Darwin's THEORY is so dang STUPID a childhood riddle can SCREW it UP!

when i was a little kid being taught darwin crap in elementary school... i came home and asked my dad how come there weren't any half monkey half humans around? where are all the semi evolved species? ... why are there not all kinds of semi evolved species in all kinds of various states of "evolution"?

Pa didn't really have a good answer.

Evolution is a lie from the pit of hell designed to buttress the new world satanic global order where only the fittest (in their eyes) will survive ...

Darwin was a chump; which is a little lower than a chimp.

I'm not a bible-tard either and you're right of course...you don't get something from nothing...even if you believe in evolution you have to ask where all the stuff came from to make life...it's only logical to believe in a creator...

So if God is, then other things can just be then.

Ah, a teenaged poor little dumb fucker.

stuppid??? never heard of that word , and you call darwin stupid , the chicken came first Idiot

The point is that Darwin says something came out of nothing.

God Called those things that are not as though they wereand said LET THERE BE , and there was.

That is unacceptable and foolish but, Darwin, a man who is rotting in the earth(as we speak like all the other dead scientist) his "story" is acceptable, no matter how foolish it sounds?

The real question is WHO is the creator? Even if it was some form of extraterrestrial life, then that means if you go back far enough into the depths of time and space there is either some kind giant life giving being or structure out there, OR an interdeminsial being, OR a "god" of some kind.

Makes you think.

Like I said, your mum wasn't complaining. She likes 'em young, and smarter than you.

The same reason monkeys and apes arent evolving to be humans any,more I guess

Yep. God said let there be fish in the sea, animals on the land and seed bearing fruit and there was ...

Darwin said it all crawled out of nowhere starting with (Look mom no hands or feet) so whats the difference it's all a stretch that requires faith to believe it.

What cracks me up is how many people today claim evolution is a fact when even Darwin HIMSELF said it was only a theory and couldn't prove it with any certainty.

Those who side with Darwin are just afraid to admit there is a Supreme Creator God because THAT would mean they would have to answer to Him one day. You can't accept that fact and continue to live a morally deprived lifestyle if you knew there would be consequences.

So, by all means, Creationists, be gentle with the Evolutionists. Their egos are pretty fragile and unless they realize just how ridiculous their lame theory is before it's too late, they are going to have to come up with a valid excuse for why they fell for it in the first place.

That being said, my money is definitely on THE CHICKEN!

God Bless!

Last Edited by ^Watcher^ on 11/20/2010 12:02 PM

Because they never did, that's why. Kind after kind. Otherwise we would be popping out fins here and there just for old times sake.

Energy, then atoms, then complex molecules, then single celled bacteria, etc.

a lot of people who say "dang" don't believe in science

To have an apposing view on a theory like evolution you need to have all your facts on the table, and fully understand evolution. First of all life isn't "Crawling out of the Ocean" everyday because the conditions on the planet are different now than they were then. But that still doesn't answer the intrinsic question. Proteins do not spontaneously animate in ANY given condition. That has been proven through years of scientific testing and theory, and in turn throws the entire theory of evolution into question.

Darwin really "put the cart before the horse" when he came up with his theory.

Again let facts speak here. Evolution can not fuse a chromosome. Evolution can create HYBRIDS but that is it. To fuse a chromosome one is changing the structure of its DNA and this is impossible thru this process. Hybridization is a very real trait of evolution and this is what Darwin has proven. If you take to diferent species that are from the same genus in some cases you can create a hybrid.(HYBRID IS SOME OF BOTH OF THE TRAITS PUT TOGETHER IN NEW SPECIES) However to say that we can not alter dna is ridiculous. It is common info that we can. So if we can alter DNA in our current state than WHY is it so hard to think that we were not created. LOOK IT UP PEOPLE THIS EVOLUTION THING IS A LIE < ONE BIG COVER UP.

I believe in God, but it doesn't impact my belief in how we got here or how the chicken or the egg got here.

I don't believe in Darwinian evolution because it is an incorrect explanation. It's not even close to being correct.

I believe in the theory "Hierarchic Organization" developed by Emanuel Revici, M.D.

He wrote about it in his 783-page book Research in Physiopathology As Basis For Guided Chemotherapy with special application to cancer. The book is out of print.

It is also discussed in the book The Doctor Who Cures Cancer.

Last Edited by AwthrAwthr on 11/20/2010 12:20 PM

Why is it so hard to believe that the Creator has not been with us the whole time, speaking to us from the place we call the spirit realm?

In dreams, imaginations, ideas; through our creativity, using inspired thought, projecting pictures upon the screen of our mind, as we write them down, paint them, verse them

.. wisdom that have lasted through the ages: our canvas has been rock, and leather, cave walls, and pristine chapels that have been built in the feeble attempt to describe the glory (unfathomable personage) of the God we have felt in our hearts ...

man made attempts to describe this power; who caresses his beloved creation in their dreams. Who sent a representation of himself from another dimension to show the way more perfectly ... they called him the prince of Peace ... and we have a message that he left with us, that has remained for 2000 years. (Science cannot comprehend this?) Of all the Galaxies in the universe that science has discovered, they cannot believe that Christ could have been a contact? That there are other "contacts" that mean us evil, and have been at work to devise a revolt against the one true parent of all that we are?

The message-

" I AM said I will be back, and you will see "NEw Jerusalem coming out of heaven like a bride adorned for her husband". (The place where peace is taught.) (Definition of Jerusalem). Will we be visited by a craft from the universe 1500 miles long/wide and tall?


"And then I saw a new heaven and an new earth for the former heaven and earth was no more ... Is this so out of the reach of science ... it can't be understood?!!

Last Edited by OceanRiver on 11/20/2010 12:47 PM

Oh really? But the ones who say f@#%k You Motherf%&#%king creationists are your representation of what is considered a scientist? Science reinforced my belief in a Creator. Darwinism is not true science. The best scientists believe in intelligent design.

Yikes, recorded history is barely long enough to even witness evolution.. we are discovering hundreds of new species in the ocean every year. Is that a result of evolution? Probably not.. but they definitely evolved from some other species due to environmental demands.

I personally can't wait until we discover life on other planets, so we can finally put this religious crap to rest and get on with progress.

Excellent...

You cannot prove that there is an uninterrupted continuum of links that carry each one of these items into what is called beast or man. Darwin who had less to work with than science has said, with out the missing links his theory would always be just a theory.

YET, that theory is taught in schools as truth and you swallowed the lie, BECAUSE you have not been given a comprehensive representation of any alternate facts in your public education. BECAUSE all other theories or IDEAS are more or less banned, in public schools; teachers in universities and colleges are reprimanded severely if they attempt to offer intelligent design as a study to examine.

Last Edited by OceanRiver on 11/20/2010 01:26 PM

Ermmm egg?

Just the drivel you would expect from someone who can't spell stupid. As for what came first the chicken or the egg,
obviously the chicken as eggs are to immature to come.

I believe his theories of evolution could coexist with a creation type of scenario.Why not anyway I thought Darwin changed his mind on some things like God later in life even to the point of believing.

I hate to tell you this, buddy, but, ah, the evolutionists don't have a firm grasp of Darwinism cause its a bunch of bull shit made up by the people who run this world to get all you peon's to believe your uncle is a monkey.

And you do...

Don't stop there.

Why are we not seeing evolution in nature every day?

Why are there no missing links in the fossil record when there should be millions of em?

Actually, its mathmatically impossible for life to create itself out of nothing.

That would be you...