Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,965 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 726,349
Pageviews Today: 962,805Threads Today: 262Posts Today: 3,879
08:21 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Radiation scientists agree TSA naked body scanners could cause breast cancer and sperm mutations

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1173292
United States
12/04/2010 03:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Radiation scientists agree TSA naked body scanners could cause breast cancer and sperm mutations
The news about the potential health dangers of the TSA’s naked body scanners just keeps getting worse. An increasing number of doctors and scientists are going public with their warnings about the health implications of subjecting yourself to naked body scanners. These include Dr Russell Blaylock (see below) as well as several professors from the University of California who are experts in X-ray imaging.

At the same time, some internet bloggers are insisting that the TSA’s naked body scanners pose no health risks because air travelers are subjected to higher levels of radiation by simply enduring high-altitude flights where cosmic radiation isn’t filtered out by the full thickness of the Earth’s atmosphere. This comparison, however, is inaccurate: The TSA’s body scanners focus radiation on the skin and organs near the skin whereas cosmic radiation during high-altitude flights is distributed across the entire mass of your body.



[link to www.infowars.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1179837
Puerto Rico
12/04/2010 06:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radiation scientists agree TSA naked body scanners could cause breast cancer and sperm mutations
Well Chertoff made a few millions, so he got his money even if they put them back in the warehouse.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 889802
United States
12/04/2010 08:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radiation scientists agree TSA naked body scanners could cause breast cancer and sperm mutations
The news about the potential health dangers of the TSA’s naked body scanners just keeps getting worse. An increasing number of doctors and scientists are going public with their warnings about the health implications of subjecting yourself to naked body scanners. These include Dr Russell Blaylock (see below) as well as several professors from the University of California who are experts in X-ray imaging.

At the same time, some internet bloggers are insisting that the TSA’s naked body scanners pose no health risks because air travelers are subjected to higher levels of radiation by simply enduring high-altitude flights where cosmic radiation isn’t filtered out by the full thickness of the Earth’s atmosphere. This comparison, however, is inaccurate: The TSA’s body scanners focus radiation on the skin and organs near the skin whereas cosmic radiation during high-altitude flights is distributed across the entire mass of your body.

"some internet bloggers are insisting that the TSA’s naked body scanners pose no health risks because air travelers are subjected to higher levels of radiation by simply enduring high-altitude flights ???"

[link to www.infowars.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1173292


"some internet bloggers are insisting that the TSA’s naked body scanners pose no health risks because air travelers are subjected to higher levels of radiation by simply enduring high-altitude flights ???"

Do they work for the FDA certifying x-ray machines?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 889802
United States
12/05/2010 12:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radiation scientists agree TSA naked body scanners could cause breast cancer and sperm mutations
The news about the potential health dangers of the TSA’s naked body scanners just keeps getting worse. An increasing number of doctors and scientists are going public with their warnings about the health implications of subjecting yourself to naked body scanners. These include Dr Russell Blaylock (see below) as well as several professors from the University of California who are experts in X-ray imaging.

At the same time, some internet bloggers are insisting that the TSA’s naked body scanners pose no health risks because air travelers are subjected to higher levels of radiation by simply enduring high-altitude flights where cosmic radiation isn’t filtered out by the full thickness of the Earth’s atmosphere. This comparison, however, is inaccurate: The TSA’s body scanners focus radiation on the skin and organs near the skin whereas cosmic radiation during high-altitude flights is distributed across the entire mass of your body.



[link to www.infowars.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1173292



In any case, if you feel that Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act is worthy of your vote, contact your congresional representative and urge him or her to support Ron Paul's bill.



Re:
Re:

Thread: ++++ Homeland Security Compiling TSA Enemies List ++++


Here's the 6th paragraph from the top in the link that appears in the beforeitsnews.com article linked above...

From: (6th paragraph down in the link mentioned in the above link.)


quote:

For “any person, group or domestic alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel “disruptions” at U.S. airports (as defined above) in response to the enhanced security procedures, the [applicable DHS administrative branch] is instructed to identify and collect information about the persons or entities, and submit such information in the manner outlined [within this directive].

end quote...

So, our 4th Admendment Rights flew out the window, and in the process, our 1st Admendment Rights are also destroyed.

That's two birds with one stone (big time!)

You're not even allowed to object to TSA enhanced pat downs and radiation by a machine that has not be certified by the FDA!


Posters and Repliers...

I am not going to tell you to post your thoughts about the TSA or not to post your thoughts about the TSA.

And nobody knows for certain whether this so called DHS Directive is a hoax.

Nonetheless, consider it REAL!!!!!!!!!

If you choose to post something about the TSA and you feel that Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act would help remedy your complaints, then somewhere in your post or reply, ask your readers to support Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act.

If the DHS investigates you because you are a Domestic Extremist, then you have recourse under the law.

If the DHS is labeling people who are urging support for a bill in congress, they will be shooting themselves in the foot and you will have legal standing in a recourse against the DHS.
Urge your congressional representative to support Ron Paul's Passenger Act



Reference:

Thread: ++++ Homeland Security Compiling TSA Enemies List ++++


The most important thing that anyone should know about the DHS memo is that the term DOMESTIC EXTREMIST is NOT in any dictionary. That is, the DHS (if the directive is real) made the whole thing up!

There is no definition in any legal dictionary or in any law of the term Domestic Extemist. It means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!

There is no historical record for such a term and there is no justification for anyone to be the subject of a DHS investigation (phones tapped and such) because they were a domestic extremist (even if such thing does exist).

In other words, if the directive is read (and I will act that it is until I am informed otherwise) the DHS is making up a law that doesn't exist, and then, taking legal action without the concurrence of a court of law based on a legal premise that does not exist.

This was one of the staple tactics in Nazi Germany.

I urge all of you to call your congressional representative and urge them to support and/or co-sponsor Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act.

Posters and Repliers...

I am not going to tell you to post your thoughts about the TSA or not to post your thoughts about the TSA.

And nobody knows for certain whether this so called DHS Directive is a hoax.

Nonetheless, consider it REAL!!!!!!!!!

If you choose to post something about the TSA and you feel that Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act would help remedy your complaints, then somewhere in your post or reply, ask your readers to support Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act.

If the DHS investigates you because you are a Domestic Extremist, then you have recourse under the law.

If the DHS is labeling people who are urging support for a bill in congress, they will be shooting themselves in the foot and you will have legal standing in a recourse against the DHS.
Urge your congressional representative to support Ron Paul's Passenger Act

Reference:

Thread: ++++ Homeland Security Compiling TSA Enemies List ++++


The most important thing that anyone should know about the DHS memo is that the term DOMESTIC EXTREMIST is NOT in any dictionary. That is, the DHS (if the directive is real) made the whole thing up!

There is no definition in any legal dictionary or in any law of the term Domestic Extemist. It means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!

There is no historical record for such a term and there is no justification for anyone to be the subject of a DHS investigation (phones tapped and such) because they were a domestic extremist (even if no such thing exists).

In other words, if the directive is read (and I will act that it is until I am informed otherwise) the DHS is making up a law that doesn't exist, and then, taking legal action without the concurrence of a court of law based on a legal premise that does not exist.

This was one of the staple tactics in Nazi Germany.

I urge all of you to call your congressional representative and urge rim or her to support and/or co-sponsor Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act.



******************************


Thread: ++++ Homeland Security Compiling TSA Enemies List ++++


Here's the 6th paragraph from the top in the link that appears in the beforeitsnews.com article linked above...

From: (6th paragraph down in the link mentioned in the above link.)


quote:

For “any person, group or domestic alternative media source” that actively objects to, causes others to object to, supports and/or elicits support for anyone who engages in such travel “disruptions” at U.S. airports (as defined above) in response to the enhanced security procedures, the [applicable DHS administrative branch] is instructed to identify and collect information about the persons or entities, and submit such information in the manner outlined [within this directive].

end quote...

So, our 4th Admendment Rights flew out the window, and in the process, our 1st Admendment Rights are also destroyed.

That's two birds with one stone (big time!)

You're not even allowed to object to TSA enhanced pat downs and radiation by a machine that has not be certified by the FDA!


Posters and Repliers...

I am not going to tell you to post your thoughts about the TSA or not to post your thoughts about the TSA.

And nobody knows for certain whether this so called DHS Directive is a hoax.

Nonetheless, consider it REAL!!!!!!!!!

If you choose to post something about the TSA and you feel that Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act would help remedy your complaints, then somewhere in your post or reply, ask your readers to support Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act.

If the DHS investigates you because you are a Domestic Extremist, then you have recourse under the law.

If the DHS is labeling people who are urging support for a bill in congress, they will be shooting themselves in the foot and you will have legal standing in a recourse against the DHS.
Urge your congressional representative to support Ron Paul's Passenger Act

Reference:

Thread: ++++ Homeland Security Compiling TSA Enemies List ++++


The most important thing that anyone should know about the DHS memo is that the term DOMESTIC EXTREMIST is NOT in any dictionary. That is, the DHS (if the directive is real) made the whole thing up!

There is no definition in any legal dictionary or in any law of the term Domestic Extemist. It means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!

There is no historical record for such a term and there is no justification for anyone to be the subject of a DHS investigation (phones tapped and such) because they were a domestic extremist (even if no such thing exists).

In other words, if the directive is real (and I will act that it is until I am informed otherwise) the DHS is making up a law that doesn't exist, and then, taking legal action without the concurrence of a court of law based on a legal premise that does not exist.

This was one of the staple tactics in Nazi Germany.

I urge all of you to call your congressional representative and urge them to support and/or co-sponsor Ron Paul's Passenger Dignity Act.





GLP