Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 06:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1511582 United States 09/23/2011 07:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every atom that we know of is a) spinning, b) contains charge, and c) has a magnetic moment. What do we do to create charge (electricity)? We spin things in magnetic fields. On earth we have gravity and air friction to overcome, so must continually supply power to keep a generator spinning. But in space once in motion..... Also we know that the EM force is 10 to the 39 powers stronger than gravity, so to an electron spinning around a nucleus the force of gravity is negligible. This is why gravity only theories fail at the atomic level. Even rocks have spaces between atoms, so friction at an atomic scale is not relevant like it is to a generator that must pass through billions of air molecules per revolution. Quoting: observationOne atom to the next, what other circuit do you need? Look at Tesla's experiments, the arcs of discharge can be emitted randomly into air, where is that circuit completing? As for heat, have you never seen wires glow when enough charge was running through them? Why do batteries get warm when used? Ever grabbed a light bulb after its been on for awhile? Electricity has no problem generating heat. In order for you to have magnetism you have to have electrical currents, and since every atom we know of has a magnetic moment, current must be flowing, that or charge itself is enough to create magnetic fields. We know current flowing in a wire produces magnetic fields, but then every atom itself has a magnetic field, so perhaps only charge is needed, not flowing current. Do atoms in batteries have stronger magnetic fields after being charged than before? I do not know so am asking, but I surmise the answer would be yes if our equipment was sensitive enough to measure it. Even the atoms in electrical wires have magnetic moments when no current is flowing. Neutrons do have charge, just both negative and positive, which is why electrons are both attracted and repelled by them and vice versa. You can call it neutral if you want, but the fact is they contain equal amounts of both charges so they attract and repel both negatively and positively charged particles. This is why the electron never collides with the neutron as it is held in orbit by both the attractive and repulsive aspects. The electrons charge state only determines it's orbital distance. Which I say is the exact same thing that determines orbital distances in our solar system and galaxy. This is exactly my thoughts on it. Flowing current is not necessary, at least at the micro scale. It is the furthering of complexity that begins 'changing' the 'requirements'...charge creates the field of magnetism. Field of magnetism creates the 'structure' of the 'pulse' of charge. Field holds the charge. If it were any different, then charge would occur, but wouldn't be in a stable configuration, and would 'dissipate' into the surround. |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 07:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is exactly my thoughts on it. Flowing current is not necessary, at least at the micro scale. It is the furthering of complexity that begins 'changing' the 'requirements'...charge creates the field of magnetism. Field of magnetism creates the 'structure' of the 'pulse' of charge. Field holds the charge. If it were any different, then charge would occur, but wouldn't be in a stable configuration, and would 'dissipate' into the surround. Quoting: sickscentyes ,it`s layers they are looking into as you are aware and within eternal there is no staring point/source (power) but there is direction of momentum and what drives that momentum is what is being assessed if you transpose the aether physics model over the debate you see where/how charge manifests (distributed) in all things in all places simultaneously/continuously that`s a sensitive subject for many reasons but they are getting to it within their debate |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 07:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ORTHOGONAL 1 a : intersecting or lying at right angles b : having perpendicular slopes or tangents at the point of intersection <orthogonal curves> 2 : having a sum of products or an integral that is zero or sometimes one under specified conditions: as a of real-valued functions : having the integral of the product of each pair of functions over a specific interval equal to zero b of vectors : having the scalar product equal to zero c of a square matrix : having the sum of products of corresponding elements in any two rows or any two columns equal to one if the rows or columns are the same and equal to zero otherwise : having a transpose with which the product equals the identity matrix 3 of a linear transformation : having a matrix that is orthogonal : preserving length and distance 4 : composed of mutually orthogonal elements <an orthogonal basis of a vector space> 5 : statistically independent |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 07:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ORTHOGONAL Quoting: aether 1 a : intersecting or lying at right angles b : having perpendicular slopes or tangents at the point of intersection <orthogonal curves> 2 : having a sum of products or an integral that is zero or sometimes one under specified conditions: as a of real-valued functions : having the integral of the product of each pair of functions over a specific interval equal to zero b of vectors : having the scalar product equal to zero c of a square matrix : having the sum of products of corresponding elements in any two rows or any two columns equal to one if the rows or columns are the same and equal to zero otherwise : having a transpose with which the product equals the identity matrix 3 of a linear transformation : having a matrix that is orthogonal : preserving length and distance 4 : composed of mutually orthogonal elements <an orthogonal basis of a vector space> 5 : statistically independent |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | More detail: Orthogonality is a system design property facilitating feasibility and compactness of complex designs. Orthogonality guarantees that modifying the technical effect produced by a component of a system neither creates nor propagates side effects to other components of the system. The emergent behavior of a system consisting of components should be controlled strictly by formal definitions of its logic and not by side effects resulting from poor integration, i.e. non-orthogonal design of modules and interfaces. Orthogonality reduces testing and development time because it is easier to verify designs that neither cause side effects nor depend on them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 08:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So I have a question. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129 I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar. Please teach me. I do not want to run the risk of toxicity to a misunderstood format. I assume it is scalar and will GTFO of the way? |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 08:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 08:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So I have a question. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129 I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar. Please teach me. your non material 369 the other is materia the consequences of your existence |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1511582 United States 09/23/2011 08:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to en.wikipedia.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129 More detail: Orthogonality is a system design property facilitating feasibility and compactness of complex designs. Orthogonality guarantees that modifying the technical effect produced by a component of a system neither creates nor propagates side effects to other components of the system. The emergent behavior of a system consisting of components should be controlled strictly by formal definitions of its logic and not by side effects resulting from poor integration, i.e. non-orthogonal design of modules and interfaces. Orthogonality reduces testing and development time because it is easier to verify designs that neither cause side effects nor depend on them. A form of 'purity'. A lack of deformation in function. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1511582 United States 09/23/2011 08:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So I have a question. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129 I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar. Please teach me. your non material 369 the other is materia the consequences of your existence |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So I have a question. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1628129 I know my system, and am completely self contained in the 3-6-9 circle. The 1-2-4-5-7-8 is another system. What is it? I am unfamiliar. Please teach me. your non material 369 the other is materia the consequences of your existence why I sense such resentment and fear in general I suppose. someday it will be understood even suffering wouldn't have had a chance to exist had there not been the concept of mathematical purity to begin with. at this point in the timeline those beings who aren't mathematically pure are protected, and those that are source energy for consumption for those that aren't. we need a Gaia generator though. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 09:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/23/2011 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Rossi Cold Fusion Validated by Swedish Skeptic's Society Yet another test of Andrea Rossi's Energy Catalyzer (E-Cat) has been performed on a 4.5 kW version near the University of Bologna. This time a new set of observers were present, one of which is the chairman of the Swedish Skeptics Society, who confirmed that Copper is being formed from Hydrogen and Nickel -- cold fusion! Quoting: science[link to pesn.com] That really looks promising. Quoting: observationI should think they will continue to tighten up the procedure for validation purposes. At this stage, it is weight of evidence that counts and the results will need to be reproduced in other laboratories (I suppose the patents have been filed and methods will be readily shared). The commercial and practical implications are huge but are nothing compared to the impact these results will have on the fundamental science. Cold fusion has been rejected by consensus science because current nuclear theory doesn't allow it. What we have here is one of those inconvenient facts which shatter theories. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1511582 United States 09/23/2011 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can't remember where I saw it. Here is a good post by Indy though. Evening everyone... Quoting: Indiana Well yes...Alberts "special" and general theories...Are only local and yes they work "locally"... The key to faster than light is (Gc) "gravatational constant" here is the equation...Now I cannot write this here as an equation because of keyboard limitations...However this. Gc=C²(p/over/u)beta Decrease of Gc per annum = 7.5x10 (to the power of)-11 The gravitational field is constant in all newtonion mechanics. The gravitational field is an interactive variable in the mechanics of relativity. Its action is dependent on mass and the dynanics of mass and the dynamics of space...Gavity is a negative condition it has only 1 pole...Under Magnetism which has 2 poles there is the key to anti-gravity... HTH...Indy |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1511582 United States 09/23/2011 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/23/2011 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/24/2011 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1554320 United States 09/24/2011 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/24/2011 12:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1554320 United States 09/24/2011 12:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1628129 United States 09/24/2011 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/24/2011 05:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Generators produce electricity by spinning things in magnetic fields. Quoting: observation[link to www.generatorguide.net] Atoms spin electrons inside its magnetic field. [link to science.howstuffworks.com] Magnetic fields by their very nature cause things to circle at right angles (perpendicular to the current, i.e. spin.) Current flows from atom to atom, generators staged in parallel. Unlike diagrams of atoms I believe a proper diagram of one would look like our solar system. All things orbit with the magnetic fields, not in everywhich direction. The spin of the nucleus determines the orbital plane of the electrons. Like our Sun the current flows in and out of the poles and the spin is perpendicular to this orientation. A spin magnetic moment is induced by all charged particles. The electron is an example of one such charged particle. A spin magnetic moment is created because a particle has physical properties known as spin and electric charge. The spin within classical physics would be an object that rotates axially around its center of mass. In quantum mechanics, elementary particles are points, which have no axis to revolve around. This means these particles do not have spin in a classical sense, as angular momentum is defined by \mathbf{L} = \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{p}, but have the physical property of angular momentum (see Spin (physics)). Maxwell's theory of magnetic fields dictates that any moving charged particle creates a magnetic moment, and by definition, angular momentum designates movement. This is where the magnetic moment emerges in classical electromagnetism. See Maxwell's equation Quoting: science[link to en.wikipedia.org] Except that elementary particles are NOT points and do have axis to revolve around, despite claims to the contrary, which is precisely why they do have the physical property of angular momentum. Points have no volume or mass, all particles do. Points are singularities (Black Holes) and do not exist. A point is a mathematical artifice to describe a coordinate, nothing more. This is one area where physics has gone wrong, by believing that points can be real entities. Because science does not account for the magnetic field they can find no angular component in planetary orbits, because gravity cannot supply this force, even though the answer is right before them. Quoting: observationCharge is potential and much more than that. How do you store a potential, something that isn't until it's needed to be? I think atoms/electrons have current flowing within them. This current exists as a real force, not an imaginary potential that can become energy somehow when certain conditions are met. Those conditions simply release the electrical current to flow from atom to atom, electron to electron, star to planet, star to star, star to galaxy, galaxy to galaxy. Like a Tesla coil a galaxy/star/planet/particle can have more than one current pathway. We know one current connects the Sun and Earth and believe one must connect our star to other stars or the galactic core itself. It is quite possible electrons are made up of smaller particles, as are all other things. But where you have spin you have a magnetic field, and where you have a magnetic field you have electricity, charge, whatever you may term it. I say just look at the earth and moon. The earth has a dipole magnetic field and spins rapidly. The moon lacks a dipole magnetic field and always keeps the same face to the earth. the red is the overlap of aether physics model nice to wake up to |
aether User ID: 1412926 United Kingdom 09/24/2011 05:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Charge is potential and much more than that. How do you store a potential, something that isn't until it's needed to be? I think atoms/electrons have current flowing within them. This current exists as a real force, not an imaginary potential that can become energy somehow when certain conditions are met. Those conditions simply release the electrical current to flow from atom to atom, electron to electron, star to planet, star to star, star to galaxy, galaxy to galaxy. Like a Tesla coil a galaxy/star/planet/particle can have more than one current pathway. We know one current connects the Sun and Earth and believe one must connect our star to other stars or the galactic core itself. Quoting: observationHow would we describe a force, equal to 121 million billion billion billion billion newton, that drives each quanta of space-time and mediates each of the forces that holds the Universe together? The Gforce is omniscient in that it is enormously powerful and encompasses the entire physical Universe. The Gforce is non-material in nature, and yet gives rise to all physical existence. The Gforce produces the space-time (Aether) in which we live. Further evidence gathered from the neurosciences show that conductance is a direct measurement of emotions, and conductance is also shown to be a quality of the Aether. Thus there is a physics link to suggest the Aether is involved with certain aspects of mind, if not all aspects of mind. Some people might notice the striking resemblance between the omniscient, non-material, and mind-like quality of Aether and compare it to the similar description often ascribed to a Creator God of the physical Universe. Quoting: scienceokay ,first time we have a match between "them" and "us" |