Y-BIAS AND ANGULARITY - The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality From the Zero Point to Infinity

I know you! lol. Its funny Bea, I have seen others get confused by your words, or misconstrue them, and I think to myself, "No! She meant this!" And sure enough, you come back and respond to them and it was exactly what I thought...

cool.

The Standard Model obviously needs to be heavily revised.

Mainstream Scientists should grow a pair of balls to accept the "non-physical" but unfortunately they don't because they fear it could accidentally "validate" Religion or most of the spiritual stuff they believe as "pseudo-science" and "bullshit".

Considering most Scientists are strictly materialistic atheists, I am not surprised.

Last Edited by ~^PropHeTic^~ on 11/17/2011 05:43 PM

Complex system



[link to en.wikipedia.org]

I'll see your complex system and up you one complex ADAPTIVE system... what we seem to be, speaking as what we'd define as human, of course.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

[link to plasmauniverse.info]

Complex plasma phenomena


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

communicative intuition ?

Sounds like us, huh?

Characteristics of Complex Adaptive Systems

Complex adaptive systems are characterized as follows and the most important are:

The number of elements is sufficiently large that conventional descriptions (e.g. a system of differential equations) are not only impractical, but cease to assist in understanding the system, the elements also have to interact and the interaction must be dynamic. Interactions can be physical or involve the exchange of information.

Such interactions are rich, i.e. any element in the system is affected and affects several other systems.

The interactions are non-linear which means that small causes can have large results.

Interactions are primarily but not exclusively with immediate neighbours and the nature of the influence is modulated.

Any interaction can feed back onto itself directly or after a number of intervening stages, such feedback can vary in quality. This is known as recurrency.

Such systems are open and it may be difficult or impossible to define system boundaries.

Complex systems operate under far from equilibrium conditions, there has to be a constant flow of energy to maintain the organization of the system.

All complex systems have a history, they evolve and their past is co-responsible for their present behaviour.

Elements in the system are ignorant of the behaviour of the system as a whole, responding only to what is available to it locally.

you like that huh

my point is

if some fuck whom i strongly suspect is a man is clever enough to write it right how come all the other fucks, whom i know are men, do not fucking live it

Mankind


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

so by definition 99.999% of all that is earth must express itself within a complex system therefore we (humankind) are functioning in a manner most of us, it appears, have 0 imagination of

a complex system such as us (humankind), within a complex system (gaia), within complex system (galaxy), within a complex system (universe), must have a unique personality (function) that interacts (effects) all other complex systems we by default interact with

how does that sound?

Like wheels within wheels :) Perfect.

good

...and we're the minority...

SS thx for the link will be reading this later...

Then good news... The interactions are non-linear which means that small causes can have large results. Minorities affect majorities, one breadcrumb at a time ;)

I highly recommend it. It is a VERY interesting read.

I am just glad you changed your avatar back, you were scaring me.

Very nice SS.
Always the very tastiest technofantasy.

How do you come across all this stuff?

Refreshing to hear some real reflection of ownership and responsibility for where we are, I'm still hoping we get a strong enough CME to wipe out the TVs, in Plasma Cosmology every structure is interconnected, from DNA to Diamonds everything being part of the same forces, native Americans say the chimp may be our (western civilizations progenitor) but not their relative.

[link to www.youtube.com]

This is incredible. I LOVE this!

One of the authors e-mailed me with the paper, and asked me to go over it.

:colorbump:

Thread: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology (Page 127)

Last Edited by aether on 11/18/2011 11:17 AM

Nice placement aether!

Hah! The criticality point has been breached!

I'll be happy the day the darwinian secularists go the way of the dinonuggets. Us alchemists may figure out all the secrets while the scientists fight each other in their crib and make fun of the people outside.

They all lost a lot of credibility during this global warming bonanza.

Early morning bump!

Thread: NASA Fudges Climate Data - Worse than CLIMATE-GATE

:boobbump:

just what i was looking for

Namasté

Glad I could help.

"An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"[1] is a physics preprint proposing a basis for a unified field theory, very often referred to as "E8 Theory,"[2] which attempts to describe all known fundamental interactions in physics and to stand as a possible theory of everything. The paper was posted to the physics arXiv by Antony Garrett Lisi on November 6, 2007, and was not submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal.[3] The title is a pun on the algebra used, the Lie algebra of the largest "simple," "exceptional" Lie group, E8. The paper's goal is to describe how the combined structure and dynamics of all gravitational and Standard Model particle fields, including fermions, are part of the E8 Lie algebra.[2] In the paper, Lisi states that all three generations of fermions do not directly embed in E8 with correct quantum numbers and spins, but that they might be described via a triality transformation, noting that the theory is incomplete and that a correct description of the relationship between triality and generations, if it exists, awaits a better understanding.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]