I Give Up: The Apollo moon missions were UN-fakeable. They went and I must deal with that.

Wow. Just wow. Is this for real?

If they faked the images and footages, which is totally unimportant to you, could they have faked the whole thing?

I look at the evidence of fakery and there you go.



Again, and I'm getting tired of asking this, WHAT EVIDENCE OF FAKERY? Be specific.

5 miles, not a few hundred yards.



In which mission do you think the astronauts travelled 5 miles from their landing spot?


The big one in July 1969. I'm not 100% certain about the 5 miles. Some sources talk about 5, others about 2.5 and most talk about "several miles", but not yards.

I look at the evidence of fakery and there you go.



Again, and I'm getting tired of asking this, WHAT EVIDENCE OF FAKERY? Be specific.

Go do your own research fool....check out "something happened on the way to the moon" check out Davesweb. Check the other moon hoax threads. You astroNOT believers are toast.

Your either blind or retarded.


I think he's lying about his 30 year career as an astrophotographer.

Some people go really far when they defend the lies of the country they are in love with.



I didn't say that I had a 30 year career as an astrophotographer, now did I? I have a 30+ year career in television and video engineering. My astrophotography work can be seen in a number of books and on the web at

www.machunter.org/hapspics.html


With all due respect, but the website doesn't prove anything.



I know a thing or two about photography and have made a quite nice living from it. What are YOUR photographic critique credentials? Please be specific.

The speed (ASA) of the Apollo film was typically very slow, since light on the lunar surface is abundant! Here are some reference articles:

[link to sterileeye.com]

[link to history.nasa.gov]

This films listed are:

Kodak Panatomic-X fine-grained, 80 ASA

Kodak Ektachrome SO-68 and SO-121, typically 160 ASA

Even the strong X-ray machines in airports will not fog film slower than ASA 800.

Also, by the time of Apollo, film had already been used in several lunar orbiters with onboard film processing equipment and fogging was not found to be an issue.

The NASA Lunar Orbiter (5 flights)...

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

and the Soviet Luna 3...

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

5 miles, not a few hundred yards.



In which mission do you think the astronauts travelled 5 miles from their landing spot?


The big one in July 1969. I'm not 100% certain about the 5 miles. Some sources talk about 5, others about 2.5 and most talk about "several miles", but not yards.


But you made the claim of 5 miles. Show me the two images taken 5 miles apart on the moon that you think show an identical background.

Wow. Just wow. Is this for real?


Yes.


If they faked the images and footages, which is totally unimportant to you, could they have faked the whole thing?


No. See previous.

I can come up with various reasons as to why they would have staged footage and imagery. You too?

5 miles, not a few hundred yards.



In which mission do you think the astronauts travelled 5 miles from their landing spot?


The big one in July 1969. I'm not 100% certain about the 5 miles. Some sources talk about 5, others about 2.5 and most talk about "several miles", but not yards.


But you made the claim of 5 miles. Show me the two images taken 5 miles apart on the moon that you think show an identical background.



I'm sure you know how to use Google.

www.machunter.org/hapspics.html

But you made the claim of 5 miles. Show me the two images taken 5 miles apart on the moon that you think show an identical background.



I'm sure you know how to use Google.



I didn't make the claim...YOU did. Are you now backing down from it?

Radiation fool radiation. Why would we not go back in 40 plus years? Why when its the most logical place for a base and a telescope and manufacturing and research? Why not even a rover? Your asking us to prove something that is now SO APPERANT is like (as I said before) asking me to prove your father and mother f'ed. Don't need to BECAUSE your here.

But you made the claim of 5 miles. Show me the two images taken 5 miles apart on the moon that you think show an identical background.



I'm sure you know how to use Google.



I didn't make the claim...YOU did. Are you now backing down from it?



Lazy?

Radiation fool radiation. Why would we not go back in 40 plus years? Why when its the most logical place for a base and a telescope and manufacturing and research? Why not even a rover? Your asking us to prove something that is now SO APPERANT is like (as I said before) asking me to prove your father and mother f'ed. Don't need to BECAUSE your here.

Ahh, I love it. Beat the other guy with questions that are impossible to answer.

That was a wise move.

I guess bringing those "MOON ROCKS" back along with soil from the moon kind of clinched it right?

But you made the claim of 5 miles. Show me the two images taken 5 miles apart on the moon that you think show an identical background.



I'm sure you know how to use Google.



I didn't make the claim...YOU did. Are you now backing down from it?



Lazy?


Your evasion is noted and your claim laid to rest.

My 7 year old cousin would be able to find it without help.

Ahh, I love it. Beat the other guy with questions that are impossible to answer.

That was a wise move.


Thanks for admitting that the question on how exactly Apollo was faked is impossible to answer.

A wise move indeed and congratulations of arriving at the same conclusion as I did. Hope I saved you some valuable quality time.

My 7 year old cousin would be able to find it without help.


Good. When he finds it, bring it here and we'll go over it.

Typical HB. Make a stupid claim with NO evidence NOR references, and then call someone ELSE "lazy" when YOU won't go get references for the claims YOU made.

Priceless!

Radiation fool radiation. Why would we not go back in 40 plus years? Why when its the most logical place for a base and a telescope and manufacturing and research? Why not even a rover? Your asking us to prove something that is now SO APPERANT is like (as I said before) asking me to prove your father and mother f'ed. Don't need to BECAUSE your here.



You pontificate from obvious ignorance. Do you not realize that rovers DID go to the moon? And just what is the radiation level on the moon and in the VAB on the 30 degree inclination path that was traversed? Do you actually know, or are you just regurgitating something a kook web site told you?

Radiation fool radiation. Why would we not go back in 40 plus years? Why when its the most logical place for a base and a telescope and manufacturing and research? Why not even a rover? Your asking us to prove something that is now SO APPERANT is like (as I said before) asking me to prove your father and mother f'ed. Don't need to BECAUSE your here.



You pontificate from obvious ignorance. Do you not realize that rovers DID go to the moon? And just what is the radiation level on the moon and in the VAB on the 30 degree inclination path that was traversed? Do you actually know, or are you just regurgitating something a kook web site told you?

Let me get this straight...YOU want ME to go find evidence for YOUR claim? Do I have that right?