I think you have a pretty limited view of alchemy, you seem to have swallowed the modern concept of lead into gold or some such nonesense.
And I really don't know what point you are making about Hippocrates, you think that alchemical knowledge doesn't take on many forms that stretch back into history?
Do you not realize Hippocrates utilized the science of alchemy in his formation of medical arts to suit the new physical body?
Oh, and did the Dark Ages exists is a hot topic...goggle it.


For myself, alchemy is the equivalent of astrology for chemists. Alchemy and astrology were the "forefathers" of chemistry and astronomy respectively. As man began to have a better picture of the environment, he abolished the "magical" properties and instead concentrated on the hard facts. This process took centuries though.

The point I'm trying to make is why alchemy wasn't the medium of healing for hippocrates compared to medicine IF alchemy is working. You can make all sorts of elixirs and cures as an alchemist right? I wouldn't say he used alchemical knowledge, more like a form of proto-chemistry which is what alchemy really is. What do you mean the NEW physical body? Also why doesnt a proponent of alchemy CAPTURE an alchemical reaction on VIDEO and present it to nonbelievers??? That would erase all doubts. I'm wondering why no one has come forth with this evidence.

As far as the dark ages existence is concerned, all I can find is the confusion regarding the first 300 years, 600-900AD. That's far from saying the middle ages did not exist at all. Maybe this is the problem with people here, citing out of context. However, I'll have to read more on the subject to form a solid opinion.