Apparently the author didn't like the "if" statement about wavelength being proportional to sqrt(A+k)... critical of a young Einstein.

A is the elastic aether force, a priori a constant which we have to determine empirically, and k the (variable) strength of the magnetic field

Would seem to me that if A is constant, it deters from the "intelligent" nature of an aetheric node.

According to further reading from the author, the Unified Force Theory provides for 2 charge "manifestations", so charge is distributed as charge squared.

I like the use of "manifestations" -)

So far so good, two spinning opposing vortices, but like anything with momentum, that inherent momentum is subject to external biases... (RLC // Spring-Mass-Damper)

Seems aether has to be pinned between two high density fields/masses to really get a grasp for high stress/strain elastic behavior, otherwise it flows like a sheet in the wind... A shearing high amplitude bias near 0 K, could produce vortex separation, which would most likely result in either light generation as entropy or a tear in 3D and thus time. Doing so, in a controlled environment at higher temperatures should allow for "conduit" formation between the two receding vortices. As a vortex elongates into a tube, ajacent charge pairs (around the vortex "mouth") would then participate in the process...

It appears to me that the aether behaves like a fine migrative as well as electrophoretic medium that can also gel like an electrorheological fluid in a static field.

A is intrinsically a dominant sub-elastic component of k (the elasticity of aether underlies all other fields), then at a particular magnetic field strength both should exhibit similar elastic behaviour.

A behaves as k does, relative energy density dictates charge flow, but an artificial magnetic field warps charge flow and even more so when charge set separation occurs.

Anyway, I'm rambling...