all of this seems so complicated.

wouldn't it have just been easier to fly a couple of planes into those buildings to achieve the exact same effect?



No, because, those buildings could not be destroyed by planes.

The structure of the WTC was built to withstand multipule jetliner impacts, and were designed so with that specific in mind.

A single plane impact would have been the equivilent of poking a pencil thru a screen door, sure, theres a hole, but the screen is still 99% functional.

So, in other words, planes alone could not have brought the towers down, thus, the elaborate hoax.


9/11 was planned since 1996 by Al Qaeda. What would prevent their people from working in the WTC and with the airlines as baggage handlers, cleaners, and kitchen workers? They had access to the planes.

What would stop them, as employees, from placing bombs/explosives on the planes that flew into the WTC buildings and also inside the buildings?

A Boeing 767 is capable of carrying approximately 24,000 gallons (91,000 L) of fuel, EMPTY weight is approximately 190,000 lbs., it's length is 159 ft., cruising speed is 550 mph, cargo area is 2,875 ft.

Fly an airplane into the building, thousands of gallons of fuel ignites, planted bombs throughout the buildings explode...