Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,003 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,502,671
Pageviews Today: 2,042,697Threads Today: 494Posts Today: 9,899
06:30 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

What really brought down the twin towers!

 
TheJuiceisLoose
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1129173
United States
10/17/2010 04:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
What really brought down the twin towers!
TWO PLANES.



Ok people, all of the so called evidence people claim that the tower had explosives are pure speculation. There is no evidence of explosives. However, there is evidence of explosions, there is a difference you know. First do you realize how much potential energy a quarter mile long steel support beam has when it is holding up an off balanced damaged skyscraper has? My guess is ALOT. Also, we know that not all of the jet fuel ignited immediately and that it leaked down the inside of the building. If that were to be ignited in a small enclosed space the explosion would be massive.

There is only one piece of real evidence of sabotage in this entire case. That is the written proof that the Bush administration had prior knowledge of the impending attack.
Now, look at who was in charge of the administration before the attacks. Vice President, Dick Cheney was the C.E.O of a fortune 500 company named HALIBURTON until one year before the attacks. Cheney was also part of the board of advisors of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). If you don't know what JINSA is look it up, they own us. Cheney stated he stepped down as C.E.O to HALIBURTON to remove any "Conflict of interest"... Why would there be conflict of interest with anything while the president George W Bush owned a company with proven ties to the family of known terrorist Osama Bin Laden without any suspicion of conflict of interest?

We all know that even though Dick Cheney was a cold hearted businessman, he wasn't a very good one. he was driving Halliburton into Bankruptcy. How can a failing Fortune 500 OIL company be saved from certain bankruptcy? The only way is WAR. Think about it, why would Dick Cheney, the most powerful vice president in history, who was also SECRETARY OF DEFENSE for daddy Bush let us be attacked even though he and the administration had extensive prior knowledge of specifics of the attack?

The only reason we were attacked was to save Halliburton and make MASSIVE Profit. Look at the stock 1 year after Dick Cheney crippled the company and resigned. Now look what happened the second we entered Iraq in 2003. [link to www.google.com]

Also, It did not matter whether the buildings fell or not in order to go to war. It is policy for the United states to retaliate against any type of physical attack. They did not need to risk everything by secretly rigging all of the floors of one of the largest and busiest buildings in the world. That would require not being noticed by any of the 10,000 employees which is impossible. All they needed were terrorists with knowledge of flying a dc-10 jet. which the terrorists were specifically trained to fly by the U.S. Seriously guys it is really that simple. All it took was the death of one man to start world war one, someone simply threw a grenade through a window of a car. You know our gov't does not like to get their hands dirty. so why would they make a plan which is much more likely to go wrong than to succeed when all they needed to do is physically attack us in any public way. Im sure Cheney shit himself when they actually fell. There is a golden rule in harming someone without them knowing. It is called the K.I.S.S rule

Keep
It
Simple
Stupid


Simpler is always better.
Im dangerous like a fire in a nursing home
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 911383
United States
10/17/2010 04:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
pride
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1132746
Australia
10/17/2010 04:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Simpler is always better.
 Quoting: TheJuiceisLoose


Okay simpler is, GRAVITY.

bsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 998486
United States
10/17/2010 04:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Kiss this JREF`r!! stfu
Swissy
User ID: 959947
Switzerland
10/17/2010 04:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
This brings in a motive for Cheney but doesn't explain, why the towers came down. I don't believe one moment, it was only the planes or the fuel. Don't forget building 7.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 878570
United States
10/17/2010 04:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Planes

Explosives

Gravity

OMG! It was PEG BUNDY !!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1130801
United Kingdom
10/17/2010 04:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Okay simpler is, GRAVITY.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1132746


GRAVITY (ironically) would keep your symmetrical building standing, i.e. not EXPLODING THROUGH its path of greatest architectural resistance. There is no FORCE great enough to push the top of the WTC all the way down through the resistive force of the remainder.

Der!

Come on, shills and supporters of 'smouldering office fires' exploding steel buildings and evaporating core columns.

Try again, and with feeling this time. Aren't they paying you enough?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 643026
United Kingdom
10/17/2010 04:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
"....Also, we know that not all of the jet fuel ignited immediately and that it leaked down the inside of the building. If that were to be ignited in a small enclosed space the explosion would be massive."

Do you know how much actual jet fuel there was? Compared to the size of the towers it was a tiny amount. And how could it have leaked into an 'enclosed' space? And even if it did, how could it have been ignited?
TheJuiceisLoose (OP)

User ID: 1129173
United States
10/17/2010 06:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
"....Also, we know that not all of the jet fuel ignited immediately and that it leaked down the inside of the building. If that were to be ignited in a small enclosed space the explosion would be massive."

Do you know how much actual jet fuel there was? Compared to the size of the towers it was a tiny amount. And how could it have leaked into an 'enclosed' space? And even if it did, how could it have been ignited?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 643026

when a building gets hit with the equivalent of 600 tons of tnt close to the middle of a building there will be MASSIVE structural damage. there would be holde and cracks throughout the building. as for igniting, the fucking thing was on fire.

The point is, they did not need to blow it up to start a war. so why would they? they wouldn't

We have what is called a massive retaliation policy and flying the planes alone justifies the war according to law.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Im dangerous like a fire in a nursing home
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1132987
Australia
10/17/2010 06:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Simpler is always better.


Okay simpler is, GRAVITY.

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1132746


Gravity.... and jet fuel.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1044438
United States
10/17/2010 06:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
bushfing lala dick
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1122201
Australia
10/17/2010 09:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
when a building gets hit with the equivalent of 600 tons of tnt close to the middle of a building there will be MASSIVE structural damage. there would be holde and cracks throughout the building. as for igniting, the fucking thing was on fire.

The point is, they did not need to blow it up to start a war. so why would they? they wouldn't

We have what is called a massive retaliation policy and flying the planes alone justifies the war according to law.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: TheJuiceisLoose


"when a building gets hit with the equivalent of 600 tons of tnt"

Where did you get this BS from?

The point is, they did not need to blow it up to start a war. so why would they?

The buildings were obsolete and unsuitable for modern offices as they were never cabled for computers, as well they were full of asbestos which by law had to be removed (at enormous cost). It was much easier for Larry Silverstein if they were blown up. Do some research.
Mr Spock
User ID: 1133052
Australia
10/17/2010 09:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
GREED LUST AND FAULSE POWER, the things naughty humans do to keep in control of the masses....

spock flower
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1133148
United Kingdom
10/17/2010 10:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Any amount of burning kerosene WOULDN'T EVEN BEND A STEEL BUILDING let alone explode it to smithereens half an hour after most of the kerosene fires had been extinguished!

You could pour burning kerosene on the same steel building all day for days and days and days and nothing would happen.

Otherwise all cooking implements would MELT on the stove, FFS.

WHAT PART OF REALITY ARE YOU F***ING IDIOTS MISSING?

Sorry ... I mean, come on!

Please!
][nƒeRnaL

User ID: 820518
United States
10/17/2010 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Op and thread are a waste of space,....
Theories: Misconceptions awaiting confirmation of incorrectness.
Everything is subject to continually changing variables, leaving nothing to remain as a constant.]D)one!!!!
:nfrnl1111:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1133173
United States
10/17/2010 10:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
OP can't explain away how WTC7 collapsed WITHOUT A PLANE.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1133173
United States
10/17/2010 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
OP can't explain away how an alleged PLANE leaves a tiny hole in the Pentagon TOO SMALL FOR A PLANE and leaves zero plane wreckage.

If a plane is enough to melt and collapse a skyscraper, why then does a plane do almost NOTHING to the Pentagon?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1133173
United States
10/17/2010 10:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
OP can't explain away how Flight 93's crash left only a small indentation in the ground, and very little retrievable wreckage, utterly inconsistent with any other plane crash in the entire history of aviation.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1133173
United States
10/17/2010 10:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
OP can't explain away how much worse and much larger fires have occured in other skyscrapers, and yet NOTHING LIKE 9-11 EVER HAPPENED in any of these instances.

[link to 911research.wtc7.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1133153
United States
10/17/2010 11:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
What really brought DOWN the TWIN towers!




[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]
TheJuiceisLoose (OP)

User ID: 1129173
United States
10/17/2010 11:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
you people are misguided and look like idiots and this is all i gotta say. You dont know if it is impossible for those planes to bring them down as they were only tested to withstand a empty 707 without the weight of the fuel, not a full 767. There is a huge difference. No one knows whether they could bring it down or not because it had never happened before and will never happen again. You are all being mislead and made to look like fools just so no proper investigation can be done.

YOU KNOW I'M RIGHT
Im dangerous like a fire in a nursing home
TheJuiceisLoose (OP)

User ID: 1129173
United States
10/17/2010 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
[nƒeRnaL]
Op and thread are a waste of space,....
 Quoting:

YOU KNOW I'M RIGHT...
Im dangerous like a fire in a nursing home
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1010900
Canada
10/17/2010 11:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
The point is, they did not need to blow it up to start a war. so why would they? they wouldn't

We have what is called a massive retaliation policy and flying the planes alone justifies the war according to law.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: TheJuiceisLoose

bump hf
FreeDumb

User ID: 1049247
United States
10/17/2010 11:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
Okay simpler is, GRAVITY.


GRAVITY (ironically) would keep your symmetrical building standing, i.e. not EXPLODING THROUGH its path of greatest architectural resistance. There is no FORCE great enough to push the top of the WTC all the way down through the resistive force of the remainder.

Der!

Come on, shills and supporters of 'smouldering office fires' exploding steel buildings and evaporating core columns.

Try again, and with feeling this time. Aren't they paying you enough?
 Quoting: Free Planet



Since they were hit off center, my "guess" along with alot of others guesses would have them tipping to one side, and falling over.

NOT straight down.

Also, since 2 planes brought down the twin towers, what happened to 7?

Last Edited by FreeDumb on 10/17/2010 11:26 AM
"Majority of Amerika is too awash in its own mediocrity to commit to fighting for freedom" Mojo
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1010900
Canada
10/17/2010 11:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
The buildings were obsolete and unsuitable for modern offices as they were never cabled for computers,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1122201

LOL -- What a joke!

No computers at the World Trade Center, ha ha ha, Morgan Stanley was operating completely by courier, ha ha ha!

as well they were full of asbestos which by law had to be removed (at enormous cost). It was much easier for Larry Silverstein if they were blown up. Do some research.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1122201

LOL -- Comedy non-stop!

Every high-rise must be insulated with fire retardant, ITS THE LAW, or any fire that takes place on any floor can devastate and destroy the whole high-rise threatening other buildings in the area as well.

Aside from comedy, Insurance companies don't like paying claims, they would gladly have presented the evidence to deny the owner any claim if there was any truth to this non-sense.

peace
TheJuiceisLoose (OP)

User ID: 1129173
United States
10/17/2010 02:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What really brought down the twin towers!
The point is, they did not need to blow it up to start a war. so why would they? they wouldn't

We have what is called a massive retaliation policy and flying the planes alone justifies the war according to law.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

bump hf
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1010900

bump
Im dangerous like a fire in a nursing home

News