Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,213 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 414,330
Pageviews Today: 551,105Threads Today: 98Posts Today: 2,583
05:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)

 
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 2125973
United States
10/04/2011 05:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Hey Curve, have you commited the ec characters and their meaning to memory yet? I've made flash cards and I understand the characters as an input/ output, the associated sound, image and meaning. Do you have any recommendations beyond finding associations throughout the day to practice when idle?
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 2125973
United States
10/04/2011 05:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Chaol, is it inappropriate to use strait vertical and horizontal lines with right angles instead of the jagged lines like in -s-p? Would a straight line with appropriately placed "boxes" suffice?


Thanks again.

Edit- I assume it would be, because it is mostly for personal use.

Last Edited by MutantMessiah on 10/04/2011 06:07 PM
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
curve

User ID: 866935
Australia
10/04/2011 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Chaol, is it inappropriate to use strait vertical and horizontal lines with right angles instead of the jagged lines like in -s-p? Would a straight line with appropriately placed "boxes" suffice?


Thanks again.

Edit- I assume it would be, because it is mostly for personal use.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah




I was wondering the same thing, but came to the conclusion that the zig-zagging was an important part of mind mapping/reprogramming/shaping.

Also, I am teaching my kids Ec as I learn (assist others and you will be assisted), and am wondering if you could please provide a simple definition and some examples of their use for the symbols -PL (kata) and -P-L (booba).
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 2125973
United States
10/04/2011 07:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Chaol, is it inappropriate to use strait vertical and horizontal lines with right angles instead of the jagged lines like in -s-p? Would a straight line with appropriately placed "boxes" suffice?


Thanks again.

Edit- I assume it would be, because it is mostly for personal use.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah




I was wondering the same thing, but came to the conclusion that the zig-zagging was an important part of mind mapping/reprogramming/shaping.

Also, I am teaching my kids Ec as I learn (assist others and you will be assisted), and am wondering if you could please provide a simple definition and some examples of their use for the symbols -PL (kata) and -P-L (booba).
 Quoting: curve


On one of Chaol's earlier posts in this thread he noted booba was "changing" and kata is "continuous"

You are probably asking for additional clarification, if so it would be nice to get some examples. I personally considered synonyms to clarify the terms inernally, but it would be nice to hear Chaol's interpretation.
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
tuuuuur

User ID: 2660672
Germany
10/04/2011 08:09 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Chaol, is it inappropriate to use strait vertical and horizontal lines with right angles instead of the jagged lines like in -s-p? Would a straight line with appropriately placed "boxes" suffice?


Thanks again.

Edit- I assume it would be, because it is mostly for personal use.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah




I was wondering the same thing, but came to the conclusion that the zig-zagging was an important part of mind mapping/reprogramming/shaping.

Also, I am teaching my kids Ec as I learn (assist others and you will be assisted), and am wondering if you could please provide a simple definition and some examples of their use for the symbols -PL (kata) and -P-L (booba).
 Quoting: curve


On one of Chaol's earlier posts in this thread he noted booba was "changing" and kata is "continuous"

You are probably asking for additional clarification, if so it would be nice to get some examples. I personally considered synonyms to clarify the terms inernally, but it would be nice to hear Chaol's interpretation.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah


I marvel at how you guys even can learn this stuff... let alone use it. To me it is mathematical gibberish (but maybe not being a native english speaker doesn't help reading the instructions).
curve

User ID: 2286610
Australia
10/04/2011 08:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Tuur...I am really just beginning to familiarise myself with the symbols and their pronunciations. I do want to reassure you that it is not neccessarily mathematical at all, although it can be applied that way. I understand the extra challenge you face being that English is your second language. Why not use the Genius to assist you in understanding Ec as it was suggested to me earlier in this thread?
curve

User ID: 2286610
Australia
10/04/2011 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
MM...yes, I was just hoping for further clarification regarding the definitions of continuous and changing. In terms I could describe to my children (and myself).
curve

User ID: 2286610
Australia
10/04/2011 08:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Anyone have any thoughts on Chaol linking us to the part of the thread where he explains a little about DNA?

Homework?
curve

User ID: 2286610
Australia
10/04/2011 08:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
I forgot to add this question to an earlier post of mine. Chaol, is it important to physically write the Ec icons in order beginning with input, ending with output?
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 1524898
United States
10/04/2011 08:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Chaol, is it inappropriate to use strait vertical and horizontal lines with right angles instead of the jagged lines like in -s-p? Would a straight line with appropriately placed "boxes" suffice?


Thanks again.

Edit- I assume it would be, because it is mostly for personal use.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah




I was wondering the same thing, but came to the conclusion that the zig-zagging was an important part of mind mapping/reprogramming/shaping.

Also, I am teaching my kids Ec as I learn (assist others and you will be assisted), and am wondering if you could please provide a simple definition and some examples of their use for the symbols -PL (kata) and -P-L (booba).
 Quoting: curve


On one of Chaol's earlier posts in this thread he noted booba was "changing" and kata is "continuous"

You are probably asking for additional clarification, if so it would be nice to get some examples. I personally considered synonyms to clarify the terms inernally, but it would be nice to hear Chaol's interpretation.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah


I marvel at how you guys even can learn this stuff... let alone use it. To me it is mathematical gibberish (but maybe not being a native english speaker doesn't help reading the instructions).
 Quoting: tuuuuur


It is most important to understand that everything is YOUR perspective, there is nothing independent of your perspective. Once you "feel" or "believe" that, then you can know that some things are close to you (in reality, time, distance) and some things are distant from you (in reality, time, distance).

Then it is important to understand all that you perceive can be understood (internally, via perspective) as logic(rules, guidelines, law, etc), possibility(paths for logic to follow, potential, space, etc), interaction(relationships or possibilities with logic/logic with possibilities) or symbol(representation, definition, names, paradigms, etc.

Then you can map them out with logic to your left, possibility beneath you, interaction to your right and symbol above you.

Then you can choose to separate logic, possibility, interaction and symbol each into High(strong, better, more than it's norm), Neutral(normal, average, what you'd expect) and Low(less than normal, weak, worse) versions of themself.

Then you can create an input and output, using high, neutral or low values of logic, possibility, interaction and symbol to begin to notice the more subtle aspects of your reality that you may or may not have previously defined. It's kind of like metaphor.

Chaol has us map it out on a chart, then extract the characters and assign a visual(the character), auditory(the internal/external sound) to them, to better remember the meaning and allow your mind to quickly notice it as it appears around you.


I may have been a little out of line, but I am finding as I work to memorize EC, I perceive a kinesthetic(feeling) aspect to them as well with the left of me(my perspective), below me, right of me, above me thing. I hope to learn this is a bad idea before I have to unlearn it.

I hope this helps.
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 1524898
United States
10/04/2011 09:03 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
I forgot to add this question to an earlier post of mine. Chaol, is it important to physically write the Ec icons in order beginning with input, ending with output?
 Quoting: curve


I started doing that, assuming that it must be that way, but ya, I was wondering the same thing. It feels awkward, having learned to write in english, but I find it makes more sense (to me) to do it from input to output instead of concerning myself with left and right, I associate them with logic and interaction respectively. (not that I've written all that much ec, when I do, I haven't bothered with the boxes and do little curls in the direction the box should be, I am probably all kinds of wrong)

Last Edited by MutantMessiah on 10/04/2011 09:04 PM
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 1524898
United States
10/04/2011 09:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Anyone have any thoughts on Chaol linking us to the part of the thread where he explains a little about DNA?

Homework?
 Quoting: curve


It would be nice to be that far along, so that I could do more than speculate. Perhaps he is attempting at giving us a carrot on a stick(what would that concept be? Meaningful symbol, with low possibility? so like: +S-P? Hmm.. perspective)

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

DNA consists of 4 symbols A, C, G and T. They have to represent logic, possibility, interaction and symbol at some level. I suppose one day I should read up on it.

Last Edited by MutantMessiah on 10/04/2011 09:14 PM
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
curve

User ID: 2286610
Australia
10/04/2011 09:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
I suppose I will have to bring DNA closer to my perspective also...though I hesitate to learn anything that I know I will be 'unlearning' down the track.


By the way MM, I continue to enjoy your explanations. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 1524898
United States
10/04/2011 09:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
I suppose I will have to bring DNA closer to my perspective also...though I hesitate to learn anything that I know I will be 'unlearning' down the track.


By the way MM, I continue to enjoy your explanations. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
 Quoting: curve


I am really glad to talk (interact) with someone who is looking to understand the same stuff (symbols) I am. Thank you Curve, I look forward to hearing more of your thoughts as well.

Feel like classmates.

dasbier
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
curve

User ID: 2286610
Australia
10/04/2011 10:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
ec1is2easy3@hotmail.com

I have created an email address for those that wish to communicate further outside of this thread. All welcome.
curve

User ID: 2286610
Australia
10/04/2011 10:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
I suppose I will have to bring DNA closer to my perspective also...though I hesitate to learn anything that I know I will be 'unlearning' down the track.


By the way MM, I continue to enjoy your explanations. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
 Quoting: curve


I am really glad to talk (interact) with someone who is looking to understand the same stuff (symbols) I am. Thank you Curve, I look forward to hearing more of your thoughts as well.

Feel like classmates.

dasbier
 Quoting: MutantMessiah



Exactly how I feel. Hence the email.
Chaol (OP)

User ID: 2690124
Thailand
10/05/2011 06:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Thank you chaol.

I see a lot of posters as having heavily preconceived (learned, infected, whatever...) notions which do not enmeshen well with what you are teaching. When did all this ascension dimension vibration stuff stop being an analogy and start being taken as realogy?
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Perhaps not much difference between one kind of representation and an other kind.

Here is how I see what you are describing (and I will end with one question)

Maybe the example of a TV set is suitable? One TV, many channels.

I do not see you as telling people how they must interpret what they see on a particular channel (whatever channel they may be on), but rather how to first realize that there are other channels, and how to select them. The easiest way at this stage is to select the next channel up or down (the most logically relative/relevant, or the most energy efficient change), although it is possible to select the exact channel you want, similar to entering say "42" instead of having 30 steps from channel 12, which you may be on currently.

Here's the kicker... on each channel, it is the same actors.
The character in the show is not the actor. Your lamp is not your car, although it may be the same actor playing both parts and therefore you can influence one via the other. Each 'actor' is a relationship within your perception which then reflects into your current rendering of reality. The underlying web of relationships is rendered in many ways... your workplace, your loungeroom, your dream, your family reunion....

YOUR PERCEPTION OF THE WEB OF RELATIONSHIPS WE CALL THE UNIVERSE IS RENDERED AS THE CURRENT MOMENT/SITUATION IN THE EASIEST POSSIBLE FASHION

 Quoting: hava 1515102


Yep. That'd be a fairly accurate analogy.

Ecsys lets you see past the rendering and look at the actual web of relationships, which allows you then to alter the relationships, which then allows you affect ALL OF YOUR SITUATIONS VIA ANY OTHER SITUATION as each situation IS A DIFFERENT RENDERING OF THE SAME TOTAL PERCEPTION-RELATIONSHIP-WEB which is YOU.

(switching to web analogy - spider web, not internet... I think)

 Quoting: hava 1515102


Yep.

We are all different spots on the web, that is why there is both a YOU and not a YOU. You are a viewpoint, not an object. You are an individual viewpoint, not an individual. We are all one web, but different points on it. Sometimes we change the connections to our corner of the web so much that we can't see other parts of the web (WHICH IS WHERE CHAOL COMES FROM) ... Chaol is teaching us how to edit our web so we can connect to the parts that we want to (and add our own sections of web)
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Yes! You got it!

(Although take out parenthesized last phrase.)

to cover the neuronics briefly (this is probably a shallow understanding but may be the intermediate step some need to understand chaol himself) our brains are hardware running language software, eg english.

 Quoting: hava 1515102


A few languages, but English (or whatever natural language comes naturally to you) has great influence over how we use our brains and how we think, what we think about, etc.

English is ok. Not great, it is like our bodies, pretty efficient at a lot of stuff but contains a lot of archaic ideas, hanger-ons from the past. It has evolved to communicate pretty well with other humans. English itself could be said to be intelligent and a lifeform, I think Chaol has already touched on that briefly. Here's the catch: ENGLISH IS NOT THE MOST EFFICIENT BRAIN LANGUAGE. Here's the next catch.. WE SEE AND RELATE TO OUR REALITY IN ENGLISH (of course substitute english for whatever other language you want... and you can also see how a chinese speaker could think COMPLETELY differently from how you do).

 Quoting: hava 1515102


It is good for the job but now that there are things to consider (less relative to what English & c. can describe) we need different ways of conceptualizing it.

To make another analogy, we are highly skilled in painting with only 3 colours. Imagine if we had 100 colours... 1000 colours... 10000 colours...

 Quoting: hava 1515102


More important than the number of colors is how useful each color is.

It could be, for example, that 4 colors is much more useful than 4 billion colors. Especially if those 4 colors can be used in a seemingly endless variety of ways.

Chaol is trying to give us a big box of paints, which will let us paint exponentially better with some practice.
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Or, the "basic elements" from which all other elements arise.

Now to my question, and thanks for your patience if you made it this far Chaol.

When using the genius system and creating a new symbol (or node on the web of relationships) and then letting it interact (build links/relationships into the existing web) I can see what is happening.

Question: How is the temporary symbol swapped for the desired representation? While the temporary symbol is interacting in your world isn't it actually... using up the space of the symbol so to speak? Wouldn't it have to be removed after a while to allow the DESIRED symbol to be rendered in its place?

 Quoting: hava 1515102


They are the same.

Each thing or relationship in our perspective is a temporary symbol. (Temporary because our perspective does not hang on to it.)

I'm having difficulty wording this although I believe you will know what I mean... You create a placeholder/analogous symbol which represents something else and it's relationships in your perception... while ever this placeholder is interacting with your reality doesn't this mean that it is already there? Wouldn't you have to remove/delete the placeholder to allow the desired representation to 'manifest'.

 Quoting: hava 1515102


It is already there because the physical representation of the thing is the symbol itself.

If you represented your own spaceship as 10-layer stack of mango wood, for example, the symbol would be your spaceship.

There would be no need for the spaceship of your fantasy (that you could climb into) to exist because it exists all ready.

The point is to make one symbol relative to an other symbol. (That is why we create symbols.. to form a logical pathway.)

And what point does the 'swap' take place? Or is it not a swap and it

Eg. You want to grow an extra head, so you buy an extra hat for the possible head and then throw it in the air once a day like you would if you were super happy with two heads and hang it on your hat rack with your hat for head number 1.... Is the hat itself the representation or are you ... hang on i think i've answered my own question.

 Quoting: hava 1515102


The hat is the head, as far as it needs to exist (all things considered).

The Law of 5/2 (Energy Perspective) implies that no energy is wasted.

The 'future' spaceship is "contained" in the wooden spaceship.

Some may call it a holographic universe, but it's really just saving energy when there's no need for it to exist in all perspectives as the same thing.

It is ready just when it needs to be.

We create the relationships, and the thing is there. The thing IS the relationships.
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Yes, because one thing must be relative to an other thing in order to exist.

We know each thing from something else.

(The thing is not as real as the relationship, you could say.)

You are building a hole in a wall by shaping the universe around the hole.
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Or, "pretending" that the hole is there everywhere else.

Some would say, acting as if. (Which may also create the necessary field relationships.)

Each thing is a representation/reflection/focus of EVERYTHING else.
 Quoting: hava 1515102


One thing, a seemingly infinite expression when it cannot be contained in any one perception.

It is recursive in this way because there is actually only one thing.

But it needs to be two in order to exist.

One thing cannot exist without being relative to something else.

Which explains how any thing is a view point just like us.

We are each the negative shape of the universe around us.

Which makes us each the universe from a different viewpoint.
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Yep.

We are one, but we are many.

A cup is the universe from one perspective, "I" am the universe from another.
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Again, the planets, Earth, galaxies, neighbors in the universe do not need to exist until you perceive them.

Planets do not exist but in the imagination. When you look at one through a telescope then a new kind of relationship is made. But there is no atmosphere in this perception, and it need not exist until you go there and interact with it.

The Law of Energy Perspective is symbol (5) without possibility (2) which comes alive only through interaction (3).

Without interaction with the representation, it exists only as a possibility (i.e., does not exist).

By looking at a situation or object or WHATEVER I am looking at the universe pressing in on all sides, with the most relevant things the closest. Distance is not distance... it is a measure of how related something is to a viewpoint... time is the measure of change of a viewpoint or idea... a car doesn't move you anywhere, it changes your point of view (intersection of relationships) relative to all other points of view at a controlled speed... the further you travel the more you have changed your perception... WHICH MEANS YOU CAN NEVER REALLY GET BACK TO WHERE YOU STARTED...EVEN WHEN YOU GO TO THE SHOP...HAHA
 Quoting: hava 1515102


You got it! I'm impressed :)

Oh oh... even sitting on a lounge chair you are 'travelling'!
 Quoting: hava 1515102


Yes. And that is what Einstein had been working on for many years.

Perhaps one day we'll find the scribbles.

My brain is melting.

Thank you.

Oh, and how do I decide how to map something like a cat into Ecsys? Are their no right or wrong answers? I would say a cat is ... -L-I. I can't understand it's logic and I don't interact with it much. Different viewpoints. Which is why I guess I see it as a cat and not as a human.

Is the game and software still coming along? I would love to help.
 Quoting: hava 1515102


In Ec, there is no right or wrong. There is only perspective.

If you think cats are evil then you'd map it out as such.

You can say "cat" in English but does the person to whom you are speaking really know how you feel?

When you exercise the expression in Ec the person may know that you're talking about something 'feline' and 'evil' for example. They'd usually use their own perspective about what it is.

That's the beauty of Ec. By communicating in it you form a tremendous amount of relationships and, thus, more things become relative. (Thus, expansion of what you'd call intelligence and lots of other fun stuff.)

However, it may be hard to conceptualize how a word in Ec can have both standard definitions and a more nebulous definition.

But actually, in English you do it all the time in a somewhat different way. (Ever pick up on social queues? Maybe a friend's "yes" has a deeper meaning, for example.)

Hope this helps :)
Advaita Vedantist

User ID: 1255103
United States
10/05/2011 06:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
In the real world there is neither physicality nor lack of it.
I am like the space which permeates all objects, and is yet undefiled. I am of the nature of Absolute Consciousness. I can now cognize my Reality to be no other than That.

Jnana Vashistha
Chaol (OP)

User ID: 2690124
Thailand
10/05/2011 06:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
OP I have a question for you is there any way to contact you?
I don't want to share it here, but I will if I have to. Thought I'd ask first, though.
 Quoting: Paysimaginaire


Hi.

Try to send me a message to my message box.

I may direct you back to this forum so everyone can learn from it, but you can still try.
Chaol (OP)

User ID: 2690124
Thailand
10/05/2011 06:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Its like the movie "GAMER". They will wait until an army of people have this new transmitters in their bodies and then press a button that activates a code causing everyone to COMPLETELY FUCKING LOSE IT! Not cool. Fuck technology unless its Green and Human/Earth Friendly....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1520365


Green is what's "killing" us, not the other way around.

I know it doesn't seem like it, though.
Chaol (OP)

User ID: 2690124
Thailand
10/05/2011 06:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
You live in a non-physical reality and yet you found a way to get access to an internet computer and tell us all this.
 Quoting: AnniJust


Interesting assumptions but my reality is physical.

Yes, I have a special message. And it's only $19.95 and starts with Anand.
Chaol (OP)

User ID: 2690124
Thailand
10/05/2011 06:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Doubt alone about the value of the material keeps certain people from trying to figure it out. I don't want to give anyone an "aha" moment with regards to DNA at this time, so I left it our for now.
[snips]
 Quoting: Chaol


from [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

This could be applied to neuronics as well as DNA.

I will answer all questions. I have not forgotten.
 Quoting: Chaol


Chaol, thank you for working with us and being so patient.

Before I came across your teachings, i had considered myself very "aware" but i was seeking a better way to describe my perspective to others. My goal has been to show others (those most relative to me) that we choose how we think, feel, react and believe. I've only been interacting with your material for two weeks and my "waking" life has changed substantially. I find it exponentially easier to communicate my perspective to others now. I'm studying the hell out of ec, using it as much as possible, I am noticing the difference. I have, for a while, noticed subtle metaphor in all things, but with ec there is now a sound and a definition assigned. Thanks again. I look forward to mastering ec and The Genius.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah


I'm glad to hear that :)

Good luck in your endeavors. Should you need some assistance, please reply here.

Thanks.
Chaol (OP)

User ID: 2690124
Thailand
10/05/2011 06:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Chaol, is it 'illegal' to use the number icons as Ec word strings?
 Quoting: curve


Not illegal. The numbers work as words, too.
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 1524898
United States
10/05/2011 09:53 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Doubt alone about the value of the material keeps certain people from trying to figure it out. I don't want to give anyone an "aha" moment with regards to DNA at this time, so I left it our for now.
[snips]
 Quoting: Chaol


from [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

This could be applied to neuronics as well as DNA.

I will answer all questions. I have not forgotten.
 Quoting: Chaol


Chaol, thank you for working with us and being so patient.

Before I came across your teachings, i had considered myself very "aware" but i was seeking a better way to describe my perspective to others. My goal has been to show others (those most relative to me) that we choose how we think, feel, react and believe. I've only been interacting with your material for two weeks and my "waking" life has changed substantially. I find it exponentially easier to communicate my perspective to others now. I'm studying the hell out of ec, using it as much as possible, I am noticing the difference. I have, for a while, noticed subtle metaphor in all things, but with ec there is now a sound and a definition assigned. Thanks again. I look forward to mastering ec and The Genius.
 Quoting: MutantMessiah


I'm glad to hear that :)

Good luck in your endeavors. Should you need some assistance, please reply here.

Thanks.
 Quoting: Chaol


In that case, I've asked you this in your other thread, but it seems more appropriate here:

"Flash cards help to memorize EC, I understand the concept of an input and an output but I haven't quite grasped the input/output in relation to the elements. I've just been guessing and assuming I am right."

"Could you (Chaol) or anyone else with a better grasp, help me to better understand (adjust my perspective) to see what exactly we mean in EC when we say input and output? How does that relate to the high/neutral/low aspects of each element and why/how it applies to concepts?

I assume that "TA"(like in taboo) for instance -P +L ec#9 is something akin to, well I dunno. This is where I am lost. I can guess, and if I do it'd be something like the actual word "Taboo", relative to me, something that is taboo (to me) is something I would personally consider irrational or inappropriate for me to do therefore a low possibility from my perspective that I'd consider it close to me? High logic because it's easy to define something as taboo, or unaccepted? Lol, I have no clue, like I said guessing... could use a little guidance."
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?
curve

User ID: 1557967
Australia
10/05/2011 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Chaol, is it 'illegal' to use the number icons as Ec word strings?
 Quoting: curve


Not illegal. The numbers work as words, too.
 Quoting: Chaol


Thank you.


Couldn't sleep, too noisy from all the pennies dropping.

EC by osmosis. Wow, it is mind expanding, and I have only caught a glimpse through binoculars of the tip of this iceberg.

Still asking some fairly rudimentary questions while I begin to assimilate the basics. Interacting/experimenting with the language of Ec I think has been the most effective method for myself to gain an understanding of the code of Ecsys and therefore the genius. Hmm maybe it has really kinda been simultaneous. I can tend to do things ass about face though.


Ok, back to Ec.

Is the input of an icon of 'greater' relevance/value/meaning than the output?

Assuming such, when we create a string of icons, would it be logical to restrict the use of each neuronic (S,I,P,L) only once per string, rather than repeat them (if our perception could be expressed adequately)? And to write them in order beginning S through L?

Apologies if I am repeating questions.

(correction)

Last Edited by curve on 10/07/2011 03:50 AM
curve

User ID: 1557967
Australia
10/05/2011 10:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Was there a rule which assigned the numbers of Ec a certain icon? Say one which related to frequencies or the like (just an example).

Or am I missing the obvious definition of the icons?

(correction)

Last Edited by curve on 10/07/2011 03:44 AM
curve

User ID: 1557967
Australia
10/05/2011 10:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
deleting multiple post

Last Edited by curve on 10/07/2011 03:45 AM
curve

User ID: 2372035
Australia
10/05/2011 10:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
Me again...is there any reason we would translate only the first 30 most popular English words into single icon expressions when there are 54 available (after subtracting 10 for numbers, and 2 for kata and booba)?


Thanks again.


Shell.

(correction)

Last Edited by curve on 10/07/2011 03:48 AM
curve

User ID: 2372035
Australia
10/05/2011 10:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
deleted multiple post

Last Edited by curve on 10/07/2011 03:50 AM
MutantMessiah
Jesse

User ID: 2701639
United States
10/05/2011 10:55 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
I don't know how to edit my posts.

Need to do another correction, several posts above for clarification.

'Assuming such, when we create a string of icons, would it be logical to restrict the use of each 'leading' neuronic (S,I,P,L) only once per string, rather than repeat them (if our perception could be expressed adequately)? And to write them in order beginning S through L?'

Hope that makes better sense.
 Quoting: curve


I don't know how to edit my posts.

Need to do another correction, several posts above for clarification.

'Assuming such, when we create a string of icons, would it be logical to restrict the use of each 'leading' neuronic (S,I,P,L) only once per string, rather than repeat them (if our perception could be expressed adequately)? And to write them in order beginning S through L?'

Hope that makes better sense.
 Quoting: curve


You have an edit post hyperlink beneath where your avatar image/name is.
Maybe... you are all powerful... all knowing... forever present in all ways... you've chosen to forget... remember?

News