Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

I got to thinking about this more and wondered about line-of-sight telescopes, that use mirrors and record the actual image. I wonder if the earth's magnetosphere could be interferring with those and the shielding technology would then offset that affect.

I can't see mirror scopes being affected by our GLB, but figured I'd toss it at you to see if it sparks anything in you? :boner:

Ribbit :eggsellent:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

CMBR is the radiation given off when the virgin matter is ejected out of all of the massive DUAL black holes at the center of EVERY spiral galaxy. In the inversion process, the matter ejected radiates light and rogue particles (radiation).

But thanks for the edumacation. I wasn't aware anyone knew about it.

Ribbit

Dr. Steven Greer: The real story about the end of NASA's shuttle program

Thread: Dr. Steven Greer: The real story about the end of NASA's shuttle program

oh, well spotted
when i wrote that i had 2018 in my awareness
hmmm
and now i look it appears the difference is dependent upon the effort utilized, me included
LOL
could be a classic "fuck them " moment
huh

Modern astronomy surely suffers from a kind of blindness. It is either a blindness of mind or one of practice.

Electric Universe advocate Wal Thornhill pointed out that neither COBE or WMAP detected "cosmic" radiation. Rather, they both found the natural microwave radiation from "electric current filaments in interstellar plasma local to the Sun. Instead of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), it is the Interstellar Microwave Background. That makes sense of the fact that the CMB is too smooth to account for the lumpiness of galaxies and galactic clusters in the Universe."

The Electric Universe theory has an entirely different way of addressing these matters. It does not rely on unseen and undetectable forces whose existence can only be inferred. Electric currents flowing through ionized gas and dust provide the energy for the stars, presenting themselves in straightforward and understandable ways without resorting to esoteric mathematical models.

Redshifts and microwaves have proven themselves inadequate to explain how the Universe functions.

Planck is designed to analyze the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) with greater precision than either of its predecessors, the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) and WMAP. COBE is no longer operational, but WMAP continues to scan the sky. However, is WMAP providing accurate information, and is the recent map showing the distribution of temperatures in the early Universe nothing but an illusion?

According to papers recently published by Pierre-Marie Robitaille of Ohio State University's Department of Radiology, many oversights and offhanded errors crept in to the data from WMAP. The team did not fully calibrate the FIRAS spectrophotometer before launch, many possible error sources in the calibration protocol were zeroed out, and no account was taken of thermal emissions from Earth's oceans—which turns out to be the likely source of so-called "cosmic" microwave radiation.

Dr. Steven Greer: The real story about the end of NASA's shuttle program

Thread: Dr. Steven Greer: The real story about the end of NASA's shuttle program

Rover ping.

[link to www.physorg.com]
Sunspot 1302: It's big. It's bad. And it's coming our way

Behemoth sunspot 1302 unleashed another strong flare on Saturday morning--an X1.9-category blast at 5:40 am EDT. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) recorded the extreme ultraviolet flash.

i was just floating over that topic reference north america mostly as i watch our energy eaters (hurricanes) remain mellow

now i`m flowing japan/new zealand side of globe prompted by your post
yes

Davis that first discovered that the North and South poles are separate energies. Another discovery of his is that the "lines of force" of magnetism do not flow around a magnet the way it is presented in textbooks to this day. The magnetic field leaves one pole, travels in a semicircle around to the exact center of the magnet (the Bloch Wall), reverses polarity, and then travels in a semicircle to the opposite pole. The magnetic fields are flowing in both directions simultaneously. Davis also discovered that magnetic energy does not have "lines of force", it has "cables of force", and he photographed these cables of force in the first picture ever taken of magnetic energy. Here is a quote from Magnetism and Its Effects on the Living System, his first book. "The spin effect is also noticeable by a pull, an electronic vortex twist, that appears on the screen at the outside edge of each cable and/or the roster." [link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
Davis was the first to discover that there are two vortices of magnetic energy at each pole, not one. Here is another quote from Magnetism and Its Effects on the Living System. "Within the wide diameter vortex of a magnet's pole is a similar attracting vortex spin. The magnet's spinning tornado-like vortex contains two expressions of power and energy. The electron spin acts as a force of spin direction, and the inner or reverse vortex located within the center of the electron fields acts to form an uptake of energy or a downward thrust of energy. The reversal of the spin effect results in the reversal of the inner vortex reaction." This book, the first by Davis and Walter C. Rawls, Jr., was first published in 1974, however Davis had informed many other scientists and doctors from several foreign nations of his discoveries. He had been in contact with these scientists and doctors for decades prior to the publication of the book.

Davis discovered that the North and South poles have opposite effects in 1936, and the copyright date of Magnetic Current is 1945.

It was Felix Bloch who discovered that there is a neutral zone, not a "semi-neutral" zone, at the center of a magnet. It's called the Bloch Wall. Davis discovered that the two energies reverse their spin and polarity in the center of a magnet (in the Bloch Wall) in a broken figure eight. And it's the same on the earth.

in the context of why south of our equator so often

The magnetic fields are flowing in both directions simultaneously...descent/ascent
an electronic vortex twist...magnet's spinning tornado...spiral

Ancient Symbols
Orphic Egg
Kundalini

...rotational oscillation gradually alternate with periods of purely up and down oscillation...runs through every system/field

Mechanical
Electrical
Electro-mechanical
Optical
Biological
Human
Economic and Social
Climate and geophysics
Astrophysics
Chemical

[link to www.physorg.com]
Physics group corrals record number of neutrons into one place

Neutrons, the particles that along with protons, exist in the nuclei of atoms (except for hydrogen) have been intensely studied ever since their discovery in the 1930’s

[link to www.physorg.com]
Physicists discover 'magnetotoroidic effect'

For many years, scientists have known about the magnetoelectric effect, in which an electric field can induce and control a magnetic field, and vice versa.

an object does not possess this energy, it possesses momentum and in the event of a collision it could apply a force - for maximum force an object can apply is a function of its mass and its velocity at any given moment. Energy is an entirely abstract concept - there is no such "thing", no substance as "energy"; not at any level of existence. It is a number, a quantifier that describes how much work an object could potentially perform. This is based on mass and velocity, that is to say it is simply a mathematical outcome of momentum and a prediction of how much force could therefore be applied by collision. If an object has no mass it cannot apply force and it does not, by definition, have any energy.

no mass equals no existence, hence virtual particles do not exist, hence photons are NOT virtual particles without mass or charge. E=mc^2 just relates to the energy potential of a particle if its entire mass could be converted to energy, as you correctly state this does not mean that particle possesses this energy in the form of charge. This is where most confusion comes into play. People assume that the particle possesses this energy, this is not what the math says. It is only the potential energy the particle contains if you could convert its entire mass into energy, a big difference between converting a particle to energy and a particle containing that energy.

what is charge?
what is a magnetic field?

No more answers than what is already written in books. We not believe charge is merely a potential though, something that does not exist until it needs to exist, then suddenly becomes electrical energy. We believe it is already electrical energy moving between atoms, within and around. We think charge may be smaller particles, quanta if you will.

As for magnetic fields we have no good answer except perhaps quanta in an excited state moving around the electric field. Fields have always bothered us. We "feel" everything must be particulate in some way or their could be no communication of forces, but how do you describe something you have never detected or imaged? Yes, we sense the field, but how do we sense it? What makes a field a field? It has to be more than imaginary lines drawn on paper, it must be composed of something, but what this something is, is beyond our ability to comprehend except to fall back to the insufficient explanation of quanta.

Dimensions of discrete natural units (quanta) are length, frequency, mass, charge, and spherical geometry. Dimension is the fundamental attribute of measurement, but is not itself measurable. Absolute dimension is a quality of reality seemingly arising from the ultimate Source of all existence. When quantity is associated with dimension, then the two together form a measurement.

like your visuals
holistically seen comes to mind

this is where they are going:



the non material dimension (s) that possess no mass but effect all mass

There are fewer dimensions at the quantum level than in the macro world. Like force, matter, and environment, dimensions increase in complexity as the orders of reality become more complex. Color, flavor, and texture are examples of complex dimensions as perceived at the level of human beings.

it gets worse...in holistically seen department...
my dreams...night processing...is beyond bizarre...
entering body through passage way...black hole type thing...

...rotating black hole... of the umbilical cord...navel
transport to the other dimension...
relationship between two arteries spiraling one vein
carrying oxygenated and deoxygenated back and forth from placenta...

placenta...villous tree structures cross section...looks like the tree of life
ceremonial cultural practices and beliefs around it...
...lotus birth...Manipura chakra..lotus symbol
Some consider the navel to be "a powerful chakra of the body”

..from the wiki link to navel cultural ritual just goes on and on...
Omphalos in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre
Axis mundi...it expresses a point of connection between sky and earth where the four compass directions meet...
...lingam and yoni represents the "indivisible two-in-oneness of male and female, the passive space and active time from which all life originates”.
The Holy Umbilical Cord is a first class Catholic relic (that which is composed of a body part) of Christ...

...the light made flesh to develop the body...
rotating black holes and gamma ray burst...
role of Wharton’s jelly in umbilical cord...
fibroblast...extracellular matrix
mesoderm...intercellular signaling

...cosmic joke...trust your gut...
...navel...umbilicus relationship to golden ratio
the guts nervous system starting from navel is as large as the brains

In a weightless environment, devoid of noticeable gravitational effects, what happens to mass? Does mass change to zero? No. When mass is near a large planet, does mass become greater? No. When an object with mass is accelerated to near the speed of light, does mass increase? No.

Nothing ever happens to mass. There is nothing to happen to. Mass is merely a dimension. Of itself, it has no material existence, although it is one of the defining qualities of material objects.

There is mass in resistance. There is mass in potential. There is mass in energy. There is mass in angular momentum. It is all the same mass, but manifested differently.

It might help to realize that there is time in units too. There is time in resistance, there is time in potential, there is time in energy, and there is time in angular momentum. You can perceive time as change, but you cannot isolate time from a unit. Similarly, you can perceive mass as inertia and length as distance, but you cannot separate the dimensions of mass and length from units. In the same way, you cannot remove the bricks from a brick building without also removing the building.

Once we stop thinking of mass as equal to matter, and realize that mass is neither physical nor is it something convertible, then it becomes easier to see what mass really is and how mass “behaves.” How it behaves is not the same as the “is-ness” of mass. You cannot “put your hands” on mass. You cannot see mass. You cannot truly weigh mass (but you can weigh matter that has mass). You cannot make mass turn into energy.

The whole issue about converting energy from mass clearly reveals itself when we realize the indestructible and unchangeable nature of dimensions. You cannot convert mass, length, time, or charge. They are absolutes. Mass is always mass. Once again, and it will be repeated often, mass (inertia) is only a dimension.

LOL i`m sighing from the glimpse effects

Mass is not converted to energy and energy is not converted to mass. Mass is merely a dimension from which the units are constructed. This is repetitive, but understanding mass as merely a dimension is perhaps the greatest intellectual physics challenge for most people coming out of the 21st Century.

We often refer to nuclear reactions on the Sun, nuclear power plants, and nuclear bombs as examples of mass to energy conversion. In the nuclear power plants the United States has been operating for 60 years, a high degree of precision applies to the measured amount of energy and material mass passed through the reactor. And yet, there is not one report available anywhere that presents the data from a nuclear power plant and shows that the mass of the fuel was exactly converted to energy according to E=mc2. One would think that to prove Special Relativity Theory, the data from a precisely monitored nuclear power plant would provide an abundance of evidence. Nevertheless, such data apparently does not exist.

In fact, there is evidence to suggest that more energy comes out of a nuclear power plant than the mass of fuel that goes in. A Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor once operated for 25 years and produced more fuel in its byproducts than it consumed during its operation. A violation of energy conservation seems to result, therefore a government employee or academic will not admit this. In practice, the scientific establishment forbids the suggestion of any violation of the energy conservation law even if the data suggest it. However there is no violation of energy conservation, as the extra energy is angular momentum of "dark matter" converting to photons through the Casimir effect.

When it comes down to truth, mass cannot be converted to energy because mass is a dimension at one level of reality, and energy is a unit made up of dimensions at a different level of reality.

Everything is so one it is mind awe...numbing though my brain is pounding...like there is so much firing in there at the same time.

What does it mean? I don’t know. What can seeing in this way do in moving energy for all? Keep the lint out of your belly button I guess...lol

The only thing I can think of at the moment is to explain the sensation what it means to be “in the world not of it.”

There would have been the collective light source trapped in the black hole of our own umbilical. Like Jesus told Judus in the gnostic text...we all came from our own star.

Let us return to the explanation of the religious practice from the point of view of physics. The second experiment and theory in physics confirm wisdom of the Ancients.

Milliards of neurons of brain are excited at different degree, possess different frequency, different phase. Their general energy is bigger than energy of quantum of light, and quantum of light does not have the possibility for its "clear development". Quantum of light is works as the charge e=±√αħc and a man does not know "his Friend". The man lives his usual life. But something unexpected, something wonderful, something critical happened. At this moment suddenly all the neutrons of his brain come to numbness, stop moving. Brain is as if in Vacuum state under some extra-low temperature. Now general energetic excitement of brain neutrons is equal to zero. Now electric resistance disappears. Now the neurons of brain do not show any electric resistance to the quantum of light, electron. Now there appeared a possibility when charge can stop. Now the charge receives its initial form of the circle. And now it possesses great potential energy E=Mc² and potential charge e²=αħc. Let us suppose that the situation is critical. Then all its great energy the Quantum of light instantly directs to change of the old program. With this purpose, it produces the impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck and in that moment of the beginning of its rotation, it with all its great energy E=Mc² reconstructs some chain of brain neutrons, reconstructs the brain program and a man starts acting according completely new program. The formula of this process is:

Everything is so one it is mind awe...numbing though my brain is pounding...like there is so much firing in there at the same time.

What does it mean? I don’t know. What can seeing in this way do in moving energy for all? Keep the lint out of your belly button I guess...lol

The only thing I can think of at the moment is to explain the sensation what it means to be “in the world not of it.”

There would have been the collective light source trapped in the black hole of our own umbilical. Like Jesus told Judus in the gnostic text...we all came from our own star.