Angular Pulse and the Movement of Information FTL | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've been thinking, how the hell do you create angular pulse? Tesla's rotating magnetic field...3 6 9 I do not see any other way to create it in a form so pure... Tesla on the Magnificence of 3-6-9 [link to sickscent.blogspot.com] “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.” -Tesla |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | on sound: Faster-than-light pulsar radio waves found You might have heard that faster-than-light travel is impossible. This is not entirely true -- there are a couple of catches which allow for F.T.L velocities. One such catch, as originally proposed by Mr. Einstein, is that something can travel faster than light if it does not contain information. This physical law has been observed on Earth in experiments, but with this pulsar (if confirmed), this is the first time this sort of thing has been observed off of our planet. What does or does not constitute information in this context however, is the subject of both rigorous study and debate. [link to www.neoseeker.com] the problem with the standard model is that it contains nothing for light or sound (information transfer) to travel through from a to b the standard model does not contain the non material dimension (aether) The failure of the Standard Model rests in its wrong assumptions. Physicists assume that all matter is solid and physical, and therefore particles that make up other particles must necessarily be smaller, solid, physical particles. Quoting: fieldThey believe this despite clear evidence that the electron is cloud-like in its structure. Physicists even have to quantify the structure of the electron in terms of probability functions, and actually believe the electron is a crap shot. The Standard Model does not allow for the concept of different orders of reality, which lead from physical matter to non-material existence. In the end, however, that is exactly what physicists will have to admit. Thread: The PYRAMID CODE then you need to consider how does information (sound/light) travel through the non material dimension does it cut through it as a boat through water or does the information travel and the non material dimension carry it as in a sequence of pulses (dominoes one after the other) IE the information travels and the effect (light and sound) appears to travel homework for you -field |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 10:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ripples in magnetic fields wafting through interplanetary space have been detected by a space probe and converted into sound. The "noises" were picked up the Cassini spacecraft which is en route to Saturn in 2004 via Jupiter. The probe is detecting waves in the thin gas of charged particles that fills the space between the Sun and its planets. The waves are in low radio frequencies and can be converted to sound wave frequencies to make the patterns audible. Listening to the "sounds" of near-Jupiter space has been done before by the Pioneer and Voyager probes of the 1970's, but this is the first time that Cassini's data have been used in this way. [link to news.bbc.co.uk] |
field User ID: 1143994 United Kingdom 10/28/2010 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Structure and function cannot be seperated. What does a photon look like? Moreover, what does aether look like? How would you determine these structures? With Quantum Constants. We will stick to five constants. Compton Wavelength Coloumbs Charge c Mass of the electron Planck Length We can take a supposition that aether is real, so lets determine what aether is.... Aether is a rotating magnetic field with a quantum spin of two. That is the supposition. One thing we know for sure....Matter HAS 1/2 spin. Spin is also known as Angular Momentum. It is possible that matter which is 1/2 spin angular momentum is a product of the aether. Do not forget that matter is a left-handed spin, antimatter spins right. You can only look forward and back and spin left or right....therefore a Aether unit can produce all four fundamental particles, electrons, positrons, protons, antiprotons. Angular momentum must scan a aether unit based on its attributes of being angular momentum and must be constrained by the quantum constants structural components. Putting those five quantum constants together and adding angular momentum and moving forward in time, we get a glimpse of the structural nature of matter and the aether from which it came. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1130978 United Kingdom 10/28/2010 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1144384 Thailand 10/28/2010 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 12:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
R... User ID: 572408 Netherlands 10/28/2010 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | scalar waves [link to www.cheniere.org] "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play." - 'Wargames' "This world is more like a mystery, trapped in a conundrum, spun by a paradox." - AC1118155 |
field User ID: 1143994 United Kingdom 10/28/2010 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Superluminal speeds are associated with a phenomenon known as anomalous dispersion, whereby the refractive index of a medium (such as an atomic gas) increases with the wavelength of transmitted light. When a light pulse – which is comprised of a group of light waves at a number of different wavelengths – passes through such a medium, its group velocity can be boosted to beyond the velocity of its constituent waves. However, the energy of the pulse still travels at the speed of light, which means that information is transferred in agreement with Einstein's theory. [link to physicsworld.com] it`s really funny how they dance around the word "aether" and the bull shit at the end However, the energy of the pulse still travels at the speed of light, which means that information is transferred in agreement with Einstein's theory. so it`s an illusion????????? an illusion has energy/information to form it!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every physicist is taught that information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light. Yet laboratory experiments done over the last 30 years clearly show that some things appear to break this speed limit without upturning Einstein's special theory of relativity. Now, astrophysicists in the US have seen such superluminal speeds in space – which could help us to gain a better understanding of the composition of the regions between stars. Quoting: field 1143994Superluminal speeds are associated with a phenomenon known as anomalous dispersion, whereby the refractive index of a medium (such as an atomic gas) increases with the wavelength of transmitted light. When a light pulse – which is comprised of a group of light waves at a number of different wavelengths – passes through such a medium, its group velocity can be boosted to beyond the velocity of its constituent waves. However, the energy of the pulse still travels at the speed of light, which means that information is transferred in agreement with Einstein's theory. [link to physicsworld.com] it`s really funny how they dance around the word "aether" and the bull shit at the end However, the energy of the pulse still travels at the speed of light, which means that information is transferred in agreement with Einstein's theory. so it`s an illusion????????? an illusion has energy/information to form it!!!!! it`s really funny how they dance around the word "aether" Its like its toxic...ANYTHING but aether! Oh, and no matter what, we must be in agreement with Einstein, AND we must state that in the article for validity's sake, otherwise it will nullify the article. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 380553 United States 10/28/2010 01:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All speculative and mishmashed [meta]physics: Anything smaller than planck length is unmeasureable... therefore waves smaller than planck legth would be travelling FTL and theoretically could be smeared across the quantum foam? Or put another way: wavicle A is smaller than planck length or travels faster than planck time. Wavicle A in that state is enfolded into the single point of beingness [call it God if you want] where it is a part of the "infinite everything now". Slow it down and it unfolds into something that can be measured in physical space and includes the quantum information that can be decoded [quantum entanglement, etc]. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 380553 United States 10/28/2010 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aether got a bad name because it was expected to be observable but wasn't...my knowledge of physics is pretty limited but it seems to me that the physicists ended up inventing dimensions that are a surrogate of aether in a ongoing attempt to make their equations balance out. Its like its toxic...ANYTHING but aether! Oh, and no matter what, we must be in agreement with Einstein, AND we must state that in the article for validity's sake, otherwise it will nullify the article. Quoting: Sickscent |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aether got a bad name because it was expected to be observable but wasn't...my knowledge of physics is pretty limited but it seems to me that the physicists ended up inventing dimensions that are a surrogate of aether in a ongoing attempt to make their equations balance out. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 380553Its like its toxic...ANYTHING but aether! Oh, and no matter what, we must be in agreement with Einstein, AND we must state that in the article for validity's sake, otherwise it will nullify the article. Makes me think of layers of aether, rather than 'dimensions'. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1136718 United States 10/28/2010 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
field User ID: 1143994 United Kingdom 10/28/2010 04:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | sound Angular momentum is the smaller then a proton. That does not make it lack electromagnetic. Electromagneticis distributed charge. Angular momentum scans an area, based on the Compton Wavelength and Plancks length, this sweeping of angular momentum, that is the buzz. Quoting: ScienceIts my conjecture that what they term "noise" and the one scientist term quantum buzz, would in Aether Physics Model terms be the scanning LC. Dave(Thomson) can correct me if that is wrong Quoting: ScienceAccording to Hogan, the holographic principle radically changes our picture of space-time. Theoretical physicists have long believed that quantum effects will cause space-time to convulse wildly on the tiniest scales. At this magnification, the fabric of space-time becomes grainy and is ultimately made of tiny units rather like pixels, but a hundred billion billion times smaller than a proton. This distance is known as the Planck length, a mere 10-35 metres. The Planck length is far beyond the reach of any conceivable experiment, so nobody dared dream that the graininess of space-time might be discernable. Quoting: ScienceSounds like aether units. Quoting: ScienceWell, everything in the "quantum domain" can be interpreted that way. Take for example the article cited in the thread "Physicists Squeeze Light To Quantum Limit". The article states that: Quoting: SciencePhysicists Squeeze Light To Quantum Limit [link to www.sciencedaily.com] And so there you have the ligamen circulatus "scanning" a sphere. And once again they find "noise": Quoting: ScienceBut uncertainty, also known as quantum noise, gets in the way of the information," explains Professor Aephraim Steinberg. Quoting: ScienceInteresting. If I take APM "aether unit" into consideration in relation to all of this "noise" it can appear that some particular experiment hones in on one or more aspect of multi-faceted "aether unit" leaving the other aspects to appear as "noise". For example, I could say that the above cited experiment appears to reveal the ligamen circulatus "scanning" the area of the spheres of ES charge in relation to the "forward time" 1/2 spin aspect - while the "dark side" (reverse time") goes unnoticed - and the other "forward time" features of the "aether unit" ("proton", "positron" etc) appear as "noise" simply because the experiment isn't "tuned" to those frequencies. Quoting: ScienceHowever, this would appear to be no different than "tuning" into a resonant aspect of "structures" formed from the variety of positional "capture" phases of Gabriel LaFreniere's wave dynamics which give the *appearance* of "particles" (electron, protons etc) and "fields" [link to www.glafreniere.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just a quick thought, and do not know if this is exactly correct...the smaller we go, the more properties of reality are are SEEN to be included into the 'piece'. I good example of what I mean is the properties of light that show it is both wave or particle. Go bigger, and the properties start defining themselves more 'accurately', or more definable. |
field User ID: 1143994 United Kingdom 10/28/2010 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ...However, this would appear to be no different than "tuning" into a resonant aspect of "structures" formed from the variety of positional "capture" phases of Gabriel LaFreniere's wave dynamics which give the *appearance* of "particles" (electron, protons etc) and "fields". Quoting: ScienceAlso, this page from spaceandmotion.comWave Diagrams, The Wave Structure of Matter [link to www.spaceandmotion.com] Good stuff. One often takes up waves and replaces charge with that theory. Charge is a wave. It is always waving. Quoting: ScienceIt is distributed and clearly not a particle. The wave they talk about is the charge wave. Just so we do not run off thinking a wave is independent of itself... i remember we said something about waves being a pulse but now i can not remember what we said |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 865798 United States 10/28/2010 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ...However, this would appear to be no different than "tuning" into a resonant aspect of "structures" formed from the variety of positional "capture" phases of Gabriel LaFreniere's wave dynamics which give the *appearance* of "particles" (electron, protons etc) and "fields". Quoting: field 1143994Also, this page from spaceandmotion.comWave Diagrams, The Wave Structure of Matter [link to www.spaceandmotion.com] Good stuff. One often takes up waves and replaces charge with that theory. Charge is a wave. It is always waving. It is distributed and clearly not a particle. The wave they talk about is the charge wave. Just so we do not run off thinking a wave is independent of itself... i remember we said something about waves being a pulse but now i can not remember what we said Yep. I know one of them was when you said to stop saying wave. Replace wave with pulse for more accuracy. |
field User ID: 1143994 United Kingdom 10/28/2010 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just a quick thought, and do not know if this is exactly correct...the smaller we go, the more properties of reality are are SEEN to be included into the 'piece'. I good example of what I mean is the properties of light that show it is both wave or particle. Go bigger, and the properties start defining themselves more 'accurately', or more definable. Quoting: Sickscentdirection all matter is forming from it`s inside out so the smaller we go the closer to the beginning of matter is what we see the bigger (further away) the greater matter changes because more layers/stages of information/energy (geometry) of it`s formation are observed, and we see those layers functions on route to the completed structure |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1145148 United States 10/28/2010 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just a quick thought, and do not know if this is exactly correct...the smaller we go, the more properties of reality are are SEEN to be included into the 'piece'. I good example of what I mean is the properties of light that show it is both wave or particle. Go bigger, and the properties start defining themselves more 'accurately', or more definable. Quoting: field 1143994direction all matter is forming from it`s inside out so the smaller we go the closer to the beginning of matter is what we see the bigger (further away) the greater matter changes because more layers/stages of information/energy (geometry) of it`s formation are observed, and we see those layers functions on route to the completed structure Right...and why? Because of complexity. Further the complexity, the more defined the object becomes. Put it in relation to 'information', and the more defined the information becomes. This is interesting, because once again, this is explaining paradox. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1145148 United States 10/28/2010 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just a quick thought, and do not know if this is exactly correct...the smaller we go, the more properties of reality are are SEEN to be included into the 'piece'. I good example of what I mean is the properties of light that show it is both wave or particle. Go bigger, and the properties start defining themselves more 'accurately', or more definable. Quoting: Sickscentdirection all matter is forming from it`s inside out so the smaller we go the closer to the beginning of matter is what we see the bigger (further away) the greater matter changes because more layers/stages of information/energy (geometry) of it`s formation are observed, and we see those layers functions on route to the completed structure Right...and why? Because of complexity. Further the complexity, the more defined the object becomes. Put it in relation to 'information', and the more defined the information becomes. This is interesting, because once again, this is explaining paradox. This would also work with the thought that the higher density, is more 'full'...no gaps...everything is in high definition, which works with my experiences (mantis)... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1145148 United States 10/28/2010 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Clarence User ID: 1141833 United Kingdom 10/29/2010 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1093212 United States 10/29/2010 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
field User ID: 1146792 United Kingdom 10/30/2010 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | interestingly for me, this came soon after i posted Quoting: field666 in latin and hebrew describe three curlicue aligned on the three dimensional axis. Its an energetic phenomenon which cant be observed directly. Besides seeing them "between the dimensions" we are able to observe them as results. The vestibular system, which contributes to our balance and our sense of spatial orientation, is the sensory system that provides the dominant input about movement and equilibrioception [link to en.wikipedia.org] This organic device does not only help to walk in a straight line and to know where up and down is. Physical and metal orientation are overlapping topics. Those are also connected to physical and mental vision. Its easy to proof by placing a person on a fast rotating gyroscope for a while. Afterwards the person will show all symptoms of a druged or insane person. The person will see stuff and will not be able to walk and probably not even able to talk. Quoting: fie;dThis is what was not always there and haunts humankind for quite a while now. "Chained between the horned antennae forever" There is a cure though. Quoting: interesting what is it telling me? it is telling me the structure of the human body provides the function of forming angular momentum Quoting: fieldthe implosive or explosive spin of the personality/consciousness interacts with the implosive or explosive spin it receives from it`s outside (nature) the two vortices (mind/nature) form (angular momentum) what you see Thread: The field of HUMAN ENERGY (Page 36) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1147899 United States 10/31/2010 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Worth looking into... Y-Bias and Angularity [link to www.pureenergysystems.com] Y-Bias and Angularity: The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality From the Zero Point to Infinity by David G. Yurth and Donald Ayres Holladay, Utah Composed on August 20, 2005 Published for the first time here at PES Network Academy Nov. 11, 2006 Abstract The quest of modern physics has been to develop a model which correctly describes the role and dynamics of the interactions by which Nature works. In order for the model which describes these interactions to be robust, it must not only accommodate phenomena which are known to occur, but must also accommodate all rigorously documented phenomena, predict phenomena which are as-yet undiscovered, and allow for the inclusion of all rigorously observed, impeccably documented, carefully reported data derived from all sources. To be adequate, any universally applicable physical model must also accommodate the contemporaneous interaction between Descartes' 'physical stuff' and 'spirit stuff' with equal cogency. The current model fails to rise to this standard. It is based on a number of fundamentally flawed, incomplete and arbitrarily imposed assumptions. In the 35 years since the Standard Model was improved by the Copenhagen School, the reductionist methodology which typifies scientific research has run up hard against the most daunting of all Nature's mysteries. Experimental results provided by the most powerful microscopes, largest telescopes, fastest linear accelerators and other advanced devices, demonstrate that there is an underlying order in the cosmos which has not yet been understood. The shortcomings of the Standard Model are ameliorated by the application of the rules of Self-Organizing Criticality in complex, open systems [SOC][1] as integrated with the dynamics described as Y-Bias and Angularity.[2] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1147899 United States 10/31/2010 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Follow-up to Y-Bias and Angularity: The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality On January 21, 2007, David G. Yurth wrote: I have just received a copy of the paper written by Dr. Paul La Violette. As you review it, you will see that it fundamentally validates one of the key concepts included in the Y-Bias model. This is extremely exciting because it means that we have suddenly been handed independent validation in a way that we had never anticipated, from a truly impeccable source. I still can't get unwound enough to get to sleep. |
OTOC User ID: 1142266 United Kingdom 10/31/2010 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The interesting thing is that it is probably a hell of a lot simpler than one would first think. Just need think of something, unthinkable to us currently. Solar Storms, Your basic guide: Thread: Solar Storms, Your Basic Guide. AC 1082864 - "This post was sponsored by OTOC. If you watch any doom on November 4, watch katla!" Yellowstone - 2024, some time after june. |