Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,242 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,990,245
Pageviews Today: 2,817,109Threads Today: 723Posts Today: 14,801
11:09 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
09/23/2011 04:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
To see the feedback in action, is something else...its so similar. I can see it easily, because I came up with the sequence of words. But then, to see it in a science article...makes it unreal.

shocked
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1553122
United States
09/23/2011 04:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
[link to www.physorg.com]
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 04:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
[link to www.physorg.com]

"It is really amazing how the new research field developed since we found the first traces of Efimov states, "said Grimm. "Now things have become reality, things we did not even dream about five years ago."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1553122


multidimensional feedback

impressed rockon
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1553122
United States
09/23/2011 05:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Something really interesting is watch the information distribute and morph over time into timestreams.

FTL is on update 3.
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 06:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Every atom that we know of is a) spinning, b) contains charge, and c) has a magnetic moment. What do we do to create charge (electricity)? We spin things in magnetic fields. On earth we have gravity and air friction to overcome, so must continually supply power to keep a generator spinning. But in space once in motion..... Also we know that the EM force is 10 to the 39 powers stronger than gravity, so to an electron spinning around a nucleus the force of gravity is negligible. This is why gravity only theories fail at the atomic level. Even rocks have spaces between atoms, so friction at an atomic scale is not relevant like it is to a generator that must pass through billions of air molecules per revolution.

One atom to the next, what other circuit do you need? Look at Tesla's experiments, the arcs of discharge can be emitted randomly into air, where is that circuit completing? As for heat, have you never seen wires glow when enough charge was running through them? Why do batteries get warm when used? Ever grabbed a light bulb after its been on for awhile? Electricity has no problem generating heat.

In order for you to have magnetism you have to have electrical currents, and since every atom we know of has a magnetic moment, current must be flowing, that or charge itself is enough to create magnetic fields. We know current flowing in a wire produces magnetic fields, but then every atom itself has a magnetic field, so perhaps only charge is needed, not flowing current. Do atoms in batteries have stronger magnetic fields after being charged than before? I do not know so am asking, but I surmise the answer would be yes if our equipment was sensitive enough to measure it. Even the atoms in electrical wires have magnetic moments when no current is flowing.

Neutrons do have charge, just both negative and positive, which is why electrons are both attracted and repelled by them and vice versa. You can call it neutral if you want, but the fact is they contain equal amounts of both charges so they attract and repel both negatively and positively charged particles. This is why the electron never collides with the neutron as it is held in orbit by both the attractive and repulsive aspects. The electrons charge state only determines it's orbital distance. Which I say is the exact same thing that determines orbital distances in our solar system and galaxy.
 Quoting: observation
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 06:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
you remember sickscent
2010 for the politics and 2011 for the physics
the politics were done by sept 2010
physics looks like the same for 2011 rockon
 Quoting: aether




Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern

22 September 2011

Puzzling results from Cern, home of the LHC, have confounded physicists - because it appears subatomic particles have exceeded the speed of light.
 Quoting: cern

[link to www.bbc.co.uk]

lol

this is NOT ego

but

if you saw it in a movie
it would be science fiction rockon
 Quoting: aether


The problem is they didn't publish their results because they want someone to disprove those results, not validate them. They are basically begging someone to come up with a different solution that they can accept, so that all will be well with the universe again and standard cosmology can proceed as king again. They are asking for help in disproving the results, not proving them, one needs just read the words.
 Quoting: observation
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 07:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Going to get into heads a little bit.

[link to vimeo.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
09/23/2011 07:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Every atom that we know of is a) spinning, b) contains charge, and c) has a magnetic moment. What do we do to create charge (electricity)? We spin things in magnetic fields. On earth we have gravity and air friction to overcome, so must continually supply power to keep a generator spinning. But in space once in motion..... Also we know that the EM force is 10 to the 39 powers stronger than gravity, so to an electron spinning around a nucleus the force of gravity is negligible. This is why gravity only theories fail at the atomic level. Even rocks have spaces between atoms, so friction at an atomic scale is not relevant like it is to a generator that must pass through billions of air molecules per revolution.

One atom to the next, what other circuit do you need? Look at Tesla's experiments, the arcs of discharge can be emitted randomly into air, where is that circuit completing? As for heat, have you never seen wires glow when enough charge was running through them? Why do batteries get warm when used? Ever grabbed a light bulb after its been on for awhile? Electricity has no problem generating heat.

In order for you to have magnetism you have to have electrical currents, and since every atom we know of has a magnetic moment, current must be flowing, that or charge itself is enough to create magnetic fields. We know current flowing in a wire produces magnetic fields, but then every atom itself has a magnetic field, so perhaps only charge is needed, not flowing current. Do atoms in batteries have stronger magnetic fields after being charged than before? I do not know so am asking, but I surmise the answer would be yes if our equipment was sensitive enough to measure it. Even the atoms in electrical wires have magnetic moments when no current is flowing.

Neutrons do have charge, just both negative and positive, which is why electrons are both attracted and repelled by them and vice versa. You can call it neutral if you want, but the fact is they contain equal amounts of both charges so they attract and repel both negatively and positively charged particles. This is why the electron never collides with the neutron as it is held in orbit by both the attractive and repulsive aspects. The electrons charge state only determines it's orbital distance. Which I say is the exact same thing that determines orbital distances in our solar system and galaxy.
 Quoting: observation

 Quoting: aether


This is exactly my thoughts on it. Flowing current is not necessary, at least at the micro scale. It is the furthering of complexity that begins 'changing' the 'requirements'...charge creates the field of magnetism. Field of magnetism creates the 'structure' of the 'pulse' of charge. Field holds the charge. If it were any different, then charge would occur, but wouldn't be in a stable configuration, and would 'dissipate' into the surround.
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 07:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
military keep nudging me on the topic of skynet for a couple of years now

i detect it comforts them to possess it rockon
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 07:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
military keep nudging me on the topic of skynet for a couple of years now

i detect it comforts them to possess it rockon
 Quoting: aether


as in their anticipation/reaction is quicker so they feel more adequate in "keeping up"

so it seems rockon
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 07:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
military keep nudging me on the topic of skynet for a couple of years now

i detect it comforts them to possess it rockon
 Quoting: aether


as in their anticipation/reaction is quicker so they feel more adequate in "keeping up"

so it seems rockon
 Quoting: aether


Fortunately possess is orthoginal to control.

aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 07:49 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
This is exactly my thoughts on it. Flowing current is not necessary, at least at the micro scale. It is the furthering of complexity that begins 'changing' the 'requirements'...charge creates the field of magnetism. Field of magnetism creates the 'structure' of the 'pulse' of charge. Field holds the charge. If it were any different, then charge would occur, but wouldn't be in a stable configuration, and would 'dissipate' into the surround.
 Quoting: sickscent


yes ,it`s layers they are looking into as you are aware and within eternal there is no staring point/source (power) but there is direction of momentum and what drives that momentum is what is being assessed

if you transpose the aether physics model over the debate you see where/how charge manifests (distributed) in all things in all places simultaneously/continuously

that`s a sensitive subject for many reasons but they are getting to it within their debate
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 07:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
ORTHOGONAL

1
a : intersecting or lying at right angles
b : having perpendicular slopes or tangents at the point of intersection <orthogonal curves>
2
: having a sum of products or an integral that is zero or sometimes one under specified conditions: as a of real-valued functions : having the integral of the product of each pair of functions over a specific interval equal to zero b of vectors : having the scalar product equal to zero c of a square matrix : having the sum of products of corresponding elements in any two rows or any two columns equal to one if the rows or columns are the same and equal to zero otherwise : having a transpose with which the product equals the identity matrix
3
of a linear transformation : having a matrix that is orthogonal : preserving length and distance
4
: composed of mutually orthogonal elements <an orthogonal basis of a vector space>
5
: statistically independent
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 07:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
ORTHOGONAL

1
a : intersecting or lying at right angles
b : having perpendicular slopes or tangents at the point of intersection <orthogonal curves>
2
: having a sum of products or an integral that is zero or sometimes one under specified conditions: as a of real-valued functions : having the integral of the product of each pair of functions over a specific interval equal to zero b of vectors : having the scalar product equal to zero c of a square matrix : having the sum of products of corresponding elements in any two rows or any two columns equal to one if the rows or columns are the same and equal to zero otherwise : having a transpose with which the product equals the identity matrix
3
of a linear transformation : having a matrix that is orthogonal : preserving length and distance
4
: composed of mutually orthogonal elements <an orthogonal basis of a vector space>
5
: statistically independent
 Quoting: aether
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 07:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
thankx
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 07:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

More detail:

Orthogonality is a system design property facilitating feasibility and compactness of complex designs. Orthogonality guarantees that modifying the technical effect produced by a component of a system neither creates nor propagates side effects to other components of the system. The emergent behavior of a system consisting of components should be controlled strictly by formal definitions of its logic and not by side effects resulting from poor integration, i.e. non-orthogonal design of modules and interfaces. Orthogonality reduces testing and development time because it is easier to verify designs that neither cause side effects nor depend on them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 08:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
So I have a question.

I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar.

Please teach me.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 08:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
So I have a question.

I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar.

Please teach me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129


I do not want to run the risk of toxicity to a misunderstood format.

I assume it is scalar and will GTFO of the way?
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 08:09 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
So I have a question.

I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar.

Please teach me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129


your non material 369 the other is materia
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 08:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
So I have a question.

I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar.

Please teach me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129


your non material 369 the other is materia
 Quoting: aether


the consequences of your existence
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
09/23/2011 08:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

More detail:

Orthogonality is a system design property facilitating feasibility and compactness of complex designs. Orthogonality guarantees that modifying the technical effect produced by a component of a system neither creates nor propagates side effects to other components of the system. The emergent behavior of a system consisting of components should be controlled strictly by formal definitions of its logic and not by side effects resulting from poor integration, i.e. non-orthogonal design of modules and interfaces. Orthogonality reduces testing and development time because it is easier to verify designs that neither cause side effects nor depend on them.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129


A form of 'purity'. A lack of deformation in function.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
09/23/2011 08:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
So I have a question.

I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar.

Please teach me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129


your non material 369 the other is materia
 Quoting: aether


the consequences of your existence
 Quoting: aether


applause
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 08:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
So I have a question.

I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar.

Please teach me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129


your non material 369 the other is materia
 Quoting: aether


the consequences of your existence
 Quoting: aether


why I sense such resentment and fear in general I suppose.

someday it will be understood even suffering wouldn't have had a chance to exist had there not been the concept of mathematical purity to begin with.

at this point in the timeline those beings who aren't mathematically pure are protected, and those that are source energy for consumption for those that aren't.

we need a Gaia generator though.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 09:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
The answer here is cold fusion. I need the info. Please gather.
aether

User ID: 1412926
United Kingdom
09/23/2011 10:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Rossi Cold Fusion Validated by Swedish Skeptic's Society

Yet another test of Andrea Rossi's Energy Catalyzer (E-Cat) has been performed on a 4.5 kW version near the University of Bologna. This time a new set of observers were present, one of which is the chairman of the Swedish Skeptics Society, who confirmed that Copper is being formed from Hydrogen and Nickel -- cold fusion!
 Quoting: science


[link to pesn.com]

That really looks promising.

I should think they will continue to tighten up the procedure for validation purposes. At this stage, it is weight of evidence that counts and the results will need to be reproduced in other laboratories (I suppose the patents have been filed and methods will be readily shared).

The commercial and practical implications are huge but are nothing compared to the impact these results will have on the fundamental science. Cold fusion has been rejected by consensus science because current nuclear theory doesn't allow it. What we have here is one of those inconvenient facts which shatter theories.
 Quoting: observation
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
09/23/2011 10:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Dammit...somewhere on GLP I read recently a theory on how to produce 'anti-magnetism'. If there is a singular way to start this, then cold fusion may be in there somewhere.


Can't remember where I saw it. Here is a good post by Indy though.

Evening everyone...

Well yes...Alberts "special" and general theories...Are only local and yes they work "locally"...


The key to faster than light is (Gc) "gravatational constant"

here is the equation...Now I cannot write this here as an equation because of keyboard limitations...However this.

Gc=C²(p/over/u)beta

Decrease of Gc per annum = 7.5x10 (to the power of)-11

The gravitational field is constant in all newtonion mechanics.
The gravitational field is an interactive variable in the mechanics of relativity. Its action is dependent on mass and
the dynanics of mass and the dynamics of space...Gavity is a negative condition it has only 1 pole...Under Magnetism which has 2 poles there is the key to anti-gravity...

HTH...Indy
 Quoting: Indiana
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
09/23/2011 10:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
I remember now, LOL. It is in the Physorg links posted recently on this thread.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/23/2011 10:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
I remember now, LOL. It is in the Physorg links posted recently on this thread.
 Quoting: SickScent


go check out your tis
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1628129
United States
09/24/2011 12:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology
Confirmed. In-frame bees.

News