Test scores show Obama supporters have a low IQ

yeah dude glp is made up right wing bullshit propaganda central, there are no more gullible republican sheeple on earth than glp'ers, they lap it up.

for truth

Really.....my IQ score is 157. Go figure, guess they had selective testing.

Good quality post OP. Just another dagger to the heart of lowlife scumbags (and now those including a low IQ.)

I think this is bogus. How about a real link instead of just "SODAHEAD.COM".

So many idiots will believe anything.

I personally like to point out lowlife scumbags...if this isn't an option I'm sure another will pop up soon. ;-)

Liberals are still idiots.

[link to www.zombietime.com]

doublepost

Last Edited by LakeXeno on 02/13/2012 12:17 PM

78 is the average for blacks

78 is the average for blacks

Obama supporters seem to average around 65

Perfectly described and delivered.

Every Occutard and Libtard should be introduced to this, but of course the liberal state controlled media, schools, and culture could never withstand this kind of logic, reasoning and truth.

bump

Low IQ Libtards

Watch out World, the idiots are in charge.

This is so true. I support Obama (to the extent that this country is most likely going to get fucked either way) and I'm freaking retarded.

Two fluent languages, two proficient languages, three programming languages, working on a degree at MIT, a pretty decent knowledge of the western literary canon, I play two instruments, a fair bit of practice with advanced physics, math, economics, philosophy and sociology... Among other things.

That said, I'm half Mexican, so I must be a lazy moran.

Half of you people wouldn't know reasoning if it bit you in the ass. I suggest you all take a course in logic and the principles of research and learn to contextualize. Shit, just read more. Even if the study WERE real, a single study does not make something true. That's the whole freaking point of science.

THAT said, if you people actually bothered to take a look instead of being sheep, you'd realize that a Professor Sidney Campbell has never attached his/her name to any such study, the Institute for Freedom has no record of such a study, and the only instance of this article and the study it is based on come from the lady on Sodahead who goes by American Cow Girl @ heart.

Think for yourselves, you freaking sheep. You have the internet at your fingertips, it is NOT hard to do preliminary research.

All that out of the way, I actually kind of hope Romney wins, despite my libtardedness. He is going to be faaaarrrr more liberal than Obama Should have seen the way he ran MA. True moderate and far smarter than some of the other morons that get elected to the Governor's office in other states.

OP, your mother has a low IQ.

I assume then you have read Hayek, Rothbard, Bastiat and Smith and found them unconvincing?

Smith is almost entirely misinterpreted by both the Right and the Left, Rothbard is incomplete (in that private monopoly is a good thing, among other ridiculous notions), Hayek is perfectly right on a ton of stuff, but again misinterpreted by both sides. Bastiat... Is Bastiat.

All of them made some seriously important contributions to Economic theory, but when we attempt to implement them we fuck them up based on our political ideologies. We try to make Economic theory fit our world view and in that manner both sides screw everyone over. Key point: A free market != an unregulated market. A free market is a limited regulation market, with the government using SCIENCE and the best available economic theories to regulate the market according to best practices. Bastiat for example championed taking a look at the WHOLE picture for economic decisions: I.E. the long-term. Yet, today's version of Capitalism, championed by Friedman and his flunkies, is concerned with short term economic gain. Another example, with Smith we pick and choose which of his theories to use, when he was in fact adamantly against corporations and very much agreed that certain aspects of trade SHOULD be regulated by the government. The government is regulating the wrong fucking things, for sure, but it is a consequence of competing patch-work theories driving each other into the ground.

If anything, Economic decisions should be regulated by an entirely new branch of government composed of the top thinkers from both sides of the aisle, with a strict set of rules for what they can and can't do. Letting the morons in congress, or an already corrupt market, dictate the terms of the economy doesn't work. That, said, this would be almost entirely infeasible given the nature of our moronic system of government. I, personally, don't have a way out of this mess, I just know what is causing it.

Not that it matters what I think but that's not bad. I would disagree on a couple of points but so what? I personally don't have a way out of this mess either. Except freedom but I guess that doesn't work with humans. As your post and mindset seems to attest.

Is it lower than George W. Bush's IQ?

Because that would be pretty low.

LOL consider the source of this 'news'

Except, of course, there wasn't any study conducted and there isn't any Sidney Campbell at The Institute for Freedom, because....

... the original "story" has been published on Satire World. The satirical article ends:

[link to satireworld.com]

"...The Tele-Prompter Society of America disputes the findings and has released a study by the ACORN University Group that reveals Obama has an IQ that trumps Einstein’s, shows where he invented mass transit, and invented the Wii system..."

CRETINS!