THE TRUTH ABOUT PAUL McCARTNEY WILL BE REVEALED BY 2012 - Mysterious makers behind 'The Rotten Apple' Videos

Every mouse over the screen to see if there are any hidden links

Fuck dat just read page source newb

He is telling people it, whatever it is (album?), will be there in the morning. It has to finish uploading.

More songs on itunes, as I said before.

How about this:

[link to pid90066.tripod.com]

This is true

Nothing is happening

The social engineers are very interested in the music kids listen to. I'm not sure why, but they are.

It serves as an effective conditioning tool.

Scam. Like I said, a gimic to get people to buy his songs on itunes. He's back peddling. Go to his FB page to see the link.

[link to www.facebook.com]

Last Edited by 284dan on 11/09/2012 05:22 PM

Total bullshit.

One of the most ridiculous conspiracies out there.

We know he died and 40 years later, who cares.

That's not him, dumb shit. That is a fan page.

284dan is not very bright.

Just because I havent paid this nonsense any attention doesnt mean I am not very bright. The things a dud, a scam. Nothing happened.

scam for what? it's a fucking documentary you retard. get out of this thread if you're going to spew retardedness all over the place.

.

THE ABSOLUTE PROOF IS IN THE HAIR "PART".

Plastic surgery can change a lot of facial features, but

it can't change the hair part.

NOTICE when looking at photo comparisons of the younger

Paul that HIS HAIR PART IS ON HIS LEFT.

Then, SUDDENLY - His hair part changes to his RIGHT.

How can that be?

The perpetrators of the switch SCREWED UP BIG TIME

by not selecting a double whose hair parted on his LEFT.

Comparisons of OLDER 60's, 70's, maybe 80's PICTURES will

PROVE TO ANYONE that the two men are NOT the same.

I did notice that on the famous David Letterman interview

that the aging "Paul" has his hair parted BACK on his LEFT.

This could easily be an attempt to rectify their screw up.

Maybe a "makeup" artist could force his hair to appear to

part BACK ON THE LEFT SIDE?

BUT WE MUST GO BACK TO THE PHOTO COMPARISONS OF "PAUL" IN

THE EARLY YEARS WHEN IT WAS OBVIOUS THAT AFTER 1967 "PAUL'S"

HAIR MAGICALLY SWITCHED FROM HIS LEFT SIDE TO HIS RIGHT.

If you are SINCERELY interested in the TRUTH, look no

further than photo comparisons of the early hair "parts".

IT WILL BECOME ABSOLUTELY 100% POSITIVE TO ANYONE WHO DOES

A LITTLE RESEARCH (DO IT YOURSELF), THAT THE "PAUL" OF

1968 AND BEYOND IS NOT THE REAL PAUL MCCARTNEY OF 1967 AND

THE YEARS PRIOR TO 1967.

CASE CLOSED!

You don't know that he died. He was just replaced.

Actually, it is probably a very good bet that none of them are dead.

Nah..
I can tell by the way he plays and sings.. body movements.
I was 10 years old in '66 and a working musician..
Also, as a bassist/guitarist.. I studied his playing, closely..
Same dude I watched live on Ed Sullivan..

First of all: the current day Paul McCartney is the same as the one that has always been in the Beatles, and the guy that was born with that name. Simple.

But second:
A weak aspect of almost all conspiracy-theories on GLP. The 'why' question. A question most people who believe in these kind of conspiracies ain't able to answer.

Too put it simple: WHY would the beatles continue with a fake-Paul when the 'first' had died? Shouldn't it be ore easy and logical to tell that Paul had died, and that the Beatles would disband or go on without him?

WHY would the Beatles continue with a 'fake Paul'? whats the use? why lie about it? what's the bigger / satanic / illuminati scheme around it?

As long as you aint able to answer those logical questions, and use your common sense, any debate about 'fake paul' is simply illogical and farfetched.

That 'why'-question / the lack of logical / rational motive, is the major downfall of most conspiracy-theories, and the reason why I can't take people defending these kind of theories seriously.

Call me sheeple, call me a shill...but as long as many of you keep reasoning in such a twisted way, the majority of the people you call 'sheeple' have more insight and common sense then many of you.

lying queer

The Horror, The Horror

I remember looking this up a few months ago and finding a few good websites about the idea. If it is false there's alot of things that say otherwise.

Alot of their later songs do sound weird and in a way are creepy especially their Strawberry Fields Forever song. But after hearing this and looking into it more they just get more creepy.

Last Edited by BAD WOLF on 11/09/2012 07:59 PM

I didn't read all 20 pages, but I have a question I hope someone could ancwer. If Paul was replaced, wouldn't his wife Linda Eastman have noticed, and objected?

I always thought his choice of second wife was odd, that strange amputee woman.

To find out 'WHY' - as with everything....especially 'conspiracies'....follow the money!!

No OTHER BAND EVER would stop touring after just 4 years - especially as they had just gained HUGE WORLDWIDE RECOGNITION....(Normally bands continue touring for decades after gaining global notoriety after a mere year!)

Now THAT certainly makes me question WHY!

Only logical reasoning points to something happening that seriously impeded continuing with live performances...like ...perhaps...one of them died!

Learn about body languange...i mean seriously research it and then re-watch the documentary and you'll see it with new eyes.


After 30 odd yrs of thinking paul was paul....i now realise the truth. It's glaringly obvious!

'Those with eyes to see'...

RIP Paul ...who died today, a long time ago...

When Paul "died" in 1966 he was dating actress Jane Asher, and I believe they may have even been engaged. They were quite the celebrity couple. Shortly after the introduction of "Faul" [if you believe it, that is] they broke up and "Faul" was dating Linda Eastman [who is Jewish].

Two things spring to mind here.

The first is it could be true that due to the huge amounts of money being generated by the Beatlemania wave sweeping the western world that Paul died and was replaced. If only to keep the cash flowing. Yet, look at the Elvis industry.

The Beatles were huge, so yeah it is possible??? But think Elvis.

Secondly, to find a gifted left hander who has a similar voice, manerisms and looks, irrespective of plastic surgery, hair transplanting etc is really stretching it.

I've known many people to change abruptly after serious accidents and think this is more than likely then case.

Not to get in the way of a juicy web urban legend conspiracy, of course!

If you play it backwards it says "I'm very bored."

nothing happened, my friends. nothing.