GOOGLE BOSS SAYS: 'IF YOU DON'T LIKE GOOGLE STREETVIEW, THEN MOVE HOUSE'

Time to boycott google.

Time to boycott google.

What a fucking dick-head.

It's not illegal to take a picture of a house. Besides, most of you don't even truly own your houses anyway.

Time to boycott google.

It's not illegal to take a picture of a house. Besides, most of you don't even truly own your houses anyway.

It isn't the house picture that is the problem, it is posting it on the internet for all to see that brings legal ramifications.

Would you like me to post some pictures of your children on 4chan or here? Get my point?

There should be an assumed amount of privacy.

Also, nevermind the picture, how about the INTRUSIVE and self-admittedly ILLEGAL network scanning/sniffing/logging/who knows what else that they ADMIT they did?


I'll tell you this about them.

THEY USE WINDOWS.

How do I know?
Because watchers can be watched.
The next time "google" scans my internet, I hope they made good backups of their little street car named desire.

How do they get away with collecting data?

Put the fkrs in chains.

How do they get away with collecting data?

Put the fkrs in chains.


Because their Jews working on behalf of the world's jewish occupational governments.

It's not illegal to take a picture of a house. Besides, most of you don't even truly own your houses anyway.

They are not doing anything illegal, by taking a video of your house. They are shooting from the street, which is public property.
Hope they never make it illegal, else no one will be able to take any videos anywhere.

The next time "google" scans my internet, I hope they made good backups of their little street car named desire.

The next time "google" scans my internet, I hope they made good backups of their little street car named desire.


This is how you act like an ITG, everyone. Well done.

It's not illegal to take a picture of a house. Besides, most of you don't even truly own your houses anyway.

It isn't the house picture that is the problem, it is posting it on the internet for all to see that brings legal ramifications.

Would you like me to post some pictures of your children on 4chan or here? Get my point?

There should be an assumed amount of privacy.

Also, nevermind the picture, how about the INTRUSIVE and self-admittedly ILLEGAL network scanning/sniffing/logging/who knows what else that they ADMIT they did?


I'll tell you this about them.

THEY USE WINDOWS.

How do I know?
Because watchers can be watched.
The next time "google" scans my internet, I hope they made good backups of their little street car named desire.

I don't think there are any legal ramifications either. If it's a public street (which the street views are as far as I know), anyone can drive down it and take a picture and post it anywhere they want. You don't own privacy over the "sight" of your house. If you don't want someone seeing it, put up a wall, or big trees, or bushes, or whatever...

Now, birds eye view into your private back yard is another thing altogether!! And their sniffing of emails/passwords etc over wifi is definitely wrong, although people shouldn't be so dumb as to not encrypt....

Now, the network issue is the real problem.
Who the fuck is google that they need to sniff/record every network in the world?
Who gave them the legal right?

Now, the network issue is the real problem.
Who the fuck is google that they need to sniff/record every network in the world?
Who gave them the legal right?


They use the wi-fi access points to enhance the accuracy of the geo-location on Android phones. By plotting the GPS co-ords of known access points it makes it possible for an Android phone user to fix their position on a Google map even with the GPS turned off since the phone can detect a list of the wifi-networks in the area and cross-reference them with the database to fix a position.

There is nothing wrong with that if you ask me, and it only works if your access point is set to broadcast its name (SSID), mine is not-- one needs to know it's name to connect to it, along with a passphrase, etc. If you are broadcasting the fact that you have a wi-fi network (and airwaves are public, BTW) then it can be tracked at will (just ask any police scanner owner).

I do wonder why they sniffed the networks, however, since that is not required for the above functionality.