Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)

I am here.

Greetings Chaol .

I just finished reading this thread , and i am in the middle of the other one you have posted putting the pieces together everyday from the answers you post .

From the first moment i started to read of what you post my reality has started to change , to say an example when i want something badly on which i am physically attached i think "perspective" and that it is "irrelevant" to me it dissapears from my thoght :P , I feel like i finally tamed my mind into making a start for the manipulation of the perspective of my reality.

I am starting to understand the genius cause it has similarities with some other things i always had in my perspective.

But i still havent made any changes with it cause i still cant define what aspects of my reality i want to change .

To begin with,

I Think about making a huge polymer clay cane( Its a Cane like a sausage :P you bake it and becomes hard , they jewelriews and different stuff with it . ) with the symbol and divide it in many parts because thats the intention of the cane, so all would be the same and then i think about going everywhere and stick it with glue where people pass so they could interact with it just by observing it , is that a possibility?

I am only interacting with your perspective 3 days so i am at the start .

Waiting for you reply. Tony.

Hi. Answered on the other thread here [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Cool! Hi, Chaol!

Hi :)

Hey Chaol,


This is my first attempt at making a word with neumonics.


Let's see if I am grasping this...I have chosen to create a new word, one that combines the words physical and illusion...let us call it 'phylusion', cumbersome as it is, and (inadequately) define it as:- The false belief or perspective that things pertaining to matter and/or the body exist independently of our perception.


The reason for this, is I kinda thought it would be useful, and more economical (the path of least resistance) having one word for this perspective, rather than needing an entire sentence to define it every time we wish to express it.


I wonder also, if we could substitute 'phylusical' for the word 'physical' on as many occasions as we can, that way we have a constant and subtle reminder of the true nature of existance...hmmm, of course this approach could be applied to many other words, and help begin the reprogramming process.



ok, English - Ec


phylusion - 'duashep' or (+P-L -L+L -S-I)


How am I doing Choal?


Appreciate your thoughts as always,


Shell

Perhaps even,

phylusion - duawhyp or (+P-L -LL -S-I)

This is good.

But your first one in this statement: (+P-L -L+L -S-I) appears to be Tatat.

Also, your second one looks illegal (-L+L). +L-L would be ok, if it suits your purpose.

And make sure the third one is the correct pronunciation.

Beg my pardon, correction (+P-L +L-L -S-I), pronunciation tatatshep.


Have been thinking about how to represent hello, -S+P, K, was what made best sense to me. If I were trying to communicate with others in Ec, when out of context, how would we differ this neuricon from other words which utilised the same single icon? And how would we pronounce it?

Hello Chaol, nice to see you back. Any new updates for us?

Thread: Alien Technology Discovered by Robot Giza Pyramids City in A bottle Scientifically and trigonometrically possible

Thank you chaol.

I see a lot of posters as having heavily preconceived (learned, infected, whatever...) notions which do not enmeshen well with what you are teaching. When did all this ascension dimension vibration stuff stop being an analogy and start being taken as realogy?

Here is how I see what you are describing (and I will end with one question)

Maybe the example of a TV set is suitable? One TV, many channels.

I do not see you as telling people how they must interpret what they see on a particular channel (whatever channel they may be on), but rather how to first realize that there are other channels, and how to select them. The easiest way at this stage is to select the next channel up or down (the most logically relative/relevant, or the most energy efficient change), although it is possible to select the exact channel you want, similar to entering say "42" instead of having 30 steps from channel 12, which you may be on currently.

Here's the kicker... on each channel, it is the same actors.
The character in the show is not the actor. Your lamp is not your car, although it may be the same actor playing both parts and therefore you can influence one via the other. Each 'actor' is a relationship within your perception which then reflects into your current rendering of reality. The underlying web of relationships is rendered in many ways... your workplace, your loungeroom, your dream, your family reunion....

YOUR PERCEPTION OF THE WEB OF RELATIONSHIPS WE CALL THE UNIVERSE IS RENDERED AS THE CURRENT MOMENT/SITUATION IN THE EASIEST POSSIBLE FASHION

Ecsys lets you see past the rendering and look at the actual web of relationships, which allows you then to alter the relationships, which then allows you affect ALL OF YOUR SITUATIONS VIA ANY OTHER SITUATION as each situation IS A DIFFERENT RENDERING OF THE SAME TOTAL PERCEPTION-RELATIONSHIP-WEB which is YOU.

(switching to web analogy - spider web, not internet... I think)

We are all different spots on the web, that is why there is both a YOU and not a YOU. You are a viewpoint, not an object. You are an individual viewpoint, not an individual. We are all one web, but different points on it. Sometimes we change the connections to our corner of the web so much that we can't see other parts of the web (WHICH IS WHERE CHAOL COMES FROM) ... Chaol is teaching us how to edit our web so we can connect to the parts that we want to (and add our own sections of web)

to cover the neuronics briefly (this is probably a shallow understanding but may be the intermediate step some need to understand chaol himself) our brains are hardware running language software, eg english.

English is ok. Not great, it is like our bodies, pretty efficient at a lot of stuff but contains a lot of archaic ideas, hanger-ons from the past. It has evolved to communicate pretty well with other humans. English itself could be said to be intelligent and a lifeform, I think Chaol has already touched on that briefly. Here's the catch: ENGLISH IS NOT THE MOST EFFICIENT BRAIN LANGUAGE. Here's the next catch.. WE SEE AND RELATE TO OUR REALITY IN ENGLISH (of course substitute english for whatever other language you want... and you can also see how a chinese speaker could think COMPLETELY differently from how you do).

To make another analogy, we are highly skilled in painting with only 3 colours. Imagine if we had 100 colours... 1000 colours... 10000 colours...

Chaol is trying to give us a big box of paints, which will let us paint exponentially better with some practice.

Now to my question, and thanks for your patience if you made it this far Chaol.

When using the genius system and creating a new symbol (or node on the web of relationships) and then letting it interact (build links/relationships into the existing web) I can see what is happening.

Question: How is the temporary symbol swapped for the desired representation? While the temporary symbol is interacting in your world isn't it actually... using up the space of the symbol so to speak? Wouldn't it have to be removed after a while to allow the DESIRED symbol to be rendered in its place?

I'm having difficulty wording this although I believe you will know what I mean... You create a placeholder/analogous symbol which represents something else and it's relationships in your perception... while ever this placeholder is interacting with your reality doesn't this mean that it is already there? Wouldn't you have to remove/delete the placeholder to allow the desired representation to 'manifest'.

And what point does the 'swap' take place? Or is it not a swap and it

Eg. You want to grow an extra head, so you buy an extra hat for the possible head and then throw it in the air once a day like you would if you were super happy with two heads and hang it on your hat rack with your hat for head number 1.... Is the hat itself the representation or are you ... hang on i think i've answered my own question.

We create the relationships, and the thing is there. The thing IS the relationships.

You are building a hole in a wall by shaping the universe around the hole.

Each thing is a representation/reflection/focus of EVERYTHING else.

Which explains how any thing is a view point just like us.

We are each the negative shape of the universe around us.

Which makes us each the universe from a different viewpoint.

We are one, but we are many.

A cup is the universe from one perspective, "I" am the universe from another.

By looking at a situation or object or WHATEVER I am looking at the universe pressing in on all sides, with the most relevant things the closest. Distance is not distance... it is a measure of how related something is to a viewpoint... time is the measure of change of a viewpoint or idea... a car doesn't move you anywhere, it changes your point of view (intersection of relationships) relative to all other points of view at a controlled speed... the further you travel the more you have changed your perception... WHICH MEANS YOU CAN NEVER REALLY GET BACK TO WHERE YOU STARTED...EVEN WHEN YOU GO TO THE SHOP...HAHA

Oh oh... even sitting on a lounge chair you are 'travelling'!

My brain is melting.

Thank you.

Oh, and how do I decide how to map something like a cat into Ecsys? Are their no right or wrong answers? I would say a cat is ... -L-I. I can't understand it's logic and I don't interact with it much. Different viewpoints. Which is why I guess I see it as a cat and not as a human.

Is the game and software still coming along? I would love to help.

OP I have a question for you is there any way to contact you?
I don't want to share it here, but I will if I have to. Thought I'd ask first, though.

Thanks hava, I have enjoyed your perspective on neuronics, has definately helped me.

NWO Matrix Mush Minds....

lovely. Welcome to your snare.

explain further please

Amazing thread!


.

Its like the movie "GAMER". They will wait until an army of people have this new transmitters in their bodies and then press a button that activates a code causing everyone to COMPLETELY FUCKING LOSE IT! Not cool. Fuck technology unless its Green and Human/Earth Friendly....

[link to www.youtube.com]

Basically, we are not human.

"I" includes all these other life forms.

We think their thoughts and feel their feelings along with "ours".

The cells do not think of themcells as a single entity any more than your mouth does.

Your mouth has its own genome and would be considered 'conscious' but would not say "I" or "me".

Those terms (I, me) are our own ideas or interpretation of reality.

We perceive that which is most relative to us and say ."that is me".

The cells realize it is part of another whole (YOU) as much as realize that you are.



You are already non-physical.

Physicality does not actually exist.

But to answer your question, the "I" will still be there. It'll just be a different you. You'll still remember your childhood and your favorite drink.

The difference is that your reality won't take as long to adapt to your thoughts.

Your reality will be as you want it to be. (The entirety of your wants, not just what you want at a particular moment.)


Is this not what we think of as Heaven?

You live in a non-physical reality and yet you found a way to get access to an internet computer and tell us all this.

Yea some people. My version is different but this will enhance the human species i agree- however- the industrial revolution and many other things are seen to be "Enhancing" to our species but they ended up causing serious health defects and damaging the very planet that we live on. The planet is physical- AND non physical- As are WE. This has to be cherished. This new technology they want us to have in our bodies would take us into the dark age IMO. Rightnow we have the chance to enter a GOlden Age but i dont feel like typing out my theory on that one WAY too long lol...

A unhackable Language...

Last Edited by Dark Zen on 09/30/2011 09:15 PM

from [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

This could be applied to neuronics as well as DNA.

I will answer all questions. I have not forgotten.

Chaol, thank you for working with us and being so patient.

Before I came across your teachings, i had considered myself very "aware" but i was seeking a better way to describe my perspective to others. My goal has been to show others (those most relative to me) that we choose how we think, feel, react and believe. I've only been interacting with your material for two weeks and my "waking" life has changed substantially. I find it exponentially easier to communicate my perspective to others now. I'm studying the hell out of ec, using it as much as possible, I am noticing the difference. I have, for a while, noticed subtle metaphor in all things, but with ec there is now a sound and a definition assigned. Thanks again. I look forward to mastering ec and The Genius.

Chaol, is it 'illegal' to use the number icons as Ec word strings?

Is there a preferred order to Ec icon strings, for example:

using my earlier example, I have ordered it like so:

+P-L +L-L -S-I (tatashep)

is it preferable to order it beginning with symbol:

-S-I +P-L +L-L (ptatashe)? awkward pronunciation though


Also, using your example 'oo' from the Ecsys website, is this an Ec/X word from your reality? If so, is it one of the thirty most common words? If it is not, wouldn't it require at least one other icon?


'It is not necessary to learn all of the 66 icons in order to start thinking in EC. You can start with just one.



In our world, most of us generally would not say something like, "You are generous". Instead, we use a more open an engaging expression like, "I see you as generous".


Input: Box-before-line means it's high. Position is in "symbol". So, it's +S
Output: Line without box means it's neutral. Position is in "interaction". So, it's I.' Ecsys.org


[link to ecsys.org]


According to the following rule:

'1 icon is used for the ~30 most popular words in the English language.

2 icons are used for the next ~1,000 most popular words in the English language.

3 icons are used for the next ~1,000 to ~50,000 most popular words.

4 icons are used for all other words' Ecsys.org


Would you translate names from English to Ec as they are pronounced? Or, if they have a known meaning, create an icon pertaining to its definition? Is it necessary to denote pronouns in a particular way?

Thanks Chaol, I hope you have the time to answer the neuronics questions, I have many more.