|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Neuronics: The future of humanity (Humanity without physicality)
|
|
Poster Handle
|
U3 |
|
Post Content
|
Here we go....relates to an earlier conversation in one of the threads. (I don't know which one...but we talked about this very thing just a while ago.)
Quoting: Chaol There is further discussion awhile after this particular post. It began with a question of how one could define "good" (I think the subject was "good"). In order to call anything "good", all the "bad" that one could imagine would have to be defined (by experiencing it!), and then all the "good" would have to be defined, and then all other tangents related to "good" or "bad" would have to be experienced and defined, before one could settle on a final definition of "good". There are always two sides to a coin. They go together. One side cannot be defined without defining the other side. And this is the very thing that differs from teachings re: enlightenment. With enlightenment, the goal is to transcend duality. That's why I now see enlightenment as separating mind and body. And it is a tough road. I think the end result would be very close to non-existence unless you believe in God...which is a perception, LOL! Whereas with what we're learning here, it's more of an acceptance of everything...and feels much healthier and natural, that's for sure. I was on the path of enlightenment! So very glad I found these threads. THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
