interact with one another. What we perceive as mass, for me relates directly to the amount of energy in the photon.

We know that photon frequency determines its' energy. Mass attraction is really just another way of saying energy density attraction. So the higher the frequency of a photon the higher its' apparent mass.

What is the highest possible frquency photon that can exist in our dimension. How could we possibly know? How do we measure the existence of a photon? Think about it.

Perhaps there is a density threshold at which time the energy and apparent mass of a photon becomes so great it will through mass attraction orbit another photon, not by electrical or magnetic interaction..... Just a thought.

My view of a photon is like a disk with two axis' of rotation. One axis is perpendicular to the surface and passes through the center of the disk(spin A). The other is parallel to the surface and passes through the center of the disk(spin B). Obviously there is more at work here, but this provides a way to visualize the electrical and magnetic potentials. The parallel axis also represents the vector of propogation through what we perceive as physical space.

Remember there is only spin energy nothing more. "Spin A" provides the torsional existence. "Spin B" exposes the orthogonal nature of the magnetic and electrical nature of the photon. Now, imagine 3D space as a 2D membrane (Aether), difficult I know , but try.

When rotaion of the disk is parallel with the membrane we see a twist in one direction. As the spin B progresses 90 degrees we see a vertical stretch in one direction. As the spin B progresses to 180 degrees we see the twist in the opposite direction. Another 90 degrees the vertical stretch is in the other direction...... etc

Twist is magnetic, vertical stretch is electrical. They are orthogonal rotations of the same spin.

Okay time to eat dinner. Perhaps more later.
One Truth.... many realities
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
11/21/2011 08:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Scimitar, I really enjoy your response. I am going to dissect it (probably tomorrow) and get your feedback after dissection. We are of a VERY similar thought pattern. I am thinking that the restriction of language is the difference we have, but the actual thoughts are nearly the exact same.
watcher
User ID: 2206413
United States
11/22/2011 01:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
SickScent, Just a dude and scimitar{

I was hoping someone could help me to understand [link to arxiv.org] as I have very good reason to believe that we are embedded in both real space and fractal space and that of dimension 3 and -3 respectively.

In regard to Hilbert space, this was a seminal work by Dr. John Von Neumann, in trying to describe quantum mechanics from both the Schrodinger viewpoint and the other mechanistic viewpoint using matrices(I forget the strongest protaganist's name at the moment) as a synthesis. He was forced to synthesize the two viewpoints and developed his own operator theory on Hilbert spaces as a result, but his later works (which I consider the greatest) were yanked from public view.

I might mention "pilot-wave" quantum mechanics as successfully invalidating the Copenhagen viewpoint, but few Americans seem knowledgable about it, but this is a side road to the present discussion.

What does this all have to do with aether? Lots, as Von Neumann became acquainted with Nikola Tesla's results. Tesla's history and his discoveries has been terribly misrepresented and there is a popular mythology today around both men today which seems to be continually replicated.

In regard to Kopernicky's results, while he insists that Coloumb's law is invalidated, I would suggest that perhaps the north and south fields are actually different in regard to the behavior of attraction and repulsion because they really are not the inverse of each other. I would suggest to all readers that taking a closer look at Howard Johnson's comments about the secrets of magnets deserves a much closer work, since a scientific experiment later run by NASA actually confirmed his results. (much to everyone's surprise)

Unfortunately those experimental results were yanked from public view too, before the popular paradigm's foundations would be discovered to be faulty.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5827855
United States
11/22/2011 01:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
Creation is a result of balanced, interactive deformation.

Thread: Big Bang & Einstein WRONG - REAL meaning of E = mc2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5827855
United States
11/22/2011 01:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
SickScent, Just a dude and scimitar{

I was hoping someone could help me to understand [link to arxiv.org] as I have very good reason to believe that we are embedded in both real space and fractal space and that of dimension 3 and -3 respectively.

In regard to Hilbert space, this was a seminal work by Dr. John Von Neumann, in trying to describe quantum mechanics from both the Schrodinger viewpoint and the other mechanistic viewpoint using matrices(I forget the strongest protaganist's name at the moment) as a synthesis. He was forced to synthesize the two viewpoints and developed his own operator theory on Hilbert spaces as a result, but his later works (which I consider the greatest) were yanked from public view.

I might mention "pilot-wave" quantum mechanics as successfully invalidating the Copenhagen viewpoint, but few Americans seem knowledgable about it, but this is a side road to the present discussion.

What does this all have to do with aether? Lots, as Von Neumann became acquainted with Nikola Tesla's results. Tesla's history and his discoveries has been terribly misrepresented and there is a popular mythology today around both men today which seems to be continually replicated.

In regard to Kopernicky's results, while he insists that Coloumb's law is invalidated, I would suggest that perhaps the north and south fields are actually different in regard to the behavior of attraction and repulsion because they really are not the inverse of each other. I would suggest to all readers that taking a closer look at Howard Johnson's comments about the secrets of magnets deserves a much closer work, since a scientific experiment later run by NASA actually confirmed his results. (much to everyone's surprise)

Unfortunately those experimental results were yanked from public view too, before the popular paradigm's foundations would be discovered to be faulty.
 Quoting: watcher 2206413


With regard to poles, what if there are more like four? As in two poles, each with it's own inverse.

?
watcher
User ID: 2206413
United States
11/22/2011 01:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
SecondPrecession:

Are you referencing the magnetic field pattern overlaid upon the human being in [link to www.magnetage.com] and suggesting that there are 2 poles with respect to each field?

I do need to mention that Dr Albert Roy Davis was the first to discover the true nature of the magnetic fields in a permanent magnet, then Howard Johnson, then NASA.
just a dude

User ID: 1080654
United States
11/22/2011 01:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
SickScent, Just a dude and scimitar{

I was hoping someone could help me to understand [link to arxiv.org] as I have very good reason to believe that we are embedded in both real space and fractal space and that of dimension 3 and -3 respectively.

In regard to Hilbert space, this was a seminal work by Dr. John Von Neumann, in trying to describe quantum mechanics from both the Schrodinger viewpoint and the other mechanistic viewpoint using matrices(I forget the strongest protaganist's name at the moment) as a synthesis. He was forced to synthesize the two viewpoints and developed his own operator theory on Hilbert spaces as a result, but his later works (which I consider the greatest) were yanked from public view.

I might mention "pilot-wave" quantum mechanics as successfully invalidating the Copenhagen viewpoint, but few Americans seem knowledgable about it, but this is a side road to the present discussion.

What does this all have to do with aether? Lots, as Von Neumann became acquainted with Nikola Tesla's results. Tesla's history and his discoveries has been terribly misrepresented and there is a popular mythology today around both men today which seems to be continually replicated.

In regard to Kopernicky's results, while he insists that Coloumb's law is invalidated, I would suggest that perhaps the north and south fields are actually different in regard to the behavior of attraction and repulsion because they really are not the inverse of each other. I would suggest to all readers that taking a closer look at Howard Johnson's comments about the secrets of magnets deserves a much closer work, since a scientific experiment later run by NASA actually confirmed his results. (much to everyone's surprise)

Unfortunately those experimental results were yanked from public view too, before the popular paradigm's foundations would be discovered to be faulty.
 Quoting: watcher 2206413


It all ties in very nicely. Fractal input would be a special case of pilot-wave qm. The negative dimensions arise from the notion of complex -1, but are also justifiable when looking at antimatter. We've reproduced antiatoms like antihydrogen, antihelium, and antilithium is most likely next.

Tangent spaces, linking in the 2-brane/2D Planck world. Branes stirred into motion/existence from adjacent universes. Negative space in this context is a directional quality, typically tangent and expanding symmetrically from the point of contact, in the opposite direction from positive space.

On this side of creation it seems that these 'negative' spaces are untenuous, but the notion that such spaces could mirror our fractal nature, implies that they could be underpinning feeds to the 2D Planck world underlying creation. Pattern feeds where the simplest building blocks seem to have been witnessed as already bleeding through.
Discretionary email only, please.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5827855
United States
11/22/2011 02:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: State of Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein
SecondPrecession:

Are you referencing the magnetic field pattern overlaid upon the human being in [link to www.magnetage.com] and suggesting that there are 2 poles with respect to each field?

I do need to mention that Dr Albert Roy Davis was the first to discover the true nature of the magnetic fields in a permanent magnet, then Howard Johnson, then NASA.
 Quoting: watcher 2206413


I am only referring to my own weird ideas and unfortunately I fail at articulating them clearly sometimes. My field is biology so magnetics is a mystery except when it comes to EM as applies to the body.


Thank for for the link! I'll be back after perusing.

hf