Marko Rodin - Smart Lazer Technology

i am experiencing desire to go hunting

maybe time to take a walk and .....i don`t know
see how the mood takes me
[link to www.youtube.com]

Hunting is not a sport. In a sport, both sides should know they're in the game.~Paul Rodriquez



You really should get out and take a drive...

Decay is the most misleading word ever invented. Radioactive isotopes do not "decay" they eject part of their nucleus (what is termed an alpha particle) and loose electrons and become other isotopes. They do this because they produce/receive more energy than they can contain. Energy conservation is met as the original isotope transmutes into a lower isotope and the excess material is ejected. The term decay is an ejection of material, not a loss of material converted into energy. And every particle in existence radiates energy

interesting point of discovery:

so what do we know
we know this:



caused this:


[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

we know st micheal`s mount is:


[link to www.sacred-destinations.com]



which is the "touch stone of this:



John Mitchell's "The View Over Atlantis", p69:
[link to www.despatch.cth.com.au]

so we know upon this day the system is on in a manner it was not before

[link to www.youtube.com]

If the information fits, how is it stupidity? I am asking that question more deeply of myself today. It takes me back to something I said on this thread...about there are no “special relationships” and then another time about “be careful what we ask for we just might get it” in regards to the information flow of “one”.

Quite a number of people have realised that quantum theory must link with evidence proving the continued existence of consciousness following death of the brain. The most recent contribution of this nature I have seen is the excellent article The Quantum Marriage, by Will Hand (1). He shows, for example, that quantum theorists were driven to accept that on the small scale of the atom, what we interpret as "reality" only occurs at the instant of observation. This is the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of a phenomenon called "wave-particle duality": an important feature of quantum theory. Quantum theorists found that, on these small scales, what had been regarded as minute objects, the electrons, photons and other components associated with atoms, seemed to exist as sets of interfering waves until observed. Only then did these waves "collapse" to become real particles. The extraordinary situation, which has prevailed for nearly a century is that, despite the clear acceptance of the role of consciousness in creating reality, all mainstream scientists still insist that consciousness vanishes on brain death. The obvious paradox, which is never mentioned, is that matter could not exist prior to any brain!

this feedback was waiting for me when i awoke on the topic
processing

SURVIVAL PHYSICS: A Brief Summary


[link to www.cfpf.org.uk]

as in: there is a processing process to apply our processing abilities to

that switch from wave (pulse) to particle is the processing process we interact with

intelligence = process = motive

it has motive thus our interaction is guided by it`s motive and our reaction to it

All that is left in the three force model is gravity.

So there you have it, the universe in a nutshell.

There is no wave/particle duality, what there is is two forms of distributed charge.
One is a traveling wave, one is a standing wave (which appears to the scientist as a point particle).

The dual slit experiment now makes total sense.

There is therefore no quantum mechanical probability wave waiting to collapse into a particle if I look at it, there is only distributed charge, in two forms, for every electron, proton. That means there is also no quantum Uncertainty Principle either. Having a composite unit, of distributed charge, is the proper way to understand sub atomic physics.

i agree and in fact if i look objectively since i came on line, if i strip out my personal emotions formed whilst on line , which on occasions feels as if it interferes, it doesn`t, the information flow continues as you describe

i always was aware of that and attribute it to motive
my motive for coming on line, although connected to personal, is not as such personal so, no matter what may or may not occur, it is always in conjunction to the same motive as in :
reaction to my purpose

i don`t think it matters if there is no purpose other than the feedback is meaningless

if there is purpose, whatever it is, the feedback informs and guides the purpose, one way or another

aether, you need to explain the gravity thing once you get a good hold of it. You know I have always said gravity is an effect of e/m.

The writer brings to light the supposedly well-known fact that vectors of attractive forces of magnets and electrostatic charges are linear and repulsive forces are tangential. The writer asserted that as the consequence of this fact, the attraction between opposite polarities (of magnets and electrostatic charges) and repulsion between same polarities is not equal due to the different geometry of the field, and therefore different density of the field between two (or more) charges (magnets). The writer assumed that this asymmetry actually can account for gravitation. That would bring possibility that gravitation can belong to the family of electromagnetic forces. The writer also elaborates on the idea of possibility of electromagnetic origin of inertia, brought in by late Prof. William (Bill) Hughes from the University of South Dakota. The consequence would be an inherence and independence of inertia, in accordance with Newton’s views.

Gravity nothing more than a misunderstood aspect of the electromagnetic force. Everything possesses a negative or positive charge or a combination of particles composed thereof. Like charges repel, unlike charges attract. It has recently been suggested that the attraction of a magnet is stronger than its repulsion, which could explain why all things are attracted together with the same force regardless of their mass.

Everything possesses a negative or positive charge or a combination of particles composed thereof. Like charges repel, unlike charges attract.

Everything possesses a negative or positive charge or a combination of particles composed thereof. Like charges repel, unlike charges attract.

you know we are going to have to get away from these descriptions:
repel, attract , negative, positive etc.

we describe everything around our emotions and convince ourselves it, whatever it is, is experiencing what we do

Do you really think they'll change rather than just start a whole new quest for judgement of ourselves in comparison to a newly discovered god/creator concept?

Maybe we just spend another ten or thousand years going thru all the same lessons as before only to get to the same point again...a choice between accepting self as is (which includes not understanding our creation while just accepting it) or continue the search for that answer that may really not exist.

it is impossible to not understand
there is no choice, no where to go to avoid it, dead or alive
creation will be one of first emotive words to go/alter
as example

Thread: Petroglyphs, not just simple, crude drawings from ancient man. The truth is stranger then you could ever imagine. (Page 34)

THE MOST INFLUENTIAL PERCEPTUAL PROGRAMMING of the subconscious mind occurs from birth through age six. During that time, the child’s brain is recording all sensory experiences as well as learning complex motor programs for speech, crawling, standing, and advanced activities like running and jumping. Simultaneously, the child’s sensory systems are fully engaged, downloading massive amounts of information about the world and how it works.

It’s important to realize that perceptions acquired before the age of six become the fundamental subconscious programs that shape the character of an individual’s life.

During this time of accelerated learning, Nature facilitates the enculturation process by developmentally enhancing the subconscious mind’s ability to download massive amounts of information. We know this thanks to our study of brainwaves in adults and children.

The predominant delta and theta activity expressed by children younger than six signifies that their brains are operating at levels below consciousness. Delta and theta brain frequencies define a brain state known as a hypnagogic trance—the same neural state that hypnotherapists use to directly download new behaviors into the subconscious minds of their clients.

In other words, the first six years of a child’s life are spent in a hypnotic trance!