TSA lacks evidence

It's not easy to get a pin around here.

The current airport security premise seems to be 'guilty until proven innocent.'

Guilty of what? Based on what evidence or probable cause?

The TSA, lacks legal justification for their actions.

. .

True.

.

Standing is the same wherever you go, the important elements are (1) the violation of a right; and (2) injury. The only "authority" one should need is to look at the Declaration of Independence for the only reason for the establishment of an American government:


"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."

Terrorists come in all shapes and sizes.



Did you know that the first aircraft hijacking was carried out by zionist Jews?

[link to www.israelforum.com]

Sorry, but the ones that attacked us, were all middle eastern muslims.

Sorry, but you are completely wrong.

The ones who attacked us were in our government and their friends. PNAC, Cheney & Bush, a few Saudi investors, military brass in the Pentagon, and others.

Get up to speed. 911 was an inside job. Rove told me they were going to do it in 1972.

Well, then would just further make the case of no probable cause, wouldn't it?

TSA is clearly violating Americans 4th amendment rights. Protection from unlawful search and seizures. Doesn't the TSA require a warrant to do that kind of a search?

Any agent of government does, and they need probable cause to get one issued.